Categories
Archives
HELP US KEEP YOU BETTER INFORMED ABOUT THE TRICKS OF THE RADICAL PROGRESSIVE REVOLUTION PLEASE DONATE ANY AMOUNT YOU CAN

Author Archive

OPEN BORDERS ABUSE: Cameras At the US-Mexico Border Capture Unreal Images

open borders
This will become the new norm as Obama’s amnesty plans get pushed through.

Cameras placed along Texas’ 1,200-mile border with Mexico have captured the stream of illegal immigrants sneaking into the country on a daily basis.
The network of more than 1,000 motion detectors, similar to those used to film wildlife, have been placed strategically in areas that have not been secured – where Mexican citizens can cross and evade capture with ease.
They helped border guards apprehend nearly 30,000 suspects and led to 88,400 pounds of drugs being seized in 2014 as part of Operation Drawbridge.

The system has also had a significant impact on Mexican cartels and their ability to smuggle narcotics, people and stolen vehicles between the two countries.

The startling images have been revealed as President Obama continues to fight to push through an executive order to shield illegal immigrants from deportation.
Earlier this month a federal judge in Texas refused to lift a temporary block on a White House immigration plan.
According to the Texas Department of Public Safety, the ‘sophisticated’ cameras are stationed on ranches and farms on the border.
The turn on when movement is detected and are monitored in real-time, around-the-clock by a number of agencies.
If they think suspicious activity is taking place, they alert law enforcement in a bid to get them to cut them off.
Steven McCraw, the director of the agency, said: ‘Every day, sheriff’s deputies, police officers, Border Patrol agents and state law enforcement officers in the Texas border region risk their lives to protect Texas and the entire nation from Mexican cartels and transnational crime.

27A5354300000578-0-image-m-22_1429225555073
This innovative use of technology has proven to be a force multiplier in detecting the smuggling attempts along the border, which is critical to interdicting criminal activity occurring between the ports of entry.
‘Any time law enforcement interdicts a smuggling attempt, we consider it a significant gain in the fight against the cartels and their operatives.
‘The collaborative law enforcement efforts of Operation Drawbridge have bolstered our ability to combat the exploitation of our border by these ruthless criminals.’
In March it was revealed more immigrants are choosing more remote and dangerous crossing points to make it to the United States.
The Border Patrol has responded by expanding its search-and-rescue teams to monitor the area, as a growing number of bodies of suspected illegal immigrants are being found.
Many of the bodies are being discovered just southwest of Mission, Texas, where the fire department’s dive-and-rescue team has had a busy winter. In January and February alone, it recovered at least six bodies in the murky canals.
In February, governor Greg Abbot claimed that had 20,000 illegal immigrants had already entered the country since the start of the year.

Stunning Video Shows Obama Admitting that Communist Mentored Him and Taught Him about ‘White Racism’!

by Onan Coca
In a stunning video that has somehow been kept quiet until now, a much younger Barack Obama is seen discussing his close ties to the infamous communist Frank Marshall Davis (on whom the FBI still has a very large file). What had long been a dark rumor whispered among conservatives and scoffed at by the left, has finally been proven true… and the truth comes from Obama’s own words. In the run up to his first election as President, much was made of Obama’s connections to the racist preacher Jeremiah Wright and to the violent revolutionaries Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn. But the Democrat left and their lapdogs in the media refused to connect the dots, so the most anti-American President ever was soon elected to office.

I’m sure they’ll choose to ignore this video, too. But we won’t. We’ll watch as a man who pretends to love America admits that he was counseled and mentored by a man who openly hated America.obama-davis-300x166

From the Gateway Pundit:

obama davisIn an extraordinary development, film of Obama explicitly and openly identifying “Frank” as Frank Marshall Davis has suddenly surfaced on the Internet. It is described as having been recorded on September 20,1995, with the program originally airing on Channel 37 Cambridge Municipal Television as an episode of the show “The Author Series.” Obama admits the mysterious “Frank” from his book Dreams from my Father is indeed the communist Frank Marshall Davis. But Obama does NOT say Davis was a communist. America’s Survival, Inc. President Cliff Kincaid discusses the significance of this discovery.

In the interview Obama can be heard admitting that everything he learned about racism he learned from a communist agitator who hated America.

“And the conversation finally ends with me having a conversation with a close friend of my maternal grandfather, a close friend of gramps, a black man from Kansas named Frank. Actually at the time a fairly well known poet named Frank Marshall Davis who had moved to Hawaii and lived there. And so I have a discussion with him about the kinds of frustrations I’m having and he sort of schools me that I should get used to these frustrations.”

Read more at http://eaglerising.com/17408/stunning-video-shows-obama-admitting-that-communist-mentored-him-and-taught-him-about-white-racism/#VERvcmUO5EP4PdcM.99

Man, those Democrats who wanted to bring down the Scott Walker network were really, really serious

wisconsin042015-800x500
Man, those people who wanted to bring down the Scott Walker network were really, really serious
Posted on April 20, 2015 by Personal Liberty News Desk Views: 8,016
851 Shares
wisconsin state flag
The collective will to keep Wisconsin’s labor structure from crumbling under the imposition of new laws backed by Republican Gov. Scott Walker expressed itself through police raids, lawfare, threats of sanctioned state violence, humiliation and the confiscation of private property.

That’s the upshot of a new in-depth story teased today by David French at National Review. It relates the ordeals of three conservative supporters of Wisconsin’s Act 10 bill, a law that in 2011 introduced new limits on collective bargaining among public employees — to the outrage of pro-union stalwarts.

The accounts are almost unbelievable in their portrayal of state power wielded as a blunt political instrument. They describe raids, threats to secrecy, and intimidation tactics that wouldn’t feel out of place in a gangster movie. Here’s an example:

“IT’S A MATTER OF LIFE OR DEATH.”

That was the first thought of “Anne” (not her real name). Someone was pounding at her front door. It was early in the morning — very early — and it was the kind of heavy pounding that meant someone was either fleeing from — or bringing — trouble.

“It was so hard. I’d never heard anything like it. I thought someone was dying outside.”

She ran to the door, opened it, and then chaos. “People came pouring in. For a second I thought it was a home invasion. It was terrifying. They were yelling and running, into every room in the house. One of the men was in my face, yelling at me over and over and over.”

It was indeed a home invasion, but the people who were pouring in were Wisconsin law-enforcement officers. Armed, uniformed police swarmed into the house. Plainclothes investigators cornered her and her newly awakened family. Soon, state officials were seizing the family’s personal property, including each person’s computer and smartphone, filled with the most intimate family information.

Why were the police at Anne’s home? She had no answers. The police were treating them the way they’d seen police treat drug dealers on television.

In fact, TV or movies were their only points of reference, because they weren’t criminals. They were law-abiding. They didn’t buy or sell drugs. They weren’t violent. They weren’t a danger to anyone. Yet there were cops — surrounding their house on the outside, swarming the house on the inside. They even taunted the family as if they were mere “perps.”

As if the home invasion, the appropriation of private property, and the verbal abuse weren’t enough, next came ominous warnings. Don’t call your lawyer. Don’t tell anyone about this raid. Not even your mother, your father, or your closest friends.

What kind of woman did this happen to? Who is she?

Although the story protects her anonymity, she’s described as a supporter of Act 10 “and other conservative causes in Wisconsin.”

But the story offers some insight into the kind of people who attracted such forceful attention in its retelling of another, similar ordeal. That episode involves a police “raid” (or, more properly, an invasion) at the home of Cindy Archer, “one of the lead architects” of the bill.

It involves the same stuff: a nighttime SWAT-style police intrusion, dubious search warrants, warnings that Archer not speak to an attorney, and — at the end of it all — the confiscation only of a cellphone and a computer.

Six people with ties to Walker’s administration were eventually convicted in the so-called “John Doe” investigations, a series of probes into Walker’s network of associates in search of criminal activity.

“The state’s John Doe law dates back to Wisconsin’s days as a territory and is unique to the state,” Wisconsin’s The Capital Times explained last month. “It allows a prosecutor, under supervision of a judge, to investigate whether a crime has been committed and, if so, who committed it. The prosecutor can compel people to testify and turn over documents.”

That’s a unique and state-empowering law, one that current GOP legislators in Wisconsin have tried — so far without success — to reform.

But despite the law’s crime-finding power, Archer was never charged with any crime.

Is it all downhill for Hillary now? – We Hope so – Corruption, Corruption, Corruption

hillary042015-800x500

by Chip wood
It’s been almost a week since Hillary Clinton rolled into Iowa in her “Scooby” van to launch her campaign for the presidency. And despite her carefully controlled schedule, with one tightly calculated event after another, things have not been going all that well.

First, there was that highly publicized stop at a Chipotle, where instead of shaking hands and introducing herself, she hid behind dark glasses and remained totally anonymous. In fact, the manager had to check the security tape later to confirm that his customer actually was the former secretary of state. After collecting her burrito, her cheapskate staff didn’t even put a couple of bucks in the tip jar.

Once they got to Iowa, her driver pulled the van into a handicapped parking place. No surprise that photographs of the out-of-place van quickly circled that globe. But taking up a handicapped spot is no way to win favor with “the folks.”

Oh, and how about that so-called “random” meet-and-greet at a local coffee shop? It didn’t take reporters very long to learn that the attendees were a carefully screened bunch of Clinton supporters, including an intern from their staff. You can be sure that no uncomfortable questions would be asked by that bunch.

In fact, the whole week was spent avoiding reporters’ questions. There were no interviews permitted, no appearances on national TV, no one-on-one chats allowed. The Clinton staff knows that even the most liberal supporter in the press would have to ask a few tough questions to maintain any appearance of objectivity. And that’s something they want to avoid as long as possible.

Even the friendliest question about all those missing emails will make her look bad. There is no way she can justify using a private email server during her time as secretary of state — and then erasing 32,000 of them before anyone could see them. I can’t wait to hear what will happen if Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), the tough-as-nails former special prosecutor, gets her to testify before his special committee on Benghazi.

But missing emails and mistakes over Benghazi aren’t the only subjects Clinton is eager to avoid. There are also the tens of millions of dollars that her family foundation has raked in from some of the most repressive governments on Earth.

And it’s not just the family foundation that pulled in a ton of cash. So did Bill and Hillary Clinton themselves. A new book, “Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich,” will be released by HarperCollins next month. The New York Times says it is already “the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle.”

But even when she’s surrounded by friendly faces, Hillary Clinton can still manage to put her foot in her mouth. Such was the case with her claim earlier this month that all of her grandparents came to this country as immigrants. Turns out three of her grandparents were born in this country; only one was born somewhere else.

A Clinton spokesperson offered this shaky explanation for the misstatement: “Her grandparents always spoke about the immigrant experience and, as a result, she has always thought of them as immigrants.” That makes as much sense as her earlier explanation about why she spoke about being under sniper fire in Bosnia when it wasn’t true. The lady does like to stretch things a bit.

In fact, she’s even been known to exaggerate how she got her first name. She said her mother had read about the exploits of Sir Edmund Hillary, the famous mountain-climber. Her mother knew his last name had two L’s, she said. “So when I was born, she called me Hillary and she always told me, ‘It’s because of Sir Edmund Hillary.’”

The problem with that fairy tale is that Hillary was born on Oct. 26, 1947. Sir Hillary did not make his first notable climb until January 1948.

Yes, the first week of the 2016 campaign made it clear that the lady has a bit of a problem with the truth. And while this may not be enough to derail her coronation as the next Democratic nominee for president, it could cost her the election.

And it will — if the Republicans have the guts to run as tough a campaign as the Democrats will.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

–Chip Wood

ARABIC STREETS SIGNS IN AMERICAN CITIES INDICATES ISLAMIC TAKEOVER

dearborn-michigan-highest-concentration

How would you feel if you drove into a town here in the United States and found that many of the street signs were in Arabic only with no English wording? Then you look around and discover that many of the signs on businesses were also in Arabic.

Not possible you say? Think again! Welcome to Dearborn, Michigan.

Steve Tarani, author and speaker recounts what he saw when he rode with a member of the Detroit Metro SWAT Police as they drove around Detroit and into Dearborn:

“The street signs suddenly went from English to Arabic. There wasn’t a single English word on any shop or any street sign. And in fact, these little yellow signs were posted all along the edges. Jeremy said to me, ‘this is it. We don’t go past this line.’ And I said to Jeremy, ‘what do you mean? You guys are Detroit Metro. You’re the SWAT team. You can go anywhere you want. What if you get a call over there?’ He said ‘this is it, it’s hazardous for our team if we go past this line.’”

“I have seen it with my own eyes, witnessed it in the backseat of a car and it is for real. No-go zones exist in the United States.”
“Dearborn, Michigan is not the only place that these settlements exist. They are spread out over the country in various cities. There’s an estimate of over 5,000 known terrorist cells in the United States. However our most persistent and significant threat, right now, to us here today this morning, is the homegrown violent extremists.”

Some people try to discount Tarani’s account but I’ve seen too many reports that have come out of Dearborn that would tend to support his account of the Muslim takeover of the American city. Christians have been only attacked by Muslims without prosecution. They’ve also been told to stay away from the city’s Islamic festival and even banned from talking to people on the public streets outside the festival.

The Muslim influence is so strong in Dearborn that the high schools hold girls only proms because Muslim girls are not allowed to socialize or dance with boys. These proms are religious based and no one has said anything about a violation of church and state or tried to stop them. Christian students are banned from having Christmas parties, prayer meetings or Baccalaureate services, but Muslims are allowed to pray in school and hold Islamic proms. You have to ask why organizations like the ACLU, American Atheists, Freedom From Religion Foundation and Americans United for Separation of Church and State remain silent about what is happening in Dearborn schools.

Murfreesboro, Tennessee is fast becoming a second Muslim controlled city like Dearborn and there are others on the way. I have friends in the United Kingdom who have told me of how Muslims have taken over entire cities and areas in their country. What they tell me is that it all started with cities like Dearborn and Murfreesboro and just continues to spread. One of my friends compared Islam in England to a cancer that continues to spread and contaminate everything it encounters. In time it will spread to the point that the country dies from it and becomes the home of a religion that teaches hate, bloodshed and sharia law. Like a cancer, the only way to save the nation is to stop the spread of the religion of terrorism. Then he told me that in our modern sophisticated world full of freedoms and rights that it’s impossible to stop the spread of Islam without igniting a worldwide religious war.

Now realize that Barack Hussein Obama has been actively inviting Muslims to come to the US. He is also advocating opening our doors to up to 7 million Syrian Muslim refugees and there is no telling how many terrorists ware hiding among those 7 million. That would be like trying to cure a patient by injecting him with massive doses of cancer cells.
I have to honestly say that the future of America is not looking very bright and to be honest, I don’t know what to do to change it other than make others aware of it and encourage everyone to get on their knees and pray for the Christian revival of America.

*Editor’s Note: You can do more than just pray about this. Conservatives and Christians can get out and vote, casting their ballots for candidates who uphold biblical principles and recognize that this country was founded as a Christian nation. The Framers of the Constitution would never have included Islam under freedom of religion. “Thomas Jefferson, embroiled in a war with Islamic terrorists in his day, commented, ‘Too long, for the honor of nations, have those Barbarians been [permitted] to trample on the sacred faith of treaties, on the rights and laws of human nature!’” Conservatives and Christians should run for public office at every level—local, state, and federal.

OBAMA’S EPA HAS PUT 300,000 JOBS ON THE CHOPPING BLOCK

Mitt Romney Finishes His Four Day Bus Tour In Ohio
Thank you Mr. President….
Check it out:

Combating climate change has been a priority of the Obama administration, and there’s a new regulation to be released this summer that outlines significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. It aims to cut them by nearly 30 percent between 2025-2030. Based on the calculations by American Action Forum (AAF), this new regulation would force one-fifth of coal plants to close at an initial cost of 80,000 jobs. Yet, AAF also noted “secondary employment impacts,” which could soar to nearly 300,000 jobs lost, which is roughly the population if Cincinnati:
Buried in one of EPA’s technical support documents, among more than 1,600 other supporting documents for the proposed rule, the administration detailed the economic implications of complying with building blocks one (heat rate improvements at coal plants) and two (increased natural gas dispatch rates and decreased coal usage).

AAF used the 49 GW figure [the estimated amount of power lost with this new regulation] and EPA’s eGRID data to find the least efficient affected power plants, as measured by heat rate and pounds of CO2 emitted per megawatt hour (CO2/MWh). Anticipating that the least efficient coal facilities are most at risk for closure, AAF identified the 93 least efficient power plants that produced about 50 GW of power.

PA predicts that if states adopt only options one and two of the administration’s plan for power plants, 80,000 energy industry jobs will be lost to EPA climate regulations.

For perspective, 80,000 jobs is larger than the population of Napa, CA. But this is only the first part of the story. EPA never quantifies the secondary employment effects of these lost jobs. A 2009 PricewaterhouseCoopers study found that one energy job supports 3.7 additional jobs. Using a jobs multiplier of 3.7, applied to the 80,000 lost jobs that EPA concedes, yields about 296,000 lost jobs across the U.S.

To put the figure of 296,000 lost jobs in context, the average annual pay in the “fossil fuel electric power generation” industry is $103,645 and the average coal mining salary is $82,068. This means that by 2030, the economy could lose $27.7 billion in wages, larger than the GDP of Jamaica. However, nowhere in EPA’s Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) do they monetize the loss of these jobs or wages.

15
Combating climate change has been a priority of the Obama administration, and there’s a new regulation to be released this summer that outlines significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. It aims to cut them by nearly 30 percent between 2025-2030. Based on the calculations by American Action Forum (AAF), this new regulation would force one-fifth of coal plants to close at an initial cost of 80,000 jobs. Yet, AAF also noted “secondary employment impacts,” which could soar to nearly 300,000 jobs lost, which is roughly the population if Cincinnati:

Buried in one of EPA’s technical support documents, among more than 1,600 other supporting documents for the proposed rule, the administration detailed the economic implications of complying with building blocks one (heat rate improvements at coal plants) and two (increased natural gas dispatch rates and decreased coal usage).

AAF used the 49 GW figure [the estimated amount of power lost with this new regulation] and EPA’s eGRID data to find the least efficient affected power plants, as measured by heat rate and pounds of CO2 emitted per megawatt hour (CO2/MWh). Anticipating that the least efficient coal facilities are most at risk for closure, AAF identified the 93 least efficient power plants that produced about 50 GW of power.

PA predicts that if states adopt only options one and two of the administration’s plan for power plants, 80,000 energy industry jobs will be lost to EPA climate regulations.

For perspective, 80,000 jobs is larger than the population of Napa, CA. But this is only the first part of the story. EPA never quantifies the secondary employment effects of these lost jobs. A 2009 PricewaterhouseCoopers study found that one energy job supports 3.7 additional jobs. Using a jobs multiplier of 3.7, applied to the 80,000 lost jobs that EPA concedes, yields about 296,000 lost jobs across the U.S.

To put the figure of 296,000 lost jobs in context, the average annual pay in the “fossil fuel electric power generation” industry is $103,645 and the average coal mining salary is $82,068. This means that by 2030, the economy could lose $27.7 billion in wages, larger than the GDP of Jamaica. However, nowhere in EPA’s Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) do they monetize the loss of these jobs or wages.

The spread of the job loss won’t be equal either. Virginia could potentially see over 7,000 jobs lost due to this new regulation.

“While coal extraction in the Appalachian Basin is far more labor-intensive than coal extraction in the western U.S., western states account for a greater percentage of coal generation. The result is job losses distributed across centers of production,” according to AAF.

So far, West Virginia and Texas have shouldered the bulk of the job losses from existing EPA regulations on power plants. The facts, figures, and costs can also be found on their Regulation Rodeo portion of their site. Since 2008, the total number of new finalized regulations is 2,597, the cost amounts to $733 billion dollars, and that adds up to 500,787,395 in paperwork hours. You can go through a line-by-line account of the red tape coming out of Washington.

As I’ve written previously, we’ve experienced the calmest Hurricane season in 30 years, the quietest tornado season in 60 years; the creation of 19,000 Manhattan islands worth of sea ice, and the Arctic Ice Cap has grown by 533,000 square miles. In 2007, the BBC warned the cap could vanish by 2013. Oh, and we’re at the most industrialized point in human history–and air quality couldn’t be better, according to the EPA. It’s hard to justify the potential cannibalization of nearly 300,000 jobs with such figures.

Oh, and Americans really don’t care about climate change; they care about jobs and the economy.

As for the EPA, well, they seem to be wasting taxpayer funds on research equipment that they haven’t used in years (via Citizens Against Government Waste):

A March 16, 2015 EPA Inspector General (IG) report found that $2.95 million of sampled EPA research equipment went unused for two to 14 years in the Office of Research and Development (ORD). The IG reviewed “capital equipment,” defined as a piece that costs more than $75,000, at three of ORD’s 14 research facilities nationwide.
The IG “determined the date the equipment was last utilized,” and found that 30 of the 99 pieces of capital equipment reviewed, or 30 percent, hadn’t been utilized for between two and 14 years. The report provided a harsh assessment of the agency’s cost-controls, concluding, “The EPA does not manage its scientific equipment as a business unit or enterprise. ORD managers and staff are not aware of federal property management requirements.” This latest review followed previous reports from the IG, the Government Accountability Office, and the National Academy of Sciences on unused EPA equipment since 2011.

HELP US KEEP YOU BETTER INFORMED ABOUT THE TRICKS OF THE RADICAL PROGRESSIVE REVOLUTION PLEASE DONATE ANY AMOUNT YOU CAN