Archive for the ‘America’s Future’ Category

FBI data backs up Trump claims on illegals and crime

American people are sick of watching our glorious nation be destroyed

Largely unreported data published by the FBI appears to back up Donald Trump’s contentions regarding illegal aliens from Mexico committing drug and violent crime offenses in the U.S.

According to the FBI, criminal gangs – in some regions comprised significantly of illegal aliens – are wreaking havoc in the U.S., with 65 jurisdictions nationwide reporting gang-related offenses committed with firearms account for at least 95 percent of crime in those areas.

The FBI further documented gangs in Southwestern border regions consisting of up to 80 percent illegal aliens were committing a multitude of crimes in America, “including drug-related crimes, weapons trafficking, alien smuggling, human trafficking, prostitution, extortion, robbery, auto theft, assault, homicide, racketeering, and money laundering.”

The information was contained in the FBI’s 79-page National Gang Report published in 2013, the most recently released extensive agency report providing an overview of gang activities and trends in the United States.

The data is newly relevant following a national debate about illegal alien criminals emanating from Mexico sparked by Trump’s controversial comments.

“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best,” Trump said when he announced his run for president. “They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”

Trump has since clarified numerous times his comments were in reference to illegal aliens crossing into the U.S. from Mexico.

“I accept the 80 percent number, but I’ve heard testimony that goes higher than that,” Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, told WND. “It might be that gangs are now starting to recruit children that are born to illegals.

Ann Coulter takes apart the arguments from advocates for amnesty and illegal aliens, in “Adios, America,” and in the course of her work reveals that Democrats always have thought of immigration reform as a way to stuff the ballot box.

“That might account for some of the remaining 20 percent,” he said, noting it could get worse.

“You turn over another generation of this and you won’t be able to characterize them as illegals anymore. They will be anchor babies.”

Michele Bachmann, a former member of Congress, added, “With every news cycle, Donald Trump is being proven right about problems associated with illegal aliens. The Dem/GOP ruling class in D.C. is petrified their false claim that massive Third-World immigration is good for America is unraveling.

“The ruling class should be worried, and their handmaidens in the media, because the American people are sick of watching our glorious nation be destroyed and they are longing for a true champion to fight for American greatness and sovereignty.”

She said, “Trump just might pull this off!”

The FBI’s latest National Gang Report extensively documents criminal gangs, some comprised in large part of illegal aliens, are indeed importing drugs and committing a high percentage of violent crimes throughout the U.S.

One section of the 79-page report details “Gangs and the U.S. Border.” It documents gangs, “especially national-level Hispanic gangs, such as MS-13, the Eme, Sureños, and TB, continue to pose a significant threat to the Southwest border region.”

The report reveals that “in many cases, gang members who commit criminal activity in the region are not U.S. citizens nor lawful permanent residents.”

The FBI documented that surveys conducted by U.S. Customs and Border Protection indicate in some southwest border sectors “the percentage of non-U.S. citizen gang members was as high as 80 percent.”

The report states that once deported, gang members have been documented as repeatedly attempting to re-enter U.S. illegally “in order to re-join the gang and engage in criminal activity.”

The FBI statistics show gangs “exploit opportunities along the nearly 2,000 miles of contiguous U.S.-Mexico territory” to engage in a multitude of crimes, “including drug-related crimes, weapons trafficking, alien smuggling, human trafficking, prostitution, extortion, robbery, auto theft, assault, homicide, racketeering, and money laundering.”

“Of these offenses, drug-related crimes – such as production, smuggling, trafficking, and distribution – are the most widely reported criminal acts committed by gangs of all types,” according to the 2013 report.

The report relates gangs are establishing and maintaining “mutually beneficial relationships” with international crime syndicates, including Mexican Transnational Criminal Organizations.

These cross-border relationships, the FBI warned, “increase profits for gangs through drug distribution, drug transportation, and the commission of violent crimes to enforce drug payment and protect drug transportation corridors from rival usage.”

Firearms proliferation; military weaponry

Perhaps just as alarming is the section on “weapons and explosives” which notes the massive proliferation of firearms among illegal gangs, revealing gangs are in possession of vast quantities of “handguns, rifles, both semi and fully automatic, shotguns, and in some instances, machine guns.”

“Gang members use these weapons in violent encounters with rival gang members, law enforcement officers, and innocent victims,” the report relates.

Law enforcement officials in multiple U.S. jurisdictions reported gang members in their regions also have been caught in possession of “law enforcement only and military weaponry such as assault rifles, grenades, and body armor.”

Law enforcement officials surveyed nationwide reported a full 30 percent of gang-related crime in their jurisdiction was committed with firearms while 65 jurisdictions nationwide reported gang-related offenses carried out using firearms accounted for at least 95 percent of crime in their areas.

Just how many gang members are inside the U.S.? The 2013 report refused to provide numbers citing “inconclusive reporting and lack of confidence in estimates.”

However, the FBI’s previous report, released in 2011 and reviewed by WND, estimated there was about 1.4 million active street, prison and outlaw motorcycle gang members in more than 33,000 gangs operating in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico.

With additional reporting by Garth Kant in Washington, D.C.


Brigitte Gabriel on Energy Security

Energy Security is National Security
VIDEO: Brigitte Gabriel and T. Boone Pickens talk about the direct correlation between National Security and Energy Security.
Few subjects are as closely connected as National Security and Energy Security in the U.S. Without a reliable source of fuel, the U.S. economy will grind to a halt, but almost every dollar that goes overseas to pay for oil helps to fund radical Islamic terror.

There is a solution, however. We need to “turn oil into salt.”

In ancient times, salt was the commodity that drove commerce. Cities rose and wars were fought over salt deposits. Today, due to refrigeration, salt is now one of the cheapest commodities available. It no longer has any strategic value. Two pieces of legislation that have been introduced in the U.S. Congress will help “turn oil into salt.” If passed and signed into law, these bills will set the stage for oil to become the salt of the modern world — abundant, cheap, and easily replaceable.

If oil is no longer a strategic commodity, the vast amount of wealth enjoyed by oil rich OPEC countries, and the terror funding that is supported by petrodollars, will disappear. Without the OPEC oil money, terror funding dries up. It’s the closest thing to a silver bullet that we know of, when it comes to fighting jihadist terror.

The bills Brigitte mentions in the video are H.R. 2418 and S. 889 and, as she notes, they would use market forces to let consumers choose how they want to fuel their vehicles — and turn the conventional “gas” station into a fuel station. (What a concept! Americans actually having a CHOICE about how they want to fuel their vehicles, with no mandate and no cost to taxpayers!)

When consumers have this kind of choice, oil prices go down and money that finances countries that want nothing more than to destroy the U.S. dries up. It’s that simple.

The end of China envy

by Rich Lowry

A funny thing happened on the way to China’s inevitable global dominance — the country’s economic tumult rocked markets around the world.

China long ago replaced Japan as the Asian boogeyman whose superior economic model is going to sweep all before it. This is such a readily accepted article of faith that it is held, in its various forms, across the spectrum from self-consciously cosmopolitan elites like Thomas Friedman to bombastic populists like Donald Trump.

Friedman, the New York Times columnist, has written, “I cannot help but feel a tinge of jealousy at China’s ability to be serious about its problems and actually do things that are tough and require taking things away from people” (including, it must be said, their freedom). Such is his regard for China’s governance that he confessed in one column to impure thoughts: “Forgive me, Heavenly Father, for I have cast an envious eye on the authoritarian Chinese political system, where leaders can, and do, just order that problems be solved.”

Trump routinely rues how much smarter China’s leaders are than ours, and in his announcement speech noted, with regret, how China “has bridges that make the George Washington Bridge look like small potatoes.”

It is manifestly true that a closed, low-income economy that adopts some market reforms can grow quickly; that a dictatorial government can manipulate the economy to serve its ends; and that government-directed investment can build lots of bridges. None of this, though, makes for a sustainable, First World economy, let alone a juggernaut that should be feared and envied by the United States.

China might have bright, shiny airports and gauzy GDP numbers, but that is window dressing on a badly distorted economic system that is being managed about as well as you’d expect by a group of corrupt, self-interested statists, which is to say not well at all.

Some perspective is in order with regard to China’s economic position vis-a-vis the United States. As Derek Scissors of the American Enterprise Institute points out, “American national wealth is almost twice that of China and Japan combined,” and “the average American makes 12 times as much annually as the average Chinese.”

China’s double-digit growth numbers might be impressive, but even assuming that they can believed, they aren’t as telling as they seem. “Remember,” Paul Dibb and John Lee write in a report for the Australian-based Kokoda Foundation think tank, “that the Soviet Union officially tripled in size from 1950 to 1973, yet its economic model was fundamentally flawed as we realized in hindsight. GDP is essentially an accountant’s tool used to document final economic activity within a country in any given year. But GDP does not measure whether economic activity is productive, profitable or even commercially irrational.”

In China, in many cases, the economic activity is none of the above. Politically connected state-owned enterprises are favored over every other business. China has larded on the debt since 2007 — it has quadrupled and hit 282 percent of GDP, according to a McKinsey report last year — and it has been plowed into fixed investment that is often senseless. A country famous for its “ghost cities,” massive unoccupied developments, obviously has a huge malinvestment problem.

The Chinese government has talked up reforms as it seeks to put the economy on a sounder long-term footing. The list of necessary changes is incredibly long. For a truly modern economy, China needs a commercial banking system, less powerful state-owned enterprises, free capital flows, greater labor mobility and a proper retirement system, not to mention the rule of law, property rights and an independent judiciary, among other things. Yet progress has been halting and slow.

China has been able to forge such astonishing economic progress for so long because it started from a very low point. That is not something to be envied, nor are its challenges as it strives not to dominate the world, but to avoid hitting a wall.


Every Deported Illegal Household Saves Taxpayers THIS STAGGERING AMOUNT OF CASH

This is exactly what the liberal media doesn’t want you to know.

Advocates for mass-migration are using skewed financial claims to smear Donald Trump’s popular border proposals, which actually would help revive the near-bankrupt Social Security and Medicare programs.
For every illegal migrant household that leaves the United States under Trump’s plan, Americans would recoup nearly three-quarters of a million dollars ($719,350), according to 2010 data collected by Heritage scholar Robert Rector.
The lifetime savings accrued from one deported illegal household would provide funds for 125 low-income inner city students to receive the maximum Pell Grant award in 2015-2016 ($5,775); it could cover the cost of pre-kindergarten for 90 at-risk children (around $8,000 per child); or it could cover the one year cost of Medicaid for 124 enrollees ($5,790 based on FY2011 data).
But business interests want the migrants to stay. That’s because migrants help lower the cost of Americans’ wages, but also because the migrants spend their wages — plus taxpayer aid — at retail stories and rental agencies.


OBAMA KEEPS SCHEMEING -Obama scheme gives Democrats ‘power FOR ALL TIME

by Greg Corombos

A conservative congressman says the murder of a San Francisco woman by an illegal immigrant deported five times is a microcosm of the border security dereliction of the Obama administration and liberal city leaders choosing to reward criminal behavior.

Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, also addressed the fierce debate within the Republican presidential field, taking care to avoid characterizing any candidate but leaving no doubt what he thinks the GOP’s policy position ought to be.

The immigration debate took on a more personal dimension over Independence Day weekend, as 32-year-old Kate Steinle was randomly murdered by 45-year-old Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez. The killer, who has since confessed, has been convicted of seven felonies and deported five separate times.

Gohmert said similar stories have played out far too often as the Obama administration effectively waves illegals across the border.

“It’s very easy to explain when you have a president who does not believe in the rule of law, who has pandered to people who are illegally in the country,” Gohmert said in an interview with WND and Radio America. “All we can figure is, he thinks that if they can just get people who are illegally the right to vote before they understand the responsibilities of trying to keep a democratic republic, then it will give the Democrats all power for all time.”

According to Gohmert, the Steinle murder is hardly an isolated incident. He said the House Judiciary Committee, of which he is a member, received very disturbing numbers from Immigration and Customs Enforcement on the extent of violent crimes committed by illegal immigrants in Fiscal Year 2014 alone.

“These individuals have been convicted of 79,059 crimes, including 175 homicides, 373 sexual assaults, 186 kidnappings (and) 14,014 impaired driving offenses. It just goes on and on. This is making America less safe,” he said, noting both the federal government and city governments must stop rewarding criminals.

Listen to the WND/Radio America interview with Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas:

“If the president’s going to protect America, if our city leaders are going to protect America, the cities can’t be this haven for people who broke the law and would kill a beautiful young lady like we had in San Francisco,” Gohmert said. “And the federal government has got to stop encouraging illegal immigration.”

The congressman said the Steinle murder struck close to home for him, and he said the policy of San Francisco and other “sanctuary cities” needs to be revisited right away.

“Having three daughters, I’m particularly sensitive to these things. But to have her shot so senselessly, randomly, right there in front of her parents, would never have happened if San Francisco were not a city that just welcomed people who violated our immigration laws. It is a sanctuary city,” said Gohmert, meaning San Francisco and other cities have laws refusing to hold people whose only known offense is coming to the U.S. illegally.

Lopez-Sanchez has seven felonies on his record. San Francisco and the federal government are now engaged in a blame game over which is responsible for the killer being loose in the first place. The federal government asserts Lopez-Sanchez was in custody and about to be deported for a sixth time when he was handed over to the city to face a drug charge and should never have been released when those charges were dropped. San Francisco officials say it was the federal government’s job to have a warrant ready to go when the drug case concluded.

Shocker: See how the left plans to win in 2016! Strategy could bring Democrats to power – but also bring down the country


WB-How-Left_Plans-To-WinGohmert said illegal aliens create trouble for law-abiding citizens, even when there is no violent crime involved. He contends a recent account from a teenage constituent is a perfect example.

“She and her single mom were trying to make ends meet. An illegal alien hit her car,” he said. “He had no driver’s license, no insurance. He was allowed to drive off in his car. Hers was totaled. It just made things crazy for these poor girls. It’s just outrageous that this president would not be more sympathetic to the plight of Americans dealing with crime in America.”

Just as maddening to Gohmert as what he sees as the Obama administration refusing to enforce immigration law is the president’s insistence that border security is operating at record efficiency.

“It may just be because our president doesn’t know enough about our history,” he said. “I’m sure they didn’t teach it in Indonesia, but the fact is, when he says nobody has done more to secure the border than I have, or words to that effect, it’s simply not true.”

The congressman said the border was far more secure after President Woodrow Wilson (not a favorite of Gohmert’s) effectively sealed the border after Mexican revolutionary Pancho Villa conducted numerous murderous raids into the United States. On Wilson’s orders, thousands of forces clamped down on the southern border.

“The border was secure,” Gohmert said. “Nobody came in unless we wanted them to.

“This president could do more. Of course, you remember (former Homeland Security Secretary) Janet Napolitano just announced one day, ‘Hey, the four billion dollars or so that was appropriated by Congress for virtual fence? I’m not going to do that. I’m going to spend the money elsewhere.’ This administration not only encourages people to violate our immigration law but it violates the laws regularly themselves.”

The killing of Kate Steinle poured rhetorical gasoline onto an already combustible debate within the 2016 Republican presidential field over the issue of illegal immigration.

Billionaire real-estate developer Donald Trump immediate stirred the pot in announcing his White House bid.

“[Mexico is] sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists, and some I assume are good people,” said Trump on June 16.

Several other GOP hopefuls have denounced Trump both for his language and for his alleged inaccuracy.

“He’s doing this to inflame and to incite and to draw attention, which seems to be his organizing principle of his campaign,” said former Gov. Jeb Bush, R-Fla. “He doesn’t represent the Republican Party or its values.”

Gohmert is not wading into the back-and-forth between candidates, but he said he trusts the assessment of the U.S. Border Patrol, and its assessment is sobering.

“Many of them have told me there is not a single mile of the U.S.-Mexico border that is not under the auspices of some drug lord. And you don’t cross that border into the United States without permission from that drug lord. If you do, they’ll find you in the United States and kill you,” said Gohmert, who added that many illegals come across and claim they are refugees from deadly gang violence in their home countries.

After a brief interrogation, it is usually discovered that gangs are not the reason for their illegal migration but the means for shuttling them across the border.

The congressman said the proper approach for Republicans should be obvious. First, he said there should be nothing but admiration for Hispanic families who come here legally, since they value the intact family as high as this country did in the past.

“It’s a generalization, but it’s a pretty good generalization that Hispanics love God, are devoted to God, love family, are devoted to family and they have a hard work ethic,” Gohmert said. “Those are the kind of things that made America great. We need more of that. We need more of what the Hispanic can bring before we co-opt it and teach them other ways.”

However, he said, that admiration has to be tempered by a strict adherence to the law.

“They have to come in legally,” he said. “To just disregard the rule of the law makes us like the countries in central America or Mexico that they’re fleeing.”

Opposition to legal status or even a pathway to citizenship for those illegally in the U.S. has long been described as unrealistic, and now Republicans and Democrats accuse people who hold that position of being hateful or even racist. Gohmert flatly rejects the label.

“It’s ridiculous to say it’s racist if you want people who commit crimes to be punished for those crimes,” he said. “Having been a former felony judge, many times people accused me of being mean, but I followed the law. I was fair across the board, and that’s what we have to do. It’s part of the price of maintaining this democratic republic, as (Benjamin) Franklin said, if we want to keep it.”


Dumbing Down Of America

by Dave Jolly
I’ve never hidden the fact that I am not an advocate for our current public school system. I believe they have lost the purpose of educating students and have replaced it with the socialistic brainwashing and indoctrination of our kids and grandkids. In the process, far too many students cannot read, write or do simple math comparable with their age. But they have learned to trust our socialist government for all of their needs.

The current public school system along with the media is responsible for the dumbing down of America. Just consider the fact that when I was in public school back in the 1950s and 1960s, American students scored among the highest in the world. Today, American students and young adults have been sliding down the global scale.
A recent study reveals another reason why today’s public school students are being dumbed down.
According to the American Journal of Family Therapy, a study of students in Rhode Island claims that they are given too much homework. You better sit down before you find out just how much overworked these poor students are. Shockingly, first graders are given an average of 28 minutes of homework a night. This is supposedly three times the amount of homework that liberals recommend.
Even more outrageously horrifying is that they reported that tenth graders were tremendously overburdened with a whopping 54 minutes of homework a night. Can you believe the atrocity of it all?
The authors stated:

“We anticipate that an overload of homework will likely interfere with a kindergarten-aged child’s ability to play and participate in extra-curricular activities.”
I recall being in tenth grade and I had at least two hours of homework most nights and even more for more often than I would have liked. As far as extra-curricular activity and time to play, I had time to work part-time, play and enjoy my life and I know I’m prejudiced but I don’t think I turned out that bad. I’m a prolific reader when I have the time; I’m good at math, science, writing and a number of other subjects. I have a Bachelor of Science degree in wildlife and fisheries biology and a Master’s Degree in biology – population genetics. I’ve often worked in management with various employers.
When I was in school, one of the things they taught us was how to make change for a monetary purchase. We didn’t have calculators and most cash registers didn’t calculate it for you. If you really want to stump a high school or college student today, ask them to make change without using an electronic device. I’ve done it and it stops them in the tracks.
Do you remember all of the hype proceeding January 1, 2000? Everyone claimed it was the turn of a new millennium, when in fact the new millennium actually began Jan. 1, 2001. However, on January 2, 2000, my wife and I went to the local Goodwill store where she purchased a couple of items. The cashier was a young girl and we were her first customers of the day. She was completely stumped because she could not figure out how to write the date. It was obvious she failed to comprehend that 2000 is the next number after 1999. I bet none of these young people had 2 or more hours of homework a night like we did when we were in school and it shows.
If you read socialist literal, you’ll find that one of the ways they recommend to take over a nation and people is to dumb them down and use the educational system to indoctrinate an entire generation. Give them ten to twenty years and they can convert an entire nation to accept a socialist form of government. Just look around you’ll see that they are rapidly succeeding.
Don’t you think it’s time to start actually teaching our kids the real lessons they should learn and if it takes more homework, they’ll be all the better for it.


The world economy explained with just two cows.

two cows





ISIS Member Tries To Blow Up Florida Beach

A 23 year-old man who the FBI describes as an ISIS supporter was arrested and charged with plotting to detonate a backpack bomb on a Florida beach on Tuesday.

According to WSVN, Harlem Suarez of Key West has been charged with attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction in the U.S. Authorities say the young man first popped up on the FBI’s radar through his extremist online posts that praised ISIS.

The complaint states that Suarez told an FBI informant that he wanted to build a timer bomb and then bury it on a Key West beach before detonating it. He was arrested on Monday immediately after taking possession of an inert explosive device provided by the informant.

Suarez’s first court appearance was in Miami today. We’ll update you further as this story develops.


Another judge orders inquiry into Hillary Clinton’s emails

by Bob Unruh

The cloud hanging over Hillary Clinton because of her handling of government emails while she was secretary of state got a little lower, a little blacker and a little more ominous Thursday when another federal judge stepped in and ordered the State Department to work with the FBI to respond to a legal demand for details about her practice.

“We wouldn’t be here today if the employee (Clinton) had followed government policy,” U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan said, according to a report from Judicial Watch.

The organization has Freedom of Information Act lawsuits pending over access to information about Clinton’s performance while secretary of state for Barack Obama. Judicial Watch was in court because the FBI recently took physical control of a thumb drive and a computer server reportedly used by Hillary Clinton while secretary of state.

She has reported she set up her own private email system and computer server while she was head of the State Department. She has claimed repeatedly that she neither sent nor received classified emails on the unsecured and private system.

But federal officials reviewing the issue, including two inspectors general, have found emails containing classified material.

Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, said the State Department today “admitted that it had not made any effort to coordinate with the FBI in the obvious task of asking for information responsive to inquiries by the court and Judicial Watch.”

“Today’s court hearing highlights the blatant disregard for federal records laws. The court observed, ‘We wouldn’t be here today if the employee [former Secretary Clinton] had followed government policy,’ and I could not agree more,” he said.

What do YOU think? Will Hillary be forced from the presidential race by this scandal? Sound off in today’s WND poll

Sullivan’s order followed a concession by the State Department that it has an obligation to check the devices now in government custody for records that would be responsive to the Judicial Watch request.

He ordered the State Department to produce a report by Sept. 20, and another hearing is scheduled Oct. 1.

The court said: “For the reasons stated by the court at the August 20, 2015, status hearing, and as agreed to by defendant’s counsel, the State Department is hereby ordered to request that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) inform it about any information recovered from Mrs. Clinton’s server and the related thumb drive that is: (a) potentially relevant to the FOIA request at issue in this case; and (b) not already in the State Department’s possession. The State Department shall file a status report, no later than Monday, September 21, 2015 at 12:00 p.m., informing the court of the following: (1) the process agreed upon between the FBI and the State Department for the sharing of information relevant to this lawsuit; (2) the status of the Inspector General of the State Department’s report regarding Mrs. Clinton’s use of a private server; and (3) a timetable for the completion of any ongoing searches related to this lawsuit.”

The issue was complicated, Judicial Watch said, by a recent court filing from the State Department in which officials insisted they never issued a personal computing device to Clinton, and the units used by Clinton aides Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills might have been destroyed.

The explanation said: “[The State Department] does not believe that any personal computing device was issued by the department to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and has not located any such device at the department. [The State Department] believes that Ms. Mills and Ms. Abedin were each issued BlackBerry devices. [The State Department] has not located any such device at the department … Because the devices issued to Ms. Mills and Ms. Abedin would have been outdated models, in accordance with standard operating procedures those devices would have been destroyed or excessed. ”

The orders come in Judicial Watch’s lawsuit demanding records about the controversial employment status of Abedin, the former deputy chief of staff to Hillary Clinton. The case, once thought over, was reopened because of revelations about Hillary Clinton’s use of the private email services.

The Wall Street Journal said the Clinton campaign claimed that the emails were classified after the fact.

“She was at worst a passive recipient of unwitting information that subsequently became deemed as classified,” campaign spokesman Brian Fallon said.

The server she used was maintained by a private company and stored at a data center in New Jersey before it was turned over to the FBI last week.

Clinton repeatedly had assured questioners “there is no classified material” on her emails. She later changed her responses to say she didn’t get any materials marked classified.

“Secretary Clinton has repeatedly made false claims about her email records, and her charge that these investigations are partisan have been widely ridiculed. If she and her campaign are having a change of heart, she should personally admit the truth and retract her false statements,” said Kevin Smith, a spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner.

Federal investigators have said they now may be in a position to examine contents – even those that were deliberately deleted – now that they have physical custody of the unit.

CBS News reported questions are arising about not only her server but the devices she used to access her system.

“Any time you’re bringing your own equipment and using it for work purposes, it’s not as secure as something that’s actually issued by the company,” CNET senior editor Dan Ackerman told the network.

“Because they take those laptops, for example, and they pre-configure them, they put their own software on them, tracking software, update software, and they distribute them.”

WHAS TV reported even Democrats were beginning to back away from Hillary Clinton.

“I just never feel I have a grasp of what the facts are,” Rep. John Yarmuth, D-Ky., told the station. “Clearly, she has handled it poorly from the first day. And, there’s the appearance of dishonesty, if it’s not dishonest.”

The Washington Free Beacon reported analysts have described two laws that potentially were broken.

One forbids the unauthorized removal and storage of classified information, a law that was used to prosecute retired Army Gen. David Petraeus. A second law, a felony with a sentence of up to 10 years, prohibits removal of national defense information.