Whats Mine is Mine Whats Yours is Negotiable
The economy is scheduled to plunge off a cliff in January.
Back in the first two years after the Progressive’s November Revolution of 2008, the big government party enacted tax increases not scheduled to take place until after the 2012 elections. They also passed Obamacare which carries within it multiple tax increases, which are also scheduled to take affect after the 2012 election. Combine these with previous tax rollbacks scheduled to expire in January 2013 and we are looking at the major economic crisis the progressives have worked so hard to create so they can then work so hard to solve.
In 2010 the voters got a chance to let the central planners know what they thought of what had been done with the power entrusted to them in 2008. However, with only one house of Congress in Republican hands they were unable to reverse any of the changes made in the first two years of the Obama administration, so come January we hit the wall.
This manufactured economic crisis will be used by the triumphant Progressives as proof that capitalism doesn’t work. Then following their play book, since too much government wrecked the economy we need more government to fix the economy. They will tighten the already strangulating regulatory straight jacket. If Obamacare is upheld and implemented, within a few years it will kill the private insurance industry as company after company figures out it is cheaper to pay the fines imposed than purchase the insurance required. The flight of paying customers from the private insurance companies will force them into bankruptcy. Remember even if they used deceptive language at the moment of passing the bill President Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid were on the record many times saying what they were aiming at was a single payer European type healthcare system. And we can all see how well that is working out for the Europeans.
They will also use the failure of the insurance industry as more proof that capitalism doesn’t work.
As President Obama travels around the country inciting class warfare with his constant attacks on the millionaires and billionaires which he tells us aren’t paying their fair share he continues to accept vast amounts of money from those same millionaires and billionaires. While his administration imposes regulation after regulation that every day makes it harder to start new businesses, maintain or expand small businesses he turns a blind eye to the continued casino like atmosphere at the largest banks: the ones that are too big to fail and which should be too big to bail.
The largest bank in the country, J. P. Morgan Chase just lost another couple of billions in risky credit derivatives that their own chairman says were ill-conceived, poorly executed, and not managed very well. This is the same bank that President Obama says is one the best run banks in America and the same chairman who has visited the Whitehouse at least 18 times since 2009.. The Chairman of the Board Jamie Diamom, the one in charge when all the poor execution was going on was just voted 23 million dollars in compensation while the stockholders take it in the wallet.
Crony capitalism, where the public takes the risk and bears the loss while the cronies who contribute money to the politicians reap the benefits is alive and well. Favored corporation such as GE whose chairman, Jeffrey R. Immelt serves on the President’s Council on Jobs and Competitiveness makes billions in profit and often pays nothing in taxes. Personally I believe there should be no corporate taxes since they are in reality double taxation but taxing some while exempting others is the worst kind of Corporatism and the President merely uses this system to reward donors and then turns around and attacks this pay-to-play system as an example of the rich not paying their fair share.
There is a con game going on. Straw men are being set up only to be knocked down. Our fellow Americans who get their news from Jay Leno and the Daily Show have no idea what is being done. They swallow the party line as belched out by the Corporations Once Known as the Mainstream Media and troop to the polls to vote for the same party their fathers and grandfathers voted for. But the major parties today aren’t ideologically, organizationally, or in practice the same partiesAmericahas known.
Neither party stands for smaller government, individual freedom, and economic opportunity. At one time they both stood for these fundamentally American concepts. Operating like the twin heads of one bird of prey, both major parties expand the government and add to the regulatory burden which is changing America from the Land of the Free into a totalitarian morass that is stagnating its way from the first world to the second world.
From the beginning of the primary process it was obvious that Romney was the anointed choice of the establishment Republicans and the media. Now that he has been all but chosen it is time for the Democrats to scare up a third party somewhere somehow. President Obama’s record of socialist accomplishments is so stunning it has even aroused enough of the politically comatose to push him back to the 40+% of the electorate who would vote for a yellow dog before they would vote for anyone except a Democrat. He has lost the independents and the undecided. His only chance for victory is a third party, so there will be a third party even if the Democrats have to invent it and pay for it themselves.
As the big day, the day when we as voters will get a chance to reverse the November Revolution of 2008, watch as a third party emerges, well-funded and well prepared. This third party will say all the right things. They will come across as conservative ideologically and economically. They will probably even try to portray themselves as the organized expression of the thousands of independent Tea Parties across the country.
No third party has won a presidential election inAmericasince 1860. The rules have been rigged, and so many people vote instinctively for the party their fathers voted for the odds of a third party winning are close to the odds of winning the power ball.
If the progressives win one more election they will cement in their transformation ofAmericafrom a land based on equal opportunity to a land of based on equal outcome. Everyone gets the same thing except of course for those who divvy up the swag. Those who divide what they take from the producers to give to the non-producers always seem to end up with everything while everyone else gets just enough to get by long enough to produce something else that can be expropriated by an all-powerful central government.
The Progressives who have taken control ofAmericaact as if all the money we earn is theirs and the only debate is about how much they will let us keep. And they constantly remind us that the government can’t afford to leave us with too much money. If they did we wouldn’t be dependent on them.
Maybe we should change the motto from E Pluribus Unum to What’s Mine is Mine What’s Yours is Negotiable.
Dr. Owens teaches History, Political Science, and Religion for Southside Virginia Community College. He is the Historian of the Future and the author of the History of the Future @ http://drrobertowens.com © 2012 Robert R. Owens drrobertowens@hotmail.com Follow Dr. Robert Owens on Facebook or Twitter @ Drrobertowens












Hoodwinked
Both those on the right and those on the left are being hoodwinked. When the right is in power, the filibuster is necessary for the left. When the left is in power, it is a must for the right. Actually it is mostly a benefit for a very small group who use the government for their own private gains. It does insure that neither the left nor the right can enact any clear policies or appoint clear policy governmental representatives. In the end both the left and the right can not get their policies cleanly enacted or enforced and it gets worse with time. Clear policies cannot really be examined to see if they really work. This breeds contempt for the very idea of government, and paints our democratically elected government as being an ineffective representation of the people.
The growth of the Filibuster and super majority rules in the United States Senate must take a very large responsibility for this condition. These are the largest attack on the concepts of States Rights since the civil war, or war between the states, depending on your perspective. The Constitution is designed to have two representative branches of government, the House of Representatives which insures that the nation will be represented by the people based mostly on population, and the United States Senate, which is designed to give each state equal representation in the Senate. The 17th amendment did not change this requirement of equal representation but reinforced it changing only the selection of Senators from the State legislatures to the people of each state. Super Majority rules and holds deny each state its equal representation in the Senate. While the Senate can make its own rules, the rules must be constitutional. It cannot deny the States’ rights to equal representation. The States, enforcing their rights to equal representation can sue in federal court to force the abolition of the current super majority rules and private holds exercised in the Senate. They could sue to free the blocked federal legislation and appointments of federal judges and executive officers. Each State can do this through their Attorneys General or perhaps through actions brought by representative voter organizations of those states.
On May 15th, 2012, Common Cause took a page out of my book, Filibuster Solution, http://www.commoncause.org/site/pp.asp?c=dkLNK1MQIwG&b=5958583. and filed a complaint against the United States Senate in Federal Court to have it declared that the Filibuster and super majority rules are unconstitutional. http://www.commoncause.org/site/pp.asp?c=dkLNK1MQIwG&b=5958583. It was joined by several members of the House of Representatives. This is directly from my book. available on Amazon.com and at https://www.createspace.com/3586594. Common Causes’s suit relies on the legal precedents and history that I describe. When I Googled this Common Cause action on the morning of May 18, 2012, I got 72,500 hits in 0.18 Seconds. I presume there is some interest in the subject. Hopefully one will see my book in book stores soon, so the public may better understand the lawsuit and why Common Cause should win. It would be helpful if one or more Attorney General’s representing their states were to join in the action. My book, Filibuster Solutions gives the information that supports these actions.