Archive for the ‘Barry AKA Frank Marshall Davis II’ Category
Jack Wheeler is a brilliant man who was the author of Reagan’s strategy to break the back of the Soviet Union with the star wars race and expose their inner weakness. For years he wrote a weekly intelligence update that was extremely interesting and well structured and informative. He consults(ed) with several mega corporations on global trends and the future, etc. He is in semi-retirement now. He is a true patriot with a no-nonsense approach to everything. He is also a somewhat well-known mountain climber and adventurer.
Below Written by Dr. Jack Wheeler
The O-man, Barack Hussein Obama, is an eloquently tailored empty suit. No resume, no accomplishments, no experience, no original ideas, no understanding of how the economy works, no understanding of how the world works, no balls, nothing but abstract, empty rhetoric devoid of real substance.
He has no real identity. He is half-white, which he rejects. The rest of him is mostly Arab, which he hides but is disclosed by his non-African Arabic surname and his Arabic first and middle names as a way to triply proclaim his Arabic parentage to people in Kenya . Only a small part of him is African Black from his Luo grandmother, which he pretends he is exclusively.
What he isn’t, not a genetic drop of, is ‘African-American,’ the descendant of enslaved Africans brought to America chained in slave ships. He hasn’t a single ancestor who was a slave. Instead, his Arab ancestors were slave owners. Slave-trading was the main Arab business in East Africa for centuries until the British ended it.
Let that sink in: Obama is not the descendant of slaves, he is the descendant of slave owners. Thus he makes the perfect Liberal Messiah.
It’s something Hillary doesn’t understand – how some complete neophyte came out of the blue and stole the Dem nomination from her. Obamamania is beyond politics and reason. It is a true religious cult, whose adherents reject Christianity yet still believe in Original Sin, transferring it from the evil of being human to the evil of being white.
Thus Obama has become the white liberals’ Christ, offering absolution from the Sin of Being White. There is no reason or logic behind it, no faults or flaws of his can diminish it, no arguments Hillary could make of any kind can be effective against it. The absurdity of Hypocrisy Clothed In Human Flesh being their Savior is all the more cause for liberals to worship him: Credo quia absurdum, I believe it because it is absurd.
Thank heavens that the voting majority of Americans remain Christian and are in no desperate need of a phony savior.
He is ridiculous and should not be taken seriously by any thinking American.
Hooking kids on sex, even in kindergarten Planned Parenthood starts “saturation process” in kindergarten
While the White House says sequestration has eliminated funds for children touring the White House, President Obama has no problem spending $350 million federal tax dollars for sexual indoctrination programs starting in kindergarten for those same children.
This is not your grandmother’s sex education about how things work and what can go “wrong.” In fact, the exact opposite is the essence of the Personal Responsibility Education Program (PREP): Obamacare funnels $75 million annually into PREP, which must be used exclusively for Planned Parenthood-style “comprehensive” sex ed programs where no type of sex is wrong and the only sexual behavior PP considers “unsafe” is becoming pregnant.
More than one-fourth of the funds ‒ $20 million ‒ has been awarded to a coalition of six Planned Parenthood affiliates, operating under the name Northwest Coalition for Adolescent Health, to implement HHS’s TOP program across Montana, Oregon, Idaho, Washington, and Alaska at over 50 sites. In Oregon schools, Planned Parenthood is paying children cash incentives to participate.
PP is funded with our tax dollars to market sex to our children in our schools under the guise of sex education, anti-bullying, diversity, and tolerance. Once sexualized, those children then become PP sex customers for contraceptives, STD testing, and abortion.
“A glance at the teacher outline for Lesson 1A, the introductory lesson (page 12 of the linked PowerPoint presentation), shows exactly how abstinence plays out in the sex-encouraging scheme at Planned Parenthood. ‘Abstinence,’ it says, ‘means choosing not to do any sexual activity that carries a risk for pregnancy or STD/HIV,’” says Rita Diller, national director for STOPP.org. “In other words, abstinence has nothing do with abstaining from sex acts. So long as the student avoids STDs and pregnancy, and is comfortable with what he or she is doing, it’s an anything goes.”
Last year Diller’s parent organization, American Life League, released a video titled “Hooking Kids on Sex,” graphically detailing just what Planned Parenthood sex education is. It went viral and was viewed almost one-quarter million times in the first week before a PP activist got YouTube to suspend it. ALL came back with Hooking Kids on Sex (II). Even those who thought they knew Planned Parenthood were shocked.
The video’s moderator, Michael Hichborn, argues that PP follows the same business model as a drug dealer: Young children are encouraged to masturbate and explore their bodies with mirrors to introduce them to sexuality. Hichborn says of the graphic pictures used to “educate” pre-pubescent children, “If a dirty old man showed these things to a ten year old in a park, he would be arrested. But when Planned Parenthood shows them to kids in a classroom, it gets government money.”
Back in 2000 at Tufts University, a state-funed sex education workshop targeting 14-21 year olds caused a scandal dubbed Fistgate. A Massachusetts state official who spoke to teens at the conference said:
“Fisting (forcing one’s entire hand into another person’s rectum or vagina) often gets a bad rap … [It’s] an experience of letting somebody into your body that you want to be that close and intimate with … [and] to put you into an exploratory mode.”
This bizarre and dangerous sexual act was presented to children as young as 12-14 as run-of-the-mill normal sex. When PP participated the next year, in 2001, recording devices of any kind were banned and the media was not allowed in to any of the workshops.
Kevin Jennings, cofounder and executive director of the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), a sponsor of the conference, wrote it off as a glitch but also criticized those who filmed the precedings as proof. Jennings was later appointed by President Obama as America’s “safe” schools czar: assistant deputy secretary of the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools inside the Department of Education.
Jennings told attendees at a GLSEN conference over a decade ago that he looked forward to the day when promoting homosexuality in schools will be seen in a positive light. GLSEN activist and kindergarten teacher Jaki Williams has said that during kindergarten children are “developing their superego,” and “that’s when the saturation process needs to begin.”
So if you ever wonder why more and more young people accept homosexual behavior and same-sex marriage as ho-hum, look no further.
Thanks to Obamacare, both Jennings and Williams are getting their wish.
Read more: http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/common-sense/2013/mar/26/hooking-kids-sex-start-saturation-process-kinderga/#ixzz2hd0pGrQL
Follow us: @wtcommunities on Twitter
The word is out, no thanks to the unmanned drones who run the “legitimate media.” This administration is purposely trying to make the government shutdown as painful as possible. You’ve got to give them credit for creativity in this: With only 17% of the monstrosity being closed, you really have to search for ways this is hurting anybody.
Even the federal worker trotted out on NPR this morning, who has been relegated to building toy block castles with his young son during the days of furlough, will almost certainly get back pay to cover it all when it’s over. His time off is not a true layoff, but paid time off, with the timing of the payment the only thing still up in the air. Not only so, but it may be a learning experience for him, as the building of temporary castles is at least the production of something, which government workers generally know nothing about. See? Silver linings everywhere.
But whence cometh this desire to make it hurt?
Sheer spite? No doubt.
Or is it the gaining of political advantage, as the pain of the shutdown will cause the unwashed masses to rise up and demand that the House of Representatives give the President everything he wants? That’s a part of it, certainly.
But right here is where conservatives and Constitutionalists get bitten. We’re betrayed by our own failure to think as long-term as the Marxists think. We think the present battle is the be-all and end-all of what’s going on in our opponents’ heads. The articles and radio talk shows that prove this assertion are legion. Conservatives are incensed because the libs are pulling a cheap, crass, and even cruel political stunt. How dare they!
Don’t be fooled. It’s deeper than that.
“Making sure it hurts” is the bald assertion of authority. We will, because we can, and you unelected folks out there need to be reminded of it.
Like when we were kids, assuming you were raised before civilization had evolved so high that it came up with neat, humane options like the dreaded Time Out, I remember sassing my Mom one day as we both stood at the kitchen sink. Before the final syllable of my clever comment had stopped resounding in the air, her hand shot out and lifted me a few inches off the ground with a loud smack. Lovingly, of course. But there was an unmistakable message in that staccato “Pow!” That message was, “I think you’ve forgotten who you are in relation to me, son. I’m going to help you recall that information.”
That’s what we’re really supposed to hear from Daddy O and Uncle Harry when they make sure it hurts. Discipline that doesn’t hurt will not be effective.
They are hoping to remind us all, even if it’s subtle for now, that they are always right and we really don’t get a say in the matter.
Rushdoony pointed out in his classic little work Law and Liberty that all socialistic or otherwise dictatorial governments must of necessity always be at war with some segment of its own citizenry. This is because those governments must, at all costs, protect the dictum that “the government is never wrong.”
They are the elites. They know better. About everything. Whatever meager scraps of individualism and free choice they leave you with, well, you oughtta just shut up and be thankful.
So when stuff goes wrong, even as a direct result of their own policies, overweening government must blame someone else. Political opponents are handy for filling this role. (Paging Ted Cruz.) So are outspoken critics, called dissidents and disturbers of the peace.
Someone must be blamed, and that someone must be punished. A truly socialistic paradise therefore is one in which the elites are always on the warpath.
Even as I write this, Fox News is foaming at the mouth about how “unfair” it is that proponents of immigration reform are being allowed to demonstrate on federal land that is closed to everyone else, due to the shutdown. Well, of course it’s unfair, but to protest about that is a grand exercise in Missing the Point.
You don’t think the government knows it’s being unequal in its treatment of citizens? C’mon.
You’re not hearing the message, which is: Agree with Big Brother and your life will go smoothly. Disagree and you will be punished. We’ll make it hurt.
Of course, the corollary to what I’m saying is this. Wage enough war against your own people and they’ll begin to think of you as a foreigner, a usurper who has no right to rule anymore. Not only must a socialist government always be at war with some of its people, but it must also be in constant fear of them. Children eventually grow up, after all, and might get tired of being smacked around.
Check out Gordan Runyan’s book, Resistance to Tyrants: Romans 13 and the Christian Duty to Oppose Wicked Rulers, available in both paperback and Kindle formats.
Read more at http://lastresistance.com/3344/worse-think-administration-must-make-shutdown-hurt/#7Z9lfLYBky6TDlZG.99
42-year-old Saudi princess, Mechael Alayban, held on a $5 million bond after her arrest in July for accusations of human trafficking, was released when a judge dismissed the case. A Kenyan woman accused Alayban of confiscating her passport and paying her $220 a month for service 16 hours a day, 7 days a week. Authorities arrest Alayban after the Kenyan escaped from the apartment and flagged down a bus driver. The Kenyan woman claimed that the princess held her as a prisoner in Alayban’s apartment in suburban Irvine, California.
Alayban is the wife of of Saudi Prince Abdul’Rahman bin Nasser bin `Abdul`Aziz al Sa`ud, the grandson of King `Abd’ullah of Sa`udi `Arabia. The prince is also listed as Forbes’ seventh most powerful person. Being that slavery is sanctioned under Islam and is common especially with royal families, the Saudi consulate provided in July and Alayban was ordered to wear an electronic monitoring device. This was the first case prosecuted in Orange County under California’s Proposition 35.
When police searched the California residence, they discovered 4 more women from the Philippines who were held captive as slaves. Alayban responded that it wasn’t so bad for the women because she allowed them to use her pool and Facebook, and argued that this wasn’t slavery since she paid them.
Defense lawyer Paul Meyer released a statement saying, “These women had cell phones, Internet, Facebook, and the family even bought cable in their native language for them,” to argue that the women couldn’t be considered slaves since they were treated so well. “They enjoyed full use of the spa, gym and pool, and were often dropped off to shop alone at neighborhood malls, all paid for by the family,” Meyer added.
After Friday’s hearing, District Attorney Rackauckas said, regarding the Kenyan woman, “I think she believed she was a victim. I don’t think she was lying to us. I think it was a misunderstanding and miscommunication,”.
by Chip woodmongers
You’ve heard the story that Nero fiddled while Rome burned. I guess the modern equivalent is playing poker on your smartphone while debating going to war.
That’s what Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.), the top hawk on the Republican side of the aisle, was caught doing three days ago, during a hearing by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. The Barack Obama Administration’s top guns were there to testify in favor of a resolution authorizing a military strike against Syria.
McCain later joked about his lapse: “As much as I like to always listen in rapt attention constantly with the remarks of my colleagues over a three-and-a-half-hour period, occasionally I get a little bored.”
Hey, who wouldn’t, after hearing Secretary of State John Kerry’s fumbling, bumbling testimony? Bet you’d also be desperate for any sort of distraction if you had to sit through several hours of mumbo-jumbo like the response Kerry gave to the question: “[A] prohibition for having American boots on the ground — is that something that the administration would accept as part of a resolution?”:
Mr. Chairman, it would be preferable not to, not because there is any intention or any plan or any desire whatsoever to have boots on the ground. And I think the president will give you every assurance in the world, as am I, as has the secretary of defense and the chairman. But in the event Syria imploded, for instance, or in the event there was a threat of a chemical weapons cache falling into the hands of al-Nusra or someone else and it was clearly in the interest of our allies and all of us, the British, the French and others, to prevent those weapons of mass destruction falling into the hands of the worst elements, I don’t want to take off the table an option that might or might not be available to a president of the United States to secure our country.
Kerry was accompanied by Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel and Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The trio had trudged up to Capitol Hill to seek support for a resolution authorizing military action in Syria. Kerry almost blew it when he suggested that the resolution shouldn’t rule out the deployment of U.S. troops. He was forced to “clarify” his remarks:
Well, let me be very clear now because I don’t want anything coming out of this hearing that leaves any door open to any possibility. So let’s shut that door now as tight as we can. All I did was raise a hypothetical question about some possibility — and I’m thinking out loud — about how to protect America’s interests. But if you want to know whether there’s any — you know, the answer is, whatever prohibition clarifies it to Congress and the American people, there will not be American boots on the ground with respect to the civil war.
Kerry was also asked if all the various intelligence agencies came to the same conclusion: that Syria had used chemical weapons against its own citizens. He replied: “To my knowledge, I have no knowledge of any agency that was a dissenter or anybody who had, you know, an alternative theory.” No wonder McCain would rather play poker!
Meanwhile, Kerry’s boss was in Stockholm, Sweden, en route to a G-20 meeting in St. Petersburg, Russia. Obama tried to deny that he was the one who drew a “red line” regarding the use of chemical weapons. The present confrontation isn’t his fault, he insisted; it’s “the world’s” fault.
First of all, I didn’t set a red line. The world set a red line. The world set a red line when governments representing 98% of the world’s population said the use of chemical weapons are [sic] abhorrent and passed a treaty forbidding their use, even when countries are engaged in war.
Of course, that’s not what the President said last year, as The Wall Street Journal pointed out. On Aug. 20, 2012, he issued the following warning:
We have been very clear to the Assad regime, but also to other players on the ground, that a red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized. That would change my calculus. That would change my equation.
Oh, and if you won’t agree that the whole mess is the world’s fault, Obama had some other culprits to blame: You, me and his favorite whipping boy, Congress.
The President actually declared: “My credibility is not on the line. The international community’s credibility is on the line.” And he added, “America and Congress’s credibility is on the line, because we give lip-service to the notion that these international norms are important.”
McCain had already declared his fervent support for letting the missiles fly.
Now that a resolution is going to be before the Congress of the United States, we want to work to make that resolution something that majorities of the members of both houses could support. A rejection of that, a vote against the resolution by Congress, I think would be catastrophic, because it would undermine the credibility of the United States of America and of the President of the United States. None of us want that.
Wrong again, Senator! Even after weeks of hearing about the Syrian president’s “crime against humanity” for using chemical weapons against his own citizens, 50 percent of Americans still oppose taking military action against Syria. That’s according to the latest NBC News poll, which found that only 42 percent of Americans support a military response.
Nevertheless, at the end of the hearing, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee approved a resolution authorizing the President to use limited military force against Syria. No boots on the ground, you understand. No forcing Bashar Assad out of office. No, all we’re going to do is to “degrade” Assad’s ability to wage war on his own citizens.
No doubt, a majority of Democrats will meekly agree to give the President the war-making power he wants — even though many of them screamed to high heaven when Obama’s predecessor in the Oval Office sought Congressional approval for waging war against Saddam Hussein. Does anyone remember that Joe Biden and Obama were among the most fervent in their opposition? Biden even threatened to lead impeachment efforts against George W. Bush over the issue. But that was then and this now.
McCain’s shilling for the war resolution probably won’t affect the outcome in the Senate, where the Democratic majority will carry the day. If the measure is going to be defeated, it will have to happen in the House.
Sadly, the Republican leadership there is already on record as supporting military intervention in Syria. House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said: “I’m going to support the president’s call for action. I believe that my colleagues should support this call for action.”
And House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) said in a statement: “I intend to vote to provide the President of the United States the option to use military force in Syria.”
We’ll find out next week if enough members of Congress will say “no” to taking military action against Syria. Do you know how your Representative will vote? Now would be a very good time to find out. And let him know how you feel.
Until next time, keep some powder dry.
Although now, the march has undergone a public-relations makeover and the organizers, the American Muslim Political Action Committee (AMPAC), have changed its name to “Million American March Against Fear.”
Fear of what?
AMPAC claims,” Many non-Muslim Americans are terrified of Muslims, who are portrayed by Hollywood and the U.S. media as fanatical terrorists. Muslims, too, live in fear – of being dragged off in the night to Guantanamo and tortured, simply for the crime of being Muslim in the wrong place at the wrong time.”
What bothers James Neighbors, the founder of Overpasses for Obama’s Impeachment, is AMPAC is choosing to make its statement on the very day fanatical Muslim terrorists did indeed kill some 3,000 Americans, on Sept. 11, twelve years ago.
“They could’ve picked any other day of the year. There’s 364 other days of the year they could’ve picked, but the fact they chose 9/11 just simply apppears to be a slap in the face to America and an insult to every American who died in attacks on those days (in 2001 and 2012.)”
“We simply could not tolerate 9/11 being hijacked like that. It seems like a lot of people like to hijack things in this country, like Obama tries to hijack the word patriot for his progressives,” he added.
Overpasses had begun to organize it’s own march on Washington on Sept. 9, dedicated to bring attention to its primary mission, removing President Obama from office.
But founder James Neighbors changed plans and called for a nationwide protest in the streets and on overpasses on Sept. 11. specifically to oppose the Muslim march, after he learned of it.
They won’t be the only protesters, as WND reported a Facebook page has been created dedicated to bringing “2 Million Bikers to DC” to counter the Muslim march.
What Overpass protesters do is simple but effective. They merely gather on highway overpasses and wave signs calling for the impeachment of Obama or urging drivers to “honk to impeach.
WND first reported on the booming movement in July, and now the group claims it has mushroomed to 40,000 members across America to become “the largest grassroots movement in the nation” in the few weeks since it was launched in June.
The group’s national website has links to Facebook pages of groups in all 50 states, plus Washington, D.C.
WND asked Neighbors if he was concerned critics may try to brand his group as bigoted for opposing a Muslim march.
He said the group’s message has never been about race or religion and members avoid any inflammatory statements.
“We’ve had people who’ve wanted to carry signs saying things like ‘Obama is the anti-Christ’ and, well, that’s just not an impeachable offense.”
Visit WND’s online Impeachment Store to see all the products related to ousting Obama.
Neighbors says the main thing is just to stick to the issues because, “It doesn’t matter what race Barack Obama happens to be. What matters is if he’s performed criminal behavior and the precedent he has set for the future.”
He also notes, “As a movement we have no particluar issue with Islam, but the fact of the matter is 9/11 is the day, across America, people remember planes smashing into the World Trade Center, a planes smashing into the Pentagon, and men and women willing to give their lives in another plane, whose last words were ‘Let’s Roll’ before crashing into a field in Pennsylvania.”
Neighbors says, because the hijackers of those planes happened to be Muslim, it’s left a bad impression around the nation that Muslims chose this particular day for their march.
He says the fact four Americans were killed by Muslim terorists in attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya on Sept. 11 last year makes it even worse.
“I just think their complete lack of tact to have a protest on 9/11 needs to be countered by partiotic Americans that remember that’s a day of remembrance and sorrow and it shouldn’t be tainted.”
WND asked Neighbors, since Overpasses is combining issues on Sept. 11, what is the message he wants America to hear?
“We are combining them, but the impeachment message will be a bit muted on that day,” Neighbors replied.
“The people who died in Benghazi, U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, Glen Doherty, Ty Woods and Sean never really had a proper day of memorial,” said Neighbors, blaming all the news that followed, and all the “distractions created by Obama right after the event,” including the (since discredited) claim the attack was caused by a video insulting Islam.
Neighbors noted the nation has never really stopped to remember the four people who died in Benghazi, partially because “the entire incident has been buried under a mountain of scandals.”
“It’s one year late, but it is the one-year anniversary. Those four deserve a day where they’re respected and remebered, when people can cheer them as patriots and cry for their loss. That hasn’t happened yet and that’s what the whole point of our protest.”
Neighbors says, even if people don’t go out to a highway or an overpass to protest on Sept. 11, they can still participate in a significant way.
“If they happen to be up at midnight on that day, I just ask them to step out on the porc with a candle and say a little prayer for those lost in Benghazi. They haven’t been on everyone’s mind here in America and its a tragedy that hasn’t happened and our president has allowed that. And we need to do that. I would just ask everybody is they are not with us on that day, if they would do this on their own.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/look-whos-crashing-911-muslim-march/#XCiVGad37cF4dBsM.99