Categories
Archives
HELP US KEEP YOU BETTER INFORMED ABOUT THE TRICKS OF THE RADICAL PROGRESSIVE REVOLUTION PLEASE DONATE ANY AMOUNT YOU CAN
target="_top">

Archive for the ‘Democrat Party’ Category

Something Strange Happens When Democrats Leave Office

Something Strange Happens When Democrats Leave Office

[Note: This article was written by Derrick Wilburn (Derrick Wilburn is the Founder and Chairman of the Rocky Mountain Black Conservatives and BlackandConservative.com.

As they prepared for their exodus from the White House, the Obamas are joining another rarified club – that of the ruling liberal elite class owning multiple ultra-expensive homes in highly exclusive communities that none in America can afford save the one-percenters. The very same one-percenters whom they rant and rail against as being the greedy, ego-centric millionaires who simply have too much.

Following the likes of Bill and Hillary Clinton who, despite Hillary’s claim earlier this year that they left the White House dead broke, they somehow managed to educate their daughter at Stanford, Oxford, NYU and Columbia; acquire a $1.7 million estate in Chappaqua; and a $2.85 million mansion in Georgetown. And Bernie Sanders, who shortly after ending his 2016 presidential bid, bought his third home – a $600,000 lakefront vacation house on Lake Champlain. Barack and Michelle have grandiose real estate designs of their own.

Earlier this year it was revealed that, upon his leaving the presidency, the Obamas will not be returning to Chicago. They have, instead, moved into a $6 million, 8,200-square foot, 9-bedroom, 12-bathroom mansion in Kalorama, one of the District’s most posh, desirable and exclusive neighborhoods located in the heart of one of America’s wealthiest zip codes.
With daughter Malia off to college, that leaves just Barack, Michelle, and Sasha until the younger daughter graduates high school in 2018. Nothing says “I care about climate change, energy consumption, and our CO2 footprint” more than keeping an 8,200-square foot house heated and air conditioned year round for just three people. The hypocrisy and ‘do as I say, not as I do’ hubris of all these wealthy climate change proponents is sickening. By the way, the Obama’s new home is just two doors down from Clinton campaign manager, John Podesta, who recently lost the most significant campaign of his life.

But that’s not the new news. We have now learned Barack and Michelle are the proud owners of yet another home — this one on the Left Coast.

As reported by Page Six and other sources, the Obamas have a new home in Rancho Mirage, California. Rancho Mirage is a popular golf getaway, which would explain its attraction to the ex-golfer-in-chief. By some counts this makes the Obama’s fifth home. Also from PageSix, The Obamas are also said to have bought a holiday getaway in Obama’s childhood home state of Hawaii. Now… how many American families own five of anything, let alone houses? Let alone houses in Hawaii that they see once a year or so. Most of us are blessed if we’re able to rent a hotel room or condo on Hawaii once a decade.

The relocation habits of Democrats leaving office is very interesting. For example; having been voted out of office in 2014, Louisiana Senator Mary Landrieu didn’t return to Louisiana. She instead made her 7,300-square foot $2.5 million Washington DC mansion her new home. Rather than returning to Little Rock, when Bill and Hill left the White House, they chose the liberal, ultra-wealthy haven of Chappaqua, New York, with its average household income of $285,801 and average household net worth of $1,564,366 for their new residence.

Now it’s the Obama’s turn. Would they go back to Chicago to live amongst the ‘little people’, and take their chances becoming yet another statistic (total number shot as of this writing this year: 3,961)? No, not so much.

They, like the others, have moved into a private, secured community to live in a protective high-walled house, big enough for five families, where they will host cocktail parties for golf buddies and other millionaire and billionaire friends.

Yet like the Sanders, Landrieus and Clintons of the world, they will accept exorbitant five-, six-, even seven-figure speaking fees to give speeches about how the rich in our country are steadily pulling away from everyone else and increasingly isolating themselves. About how the concentration of wealth at the top is allowing some Americans to own multiple houses, vacation when and as they please, and live lives most of the rest of the country cannot fathom. They’ll blather on and on about how the rich are a big part of the problems in our country.

They will, in part, be right.

Hypocrisy !

Democratic navel gazing

 

Democratic navel gazing
by Bob Livingston :

Politicians are not real people. But they rarely go so far as to admit it.

Not so Democrat politicians who this week are at least admitting they not only are not real people, they don’t even understand them. So they are gearing up for the 2018 midterm elections by holding a series of meetings taking lessons on how to talk to real people who voted for Donald Trump, as reported by Politico.

Among the topics covered were “Speaking to those who feel invisible in rural America,” “Listening to those who feel unheard,” and “Rising America – They feel unheard too.” Also, Senator Joe Manchin (D.-W.Va.) was said to have moderated a discussion with Trump voters.

Democrats will have to defend 23 Senate seats in 2018, nine of which are in states won by Trump. Republicans will only have to defend eight. This means Democrats have a long slog if they are to take the Senate in two years.

But if they’re talking to Trump supporters, it’s obvious they’re not listening.

Trump won because he was sympathetic to the concerns of voters – Republican and Democrat — who said they were hurting from eight years of Obama economic policies and nobody – not Democrats or establishment Republicans – seemed to care. Rising Obamacare premiums, shuttered factories, lost jobs, crony trade deals and seeking after someone willing to get control of the country’s illegal immigration problem were also issues that drove voters to support Trump, who promised to tackle those problems.

But Democrats are opposing Trump’s solutions to each of these issues.

The monkey in the wrench – to paraphrase a movie line – comes with Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) who is said to be prepping Democrats on how to engage against Donald Trump’s Supreme Court pick. Filling the open Supreme Court with a conservative — particularly one who guarantees to keep the 2nd Amendment safe — in the mold of the departed Antonin Scalia was also one of Trump’s top campaign themes.

The Democrats’ core constituencies were hard at work this past week. On Friday they rioted, looted, burned, tried to set Trump supporters on fire, broke windows and attacked police. On Saturday they — mostly women — donned vagina hats, vagina costumes, pants with red liquid splashed on the crotch and other silly apparel and railed about how they had no “rights” in the first place, and if they did have any Trump was going to take them away. They ranted and screamed and scrawled filthy words and platitudes on signs and paraded about like idiots, chanted mindless and shallow slogans and listened to unhinged speeches by unhinged entertainers so far removed from middle America they couldn’t find it with both hands and a guide dog.

The abhorrent spectacle was treated as normal by the mainstream media and embraced by Democrat politicians.

People in flyover country, normal people – the very people Democrats say they want to listen to – were appalled, put off and, frankly, embarrassed by the grotesque nature of the whole thing.

So let’s get this straight. Democrat politicians aren’t going to Iowa, Nebraska, Ohio, Missouri, Oklahoma, Alabama, Georgia, Wyoming, Michigan or rural West Virginia, or any of the other states Trump carried, to talk to Trump supporters and learn why they went for Trump. Instead, Democrat politicians are huddling just outside the beltway in Shepherdstown, West Virginia, cloistered with other Democrat politicians, leftist think tanks and political hacks, discussing how to triangulate Trump’s policies and oppose his SCOTUS nominees under the guise of learning to listen to real people.

Meanwhile, among the candidates being considered to run the Democratic National Committee is a white woman who says “white people” need to “shut their mouths” and a Muslim who has penned columns defending Louis Farrakhan against accusations of being a racist and an anti-Semite and who promoted black nationalist speakers and has advocated for a separate black state.

That sounds more like a Democrat circle jerk than a listening/education exercise.

Judge Who Blocked Trump’s Order Was Nominated By OBAMA On Recommendation Of CHUCK SCHUMER

 

On Saturday night, The Gateway Pundit reported that a liberal New York Judge, Judge Ann Donnelly, issued an emergency stay Saturday night that temporarily blocks the United States government form sending people out of the country after they have landed.

From Fox News:

The order barred U.S. border agents from removing anyone who arrived in the U.S. with a valid visa from Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. It also covered anyone with an approved refugee application. The Department of Homeland Security said that more than 170 people were denied entry to the U.S. as of Saturday night, according to Reuters.

Judge Ann Donnelly was nominated by former President Barack Obama on the recommendation from Chuck Schumer.

From The Brooklyn Eagle:

Donnelly was nominated to be a federal judge by President Barack Obama on the recommendation of Sen. Charles Schumer. On Friday, she had the oath of office administered to her by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon, and Judge Pamela K. Chen bestowed the ceremonial gavel to her as the newest judge in the court.

“We are indebted to Sen. Schumer for recommending Ann Donnelly and all of the other outstanding recent appointments,” Bagley Amon said. “She takes the seat vacated by Sandra Townes when Judge Towns took senior status — seat No. 10, created in 1978.”

Should Virginia Governor Be Charged With Voter Fraud By Trying To Rig November Election?

 

With President Trump calling for an investigation into voter fraud, there are many instances that can already be proven.
For instance when Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) granted clemency to 200,000 felons so they could vote in Novembers Presidential election. The key thing to know here is that most felons tend to vote Democrat and in this case would have further incentive to repay the favor of the corrupt Democrat governor.
The Virginia Supreme Court’s ruled against McAuliffe to allow felons to vote so he is signing 200,000 individual clemency grants to the state’s ex-offenders to ensure their right to vote. In a 4 to 3 decision late Friday, the Supreme Court of Virginia stripped away the voting rights from 200,000 ex-offenders who had recently regained full civil rights through one of McAuliffe’s executive orders. The court said the governor lacks the authority under the state constitution to issue a blanket rights restoration to everyone in the state with a felony record .
But just hours after the decision, McAuliffe vowed to push back by signing clemency grants for the state’s ex-offenders one by one. McAuliffe as a true liberal is defying the courts by saying,
“The struggle for civil rights has always been a long and difficult one, but the fight goes on,” he wrote. “I remain committed to moving past our Commonwealth’s history of injustice to embrace an honest process for restoring the rights of our citizens, and I believe history and the vast majority of Virginians are on our side.”
Republicans have accused McAuliffe of pushing the voting rights restoration to help Clinton carry the swing state in the fall.
Virginia, a long-time conservative stronghold, was key to President Obama’s 2008 and 2012 victories, and was considered a toss-up for 2016. Hillary narrowly won Virginia. Theoretically, the felons could have pushed the election in favor of Hillary in which she won.

This governor should be arrested immediately along with anyone who sanctioned his actions

Democrats — the party of liars and losers


Democrats — the party of liars and losers
Posted on December 28, 2016 by John Myers Views: 7,502
2.8K Shares
President Obama appears at Miami-Dade College to talk about the Affordable Care Act on Thursday, Oct. 20, 2016. (Pedro Portal/El Nuevo Herald/TNS)
In blaming Russian President Vladimir Putin for the ills of the world, swinging the election and causing the mayhem in Syria, President Barack Obama has collected the trifecta.

First, Obama’s loyal minions in the mainstream media continue to hammer home that President-elect Donald Trump is Obama’s illegitimate successor.

Second, Hillary Clinton and her cry baby Democrats only lost the presidency because of saboteurs.

Third, for the neoconservatives who are frothing from the mouth to get into another war, Obama can be expected to build a post-presidency consensus that America will have to go to war with Russia.

It all starts with the election, or rather the results of the election. Without so much as a shred of real evidence, Obama has lectured us that we can be certain of one thing, that Russian President Putin is an evil dictator with global ambitions. Never mind that Putin has offered Russia’s help in fighting ISIS, Obama insists this is only a ploy of Putin’s to weaken America. Obama would no doubt call Putin, Machiavelli but the nitwits in his base wouldn’t know who that was. Obama can’t call Putin Hitler because the progressives in his party have already set that name aside for Republican President-elect Donald Trump.

This is the truth:
1) Hillary Clinton lost the election because she was a terrible candidate.

2) The blood of Syria is on Obama’s hands.

3) Regardless of the military facts Russia is not a dangerous adversary that demands our armed forces have the latest in expensive weaponry.

Let’s focus on Hillary Clinton’s loss because it makes the Democrats look exactly as I said, the party of liars and losers.

It’s unacceptable, say the Democrats. It’s just won’t do. Like the kids I wrote about two weeks ago in Trophy-toting progressives who are destroying the very spirit that made America great, the situation is worse now than even I thought. We are not talking about little dears expecting to be told they are winners regardless of how well they do. We have a 69-year-old woman who was counting on a coronation next month. It didn’t happen, and there are many reasons why besides the Russians, WikiLeaks, FBI Director James Comey or a giant right-wing conspiracy that tried to sully her husband, President Bill Clinton. (As it turned out it was Bill who sullied the White House intern’s dress.) But he was the Teflon president. Hillary was the flypaper candidate, mostly because she couldn’t hide her bitchy attitude, vendetta instincts and habitual lying.

Take the story that she landed “under sniper fire” during a 1996 trip to Bosnia. She should have checked one of her many mobile devices to know that war ended in 1995.

What developed was lie upon lie, like it was a video that caused a spontaneous attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11, 2012. Only God Almighty could have guessed that there were terrorists in Libya, a country of terrorists, and only He could have known that an attack might come, especially on that date. Never mind the murder of U.S. Ambassador to Libya, J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.

We are supposed to forget the lies to Comey, including that Hillary didn’t send any classified emails. The truth: the FBI found at least 110 emails that were classified at the time Clinton sent or received them. And that’s just a start. The real indicator of criminal intent by Clinton was her installation of what Politico Magazine coined a “home brew” email server.

Clinton and her web of lies make former President Richard Nixon nothing more than a fibber. But I understand where the Democrats are coming from. All Hillary had was the laundry list of lies, the miserable personality, the lack of any message other than Donald Trump is a racist, a misogynist who doesn’t have the proper temperament to be president because he is likely to have a tiff and do a full scale nuclear launch on another nation. We never know what story is going to run the next day because we don’t know who is going to tell it.

But according to Princess Clinton, always a bridesmaid never a bride, most of the blame is on Putin because he ordered the cyber-attacks intended to give old pal Donald Trump the election.

On December 17 at a fund raising event that should have been titled — how Democrats need to pick better candidates — Clinton said the Russians had undermined her candidacy because, and this is classic Clinton, Vladimir Putin’s “personal vendetta” against her.

“Putin publicly blamed me for the outpouring of outrage by his own people, and that is the direct line between what he said back then and what he did in this election.” These were her words as recorded by The New York Times.

Yes I can see it all; Putin is acting like Dr. Evil did from his secret volcano in the Urals where he was scheming to get revenge on Austin Powers. Substitute Putin for Evil and Powers for Clinton and you have an understanding of why a big mouthed upstart like Trump won the presidency. If you get caught up in another one of Clinton’s “stories” you may start to think Trump could be the Manchurian Candidate.

But that is not the whole story behind Clinton’s defeat. It took a troika of men to defeat her. She was not just going up against Trump and Putin to snap victory but also the Director of the FBI, Comey, who would risk his job, his reputation and even his freedom because what Clinton is saying is that Comey was involved in high treason. That only carries with it a possible death sentence.

Clinton and Obama’s evidence of their version of events that involves Trump wouldn’t hold up in court, kangaroo court. To think that Putin has the time, energy or inclination that might set Russia on a path towards a conflict or even a war because he likes Trump (a man he has never met) and dislikes Clinton is as ludicrous as believing that Comey would throw his life away and ruin his family all to see The Donald in the Oval Office.

Something else strange is that in September, when nobody gave Trump a chance at victory, Obama maintained that the electoral system was bulletproof and could not be hacked. Lo and behold, Clinton loses. Inside a couple of weeks the electoral process that Obama guaranteed was secure was then definitely hacked. From my reading of events nobody knows by whom exactly or for what reason. But as Obama has said, the reason it had to be the Russians was because this is the kind of thing the Russians have always done, which is a pretty lame excuse. The fact that it was undertaken because, as Clinton says, Vlad just doesn’t like her isn’t just lame, it’s a horse with no legs.

But this is the best, and something I am surprised not even conservatives who despise Clinton haven’t brought up. Do you remember throughout the election Clinton, her campaign staff and a multitude of influential Democrats said that Trump did not have the character or disposition to be president?

I have no idea where that came from, but some of the WikiLeaks I read said that her top staff knew she was a poor candidate.

In an intercepted email exchange in September 2015, John Podesta, then chairman of the 2016 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, warned that the campaign has, “taken on a lot of water that won’t be easy to pump out of the boat. Most of that has to do with terrible decisions made pre-campaign, but a lot has to do with her instincts. She’s nervous so prepping more and performing better. Got to do something to pump up excitement but not certain how to do that.”

It was the same John Podesta who looked like an idiot on election night when Clinton was too drunk, too depressed and too afraid to face the music and do what every losing president has faced since elections took place — go out and calmly inform your supporters of the loss, but the principles they fought for, blah, blah, blah.

But Clinton couldn’t manage to pull herself together to do that. She had to ask Trump if he would announce that she had conceded the election to him. Then there was a recount for Clinton undertaken by her surrogate and Green Party candidate Jill Stein, who spent $7.3 million dollars that wound up giving Trump an addition 131 votes in Wisconsin. Then there was the ballyhoo that surrounded the December 19 vote by the Electoral College, which will be remembered as Clinton’s last stand.

That is the kind of garbage that is carried around by losers. Hardly the right stuff to be president, but the stuff the losers and liars are made of but in the end cannot hide.

Yours in good times and bad,

California Democrats Legalize Child Prostitution

Teens ‘free to have sex in exchange for money without fear of arrest or prosecution’

Beginning on Jan. 1, child prostitution will be legal in the streets of California.

In fact, police officers in the state will be banned from arresting any person under the age of 18 for soliciting or loitering with intent, according to Senate Bill 1322. California Gov. Jerry Brown signed the bill on Sept. 26, and it will go into effect Sunday.

The law also requires police to report allegations of child prostitution to county child welfare agencies.

Advocates of the law say it will help child victims of sex trafficking get treatment rather than sending them to juvenile hall and tagging them with a rap sheet for prostitution.

State Sen. Holly J. Mitchell, D-Los Angeles, who introduced the bill, said, “The law is supposed to protect vulnerable children from adult abuse, yet we brand kids enmeshed in sex-for-play with a scarlet ‘P’ and leave them subject to shame and prosecution. This is our opportunity to do what we say is right in cases of sex trafficking: stop the exploiters and help the exploited.”
Teens ‘free to have sex in exchange for money without fear of arrest or prosecution’

(WND) – Beginning on Jan. 1, child prostitution will be legal in the streets of California.

In fact, police officers in the state will be banned from arresting any person under the age of 18 for soliciting or loitering with intent, according to Senate Bill 1322. California Gov. Jerry Brown signed the bill on Sept. 26, and it will go into effect Sunday.

The law also requires police to report allegations of child prostitution to county child welfare agencies.

Advocates of the law say it will help child victims of sex trafficking get treatment rather than sending them to juvenile hall and tagging them with a rap sheet for prostitution.

State Sen. Holly J. Mitchell, D-Los Angeles, who introduced the bill, said, “The law is supposed to protect vulnerable children from adult abuse, yet we brand kids enmeshed in sex-for-play with a scarlet ‘P’ and leave them subject to shame and prosecution. This is our opportunity to do what we say is right in cases of sex trafficking: stop the exploiters and help the exploited.”

But Travis Allen, a Republican lawmaker representing the 72nd Assembly District in the California Legislature, warned of the fallout from what he called a “terribly destructive legislation [that] was written and passed by the progressive Democrats who control California’s state government.”

“[T]eenage girls (and boys) in California will soon be free to have sex in exchange for money without fear of arrest or prosecution,” Allen wrote in a column published by the Washington Examiner.

Allen acknowledged that Democrats sincerely believe the law will help child sex victims, but he issued a dire warning about the “immoral” consequences of decriminalizing child prostitution.

“Unfortunately, the reality is that the legalization of underage prostitution suffers from the fatal defect endemic to progressive-left policymaking: it ignores experience, common sense and most of all human nature — especially its darker side,” Allen explained.

“The unintended but predictable consequence of how the real villains — pimps and other traffickers in human misery — will respond to this new law isn’t difficult to foresee. Pimping and pandering will still be against the law whether it involves running adult women or young girls. But legalizing child prostitution will only incentivize the increased exploitation of underage girls. Immunity from arrest means law enforcement can’t interfere with minors engaging in prostitution — which translates into bigger and better cash flow for the pimps. Simply put, more time on the street and less time in jail means more money for pimps, and more victims for them to exploit.”

Other experts agreed with Allen’s assessment.

Paul Durenberger, an assistant chief district attorney in Sacramento County who oversees human trafficking cases, told the Sacramento Bee in February that the legislation is similar to “bills that a trafficker would want to write to protect themselves.”

Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O’Malley, a respected leader on the issue of human trafficking, said the law “just opens up the door for traffickers to use these kids to commit crimes and exploit them even worse.”

The Bee noted that a program in Sacramento already relocates sexually exploited children from juvenile hall to treatment programs. Upon completion of the programs, child sex victims are cleared of charges.

Allen argued that when police officers take child prostitutes into custody, it helps young sex-trafficking victims escape their abusers.

“Minors involved in prostitution are clearly victims, and allowing our law enforcement officers to pick these minors up and get them away from their pimps and into custody is a dramatically better solution than making it legal for them to sell themselves for sex,” he wrote. “That only deepens their victimization and renders law enforcement powerless to stop the cycle of abuse. SB 1322 is not simply misguided — its consequences are immoral.”

California’s sex trafficking industry is notoriously large. In 2016 so far, there have been 307 cases of trafficking involving children and teens reported to the National Human Trafficking Resource Center. In 2015, the federal government selected Sacramento as one of six U.S. cities to flagship a national enforcement team focused on stopping human trafficking.

Wisconsin Recount Farce Nets Trump 26 Votes

“This recount is just a way for Jill Stein, who received less than one percent of the vote overall and wasn’t even on the ballot in many states, to fill her coffers with money.”

jillsteinscam_os
The recount forced by Green Party nominee Jill Stein in Wisconsin is going swimmingly so far — for President-Elect Donald Trump. Trump has extended his lead over Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton by a total of 26 additional votes.

Lifezette reports,

The results for Monday — the fifth day of the Wisconsin recount — showed that Trump accrued 84 more votes than the initial election results reported. Clinton gained 58 votes. The initial count in the Badger State had Trump trouncing Clinton by 27,257 votes.

The hard, cold numbers seem to matter little to Stein.

“If you’re for democracy, end your voter-silencing campaign and join me in advocating for election integrity, @realDonaldTrump,” Stein tweeted Monday.

But Trump does support democracy, and that includes honoring the voices of the millions of Americans who voted during the 2016 presidential election. Stein’s recount crusade seems set to continue to reap inconsequential returns.

“While @realDonaldTrump engages in a sweep-it-under-the-rug campaign, 150,000 people say they want voter justice,” Stein continued in a separate tweet.

Stein was referring to the roughly 150,000 people who pledged to financially support her recount request via her official website. Thus far in her quest, Stein has raised over $7.2 million for Wisconsin alone. The state required a fee of $3.5 million to carry out the recount.

Stein caused many an eye to roll when she announced in late November her intention to seek a recount in three key states won by Trump — Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan.

THE NAKED TRUTH

cover-story-600-ci-2

DEMOCRATS

14238219_709761619190120_5771626072279455813_n

HELP US KEEP YOU BETTER INFORMED ABOUT THE TRICKS OF THE RADICAL PROGRESSIVE REVOLUTION PLEASE DONATE ANY AMOUNT YOU CAN