Please donate any amount you can to help us try to recover legal costs in defending liberty and the right of free speech !

Muhammad and Islam’s Sex Slaves

Once again, Islamic State Muslims are pointing to Islam in order to justify what the civilized world counts as atrocities.

According to an October 13 report in the Telegraph,

Islamic State jihadists have given detailed theological reasons justifying why they have taken thousands of women from the Iraqi Yazidi minority and sold them into sex slavery.

A new article in the Islamic State English-language online magazine Dabiq not only admits the practice but justifies it according to the theological rulings of early Islam.

“After capture, the Yazidi women and children were then divided according to the Sharia amongst the fighters of the Islamic State who participated,” the article says.

As for “theological reasons” for sex slavery “according to the Sharia,” these are legion—from male Muslim clerics, to female Muslim activists. Generally they need do no more than cite the clear words of Koran 4:3, which permit Muslims to copulate with female captives of war, or ma malakat aymanukum, “what”—not whom—“your right hands possess.”

The article continues:

But most of it [Islamic State “article” or fatwa] is devoted to theological justifications for Islamic State behaviour, citing early clerics and the practices of the Prophet Mohammed and his Companions during the early years of Islamic expansion.

Indeed, while many are now aware of the Koran’s and by extension Sharia’s justification for slaves, sexual or otherwise, fewer are willing to embrace the fact that the prophet of Islam himself kept and copulated with concubines conquered during the jihad.

One little-known story is especially eye-opening:

During Muhammad’s jihad on the Jews of Khaybar, he took for himself from among the spoils of war one young woman, a teenager, Safiya bint Huyay, after hearing of her beauty. (Earlier the prophet had bestowed her on another Muslim jihadi, but when rumor of her beauty reached him, the prophet reneged and took her for himself.)

Muhammad “married” Safiya hours after he had her husband, Kinana, tortured to death in order to reveal hidden treasure. And before this, the prophet’s jihadis slaughtered Safiya’s father and brothers.

While Islamic apologists have long tried to justify this account—often by saying that Muhammad gave her the honor of “marriage” as opposed to being a concubine and that she opted to convert to Islam—they habitually fail to cite what Islamic sources record, namely Baladhuri’s ninth century Kitab Futuh al-Buldan (“Book of Conquests”).

According to this narrative, after the death of Muhammad, Safiya confessed that “Of all men, I hated the prophet the most—for he killed my husband, my brother, and my father,” before “marrying” (or, less euphemistically, raping) her.

So there it is. Muhammad seized for himself as rightfully earned booty (or ghanima) a young woman; he took her after killing everyone dear to her—husband, father, brothers, etc.

And, according to authoritative Islamic sources, she hated him for it.

If that is not rape, what is?

Ebola Czar Strategy


‘Islamophobia’– A Soft Jihad Monster: Will The West Keep Feeding The Beast?

Written by Audrey Russocookiemonster-20100301-170254-300x180
I came across an old cartoon series the other day called Fractured Fairy Tales. I realized that that title could aptly explain the world we now live in…where adults have become childlike in their inability to endure the slightest hardship, tossing security for comfort…and the leaders are the spinners of tales that when applied to reality, create tremendous adversity.

Enter…the first resort of cowards, that has never seen a victory: Appeasement. The very pacification that feeds the monstrous lie of Islamophobia.

As some of my guests have shared (Reza Kahlili, Raymond Ibrahim, Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer), Islamophobia is a faux term created by Islamists to verbally whip infidels into line. Dissected the term means: fear of Islam based upon ignorance…AND this weapon is drawn ANY time someone reveals the TRUE nature of the ideology of Islam. It’s used as an assassin’s blade to slay the character of the messenger.

This is a form of non-violent Jihad or “soft jihad”…but can, and has, led to violent Jihad or “hard jihad”.

This soft jihad monster is insatiable in its appetite to eviscerate free speech, and everyone who values this critical freedom should do all to starve this creature, right?
But such is not the case in Western media and with Western leaders. They appear to be a bit obsessive-compulsive concerning feeding this beast. They play its game of denying the reality of acts committed based upon the doctrine of Islam (WTC 1993, 9-11-01, Boston Marathon Bombing, Fort Hood Jihadist, Moore OK Beheading, etc.). The list of atrocities directly based in Islam’s holy books are unequivocal to the rational mind, but not to the Leftist/Progressive mindset that lives in what is now a fractured fairy tale. Their constant denial and appeasement is the vital nutrient this beast thrives upon.

The only weapon we possess to starve and defeat this enemy is TRUTH. The truth about the words, convictions, acts and practices of a 1,400 year old tyrannical ideology that has butchered its way into the 21st century…with a little help from friends on the Left, and the silence of the Lambs on the right.

It’s time to take the narrative back for free speech. When Islamophobia is hurled your way, retort with, “I’m an Islamorealist.” Because you’re concern is based in reality and fact, not ignorance of their system.

The Islamophobia lie is a soft jihad against freedom…it’s time to starve the beast back into its 7th century abode!

Shalom through strength…

Picture of the day

Obama go home

Death of Margaretha Geertruida MacLeod

Mata Hari

by Doc Halliday

We will get to Margaretha’s demise in a few minutes. Let me provide some background first.
Most people who read this column are familiar with Pickett’s Charge during the Battle of Gettysburg in the American Civil War. At least they have heard of the assault, even if they do not know the details which can be researched online. I will only note that firepower played a part in the Confederate defeat.
For hundreds of years, there has been a continual increase in any army’s available rate of fire. The basic factors in a charge (human wave attack) are the frequency and effectiveness of fire versus the speed of the progress.
Simply put, if the attackers are able to advance faster than the defenders can stop (by killing or disabling) them; the attackers will be able to overwhelm the position, providing there are a sufficient number of attackers remaining.
Beginning after the American Civil War, charges such as the aforementioned Pickett’s Charge became much less successful with advances in firearms such as the machine gun. Certainly, there were both successful and unsuccessful charges after that time, but the successful ones became less frequent.
One of the myths concerning charges is the Charge of Krojanty during the beginning phase of World War Two. In this action, it was reported that the Polish cavalry charged German tanks on Sept. 1, 1939 using lances on horseback. This is a myth.
The Polish cavalry did attack and disperse a German infantry unit, and the charge is thus recorded as successful. German armored cars then arrived on the scene, and opened fire with machine guns on the Polish forces. When reporters later saw the dead Polish horses, etc. the myth was born.
Unquestionably repeating firearms had been available for hundreds of years, beginning with multiple barreled weapons. Revolvers have been in existence since at least the 1500s, but were not widely available due to the expense. The first flintlock revolvers became widely available in the 1800s. The percussion cap revolver was invented in 1833, and in 1856 Smith & Wesson produced the first cartridge revolvers.
The Spencer repeating rifle with a seven round magazine was patented in 1860. By the end of the Civil War, there were about 48,000 in use. Thus, armies of the world were becoming better armed at least in terms of the rate of fire that was available to them.
Perhaps the first commercially viable machine gun was the Gatling Gun, patented in 1861. It saw very limited use during the Civil War and was manually powered by a hand crank.
Remember Margaretha? She was born Margaretha Geertruida Zelle on Aug. 7, 1876. She was the daughter of an affluent hatter.
In 1884, the Maxim Machine Gun was invented. It was the first recoil operated machine gun. The Maxim was referred to by Martin Gilbert as “the weapon most associated with British imperial conquest.”
In 1895 Margaretha married an officer of Scottish origin, Capt. Rudolph MacLeod. She was in some respects a mail order bride, as she answered a newspaper advertisement by Capt. MacLeod.
Between 1887 and 1891 several patents were issued for various formulations of smokeless powders. This invention meant that a machine gun could be hidden. Margaretha started dancing professionally in Paris in 1905 using the name of Lady MacLeod.
Her dances were provocative and relied upon her shedding clothes. She would normally end wearing just a jeweled bra, as she was embarrassed by being less well-endowed than other women. It has been stated that she wore a body stocking. Her fame grew through the years along with her promiscuity.
As World War I developed, it turned into trench warfare. Neither side could effectively cross the open ground (a killing zone) between the trenches without being cut into ribbons by the machine guns of the opposing side. The tank was originally developed as a specialized weapon to solve this difficult situation. The tank was specifically intended as a method to break the impasse of trench warfare.
As the Allies advanced working on the tank, their plans had to be kept secret. If their plans were leaked to the enemy the new invention would lose its effectiveness and surprise. Of course the tank had already been predicted. H.G. Wells had written about large, armored cross-country vehicles, armed with cannon and machine-guns.
Wells wrote about the subject in a short story, The Land Ironclads, published in December of 1903 in Strand Magazine. But I have heard that no one pays attention to what is written. Even earlier, Leonardo da Vinci drew what many have described as tanks in the 15th century. Nonetheless, the Allies would attempt to keep this development secret.
During the war, Margaretha is known to have taken many lovers. The vast majority of these men were members of the armies on one side or the other.
In February 1917, Margaretha was arrested by French authorities for espionage. She became an inmate at St. Lazare Prison in Paris. She was tried by the French military in July. Margaretha was alleged to have revealed details of the Allies’ new weapon, the tank. The allegations, if factual, resulted in the deaths of thousands of soldiers. She was convicted and sentenced to death.
On Oct. 15, the woman you may know as Mata Hari, refused a blindfold and was shot to death by a firing squad at Vincennes. Today is the anniversary of her execution. You may celebrate if you wish.
Mata Hari’s trial is now assumed to have been riddled with prejudice and anecdotal evidence. The German government publicly exonerated her in 1930, and it is probable that French authorities manufactured evidence against her. The French most likely promoted her as “the greatest woman spy of the century” as a diversion for the decimation of the French army on the western front.
Probably her worst fault was not a crime, but a weakness for men in uniform. The French government’s dossier containing her activities has purportedly indicated her innocence. That dossier is scheduled for public release in 2017, and has only been seen by a few people.
Doc Halliday is actively semi-retired, and a resident of Marshall, Texas. He may be contacted by mail at: P. O. Box 1551, Marshall, TX 75671; or by email at:

Obama’s Air Strikes


Please donate any amount you can to help us try to recover legal costs in defending liberty and the right of free speech !