Categories
Archives
HELP US KEEP YOU BETTER INFORMED ABOUT THE TRICKS OF THE RADICAL PROGRESSIVE REVOLUTION PLEASE DONATE ANY AMOUNT YOU CAN
target="_top">

Archive for the ‘Barry the Liar’ Category

We Caught Him! Obama Busted Using Tax Dollars To Pay Off Top Supporter

Washington, D.C. firm GMMB got special treatment after former President Obama took office back in 2008.

GMMB was the strategy and muscle behind Obama and Hillary Clinton’s media campaigns. and also the 2012 and 2016 Democratic National Conventions. Obama paid GMMB close to $700 million in tv buys over the course of his eight year presidency to boot.

“The overwhelming majority of the $58 million funneled to GMMB came from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) created by Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren in 2011. The CFPB awarded the agency a whopping $43.7 million, about 75 percent of GMMB’s total federal funding stream.

The second-most lucrative government account for GMMB is a community service agency founded by Bill Clinton, the Corporation for National and Community Service, which awarded GMMB $13.1 million worth of contracts. Other agencies that awarded contracts to GMMB include the Department of Homeland Security ($1.6 million) and the Department of the Interior ($24,000).

The CFPB’s outsized role in payments to GMMB may fuel new controversy about the embattled bureau, which Warren came up with when she worked as an Obama appointee in the Department of the Treasury.”

This just proves once more that Obama was sneaky and lied to the American people.

“The optics are extremely ugly when you have a major Democratic insider receiving a massive amount of taxpayer money,” Phil Kerpen, president of American Commitment, a conservative political activist group, told TheDCNF. “I think any time a political consultant is getting paid on the political side and with our tax dollars, that deserve an enormous amount of scrutiny.”

President Trump is constantly cleaning up the mess Obama left behind and this is just another prime example.

The Obama Era is Over

by DANIEL GREENFIELD, ISRAEL NEWS November 10, 2016


Obama and his supporters loved talking about history. His victory was historic. They were on the right side of history. History was an inevitable arc that bent their way.

The tidal force of demographics had made the old America irrelevant. Any progressive policy agenda was now possible because we were no longer America. We Were Obamerica. A hip, happening place full of smiling gay couples, Muslim women in hijabs and transgender actors. We were all going to live in a New York City coffee house, work at Green Jobs and live in the post-national future.

The past was gone. We were falling into the gorgeous wonderful future of dot com instant deliveries and outsourced everything. We would become more tolerant and guilty. The future was Amazon and Disney. It was hot and cold running social justice. The Bill of Rights was done. Ending the First and Second Amendments was just a clever campaign away. Narratives on news sites drove everything.

Presidents were elected by Saturday Night Live skits.
John Oliver, John Stewart, Stephen Colbert and Samantha Bee were our journalists. Safe spaces were everywhere and you better watch your micro-aggressions, buddy. No more coal would be mined. No more anything would be made.

The end of men was here. The end of the dead white men of the literary canon. The end of white people. The end of binary gender and marriage. The end of reason. The end of art. The end of 2 + 2 equaling 4. This was Common Core time. It was time to pardon an endless line of drug dealers. To kill cops and praise criminals. To be forced to buy worthless health insurance for wealth redistribution to those who voted their way to wealth.

This was Obama’s America. And there was no going back. We were rushing through endless goal posts of social transformation. The military fell. Then the police. Now it looks as quaint as anything from the 50s, the 70s or the 80s. A brief moment of foolishness that already appears odd and awkward. And then one day nostalgic. It wasn’t the future. It’s already the past. It’s history.

Scalia died. Hillary Clinton was bound to win. And she would define the Supreme Court. Down-ticket races would give her a friendly Senate. And then perhaps even the House.

But there is no right side of history. There is only the side we choose. The Obama era was permanent. It was history.

Now it is history.

It‘s shocking ascendancy has been paired with an equally shocking descent. The Obama era is done. It’s gone. It’s over. It was wiped from the pages of history in one night that left Congress and the White House in Republican hands.

It would have been bad enough if Jeb Bush had succeeded Obama. That would have been inconvenient, but not a repudiation. Instead Obama’s legacy was dashed to pieces. His frantic efforts to campaign for Hillary did no good. The public did not vocally reject him. What they did was even worse. They brushed past him. They sidelined him. They gave him passable approval ratings while dismissing his biggest accomplishments. They forgot him. They made it clear that he did not matter.

And that is in its own way far more brutal and wounding. They didn’t just destroy the Obama era. Instead they dismissed it as if it never existed.

Obama didn’t make history after all. He wasn’t a teleprompter demi-god standing athwart of history. He was Carter and Ford. He was there to be forgotten. He didn’t change the world. He wasn’t the messiah. He was merely mortal. Just another politician who will sag and age. Who will, in the end, be photographed like Bill Clinton, lonely and lost in a world that has passed him by.

The Obama era ends not with a bang, but with a whimper. With a national consensus that maybe he didn’t really matter so much after all. And those to whom he mattered the most were his enemies determined to undo everything he did.

Obama once thought that he belonged to the ages. Now he belongs in the rubbish bin.

The Obama era (error) is Over…………..thank God.

Employment: Barack Obama’s Greatest Myth

a-obama-employment-1024x576
Americans are well accustomed to the mass media covering for Democrats, but it is only in the last eight years that we’ve seen our nation’s journalists propagate White House lies with such utter disdain for the truth. President Barack Obama has been lying about the economy – and more specifically, unemployment – for years, and outlets like the New York Times, the Washington Post, NBC, and, well, every other left-of-center news organization have trumpeted his lies to the detriment of the American people.

So desperate are these “reporters” to beat back Republican criticism that they latch on to whatever numbers and figures they can to make the president’s job record look better than it really is. They do it with impunity, knowing that the economy is too complex for the average reader to find holes in their coverage. And they know that they are otherwise in the clear, since no mainstream media outlet other than Fox News will dare challenge their biased reporting.

Occasionally, of course, they will acknowledge that things aren’t quite as rosy as Obama would have us believe. In the Chicago Tribune this week, for instance, there was a short report about underemployment:

Nearly half of U.S. workers consider themselves underemployed, according to a survey of more than 960,000 people by PayScale, an online provider of salary information.
Three-quarters of those who label themselves as such say they’re not working in a job that uses their education and training. One quarter say they are working part time but want full-time work.

Now, if we had a Republican president who was crowing about bringing America back from the worst recession since the Great Depression, how much of this story would be dedicated to poking holes in those claims? Roughly…the entire thing?

But in the Tribune’s story, Obama’s name doesn’t come up once. Instead, they skip the part of the story where we might reasonably expect to find answers. They vaguely blame the underemployment on business owners who are hesitant to offer full-time positions after surviving the recession and encourage job-seekers to look for part-time work they can use to springboard into a better career. And that’s about it.

Obama’s approval numbers are startlingly high in 2016, partly because the majority of Americans believe that he led the country to a full economic recovery. The White House proudly boasts of a 4.9% unemployment rate, the media gleefully echoes this number, and it is left to conservative media to tell the truth: That the labor force participation rate is at its lowest point since 1978. If that rate had remained steady since Obama took office, his official unemployment rate would be a staggering 8.7%. That’s the real number. That’s Obama’s legacy.

Or it would be, if anyone in the liberal media had the integrity to report it.

AND THEY WONDER WHY WE ARE, ANGRY

769398

“A boy named Harold”

This pretty much summarizes how Obama and most
liberals view the US military.

Harold was a bright child. He grew up in
America. He went to school and had a bright future ahead of
him.

Harold was full of life but was cut short in a
violent moment. While few people had ever heard of Harold
before his death,
many did afterward. And in death,something very shocking
happened. What was so shocking, especially when it is
compared to the death of someone else recently in the
news?

Harold was Harold Greene, Major General, United
States Army.

On Aug. 5, 2014, Major General Greene was
killed by a Taliban terrorist. He was returned to America
with full military
honors.

It has been a tradition that the president
attends the funeral of general and flag officers killed in
the line of duty.

Richard Nixon attended the funeral of a major
general killed in Vietnam and George W. Bush attended the
funeral of Lieutenant
General Timothy Maude, who was killed in the 9/11
attacks.

While Major General Greene was buried, Barack
Obama was golfing. The vice president wasn’t there
either. Neither was the
secretary of defense. Flags were not even lowered half
mast
Four days after Harold Greene gave his
life for America, Michael Brown was killed in
Ferguson, Missouri. Brown was at best a thug. In the
minutes before his death, he committed a robbery at a local
convenience store. According to other reports, Brown struck
Officer Darren Wilson and shattered his orbital
bone.

Obama sent a three-person delegation to
Brown’s funeral! Obama would not attend the
funeral of the highest ranking military officer killed in
the line of duty since 9/11, yet he sent a delegation to the
funeral of a thug.

When Margaret Thatcher, one of America’s
staunchest allies and Ronald Reagan’s partner
in bringing down Soviet communism,
died, Obama sent only a small low-level
delegation to her funeral.

The snub was not missed by the
British.

When Chris Kyle, the most lethal American
sniper in history was murdered, there was
no expression of sympathy from the White
House.

But when Whitney Houston died from drug
overdose, Obama ordered all flags be flown at
half mast.

There was no White House delegation at the
funeral of an American hero. American heroes
die and Obama goes to the golf course. A thug dies and he
gets a WhiteHouse delegation.

No wonder most “REAL” Americans hold
Obama in such contempt, especially members
of our Military.

And the only difference between Obama
and Hillary is that she doesn’t play golf.

Krauthammer Scoffs At Obama’s Idealism, Addresses Containment Strategy Towards China

President Obama’s speech at the Hiroshima Peace Memorial included common themes and references to the human condition, the depravity of man, the value of scientific achievement, coupled with the realities of war.

Obama referenced his own desire to see nuclear weapons eliminated but added he might not see that reality take place in his lifetime. He ended his speech with a call to humanity to embrace the ideal that we’re all members of one world family, and called for a moral awakening in his closing remarks.

But award-winning columnist and author Charles Krauthammer accuses the president of being a naïve idealist.
Krauthammer writes it’s important to know the differences between idealists and realists. “For realists, generally conservative, history is an endless cycle of clashing power politics.The same patterns repeat. Only the names and places change,” the author contends. “The best we can do in our own time is to defend ourselves, managing instability and avoiding catastrophe. But expect nothing permanent, no essential alteration in the course of human affairs.”

Krauthammer says by contrast, idealists “believe that the international system can eventually evolve out of its Hobbesian state of nature into something more humane and hopeful,” mainly through peace treaties and diplomacy, as Obama suggested in Hiroshima.

The columnist contends, “Barack Obama is a classic case study in foreign policy idealism. Indeed, one of his favorite quotations is about the arrow of history: ‘The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.’ He has spent nearly eight years trying to advance that arc of justice. Hence his initial ‘apology tour,’ that burst of confessional soul-searching abroad about America and its sins, from slavery to the loss of our moral compass after 9/11. Friday’s trip to Hiroshima completes the arc.”
But Krauthammer charges Obama with failed policies.

“Unfortunately, with ‘justice’ did not come peace,” he writes. “The policies that followed — appeasing Vladimir Putin, the Iranian mullahs, the butchers of Tiananmen Square and lately the Castros — have advanced neither justice nor peace. On the contrary. The consequent withdrawal of American power, that agent of injustice or at least arrogant overreach, has yielded nothing but geopolitical chaos and immense human suffering. (See Syria).”

The reality is the world is not a peaceful place. It never has been. And if history repeats itself, it never will be.

Thus, while Krauthammer is strongly critical of Obama’s idealism, citing its failures to create peace in the Middle East, he gives passing credit to Obama for deferring to realism for returning the U.S. military to the Philippines, ending the arms embargo with Vietnam (thereby partnering with Vietnam to help contain China), and cites the Trans-Pacific partnership as an economic cordon around China.
The Fox News contributor, award-winning journalist and author concluded Obama’s legacy will be two-fold. “He thus leaves a double legacy. His arc-of-justice aspirations, whatever their intention, leave behind tragic geopolitical and human wreckage. Yet this belated acquiescence to realpolitik, laying the foundations for a new containment, will be an essential asset in addressing this century’s coming central challenge, the rise of China,” he said, concluding China’s power will be hard to contain, much like cold-war Russia’s was nearly impossible to contain.

SURPRISE: OBAMA LIED AND DECEIVED PUBLIC ON IRAN DEAL

obama114

We had to wait years until we learned the truth about Obama’s deceptive campaign to implement the Affordable Healthcare Act, but the truth about the Iran deal is already here. Ben Rhodes, one of Obama’s top national security advisers, admitted to the New York Times magazine this week that the road to that deal was paved with lies and propaganda.

According to the profile, Rhodes used inexperienced journalists and ethically-challenged experts to craft a narrative favorable to the deal. Along the way, Americans were led to believe things that simply weren’t true.

For instance, the administration said that Iranian nuclear negotiations only started once the “moderate” Hassan Rouhani was elected in 2013. Rhodes now says that the basic framework for the deal was already in place by that time, having been worked out with Iran’s Islamic hardliners. The purpose of this ruse, of course, was to make it seem like the nuclear deal was opposed by those hardliners.

Rhodes said the deception went even further than that. “We had test-drives to know who was going to be able to carry our message effectively, and how to use outside groups like Ploughshares, the Iran Project and whomever else,” he said.

White House press secretary Josh Earnest responded to the claims on Friday. “I haven’t seen anybody produce any evidence that that’s the case,” he said. “I recognize there might be some people who are disappointed that they did not succeed in killing the Iran deal. Maybe these unfounded claims are the result of sour grapes.”

Hmm. Maybe.

But it’s much easier to believe that Obama used the same deceptive tactics here that he used on Obamacare. It’s much easier to believe that the reason that this nuclear deal makes no sense is that the American people have never been told the true story.

Now, Obama is hardly the first president to lie to us. It’s been done by Democrats and it’s been done by Republicans. All too often, we don’t find out until years later when no one really cares.

Obama deserves all the criticism and blame we can throw at him, but we should reserve the worst of our attacks on the media that carried his water. It’s one thing to paint your coverage with liberal bias; it’s another thing to completely abandon your journalistic responsibilities out of blind loyalty. No president should be above serious media scrutiny, regardless of his party affiliation. If this Iran deal goes sideways, it could have catastrophic ramifications for Israel, the Middle East, and the world at large. Americans deserved to know the truth, and the media failed to shine a light on it.
– See more at: http://patriotnewsdaily.com/surprise-obama-admin-deceived-public-on-iran-deal/#sthash.02rprFcn.dpuf

Latest Benghazi Bombshell Implicates White House in Benghazi Coverup!

benghazi-liars

by TIM BROWN
Newly obtained emails by Judicial Watch point way past the State Department’s twisting of the Benghazi talking points following the September 11, 2012 jihad attacks that left four Americans dead.

Judicial Watch reports:

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that on April 18, 2014, it obtained 41 new Benghazi-related State Department documents. They include a newly declassified email showing then-White House Deputy Strategic Communications Adviser Ben Rhodes and other Obama administration public relations officials attempting to orchestrate a campaign to “reinforce” President Obama and to portray the Benghazi consulate terrorist attack as being “rooted in an Internet video, and not a failure of policy.” Other documents show that State Department officials initially described the incident as an “attack” and a possible kidnap attempt.

The documents were released Friday as result of a June 21, 2013, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed against the Department of State (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-00951)) to gain access to documents about the controversial talking points used by then-UN Ambassador Susan Rice for a series of appearances on television Sunday news programs on September 16, 2012. Judicial Watch had been seeking these documents since October 18, 2012.

The Rhodes email was sent on sent on Friday, September 14, 2012, at 8:09 p.m. with the subject line: “RE: PREP CALL with Susan, Saturday at 4:00 pm ET.” The documents show that the “prep” was for Amb. Rice’s Sunday news show appearances to discuss the Benghazi attack.

The document lists as a “Goal”: “To underscore that these protests are rooted in and Internet video, and not a broader failure or policy.”

Rhodes returns to the “Internet video” scenario later in the email, the first point in a section labeled “Top-lines”:

[W]e’ve made our views on this video crystal clear. The United States government had nothing to do with it. We reject its message and its contents. We find it disgusting and reprehensible. But there is absolutely no justification at all for responding to this movie with violence. And we are working to make sure that people around the globe hear that message.

Among the top administration PR personnel who received the Rhodes memo were White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, Deputy Press Secretary Joshua Earnest, then-White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer, then-White House Deputy Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri, then-National Security Council Director of Communications Erin Pelton, Special Assistant to the Press Secretary Howli Ledbetter, and then-White House Senior Advisor and political strategist David Plouffe.

Benghazi4

However, in another email sent by former Deputy Spokesman at U.S. Mission to the United Nations Payton Knopf to Susan Rice on September 12, 2012, he wrote:

Responding to a question about whether it was an organized terror attack, Toria said that she couldn’t speak to the identity of the perpetrators but that it was clearly a complex attack.

In another email dated September 11, 2012, Senior Advisor Eric Pelofsky wrote to Susan Rice:

As reported, the Benghazi compound came under attack and it took a bit of time for the ‘Annex’ colleagues and Libyan February 17 brigade to secure it. One of our colleagues was killed – IMO Sean Smith. Amb Chris Stevens, who was visiting Benghazi this week is missing. U.S. and Libyan colleagues are looking for him…

Rice would later appear on five Sunday shows and knowingly lie to the American public. However, she was only one of many who lied. Both Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah and Hillary Clinton knowingly and willingly lied to the families of the victims and the American people about the attacks in Benghazi.

Clearly, Benghazi became a coverup and at the center of it was an orchestrated lie, which was centered on a video with ties to the company that created the Obamacare website and that was produced by a Muslim tied to the Obama Justice Department.

OBAMA INTRODUCES NEW EXECUTIVE ORDER… THIS SHOULD TERRIFY EVERY AMERICAN

By Teresa Monroe- Hamilton

President Barack Obama signs an executive order after speaking about jobs, energy independence, and climate change, Monday, Jan. 26, 2009, in the East Room of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

President Barack Obama signs an executive order after speaking about jobs, energy independence, and climate change, Monday, Jan. 26, 2009, in the East Room of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)


This is literally insane. Obama has signed an executive order mandating that all government jobs remove the box on applications that require someone to indicate whether they have been convicted for a criminal offense. Our government is now opening their arms and welcoming the criminal element into federal offices. This follows Obama releasing criminals from our prisons. Sen. Ted Cruz took a stand against a major crime bill before the Senate that set him apart from the politically powerful Koch brothers as well. According to Cliff Kincaid, Cruz stood strongly against the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act (S. 2123) on the grounds that the legislation, which will retroactively reduce the sentences of thousands of federal prison inmates, could lead to the release of violent criminals, some convicted of using weapons while engaged in other crimes. He said the Senate bill would release “illegal aliens with criminal convictions” when a “major crime wave” is already sweeping the nation. Cruz is now being targeted by the Koch brothers for standing against the legislation. Constitutional conservatives don’t want criminals released by these Marxists and they don’t want them in our federal government.

From the Conservative Tribune:

It has long been said by many, sometimes not in jest, that the various agencies and bureaucracies of the government are filled with criminals.
President Barack Obama’s extensive use of executive orders bears that out, but the one revealed by the White House Monday could make it literally true — and by design.
According to Breitbart, the order instructs all federal agencies to remove the box on their job applications where applicants would normally admit if they have a criminal history.
The move would purportedly shift any investigations of an applicant’s potential criminal history until later on in the screening process.
A White House fact sheet released along with the order stated, “While most agencies already have taken this step, this action will better ensure that applicants from all segments of society, including those with prior criminal histories, receive a fair opportunity to compete for Federal employment.”
Obama is set to detail this new executive order during an event in New Jersey with Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., and is expected to urge private businesses in America to do the same thing.
This move follows close on the heels of the recent announcement that Obama’s Justice Departmentis releasing early from prison thousands of drug offenders, as part of their criminal justice system reforms.
It also coincides with the announcement of the creation of an $8 million fund for education grants to assist former inmates with employment and job training.
President Obama has with the stroke of a pen made it easier for criminals to apply for and possibly receive a job in the government, which would typically seem utterly bizarre and unfathomable, but is really just par for the course with this administration.
Please share this on Facebook and Twitter to help spread the word that Obama doesn’t want criminals to have to admit their criminal history on job applications anymore, potentially placing American workers in jeopardy.
Background checks mean nothing under the Obama regime. The only thing that seems to disqualify you from working for the government is if you are a conservative, a constitutionalist and love your country. This is monstrous. Next, he will try and mandate that private businesses do this and that will be an extremely unconstitutional move. It will be sheer communism. America take note… everything bad, immoral, unethical and evil is being elevated under this president. Anything that is the opposite is being vilified and banned. What does that tell you? You’ve got Progressives from both sides of the political aisle pushing this. Even some of those that I considered conservative at one time are on board with this. It’s getting harder and harder to tell who is friend or foe out there. This will bring more crime, corruption and chaos into America and will speed up her demise. Just as planned.

CBO Projects 2 Million Fewer Jobs Under ObamaCare

Thee_RANT_LogoObamacare ObamaCare is expected to cost the U.S. workforce a total of 2 million jobs over the next decade, Congress’s nonpartisan scorekeeper said Monday.

The total workforce will shrink by just under 1 percent as a result of the new coverage expansions, mandates and changes in tax rates, according to a 22-page report released by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

“Some people would choose to work fewer hours; others would leave the labor force entirely or remain unemployed for longer than they otherwise would,” the agency said in its latest analysis of the now five-year-old law.

Republicans were quick to seize on the report, which provides new analysis of a previously mentioned figure.

“When the President’s health law hurts the labor force at the same time it increases healthcare premiums and taxes, it’s clear the law is not working for the American people,” said Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah.).

By Sarah Ferris – 12/07/15 05:01 PM EST
ObamaCare will force a reduction in American work hours — the equivalent of 2 million jobs over the next decade, Congress’s nonpartisan scorekeeper said Monday.

The total workforce will shrink by just under 1 percent as a result of changes in worker participation because of the new coverage expansions, mandates and changes in tax rates, according to a 22-page report released by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

“Some people would choose to work fewer hours; others would leave the labor force entirely or remain unemployed for longer than they otherwise would,” the agency said in its latest analysis of the now five-year-old law.
The CBO is not predicting that employers will fire millions of workers or reduce hours because of the law, but that the law changes incentives over the years for the workers themselves both in part-time and full-time positions.

That could mean that older Americans who wish to retire but have remained in the workforce solely for employer health benefits could opt to leave their jobs.

Republicans were quick to seize on the report, which provides an update through 2025.

Obama Quietly Releases Plans For 2,224 Regulations Ahead Of Thanksgiving

While millions of Americans prepare to stuff themselves with Turkey and pie, the Obama administration quietly released its plans for 2,224 federal rules Friday — a preview of just how many more regulations the president is attempting to issue before he leaves office.

President Barack Obama’s Unified Agenda for Fall 2015 is his administration’s regulatory road map and lays out thousands of regulations being finalized in the coming months. Obama has developed a habit of releasing the agenda late on Friday before a major holiday.
Indeed, Obama’s Spring 2015 agenda detailing the status of more than 2,300 regulations was released the eve of Memorial Day weekend. Obama’s Fall 2014 agenda featuring more than 3,400 regulations was also released the Friday before Thanksgiving.
While Obama’s latest release features fewer regulations than the last two, it shows the administration is determined to churn out as many rules as it can before the end of 2016. This includes major energy and environmental regulations coming down the pipe, like new rules for coal minesand rules banning common pesticides.
Obama has already put out several major environmental regulations this year, including limits on carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants, more federal control over U.S. waterways, new hydraulic fracturing regulations and stricter smog rules.
In the last week alone, the Obama administration imposed $1.8 billion in regulatory costs, according to a new report by the right-leaning American Action Forum (AAF). This brings the total cost of regulation in 2015 to a whopping $183 billion — about half from final rules and the other from proposed rules.

CFR_11_20_2015-620x357
Environmental Protection Agency’s new smog limits turned out to be some of the costliest ever proposed by a federal agency.
The EPA says tighter smog, or ground-level ozone, limits would only cost $1.4 billion and yield much more in health benefits from less pollution. But AAF found that the EPA’s smog rule could end up costing 40 times more than the agency predicted based on the experience of counties not in compliance with older agency smog rules.
“Observed nonattainment counties experienced losses of $56.5 billion in total wage earnings, $690 in pay per worker, and 242,000 jobs between 2008 and 2013,” according to AAF policy experts.

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/11/obama-quietly-releases-plans-for-2224-regulations-ahead-of-thanksgiving/#eHrphWKc180TtrKR.99

SEO Powered By SEOPressor