Categories
Archives
HELP US KEEP YOU BETTER INFORMED ABOUT THE TRICKS OF THE RADICAL PROGRESSIVE REVOLUTION PLEASE DONATE ANY AMOUNT YOU CAN
target="_top">

Archive for the ‘Barry the False Prophet’ Category

You Won’t Believe What Hollywood Is Going To Do With Obama

The Obama White House is getting the Hollywood treatment as a workplace comedy.

According to the Hollywood Reporter (THR), Universal Pictures and Anonymous Content are developing a “high-concept workplace comedy” based on the book proposal From the Corner of the Oval by Beck Dorey-Stein, a former White House stenographer.

Breitbart reports,

Stein’s book has been picked up by Random House Publishing Group division Spiegel & Grau.

“The book doesn’t promise a revealing look inside the inner workings of the Obama administration, but focuses more on the White House as a workplace and on the relationships between the staffers,” THR reports.

“From the Corner of the Oval follows a young woman living in Washington D.C. who is at an all-time career low when, through a twist of fate, she goes from serving cocktails to lobbyists to being hired as a stenographer in the Obama White House,” THR says of the book’s synopsis. “The ultimate fish out of water, she stumbles into an elite world and finds herself navigating a series of misadventures in life and love.”

The film will be produced by Anonymous Content’s Michael Sugar, whose previous work includes the Oscar-winning drama Spotlight.

Obama Holds Secret Meetings With Famous Billionaire To Discuss Trump Resistance? [VIDEO]

Former President Barack Obama has been described as the head of the ‘resistance’ against President Donald Trump

He’s staying in Washington and continuing to be involved with organizing of protests against President Donald Trump.

From Young Conservatives

He even has live-in organizing help from Valerie Jarrett who is living in his home. He also lives two doors down from John Podesta.

So what was Obama doing in a ‘secret meeting’ with Silicon Valley tech bosses?

From Daily Mail

Barack Obama visited Silicon Valley for a secret meeting with tech bosses after lunching with billionaire business magnate Warren Buffett.

It was the former President’s first visit to the Bay Area since he left office in January.

Sources told NBC Bay Area that Obama had a meeting with tech bosses at the Fairmont hotel in downtown San Jose.

Obama also stopped in Omaha on the way out to California.

Prior to arriving in San Jose from Washington DC, Obama stopped in Omaha briefly on Sunday to have lunch with billionaire Warren Buffett.

Buffett and Obama have a long-standing relationship that has included campaign support and economic policy advice.

According to Buffet’s daughter, Susan, they were not talking about fundraising.

So if it wasn’t about money, what was the conversation?

Are the techies being dragged into ‘resistance planning’ or is Obama begging for a job?

New BOMBSHELL Obama “SET UP”

Instead of moving back to where they’re from as past ex-presidents have done, or at least moving someplace else as the Clintons did, Barack Obama decided to stay in Washington D.C., “relocating” just a stone’s throw from Capital Hill.

The move raised more than a few eyebrows and caused a chorus of conservatives to theorize that the reason Obama is hanging around town is to sit at the head of a ‘shadow government‘ which would work to constantly impede Donald Trump, his agenda, and with any luck at all, find a way to get him removed from office.

From Allen B. West

Information is coming to light that this entire “Russia hacking the election” narrative and supposedly “clandestine meetings” between Attorney General Jeff Sessions and “the Russians” may all be one big set up.

Follow this:

The New York Times, not exactly known for its Republican partisanship, and others reported that, “In the Obama administration’s last days, some White House officials scrambled to spread information about Russian efforts to undermine the presidential election — and about possible contacts between associates of President-elect Donald J. Trump and Russians — across the government. Former American officials say they had two aims: to ensure that such meddling isn’t duplicated in future American or European elections, and to leave a clear trail of intelligence for government investigators.”

It’s established that there’s nothing unusual about a sitting member of the Senate armed services committee (which Sessions was at the time) meeting with a foreign ambassador, yet Democrats are treating this particular meeting as if it were an act of high treason. We’ve now learned that the very meeting Democrats are using as a basis for demanding Sessions’ resignation was set up by the Obama administration in the first place!

Details on Jeff Sessions’ first meeting with the Russian ambassador in 2016 are beginning to surface. Turns out that Sessions spoke to the Russian ambassador on the invitation of the Obama Administration itself.
Fox News reports:

“The first came at a conference on “Global Partners in Diplomacy,” where Sessions was the keynote speaker. Sponsored by the U.S. State Department, The Heritage Foundation, and several other organizations, it was held in Cleveland during the Republican National Convention.”
“The conference was an educational program for ambassadors invited by the Obama State Department to observe the convention. The Obama State Department handled all of the coordination with ambassadors and their staff, of which there were about 100 at the conference.”
“Apparently, after Sessions finished speaking, a small group of ambassadors—including the Russian ambassador—approached the senator as he left the stage and thanked him for his remarks. That’s the first “meeting.” And it’s hardly an occasion—much less a venue—in when a conspiracy to “interfere” with the November election could be hatched.”

‘THIS IS WATERGATE’ Donald Trump claims ‘sick’ Barack Obama had his ‘phones tapped in Trump Tower’ before US election win

The US President unleashed a string of tweets slamming his predecessor
By Brittany Vonow and Mark Hodge
4th March 2017, 3:45 pm Updated: 4th March 2017, 4:23 pm

DONALD Trump has sensationally claimed ‘sick’ Barack Obama had his “wires tapped” in Trump Tower during the US election.

In an astonishing series of early morning tweets, the firebrand President claimed his predecessor had bugged his phones during the “very sacred election process”, slamming the allegations as a “Nixon/Watergate” scandal.

Donald Trump has accused Barack Obama of tapping Trump Tower during the US election

The combative President launched a series of tweets against Obama following a report by Breitbart News on Friday
Trump, who started the Twitter rant at 5:30am US eastern time, branded the claims a “new low” before appearing to call Obama a “bad (or sick) guy”.

The property tycoon turned politician wrote: “How low has President Obama gone to tap my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!”

Watergate refers the early 1970s political scandal which forced the resignation of Republican President Richard Nixon when it emerged that the Democratic party’s headquarters had been broken into.

He also tweeted: “Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my “wires tapped” in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!”

McCarthyism is the practise of making accusations without proper evidence and can also refer to the use of improper investigative techniques.

He later added: “Is it legal for a sitting President to be “wire tapping” a race for president prior to an election? Turned down by court earlier. A NEW LOW!”

 

Details From Trump’s First ISIS Raid LEAKED! Our ENEMIES KNEW WE WERE COMING! – A OBAMA SETUP

– The collaborator media has been attacking President Trump and his Defense Dept after a ‘botched’ raid in Yemen resulted in the death of a Navy Seal. The raid took place earlier this week but now we are learning that the Pentagon now thinks the enemies knew we were coming.

“Al-Qaeda fighters seemed ready for Sunday’s deadly Navy SEAL raid in Yemen.”

The source also claimed, “it was clear that the AQAP fighters in the compound knew the Americans were coming and engaged them with heavy weapons.”

It has been reported that over a dozen Al- Qaeda terrorists and as many as 30 civilians were killed in the raid. Tragically, William “Ryan” Owens an American Navy Seal offered up the ultimate sacrifice for out country during the failed raid. THE MISSION HAD BEEN PLANNED OVER 2 MONTHS AGO DURING THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION. Obama never actually executed the raid, his excuse was that they were waiting for a moonless night, which never came to pass between the time the raid was planned and Obama’s departure as President.

“Obama administration aides had deliberated extensively over the proposed operation, weighing the value of any information that might be recovered against the risk to the Special Operations forces plunging into hostile territory.”

The Trump White House has told the press that the raid was vetted and signed off on by the Obama Administration back in January.

LIBERTY WRITERS NEWS REPORTS THAT:
“Rumors are now surfacing that since the Obama administration had extensive knowledge of the operation and our enemies knew we were coming, officials under Obama tipped off the militants in order to botch Trump’s first military raid.

The idea isn’t far-fetched, especially given Trump’s recent friction with some in the Intelligence community.

The Washington elites have already proven that they will do ANYTHING to make Trump’s presidency hell, this would just be another example.”

If it turns out to be true that members of the Obama Administration are telling our enemies about our raids ahead of time, costing American lives, you can be sure Trump will find out and make sure the guilty parties face treason and/or sedition charges as the law demands.

 

Obama’s Mideast policy seems to have been: Praise Islam Ignore the Christians and Blame it on the Jews


Remember when the Clintons were on their way out of the White House in 2001? They stole furniture.

They vandalized computers. Overall, they behaved like vindictive, petty louses.
In a way, I wish Obama had decided to just steal the furniture.

Sure, it’s petty and childish, but it won’t leave a lasting legacy of destruction and damage in his wake.
Instead, Obama decided to go out with a vindictive bang – the ripples of which are felt the world over.
He stabbed in the back America’s strongest ally in the Middle East.
And why? Spite. That’s why.
For years now, Barry has held a grudge against Benjamin Netanyahu. And if it was the last thing he would do, he’d get back at him for having the nerve to put the interests of Israel above Obama’s selfish demands.
Worse still, this action effectively booby-traps US Middle East policy for incoming President Donald Trump.
So much for “peaceful transfer of power.”
Then again, we all knew Barack Obama was full of you know what when he lectured America on the “peaceful transfer of power.”
Don’t doubt me. This man is stinging over the fact that he cannot remain President for life.
Barack Obama is a spiteful, loathsome creature. That much is certain.
Even in something small, Barack let’s his bruised ego call the shots.

Remember the Government shutdown in 2013?
So angry was he that Republicans would not bend to his will that he took it out on the American people. He shut down all Federal Parks and deployed Park Service employees to guard them in order to keep people out.
Remember the barricades that surrounded the National Mall? World War Two vets in Washington, the honor flights were unable to go in.
Until Senator Ted Cruz came in and helped them move the barricades and let the vets in.
This is how this petty, petulant, vindictive man responds to anyone who defies him. Obama’s decision to abstain and not veto the Anti-Israel resolution at the UN is one more in a long line of spiteful, vengeful maneuvers.
The problem is, Obama unleashes something far more insidious with this spiteful action.
Even the New York Post editorial board is outraged.

Friday’s

failure to veto an anti-Israel resolution at the United Nations

sets a new low in the annals of American diplomacy.

It was a shocking betrayal of a firm US ally, and of

longstanding bipartisan US policy — a sneaky, dishonest move by

a lame-duck president to express his pique at the

president-elect and land a final vindictive blow on Israeli

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Obama’s thin skin will get people killed.
His over-weaning ego is far more dangerous to US foreign policy than any tweet Donald Trump could send out.
In closing their editorial, the Post puts it best:
As for Barack Obama, it’s a sorry exit. But it’s par for the course for

a president who has made everything all about him and his

perceived slights. Which is why he’s bungled foreign policy in

general — and the Middle East in particular — over the past

eight years.

What a profoundly sad — and dangerous — legacy. By every

measure, he has taken a giant step away from any chances for

peace and betrayed a key ally. Just for some petty personal

revenge

Obama administration fails to check immigrants against FBI databases, approves citizenship

Some 175 immigrants were approved for citizenship even though their names weren’t properly run through the FBI’s name-check databases, potentially missing red flags that may have disqualified them from naturalization, the Obama administration admitted this weekend.

4-2
Homeland Security officials blamed computer code for the problem, which affected about 15,000 applications in total.

From Washington Times

The problem was significant enough that the government halted all naturalization ceremonies already in the pipeline and banned U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services officers from approving new citizenship applications beginning on Nov. 29, when officials acknowledged the problem in an internal email that was later obtained by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte.
In the internal email, Daniel M. Renaud, associate director at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, ordered all officers “not to approve or oath any naturalization cases in ELIS,” referring to the Electronic Immigration System that serves as the case management system for processing applications.
“At this point we are not confident that proper FBI Name Checks have been run on certain ELIS cases. At this point we are uncertain of the scope of the problem,” he wrote.

It was another embarrassing black eye for USCIS, which earlier this year admitted it had granted citizenship to hundreds of criminals who should have been barred but who escaped notice because the agency wasn’t properly checking their fingerprints. Tens of thousands of fingerprints remain in paper files, and the agency was only checking electronic records, an internal audit said.

Mr. Goodlatte said he was stunned that USCIS didn’t notify him, as the chairman of the committee that oversees the agency, of the new problem. He only learned about it after a source provided him with Mr. Renaud’s internal email.
Homeland Security said the problem arose as part of the ongoing push to digital processing of citizenship applications.
Some 15,000 applications were affected, including about 175 people who had their applications approved despite not having an accurate name check, the department said. Those persons have all had their names resubmitted to the FBI for an update.
FBI name checks are a critical part of the application process, giving immigration officers a look at potential criminal histories or other national security red flags that would make someone ineligible for citizenship.
Mr. Goodlatte demanded USCIS detail when it discovered the problem and how many cases were affected, and said the agency should take steps to strip citizenship from anyone who shouldn’t have been approved.
Homeland Security spokesman Aaron Rodriguez said the department will respond directly to Mr. Goodlatte, but insisted officials take the background process seriously.

Obama Fast Tracks 1,800 Muslims Migrants to the US That Australia Rejected

by Tim Brown

Well, Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah knows his time is short and he is probably more dangerous at this point than the entire eight years previous. Reports are now coming forward that he is attempting to fast track 1,800 Muslim migrants into the US that were rejected by Australia as illegal aliens.

WND reports:

Congress only learned of the deal through media reports two weeks ago and, according to a letter sent to administration officials by Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., the deal is not only a matter of grave national security concern, but it could be illegal.

That’s because it amounts to an international treaty that Secretary of State John Kerry negotiated without consulting or notifying Congress according to Article II, Section II of the U.S. Constitution, according to the letter, sent by the two lawmakers Nov. 22 to Kerry and DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson.

Nearly 2,500 of them were interdicted off the coast of Australia in 2013 in accordance with that country’s policy of not accepting any of the wave of “refugees” streaming out of the Middle East. Unlike Europe, Australia effectively said “no” to the United Nations’ plan to open up Western democracies for millions of refugees fleeing not only the Syrian civil war but conflicts in Afghanistan, Somalia, Sudan and even countries like Pakistan that are not at war. Germany alone has accepted 1.5 million Muslim refugees and subjected itself to thousands of sexual assaults on its women and girls.

But migrants who tried to get to Australia did not find a welcome mat. They were rescued by the Australian coast guard from their unsafe vessels and taken to off-shore camps on the Islands of Papua New Guinea and Nauru, where they have remained ever since. The United Nations stepped in and is looking for countries that will take the asylum seekers.

The U.N. found a taker in the Obama administration. Kerry confirmed he had reached a deal to take an undetermined number of the 2,465 aliens for permanent resettlement in the United States. Goodlatte and Grassley said they have since found out that up to 1,800 of the boat people could end up being distributed to U.S. cities and towns. But very little information has been released about the aliens or how many will end up in which American cities.
The letter by representatives read in part:

“This situation is concerning for many reasons. First, your departments negotiated an international agreement regarding refugees without consulting or notifying Congress. Such information was not disclosed to Congress during the annual refugee consultation that occurred on September 13, 2016, even though your staff confirmed that the agreement had, at the time, been negotiated ‘for months.’ Second, the agreement and the number of refugees to be resettled has been deemed by your departments as classified, thus the American people are left in the dark as to the rationale for this agreement. Third, the individuals who will be resettled are coming from countries of national security concern. In fact, two of the countries are officially designated by the State Department to be State Sponsors of Terrorism. Finally, it begs the question why Australia and other countries refuse to admit these individuals, what other countries are doing to help alleviate the situation, what kind of precedent this sets for future refugees interdicted at sea by Australian forces and prevented from entering Australia, and how a similar situation will be prevented in the future.”

They Vote

att00035

WHY DID OBAMA SEND ANOTHER $1.3 BILLION DOLLARS TO IRAN?!!!

by Bethany Blankly
obama-administration-refuses-to-give-congress-details-on-1-3-billion-dollar-payment-iran-933x445

When more people are unemployed and don’t have health insurance, when more veterans are suffering and dying in the U.S. than ever before, why is Barack Obama sending Iran another $1.3 billion?
The Washington Examiner reports that the State Department confirmed that it already paid Iran another $1.3 billion “to settle a failed arms deal from 1979.”

Yet, the State Department could not state who the U.S. government paid in the Iran government.

Nor could the State Department explain what form of payment was used. Did the U.S. send $1.3 billion to Iran in cash, check or money transfer?

Also, the State Department confirmed that it can’t guarantee that the $1.3 billion will not end up in the hands of known terrorists.

State Department spokesman Mark Toner told reporters:

“We can always hand it over to someone who can hand it over to the IRGC,” (Iran Revolutionary Guard Corps, which finances terrorism).
Obama argues that the U.S. owes Iran $1.7 billion plus interest to compensate Iran for weapons purchases it made in 1979 but never received because of the uprising and overthrowing of its previous government.

The first installment was the notoriously illegal shipment of $400 million in cash to Iran, which depending on the day, was reportedly a ransom payment for the release of American hostages.

The remaining money Obama says the U.S. owes Iran has not been sent, but will be, but the State Department doesn’t know how or when that will take place. It also doesn’t know who is receiving the payment in Iran.

Toner said:

“I’ll try my best to get details about that.

“I believe it was Iranian officials, Iranian government officials, I don’t know particularly who individually it was.”
Who paid the $400 million to Iran? Apparently someone Toner “was ‘certain’ that some in the U.S. knew, and said he just didn’t have that information.”

But, it wasn’t a ransom, because the U.S. owes Iran money.

This is blatant treason, but no one is doing anything about it in Congress. Where is Obama getting this money? How is he sending it without Congressional approval?