Categories
Archives
HELP US KEEP YOU BETTER INFORMED ABOUT THE TRICKS OF THE RADICAL PROGRESSIVE REVOLUTION PLEASE DONATE ANY AMOUNT YOU CAN
target="_top">

Archive for the ‘Barry The Communist’ Category

ISIS vs. ISIL: Why Obama stands Alone

What’s behind the choice of name of Mideast terror group?

WASHINGTON – President Obama may have had a difficult time formulating a strategy to deal with the ISIS crisis, yet he alone has been almost obsessively resolute in referring to the group as “ISIL.”

In some of Obama’s briefings on ISIS, he has gone so far as to spell out ISIL.

Puzzling to reporters and pundits, the use of ISIL by Obama has prompted a bevy of theories.

ISIS was the original name of the al-Qaida offshoot. It’s an acronym that stands for Islamic State in Syria and Iraq. But, months ago, ISIS changed its name to ISIL – the Islamic State in the Levant. More recently, ISIS chose to be known simply as Islamic State.

Most news organizations, pundits and policymakers chose to stick with ISIS, perhaps to discourage the ISIS shell game of frequent name changes. Obama, though, has stuck with ISIL.

His determination took on almost comical tones in an interview with NBC’s “Meet the Press” host Chuck Todd that aired Sunday.

Obama: “I’m preparing the country to make sure that we deal with a threat from ISIL.”

Todd: “Obviously, if you’re going to defeat ISIS, you have used very much stronger language.”

It’s the under-reported story of the decade! Film exposes 35 jihad training camps in U.S.

So confusing was the discussion, it forced Todd to clarify for viewers: “Obviously we refer to it at NBC News as ISIS. The Obama administration, president, says the word ISIL. The last S stands for Syria, the last L they don’t want to have stand for Syria.”

Todd apparently was suggesting the Obama administration would like Americans not to associate ISIS with Syria.

Capitol Hill Democrats decided earlier this week to go with ISIL – but for multicultural reasons. Isis was the name of a deity popular among feminists, many of whom named their daughters after her. It seems Isis Martinez, a woman in Miami, has been gathering signatures on a petition to the media to use ISIL.

Fox News’ Harris Faulkner suggests Obama is “tipping his hat” to ISIS by calling it ISIL.
levant

“Levant is a bigger territory,” she said. “That’s why they want to embrace that name, and it includes many, many more countries than just Syria.”

Indeed it does. And one of those countries is Israel, as former Rep. Allen West points out.

“First, if you choose to refer to this group as ISIL, you have basically rewritten the map of the Middle East and fallen into the trap of not recognizing the existence of Israel and also Lebanon,” West wrote on his blog. “If you use ISIL, you are then validating the Islamic totalitarian and jihadist claim that the modern-day Jewish state of Israel is an occupation state and does not exist in the eyes of Muslims.”

What do YOU think? Does Obama have answers for ISIS? Sound off in today’s WND poll!

The idea that Obama is disrespecting Israel by adopting the name ISIL has been popular. Indeed, the use of the term Levant by Islamic militants in the past has been motivated precisely by their ambitions for taking over the Jewish state.

Donald Trump added to the mystery recently when he said there is “a reason” Obama uses ISIL, but he declined to elaborate.

RoseAnn Salantiri, a contributing writer to the conservative commentary site TPATH, had an even more mysterious theory.

“The territory known as the Assyrian Empire seemed to disappear off the pages of history,” she wrote. “It did not. It divided into the nations we now know as Syria, southern Turkey, Iran and Iraq – the nations we now call ISIS – not ISIL. The distinction is an important one.”

The southern Levant also included today’s nations of Israel and Jordan along with the Gaza Strip and the southern part of Lebanon.

That’s significant, she says, when interpreted through the lens of bestselling author Jonathan Cahn, whose book, “The Harbinger,” and a documentary movie treatment called “The Isaiah 9:10 Judgment,” found striking parallels between ancient Israel’s judgment at the hands of Assyria and what the U.S. has been facing since Sept. 11.

“As stunning as these comparisons may be, when Cahn wrote the book, ISIS had not made its way into the public’s eye,” she writes. “If it had, chances are his book would have been a great deal longer.”

While Cahn’s book drew parallels between the Assyrians and the Sept. 11 hijackers, it seems America in 2014 finds itself essentially at war with the old Assyrian Empire – at least in the eyes of Obama, who refers to the enemy as ISIL.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/09/isis-v-isil-why-obama-stands-alone/#mx6rPwZmqik8AF6C.99

MEET TRAVIS MORALES, ANOTHER COMMUNIST REVOLUTIONARY AGITATING IN #FERGUSON

As I wrote before, out of town radicals are flocking to Ferguson, Missouri to do nothing but create chaos and violence which they hope will further the downfall of capitalism worldwide. One of the agitators is Gregory “Joey” Johnson.

Now meet one of his partners in crime: Travis Morales, a communist and proud of it.

Travis
Here he argues with local Ferguson protestors:

gonna hurt our kids.” Morales shouts, “No, they’re hurting our kids. They’re hurting our kids, everyday.” “They” being the Ferguson police, or as Morales would call them, “the oppressive pigs doing the bidding of their capitalist overlords” or something similar. Here’s an action shot of Morales, meeting with said “pigs.”

BvZyTQkCMAE2Yr9
This photo shows Revolutionary Communist Party operative Travis Morales in #Ferguson .An instigator who wants anarchy

Putin is ready……

Putin-Strat-NRD-600-wLogo

Obama Administration Cuts Military – Army Major Writes Open Letter Condemning System

by Onan CocaMajor

The Honorable Col. Allen West recently published a letter that first appeared at Foreignpolicy.com, from Army Major Charles V. Slider. Major Slider had a wonderful and well-regarded career but is now being released from duty for a DUI that took place in 2006. While a misfortunate choice to make, if the offense were worth firing him over, shouldn’t the penalty have come down in 2006?

Why is this happening now?

President Obama has decided that we don’t need so many soldiers anymore and some of them must be let go. In his letter, Major Slider argues that the method being used by the military to decide who goes and who stays is flawed and must be changed. He argues that the military should be studying the soldier’s entire body of work… not just searching for one or two failures.

Here is Major Slider’s open letter:

major sliderMy name is Major Charles V. Slider III and I am currently stationed at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. I am an African-American armor officer, proud father, and husband and graduate of Lincoln University in Jefferson City, Missouri. I was selected for the recently convened Officer Separation Boards for the Department of the Army for a mistake over eight years ago. The mistake was a DUI in which I received a General Officer Memorandum for Record in 2006. Since this incident, I strived for excellence in every job that I performed.

I trained soldiers for deployments to Iraq as part of the surge into theater from 2006-2008. From 2008-2011, I attended and completed Ranger School, Air Assault School and earned the Expert Infantryman Badge. I commanded troops in combat in Afghanistan where I earned the Bronze Star Medal, Army Commendation Medal for Valor, and the Purple Heart for actions against a determined enemy in RC East. After the deployment, I was selected as the executive officer for the deputy commander for the Combined Arms Center of Training at Fort Leavenworth serving in the capacity as the daily assistant for a general officer. The following year I was selected among a field of majors to attend the Commanding General and Staff Officer College at Fort Leavenworth, as well as the school of advanced military studies. Both prestigious institutes serve as the educational nexus for field-grade officers. Upon graduating from SAMS in May 2014, I was notified that I would not receive an assignment due to being assessed as high risk the GOMAR in my restricted file.

On August 1, I was notified of my removal from active duty service. Although I accept this fate, this is not justifiable due to the sacrifices that both my family and I have endured. 

As a resident ILE/SAMS graduate, my interpretation of this entire process is that it involved no critical thinking about the types of officers maintained in the current military structure. In certain cases, specific skills, attributes, and character traits are required in order to provide a balance of the warrior scholar. To this end the board process chose individuals for elimination that met all of the requirements, but possessed one black mark.

obama marine umbrellaInstead of using judgment and common sense in determining the number of officers required for service, an arbitrary number was provided. This created a system in which officers were selected based on a mistake rather than their overall contribution to the Army. One lapse in judgment does not constitute a pattern of misconduct, nor a judgment of overall character. These types of decisions knee-jerk reactions within the Army have the potential to erode trust within the lower ranks.

As an officer, I believe that we should be judged on our body of work, not one isolated incident. Furthermore, this act to remove me from service serves as a blunt example of how stoic and regimented the board process is as a system. As a Purple Heart recipient and proud member of the service, my family and I have given the Army our never-ending faith and commitment. However, the Army has seen it fit to remove my services as an officer from its ranks. Although the details of the board instructions will remain hidden, this also serves as ironclad proof that these awards are merely a method to provide credibility to a force that has integrity issues and morally barren for true sacrifices.

This letter is an attempt to highlight the issues residing within an unfair system and to provide context to others within the system. As a combat veteran of two theaters, Iraq and Afghanistan, I do not expect to be treated differently or to receive any sort of pat on the back. However, my actions after 2006 prove my family’s enduring faith to an ever-evolving conflict and requirements to serve. I have served this great nation with distinction and honor and deserve a valid explanation of why its leaders choose to remove my services from the American people. I accomplished every mission presented to and went above and beyond what is expected of an Army officer. I hope that this letter finds you in good faith.

Very respectfully,
MAJ Charles V. Slider

Read more at http://eaglerising.com/7900/obama-administration-cuts-military-army-major-writes-open-letter-condemning-system/#Fw7KqQTaSbQrPGrz.99

Obama Has Left USA Defense “Dangerously Underfunded”

by Bruce Carrol
A new bi-partisan report by the National Defense Panel has concluded that the Obama administration’s four-year defense strategy lacks necessary funding to meet the global military missions and the U.S. military faces “high risk” across the world.

The report by the National Defense Panel, led by former Defense Secretary William Perry and retired United States Army Gen. John Abizaid, criticized the Pentagon’s Quadrennial Defense Review for outlining military responsibilities that cannot be met because of sharp defense funding cuts.

The report concluded that the capabilities called for in the QDR “clearly exceed the budget resources made available to the department.”

“This gap is disturbing if not dangerous in light of the fact that global threats and challenges are rising, including a troubling pattern of territorial assertiveness and regional intimidation on China’s part, [and] the recent aggression of Russia in Ukraine.”

Other threats include nuclear proliferation by North Korea and Iran, the ultra-violent Islamist insurgency in Iraq and civil war in Syria, along with growing unrest throughout the Middle East and North Africa.

“These are among the trends that mandate increased defense funding,” the report said.

Other trends that require growing military capabilities include the rapid expansion of lethal military technologies by states and non-state groups and the rise of military powers in Asia, along with demographic shifts and heated competition for scarce natural resources.
The Washington Free Beacon notes that under President Obama’s administration, U.S. military spending was first cut by $487 billion over 10 years. Then automatic spending cuts imposed by the Budget Control Act followed which included another $37 billion cut and additional cuts of $75 billion for 2014 and 2015.

The spending cuts under President Obama come as the world has gotten significantly more dangerous with current hotspots across the Middle East, Eastern Europe, Africa and new aggressive behavior by China and North Korea.

Read more at http://shark-tank.com/2014/08/01/panel-obama-left-usa-defense-dangerously-underfunded/#2ui1qDHggFayQao5.99

Busted Obamacare Website Has Already Cost Taxpayers $840 Million

By Winton Hall

Health Market Place
A newly released Government Accountability Office (GAO) report reveals that the Obama administration’s disastrous management of the construction of the Obamacare website cost U.S. taxpayers $840 million.
That figure could climb even higher, as entire sections of the Obamacare website, such as those that submit insurance payments to insurers, have not even been built yet.
Chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, Rep. Fred Upton, blasted the Obama White House for what the GAO report describes as gross mismanagement and shoddy oversight of the Obamacare website rollout.
“The disastrous implementation of the president’s healthcare law has already led to canceled plans, lost access to doctors, and higher premiums,” said Upton. “Now add to that hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars wasted on an exchange that is still not ready for prime time.”
Specifically, the GAO reports that the Obama administration “undertook the development of HealthCare.gov and its related systems without effective planning or oversight practices, despite facing a number of challenges that increased both the level of risk and the need for effective oversight.” Moreover, the GAO warned that if the administration continued its path of mismanagement, “significant risks remain that upcoming open enrollment periods could encounter challenges.”
The nearly $1 billion the Obama White House blew on its busted Obamacare website pales in comparison to the overall cost of President Barack Obama’s unpopular health law. Indeed, over the next ten years, U.S. taxpayers will spend $2.6 trillion paying for Obamacare.
Obamacare remains deeply unpopular with voters. A new Kaiser Health poll finds that President Obama’s signature legislative achievement now receives its lowest approval ever, with just 37% of Americans supporting Obamacare.

Can The U.S. Go Bankrupt?

By bob LivingstonBankrupycy
When an individual goes bankrupt, he has spent more than his income. His debts and the interest on those debts exceed all the income he has to such a degree that they are beyond his ability to repay.
Most people believe that national governments go bankrupt because they spend too much or spend more than their income. This is what colleges and universities teach and propaganda media parrot. Furthermore, when governments “overspend,” they call it “deficit spending.” But there is no such thing as national bankruptcy as the word “bankruptcy” implies or as it applies to the individual.
There are certain key words and phrases cleverly put into use to conceal the source of government finance: Federal budget, government spending, government deficit and Federal income tax. Believe it or not, none of these terms relates to government finance. But they do cover government fraud on an unbelievable scale.
The terms Federal budget, government spending and government deficit are meaningless when the Federal government and the central bank (Federal Reserve) create money in the form of paper and numbers called credit, in unlimited amounts. The government does not want public knowledge of its monetary trickery. This is why universities teach “accounting” and “finance.”
A simple axiom: To go broke or bankrupt in the national government sense implies that there is a finite or limited supply of money available to national governments. But money does not exist, and no one has ever proven that it does. People think that paper “dollars” are money. In truth, no one has ever seen a dollar. A dollar is not a thing. It is a unit of measurement the same as the terms quart or ton.
Don’t believe me? Will you believe the Federal Reserve’s own publications from the 1970s?
“Today, most coin and currency is ‘fiat’ money — money by virtue of government declaration and public acceptance. Fiat money isn’t valuable in itself and doesn’t represent a claim on gold or silver. Fiat money is acceptable because people know money’s true value is its purchasing power — its ability to buy goods and services.” — The Story Of Money, p. 19, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
“Coin and currency are ‘Legal Tender,’ money the Government says has to be accepted if offered to settle a debt. But that approval doesn’t make cash any more ‘real’ than checkbook balances.” — I Bet You Thought… p. 7, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
“Neither paper currency nor deposits have value as commodities. Intrinsically, a dollar bill is just a piece of paper. Deposits are merely book entries. Coins do have some intrinsic value as metal, but far less than their face amount… What, then, makes these instruments — checks, paper money, and coins — acceptable at face value in payment of all debts and for other monetary uses? Mainly, it is the confidence people have that they will be able to exchange such money for real goods and services whenever they choose to do so.” — Modern Money Mechanics, p. 3, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
“Currency backing isn’t relevant in today’s economy. Currency cannot be ‘redeemed,’ or exchanged, for Treasury gold or any other asset used as backing. The question of just what assets ‘back’ Federal Reserve notes has little but bookkeeping significance.” – I Bet You Thought…, p. 11, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
“Commercial banks are important financial institutions because they can create money — checkbook money. When we borrow $200 at a local bank to buy a washing machine, we sign an I.O.U. and the banker writes a slip for a $200 addition to our checking account. No one has any less money on deposit, but we have more. The banker has bought our I.O.U. with new demand deposits -­ checkbook money -­ which were created. Bank credit and checkbook money have both increased $200.” — Money and Economic Balance, p. 177, Federal Reserve of New York
The method of money creation is witchcraft. It has been witchcraft for thousands of years. Modern economists and sophisticated eggheads only imagine that they understand money.
Yet nothing that affects our lives could be so all-important. Money is not a dull subject, because the study of money is a study of tyranny. It makes a mockery out of human freedom, property ownership and the accumulation of wealth.
Once we understand money, we then know that any imagined personal freedom that we have is a license or privilege given by the government which can be taken away by the government. The purpose of money is to transfer wealth from the producers to the nonproducer money creators.
John Maynard Keynes revealed a lot in his book, Consequences of the Peace, published in 1919. He stated, “If governments should refrain from regulation (taxation), the worthlessness of the money becomes apparent and the fraud upon the people can be concealed no longer.”
Keynes said in this statement that the system of income tax covers the fraud of the government printing press. What does this mean? It means that the government and its partner the Federal Reserve is printing money (creating credit) out of nothing and paying it into circulation for whatever the government wants, whether it be a fleet of ships or an army or to keep the people fat and happy. To cover the fraud of massive confiscation of wealth with printing press money, we have an income tax system.
The income tax system has a very serious purpose, but contrary to what Americans think the income tax has absolutely nothing to do with funding the government. The income tax is a consumption tax. The income tax regulates consumption. Note Keynes’ word “regulation” above. The income tax system penalizes those who are successful. It is a social and economic leveling system.
The income tax also is used to take as much “money” out of circulation as possible. The more “money” taken out through the income tax, the more the money creators can create. The less “money” there is, the better it keeps its imagined value.
“Too much money results in excess spending. When consumers, businesses and governments spend excessively, they compete for the available supply of goods and services and force prices up. When prices rise, the purchasing power of money falls. To keep purchasing power strong, then, the supply of money must not increase too rapidly.” — I Bet You Thought…, p. 111, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
The Federal government funds itself with “printing press money.” The income tax does not fund the Federal government. Almost nobody knows this, but it is extremely important to understand. The power to create money is the source of government force and bureaucratic tyranny in our lives.
What does all this mean to us? It means that we live under an authoritarian system and we are at its mercy. The Federal government has monopoly power to create money (credit or debt) backed by force. And it disguises this system from the people with the income tax system explained above. Simply stated, corporate government is transferring unbelievable and unimaginable wealth to itself with “money” that it creates and which costs nothing. Does this not make “organized crime” look like Sunday school?
This is how and why world wars are financed that cost millions of young lives. This is how social and economic policy is forged into so-called public policy, a euphemism for government social engineering and government force.
“Public policy” is government force in our lives based on monopoly power to create “money.”
So can governments experience economic collapse? Yes, but no one is aware of how it comes about. That’s because it is not a bankruptcy as is generally understood.
Here’s how it happens: The process of government “money” creation is a concealed scheme of consuming (stealing) the national wealth. In effect, the government creates its own wealth — not from taxes, but by creating “money” and using it to fund the government and to transfer wealth from the people to itself. The simple equation is that when governments consume all the national wealth of the people, then the government collapses.
Governments produce nothing, so governments must live off of the producers. It is the nature of governments to grow bigger and bigger and consume more and more of the national wealth. Do you see this happening?
At some point, government overconsumes the national wealth and collapses. Government finally consumes more than the people can produce.
So then, modern bankruptcy of national governments is not overspending. It is overconsumption of the national wealth.

BLACKS ON BARACK: ‘Worst President Ever, He Chose Illegals Over Americans’


These Chicago residents put Obama on blast for choosing to pour millions of dollars into helping illegal aliens instead of the communities with high levels of violence and crime in the United States.

Via YouTube:

This video is about Chicago residents fed up with President Obama ignoring the black community and placing favor on illegal aliens at the southern border. One resident said, “Barack will go down as the worst president ever.

Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2014/07/blacks-barack-worst-president-ever-chose-illegals-americans/#wkDoFJYRQM00tLO8.99

YES THE PROGRESSIVES HAVE TRANSFORMED US

Transformed

TIME TO WAKE UP AND FIGHT

RULES FOR RADICALS

Paul David Alinsky (January 30, 1909 – June 12, 1972) was an American community organizer and writer. He is generally considered to be the founder of modern community organizing. He is often noted for his book

Rules for Radicals.

There are 8 levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a socialist/communist state. The first is the most important.

1) Healthcare “Control healthcare and you control the people”

2) Poverty “Increase the Poverty level as high as possible.” Poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.

3) Debt “Increase the national debt to an unsustainable level.” That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.

4) Gun Control “Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government.” That way you are able to create a police state – total local control.

5) Welfare “Take control of every aspect of their lives” (Food, Livestock, Housing, and Income)

6) Education “Take control of what people read and listen to take control of what children learn in school.”

7) Religion “Remove faith in God from the Government and school.”

8) Class Warfare “Divide the people into the wealthy against the poor. Racially divide.” This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to Tax the wealthy with full support of the voting poor.

The bases are all covered! We are ripe for the New world Order

HELP US KEEP YOU BETTER INFORMED ABOUT THE TRICKS OF THE RADICAL PROGRESSIVE REVOLUTION PLEASE DONATE ANY AMOUNT YOU CAN