Archive for the ‘America’s Future’ Category

The Chick Who STARTED Chicago Trump Riots Was Getting PAID BY DNC

Zulema Rodgriguez, paid thug. You won’t believe who is footing the bill.

An activist who bragged about disrupting multiple Donald Trump campaign events in a recent Project Veritas video was on Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s campaign payroll, a search of Federal Election Commission (FEC) records reveals.
In a Veritas video released Monday, filmmaker and provocateur James O’Keefe recounts meeting activist Zulema Rodriguez at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland. In the video, Rodriguez takes credit for violent protests in Chicago that forced Trump to cancel a March rally.
…Notably, a search of FEC records reveals that Rodriguez was paid by the Clinton campaign shortly before she disrupted the Chicago rally. The campaign paid her $1,610.34 as a “payroll” expense, and also gave her a $30 payment that is described only as “phone.”
Read more: The Daily Caller
Rodriguez also admits to involvement in an Arizona protest that shut down the highway.

Since two cops were injured in Chicago, maybe Rodriguez can pay their hospital bill. After all, she’s bringing in the big bucks from Hillary’s campaign.


Is there a depth that these people WON’T sink to?

Well, there are still 20 days left.

We’re sure to find out.

Trump Slams “Outright Lies” Coming From Clinton

The last three weeks of the 2016 election could easily prove to be more dramatic than all of the months leading up to this moment. If it seems unbelievable that things could get even crazier than they already are, just remember what a potent threat Donald Trump poses to the Washington establishment. These people are willing to do just about anything to hold onto their power, nationally and globally.

It remains to be seen if the establishment can keep Trump out of the White House, but the Republican nominee is not going to make it easy on them. This weekend, he took to Twitter to tell his followers about the deceptions coming from Hillary Clinton and her globalist pals.

“100% fabricated and made-up charges, pushed strongly by the media and the Clinton Campaign, may poison the minds of the American Voter,” Trump said, referring to the women who have accused him of sexual assault. “FIX!”

Trump continued, warning voters that our very democracy was hanging on by a thread.

“This election is being rigged by the media pushing false and unsubstantiated charges, and outright lies, in order to elect Crooked Hillary,” he wrote.

“Hillary Clinton should have been prosecuted and should be in jail. Instead she is running for president in what looks like a rigged election,” he said.
It really is depressing when you think about it. Think what you will about these allegations being levied against Trump, but what about the obvious textbook crimes committed by Hillary Clinton? Every day, it becomes more and more clear that the FBI intentionally sandbagged the investigation to make sure Hillary remained eligible to run for president. You don’t have to excuse Trump’s bad behavior – to whatever extent those accusations are true – to recognize this extraordinary and sad national coverup.

When all of this is said and done, the Republican and Democratic Party establishment think that a Trump loss will destroy the tasteless ambitions of the American people who are fed up with politics as usual. They think 2016 is just a blip on the radar. In four years, we can just get right back to normal.

Ain’t gonna happen.

If anything, supporters of Trump and other anti-establishment politicians have learned a very valuable lesson. However low you think the media and the Washington elite will sink to hold onto their power…they will sink lower still. There are no depths. And now we know.

Next time, we’ll be prepared.

Republicans Turning on Speaker Ryan for Trump Betrayal

One can easily surmise that House Speaker Paul Ryan never wanted Donald Trump to be the president of the United States. For the sake of political expediency – and last year’s expulsion of John Boehner fresh in his mind – he decided to make a nominal show of support, but he criticized Trump more often than he praised him. And when he realized this week that the poll numbers were swinging the wrong way, he chose to abandon ship altogether, telling Republicans on Monday that he would no longer defend Trump.

Many in the House did not take the news well, according to a report from CNN. According to reporter Manu Raju, Ryan “has angered other Republicans who have expressed their concerns with Ryan’s position on a private conversation call earlier this week.”

In theory, if that short-term displeasure turns into a long-term grievance, Ryan’s place as Speaker could be in jeopardy.

“If the House majority does stay Republican, Ryan needs 218 votes to stay on the House floor,” Raju reported. “He can only afford a handful of defections.”

As for Trump himself, he has essentially declared open war on the GOP leadership, starting with Ryan. In Ocala, FL on Wednesday, Trump suggested that Ryan’s allegiances should be thrown into question.
“There’s a whole deal going on there, you know,” Trump said. “There’s a whole deal going on, we’ll figure it out. I always figure things out. But there’s a whole sinister deal going on.”

But even among Republican lawmakers who support Trump, there is a consensus that he should be focusing his attacks on his opponent rather than the Speaker of the House.

“This time Ryan got support from these Republicans who actually back Donald Trump,” Raju said. “On that private conference call, Kellyanne Conway was urged by several House Republicans to tell Trump to not focus on Paul Ryan and instead train his fire on Hillary Clinton. These Republican lawmakers, I am told, think this intra-party fight has been a major distraction.”

When you step back and look at this from afar, you have to wonder if it could have ended any other way. The Trump phenomenon was at right angles with the Republican establishment in the primaries, and it seems it will finish the same way. Trump never made for a good little GOP soldier, anyway. That’s not what his campaign was ever about.

Win or lose, he’s going to finish things up his way.

And establishment Republicans standing in the way might wish they’d listened to their voters instead of the media.

McCain’s BETRAYAL Of The Republican Party Is NOW Complete!

If there WERE an ‘Academy Award’ for RINO Leading Man, ‘Republican’ John McCain has just won it, hands down.

It was yet another final straw in a career of final straws: On Monday, Arizona Sen. John McCain walked back a promise to help oppose Hillary Clinton’s Supreme Court choices if he were part of a Republican Senate majority.
According to The Hill, McCain seemed to intimate he might even be open to supporting said candidates, no matter what their ideological backgrounds.
McCain’s spokeswoman, Rachel Dean, said that McCain “believes you can only judge people by their record,” and even though Clinton “has a clear record of supporting liberal judicial nominees,” McCain would consider them.
“Sen. McCain will, of course, thoroughly examine the record of any Supreme Court nominee put before the Senate and vote for or against that individual based on their qualifications as he has done throughout his career,” Dean’s statement continued.
The statement came only hours after McCain had promisingly told a Philadelphia radio station that the Republican Senate, should the GOP maintain a majority, was ready to utilize its advise and consent role it had kept locked up in Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s desk for the entirety of the Obama administration.
“I promise you that we will, we will be united against any Supreme Court nominee that Hillary Clinton — if she were president — would put up,” McCain said. “This is why we need the majority.”

AG Lynch Wants To Welcome UN Control & Involvement in U.S. Affairs

Attorney General Loretta Lynch, under the ever over-reaching hands of the Obama Administration is once again doing everything in her power to limit the Constitutional rights of Americans. If you’ll recall reports from a few months back that talked about the United Nations looking to launch a global police force, or a revelation of the same kind by a high ranking LA County sheriff, it would seem that the idea isn’t the rambling of conspiracy theorists after all.

During her speech to the United Nations this week, Loretta Lynch announced that the Department of Justice is launching a global police force meant to combat “violent extremism” in the United States. Now who’s making up terms? She created the label but failed to give an example of what qualifies as “violent extremism”. Is she talking about people who disagree with liberal policies or perhaps Trump supporters or even our hard-working police officers? This could be the most blatant overreach of power ever demonstrated by anybody serving as Attorney General.
The saddest thing about this proposal is that it’s gone completely unnoticed by Americans. Instead of making the announcement in front of FBI headquarters or at the White House, it was made in front of the United Nations. Naturally, they all thought it was a good idea.

The groundwork is being laid for federal and international interference down to the local level. “The Strong Cities Network,” Lynch declared, “will serve as a vital tool to strengthen capacity-building and improve collaboration” – i.e., local dependence on federal and international authorities.

Lynch made the global (that is, United Nations) involvement clear when she added: “As we continue to counter a range of domestic and global terror threats, this innovative platform will enable cities to learn from one another, to develop best practices and to build social cohesion and community resilience here at home and around the world.”

Geller notes the oddity that the Strong Cities Network wasn’t announced at an appropriate national venue, such as the White House or FBI headquarters but “ominously” before the UN. It didn’t help that the DoJ press release accompanying the announcement read, “While many cities and local authorities are developing innovative responses to address this challenge, no systematic efforts are in place to share experiences, pool resources and build a community of cities to inspire local action on a global scale.”

This can and will be the end of American freedom. Not only will it put Americans under the control of the United Nations, it could also lay the groundwork for federal and international oppression. And let’s not forget about the United Nations Arms Treaty that’s been talked about so much over the past two years. This will be the end of the American Constitution as we know it.


Remember two nights ago when Tim Kaine spent the entire VP Debate calling Trump a “racist” for being against illegal immigration and wanting to enforce the law?

Well, Cranky Tim Kaine and Crooked Hillary should have been made aware that these days EVERYONE has access to the internet and can easily discover videos of their past statements.

We dug up an old video from 2005 where Tim Kaine says the same thing he and Hillary label Trump as racist for saying.

We also have dug up NUMEROUS “racist” quotes from Hillary and compiled them into a video at the bottom of this page.


DISCLAIMER: Obviously, I don’t believe this statement is racist, but Tim Kaine does. We are just holding him to his OWN standard!

Tim Kaine is talking about illegal immigration and says,
“I am deeply opposed to illegal immigration, and I call on the Federal Government, the President, the immigration services to STOP the in-flood of illegal immigrants into this country”

He didn’t stop there!

“I’ve supported wide state policies to make sure that we do not provide services to folks in this state not here legally”

By his own standards, he is a racist. WATCH this and SHARE it on Facebook so we can expose his hypocrisy to everyone!

(Hillary has also been exposed as a hypocrite on this topic, SEE BELOW the video)

Hillary Clinton Caught Cheating Her Way to the White House


by warner-todd-huston
Aside from the obvious fact that the national media is working overtime to get Hillary Clinton elected–including some in the so-called conservative media–evidence is growing that Hillary and her party are well on the road toward cheating their way to putting Hillary in the White House.

The examples of the left cheating, lying, and committing fraud in a desperate attempt to get Hillary elected are wide and varied. They range from the more trivial to the insidious.

In one case, for instance, Hillary’s campaign hired a child actor to pretend to be a little girl who is aggrieved over Donald Trump’s “body shaming” of a past beauty pageant contestant.

During a town hall-styled event Hillary’s Hollywood actress host, Elizabeth Banks, pointed out a little girl in the audience and made as if they had only just noticed the little girl for the first time. The girl rose and delivered a very polished–almost focus group created–question on “body shaming,” a topic with which the left has recently fallen in love.

The girl was applauded for her “spontaneous” question and presented as a “normal” little girl who just happened to be in the audience. But sharp eyed viewers noted that this “little girl” is actually an actress who has appeared in several movies. Obviously Team Hillary hired the girl to ask this “spontaneous” question. The 15-year-old actress, amusingly named Brennan Leach–what a perfect last name for a Hillary supporter–was exposed very quickly.

Aside from the obvious fact that the national media is working overtime to get Hillary Clinton elected–including some in the so-called conservative media–evidence is growing that Hillary and her party are well on the road toward cheating their way to putting Hillary in the White House.

The examples of the left cheating, lying, and committing fraud in a desperate attempt to get Hillary elected are wide and varied. They range from the more trivial to the insidious.

In one case, for instance, Hillary’s campaign hired a child actor to pretend to be a little girl who is aggrieved over Donald Trump’s “body shaming” of a past beauty pageant contestant.

During a town hall-styled event Hillary’s Hollywood actress host, Elizabeth Banks, pointed out a little girl in the audience and made as if they had only just noticed the little girl for the first time. The girl rose and delivered a very polished–almost focus group created–question on “body shaming,” a topic with which the left has recently fallen in love.

The girl was applauded for her “spontaneous” question and presented as a “normal” little girl who just happened to be in the audience. But sharp eyed viewers noted that this “little girl” is actually an actress who has appeared in several movies. Obviously Team Hillary hired the girl to ask this “spontaneous” question. The 15-year-old actress, amusingly named Brennan Leach–what a perfect last name for a Hillary supporter–was exposed very quickly.

It makes you wonder, if one “spontaneous” audience member was a political theater plant, how many more of the people asking questions in the audience were fakes?

Speaking of campaign trail frauds, in another case a leaked memo reveals that Hillary Clinton was provided questions beforehand when she was “interviewed” by daytime talk show host Steve Harvey. It’s proof once again that members of the so-called un-biased media are so in the tank for Hillary that they won’t even have a light daytime interview without allowing Clinton to program every aspect of it. Harvey clearly has no integrity.

This isn’t speculation, either, as Harvey show producers later fully admitted that Steve Harvey’s interview was all a pre-scripted sham.

It may be evidence of smart campaigning by Team Hillary, but it is also proof of complicity by the left-wing, sold-out, old media establishment.

But these two examples are trivial compared to the dozens of examples of vote fraud being racked up day in and day out by Democrats across the country.

The theft of this election started way back during the Democrat primaries before Hillary even “won” her party’s nomination. Early in the process the Democrat establishment was seen working hard to make sure self-avowed socialist Vermont senator Bernie Sanders would lose to Hillary.

By one estimate, for example, Bernie lost 184 delegates that had previously pledged to vote for him and that number, the study says, would have allowed the Vermonter to thoroughly beat Hillary if those delegates had not been stolen away by hook or by crook through the various machinations of the Democrat Party.

And that doesn’t even count the fact that Hillary avoided debates, nor does it take into account that the chair of the Democrat Party was caught working behind the scenes to make sure Sanders lost.

The latter is no conjecture as chairperson Debbie Wasserman Schultz was kicked out of her position as the chairperson of the DNC over the scandalous revelations. And it couldn’t have come at an more embarrassing time for the Party, either, as Schultz was forced to resign just as the Democrat National Convention was beginning.

hillary-clinton-shrugIn yet another case, the Clinton campaign was accused of cheating in Kentucky when Bernie Sanders votes in Pike County were mysteriously changed from Sanders to Hillary votes. And not just a few of them, either, but over 4,000! Some feel this fraud was just enough to allow Hillary to “win” the state’s primary.

Team Hillary also committed fraud during the Iowa Caucus. During one vote count in Polk County it was revealed that Hillary’s team purposefully miscounted votes in order to give her a win over Sanders.

The vote fraud has continued since the primaries, too.

In Illinois Union operatives were caught paying people to fill out Democrat ballots. Kankakee County officials also discovered that absentee votes were being sent in by people who are not legally registered to vote in the county.

Then there is the growing vote fraud investigation in nearby Indiana where the state police have been investigating an ever growing case of vote fraud in Marion and Hendricks counties. But as the investigation got under way it became clear that fraud was being committed by Democrats in at least seven more counties. The investigation now spans nine counties.

At the heart of the investigation is a liberal activist group called Indiana Voter Registration Project run by one Craig Varoga, a Democratic strategist who back in the day was a staffer on former President Bill Clinton’s 1996 national campaign.

The liberal voter group is based in Indianapolis and appears to have submitted thousands of voter registration forms with fake, inaccurate, or missing information.

With all this illegal activity being carried out by Democrats, a study by political scientists Jesse Richman and David Earnest estimated that at least 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and maybe as many as 2.2 percent in 2010. That estimate is likely very low, but it still adds up to thousands of illegal votes.

This fraud is still going on. In fact, only just this month we had yet another case of illegal immigrants preparing to vote when officials in Virginia admitted that thousands of foreigners were registered to vote in the Commonwealth.

And according to, a young Democrat staffer named Andrew Spieles, a student at James Madison University, confessed to registering 19 dead people to vote as Democrats.

Of course, liberals are fond of saying all this fraud is meaningless and even if there is vote fraud (which they vehemently deny) it doesn’t impact elections. But as vote fraud expert John Fund reported in August, we already have plenty of examples where vote fraud has upset election results.

But there certainly are examples of elections being overturned for reasons of fraud, including mayoral elections in Miami and East Chicago, Ind. We’ve also seen clear evidence of fraud in more important races. In 2008, illegal felon voters appear to have swung the outcome of the critical 2008 Minnesota Senate election. The day after the election, GOP senator Norm Coleman had a 725-vote lead, but a series of recounts over the next six months reversed that result and gave Democrat Al Franken a 312-vote victory.
It all adds up to clear evidence that Hillary and her party are working overtime to steal this election. So who can blame Donald Trump when he says this system is rigged?

Clinton PUPPET MASTER George Soros Has A New ENEMY…I Don’t Think He’s Going To Enjoy THIS!


If you need any evidence that the system is rigged against regular, everyday Americans like us, look no further.
For years super rich elitists have been pulling the strings of government. They have been controlling our leaders from the shadows; even making sure their preferred choices are put into office. Anyone that defies their agenda is made sure to be destroyed.

Just take this most recent case. Joe Arpaio, considered one of the toughest sheriffs in the United States, has worked tirelessly to keep Phoenix safe from crime for years. Now with his reelection at hand, there is someone trying to undermine his bid.
It’s someone we’re all too familiar with.

From AZ Family:

Joe Arpaio, the self-proclaimed toughest sheriff in America who could face criminal charges for ignoring a judge’s order to stop targeting Latinos in anti-immigration roundups, may now have a new foe as he seeks re-election – George Soros, the billionaire liberal hedge fund tycoon.

The Republican sheriff already was battered politically and support for him had been slipping when a group linked to Soros mounted an anti-Arpaio attack in an attempt to weaken his bid for a seventh straight term.

The group started sending fliers to Phoenix-area voters two weeks ago, and a mailing last week accuses Arpaio of separating a mother from her child because of an unpaid traffic ticket, botching hundreds of sex crimes investigations and scaring immigrants so much that that they don’t report crime.

Obama has been waging a war against this no-nonsense sheriff and his stance on illegal immigration. Now with his reelection coming up, another corrupt, liberal villain is trying to undermine this protector of the people.

This is nothing new. Soros has been using his billions to place select candidates into power for years, people he knows will forward a broken, liberal agenda for this country.

Over the last year, Soros contributed $3.9 million to Democrats in law enforcement political races in Chicago, St. Louis, Orlando, Houston, Albuquerque, Lowndes County in Mississippi and Caddo Parish in Louisiana, according to campaign finance records.

Soros doesn’t care if our law enforcement are weak-willed pansies who ignore law and order and make our nation unsafe. It is his plan after all: make America weak, unsecure, with a faltering economy. That will ensure he and only he will have power over us and the rest of the country.

A nation of strong, independent-minded, hard-working Americans is a rich, greedy, villain’s biggest threat. Men like Soros will do everything in their power to make sure we cannot oppose them.

It’s why the liberal elite want us dependent on the federal government for our food, money, and healthcare. We can’t demand personal liberties when we’re under the government’s thumb.

Make no mistake, any sheriff Soros backs will be weak on immigration and other crime. The Phoenix area will be flooded with more illegals, violent crime, and drugs.
If you live in the area and want it to stay safe, then there’s one thing you can still do: vote for Arpaio.

Hillary and Her Pal Lester Holt are Wrong, Stop and Frisk is Perfectly Constitutional

by Warner Tod Houston
serrano130527_2_560Stop and Frisk is Perfectly Constitutional
During the first presidential debate of the election year, Donald Trump and moderator-cum second Democrat debater Lester Holt clashed over the police policy of stop and frisk. Siding with Hillary, shill Holt insisted the policy was deemed unconstitutional while Trump disputed that notion. But in fact, Holt is wrong. Stop and frisk is perfectly legal.

One of Trump’s suggestions for how to put a dent in the wildly rising rates of violent crime in America’s Democrat-controlled big cities is to reinstate and expand the stop and frisk policy. Trump said as much during the September 26 debate.
ut, as Trump spoke the third debater interrupted him saying it was an illegal policy.

“Stop-and-frisk was ruled unconstitutional in New York, because it largely singled out black and Hispanic young men,” so-called “moderator” Holt told Trump.

“No, you’re wrong,” Trump responded. “It went before a judge, who was a very against-police judge. It was taken away from her. And our mayor, our new mayor, refused to go forward with the case. They would have won an appeal. If you look at it, throughout the country, there are many places where it’s allowed.”

So, who is right? Well, all signs point to Trump.

For those unaware, stop and frisk (sometimes called a “Terry stop”) was legitimized by the U.S. Supreme Court way back in 1968 when the court ruled that a police officer could legally frisk a suspect without obtaining a search warrant or first arresting them if the officer had a reasonable suspicion that the suspect was armed or carrying contraband (such as drugs).

But the concept goes back even farther than 1968 and can be found in the English Common Law upon which the American system of justice was based. In any case, it is a concept of very long standing and has already been ruled a legal policing tool.

The trick, though, is in the way stop and frisk is observed and put into use. In practice, the officer needs a “reasonable” cause to perform a stop and search and that is where the whole policy can get political. Should a department indulge the process too much it could result in calls of harassment by members of the community and that is what happened in New York City. Stop and frisk was ended due to political pressure, not really legal pressure.

Holt did have a minor point in that a 2013 lawsuit against the New York Police Department put a halt to stop and frisk by the NYPD saying that its process was flawed. But the lawsuit did not deem the policy of stop and frisk itself to be unconstitutional. Holt was 100% wrong on that.

In the 2013 case, Bill Clinton appointed Judge Shira Scheindlin of the U.S. District Court in Manhattan essentially ruled that New York City’s version of the policy was improper–calling it an example of “indirect racial profiling”–and demanded that the NYPD put a halt to its policy.

After her decision Judge Scheindlin was criticized by an appeals panel saying she had compromised the “appearance of impartiality surrounding this litigation” by taking the case to the media instead of remaining properly aloof during the process.

Even after she issued her decision it wasn’t necessarily the end of the case as the city had initially begun to file an appeal of the ruling. The appeal could well have over turned Judge Scheindlin’s obviously liberal political ruling but the appeal was canceled by incoming, self-avowed socialist mayor Bill de Blasio whose decision was arrived via political considerations, not legal ones

So, even the NYPD’s version of stop and frisk never reached its final legal challenge to determine its legality.

But don’t take my word for it. After the debate the policy was immediately defended by one-time New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani.

The former mayor said that stop and frisk helped bring about an 85 percent reduction in crime in the Big Apple and is a perfectly legitimate, legal and constitutional tool used by America’s police departments.

Giuliani took to the pages of The Wall Street Journal the day after the debate to side with Trump and asserted the efficacy of the stop and frisk policy.

Rudy insisted that the policy saved black lives.

Over a 20-year use of this policy, spanning the administration of two New York City mayors and four police commissioners, stop and frisk played a material part in reducing homicides in New York City. It helped to change New York City from the crime capital of America to the safest large city in the country. In each of those 20 years, approximately six of 10 murder victims in New York City were African-Americans. In other words, stop and frisk saved many black lives.
Rudy also pointed out that during his tenure the U.S. Department of Justice constantly reviewed the NYPD’s policy and never filed any sanctions or actions against the city.

It wasn’t until the liberal Manhattan judge appointed by a leftist president who wanted to make her mark in social justice before she retired that the policy was s maligned.

Rudy slammed both Hillary Clinton and “moderator” Lester Holt for their attack on Trump during the debate.

“Donald Trump was right. Hillary Clinton was wrong. Lester Holt should apologize for interfering and trying so hard to help Mrs. Clinton support her incorrect statement that stop and frisk is unconstitutional,” he wrote.

But Rudy Giuliani isn’t alone in his contention that stop and frisk is a good policy.

Even FBI Director James Comey noted that stop and frisk is a useful and legal tool for police. Comey recently told the House Judiciary Committee that the policy is perfectly fine when used properly.

Of course, many claim the policy is “racist” because it affects so many black citizens. But a study by the RAND Corp. found that “black pedestrians were stopped at a rate that is 20 to 30 percent lower than their representation in crime-suspect descriptions.”

In any case, the decision on how to or whether to implement stop and frisk is firmly in the political realm because in the legal realm the policy is perfectly constitutional.

The Never-Trump Lobby Needs To Wake Up To Reality

I just finished watching the movie “The Huntsman: Winter’s War” and couldn’t help but force myself to look into the proverbial political mirror.

And so I asked, mirror, mirror on the wall, who are the most ignorant and out of touch individuals in politics of them all?

While all of my mirrors at home are on the same page in thinking that my looks are exquisite and second to none, the political mirror told me that those pesky never-Trumpers are in a class by themselves when it comes to being out of touch with today’s political realities.

Senators Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz, two men who have reason to hate on Trump, are backing him over Hillary Clinton. The list of never-Trump turncoats continues to grow as the general election approaches.

Many of these Americans are waking up to the scary thought that Hillary Clinton and her husband Bill could be leading our country this time next year.

One individual who has spent a lot of time and money this presidential election cycle supporting the likes of Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio is Brian Ballard, the owner of Florida’s top lobbying firm.

Ballard, who is raising big cash for Trump and never pulls a punch or a personal check, told the Shark Tank that in regards to Republicans not supporting Donald Trump, a Hillary win would forever be “tattooed on their resumes.”

“Congrats on the rest of your career seeking Republican support.”-Brian Ballard
Look, the never-Trump lobby is mad, we get it. It is understandable, but they need to get a grip of themselves and put egos aside.

I am talking to you Jeb Bush and Mitt Romney, as well as any other Republicans and Independents still hung up on not voting for Trump.

Most of these self-style purists who live by the notion that voting for Trump will somehow compromised their deep-rooted conservative principles, and that a Trump presidency will signal the end of the Republican Party as we know it, need to consider laying off whatever herb or root they are currently smoking.

I have come to the conclusion that the anti-Trump wing of the GOP, who seems to want to have their day in the sun, may just only need to hug it out with Trump.

Really, they may must need Trump to pay them a visit and literally embrace them.

Look at voting for Trump this way. If President Barack Obama failed to destroy Conservatism and the GOP in 8 years of actively trying to do so, what makes the never Trump crowd think “The Donald” could do any better?

As those Rhodes Scholars on ESPN’s Sunday Morning Countdown like to say, “C’mon Man!”

Forget about what I just wrote and just listen to what Hillary Clinton said in her opening statement during the first presidential debate against Trump.

Clinton not only recited Democratic Party talking points, it seems as if she was reading directly from the Book of Obama when she said, “we also have to make the economy fairer” for the less fortunate.

In reading verse three of Obama’s Gospel, Clinton said that she supports “raising the minimum wage” and having the “wealthy pay their fair share.”

And for all of you scratched-face college kids, Clinton wants to make it so that you are “debt free” from your collegiate fiscal responsibilities. In other words, Clinton wants everyone else pay for your schooling.

She didn’t stop there. Clinton gave a full-throated endorsement of Obama’s “spread the wealth around” agenda by telling the 80+million Americans watching that night that businesses need to spread their wealth around.

If you helped create the profits, you should be able to share in them, not just the executives at the top. -Hillary Clinton

Here is the video of the first 20 or so minutes of the debate. You need only to jump to minute 3 of the video to hear Clinton’s vision of the future People’s Republic of the United States.
Donald Trump wasn’t my first presidential choice, even though he was right up there with Rubio and Cruz.

This is a no-brainer. Donald Trump for President, because the alternative will be a reckless, dishonest and destructive individual who will not only change the face of the U.S. Supreme Court, but stands to change the American identity with her “One World” philosphy.

Amen to that.