Archive for the ‘Democrat Party’ Category





WHO HIRED THIS IDIOT -John Kerry: The Bible Commands America To Protect Muslims From Global Warming

Kerry begins this speech by stating that someone named ‘Shriek’ had drafted a strategy for American and Muslim relations. Who this Shriek is exactly is unknown, but apparently his words ‘religion matters’ is ‘a mantra in the State Dept’.

Kerry continues stating that ‘our faiths’ referring to Christianity and Islam are ‘inextricably linked’.

Kerry’s words are bizarre, to say the least. It’s basically a half-baked attempt to forge an affinity for Islam, and is a statement that the U.S. is now acquiescing to the Muslim Brotherhood, who has successfully infiltrated the United States to a great degree.
Stating that we have an obligation to protect Muslims from global warming seems like something out of the Twilight Zone series, only he’s not writing for T.V.


Tuesday in riot-torn Milwaukee, Donald Trump pointed out a very blunt and irrefutable truth: “The Democratic Party has run nearly every inner city in this country for 50 years, and run them into … ruin,” with “crime policies, education policies, and economic policies [that] have produced only more crime, more broken homes, and more poverty.” And indeed, wherever we look—Atlanta, Camden, Newark, St. Louis, Chicago, Flint, Detroit, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Washington—we see one-party cities that are crumbling testaments to the awesome power of bad ideas. Specifically, Trump referenced “the situation right here in Milwaukee, a city run by Democrats for decade after decade,” citing its high rates of homicide, joblessness, poverty, and educational failure.

But Milwaukee wasn’t always like this. It was once a prosperous metropolis with a host of thriving industries, particularly renowned for its breweries and manufacturing. Modern-day Democrats and their leftist allies, however, snuffed out those good-ol’-days like a jackboot on a cigarette butt. Every mayor of Milwaukee since 1960 has been a Democrat, and the one who served just prior to 1960 was Frank Paul Zeidler, an open Socialist. Overseeing the large-scale construction of public housing as a means of promoting racial and economic justice, Zeidler spoke out forcefully in favor of what he termed “public enterprise,” the notion that government could uplift the condition of the poor via the efficient dispensation of taxpayer-funded public services—a theory that quickly became an article of faith among Democrats.

Milwaukee’s black population nearly quintupled during the course of Zeidler’s twelve-year mayoralty, and the burgeoning civil-rights movement began to make its presence felt in the city. But local black radicals, allied ideologically with the black militancy that was sweeping many American cities in the Sixties, became wholly dissatisfied with what they viewed as the inadequate pace of racial reforms. And in the summer of 1967 the race riots that rocked Detroit and Newark sparked a similar outburst in Milwaukee.

In response to the rioting, Democrat Henry Maier, who served as mayor of Milwaukee from 1960-88, swiftly unveiled a “39-Point Program” designed to address the inner-city problems of poverty and racism that liberal Democrats widely cited as the causes of the riots. Alternatively dubbed the “Little Marshall Plan,” this program sought to enlist government at all levels—local, state, and federal—to pour rivers of cash into initiatives like housing construction, youth programs, and “community renewal,” as a means of pacifying an angry populace. But in the eyes of local black leftists, it was too little, too late. As Vel Phillips, a black member of Milwaukee’s Common Council, said in April 1968, the mayor’s 39-point program had failed to demonstrate any “visible effect on the root causes” of ghetto unrest. “I don’t believe in violence,” added Phillips, “… but we’d all better realize that many young Negroes have reached the point where they’re ready and willing to die because they figure they have nothing to lose.”

When the Sixties ended, Milwaukee was still known chiefly for its manufacturing industry. But as the cost of manufacturing in the U.S. skyrocketed in subsequent decades—in large measure because of the unsustainably lavish deals that pro-Democrat unions repeatedly negotiated on behalf of their dues-paying members—many of these businesses elected to move their operations abroad. Between 1970 and 2011, Milwaukee lost no fewer than 40% of its manufacturing jobs—a trend that dealt a severe economic blow to the entire city. Today, per capita income in Milwaukee is $19,636 (32% below the national average); median household income is $35,489 (33% below the national average); and the poverty rate is 29.4% (nearly double the national average).

While joblessness and poverty plague the lives of so many Milwaukeeans, the ever-present threat of crime may be an even larger affliction for them. Milwaukee today has a violent crime rate that is 4 times higher than the national average.

The children of Milwaukee, meanwhile, have their own heavy cross to bear. Though the city’s public school system annually spends some $14,599 (about one-third more than the national average) in taxpayer funds on the education of each K-12 student in its jurisdiction, the overall high-school graduation rate in the Milwaukee Public Schools is a paltry 60.6%—far below Wisconsin’s 88% statewide average. On standardized National Assessment Of Educational Progress tests administered to measure students’ academic abilities in math and reading, Milwaukee students perform abysmally.

In 1990 the Wisconsin State Legislature passed a bill creating the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program (MPCP), a voucher initiative that has proven to be highly successful and cost-effective. But the Democrat-aligned teachers unions have fought tooth-and-nail against the MPCP, smearing voucher programs as “slash and burn” measures designed to “destroy public schools.”

In short, Milwaukee is a city that has been mismanaged into the ground by leftist Democrats and their uncompromising belief in high taxes, massive public spending, and soft-on-crime policies founded upon the twin pedestals of white guilt and black infantilization.

If a cesspool of poverty, crime, and ignorance, like Milwaukee, has been a one-party city for decade upon decade, isn’t the cause of its plight rather obvious?

Hillary Clinton to Military K-9 Unit – “Get that F***ing Dog Away from Me”!

A lover of pets, Hillary Clinton is not.

A recent story told by a former soldier may shed more light on Hillary Clinton’s prickly personality, but it shouldn’t really be that surprising. Eric Bonner, a military K9 handler, is fairly vocal about his political views on his Facebook page and he recently explained why he would not be supporting Hillary Clinton. It wasn’t necessarily about her political views; his reasons stemmed from the one time that he personally met (and was spoken to) by the Democrat candidate for President.

Here’s the story:

Eric Bonner Facebook Hillary

While Bonner’s interactions with both President George W. Bush and President Obama were more pleasant, his encounter with Hillary Clinton was far from it. While Bonner was working as security for her visit to Turkey and he and his K9 partner were sweeping her vehicle and quarters to ensure her safety, he remembers her telling him to “Get that f***ing dog away from me,” before she turned to berate her security detail. Something which Bonner claims the detail leader told him “happens every day.”

This one short but memorable encounter has led Bonner to believe that Hillary Clinton doesn’t actually “care about anyone but Hillary.”

It’s a disturbing story and it gives an important insight into the kind of person that Hillary Clinton really is. While you may not believe this anecdote, or the DOZENS of similar stories from DOZENS of other people who have had similarly terrible encounters with the Democrat candidate, SNOPES reports that the facts to the story all seem plausible and fit the timeline of actual events.

Needless to say, Bonner’s story quickly went viral after he posted it last week, and almost immediately he ran into trouble with the powers that be at Facebook. While his account is now back in functioning order, Bonner reports that the day after he posted his story Facebook temporarily suspended his account!

Navy SEAL Who Killed Bin Laden Says Khan Part Of ‘Clinton Machine’

“There’s no mistake…”
Randy DeSoto August 3, 2016 at 2:14pm
Share on Facebook Tweet Email Print
Former U.S. Navy SEAL Rob O’Neill charged on Tuesday that Khirz Khan is “part of the Clinton machine” and pointed to the timing of the Muslim man’s address to the Democratic National Convention as proof.

Appearing on Fox Business Network’s Lou Dobbs Tonight, O’Neill, who killed Osama Bin Laden, said Khan’s appearance at the DNC was “unfortunate,” adding he shouldn’t be politicizing his son’s death in the Iraq War in 2004.

“And there was no mistake that he [Khan] came out for the Clintons,” said O’Neill. “He’s worked for the Clintons before and there’s been three presidential elections since his son was killed. And he could have come out for — this is one he decides to come out for. This is part of the Clinton machine.”
O’Neill continued, “There’s no mistake that Mr. Trump was interviewed by George Stephanopoulos. He’s in the Clinton camp as well and this is how Clinton politics work — as opposed to going on Hillary’s record, we’re just going to go on how bad you are.”

Stephanopoulos interviewed Trump on ABC News’ This Week on Sunday and asked him to comment on Khan’s claim that the Republican candidate had “sacrificed nothing” for his country. The news anchor was once a senior aide to President Bill Clinton.

Trump appeared to try to give Khan the benefit of the doubt regarding the tone of his remarks saying the man was clearly emotional and “looked like a nice guy.”

Rather than attacking Trump, O’Neill asserted, “Mr. Khan should be saying what can we do to defeat this [radical Islam]. He is a Muslim, Pakistani born, and all the work that he’s done in Saudi Arabia especially with bringing in migrants. We should be using people like Mr. Khan to how are we going to defeat radical Islam rather than yelling at each other back and forth.”

O’Neill believes the Khans did not honor their son’s sacrifice by their actions at the DNC. “If I had been in his situation and saw people politicizing my sacrifice and what I’d done, I’d be a little bit disappointed, because that’s not what it’s all about. He died a hero,” he said.

As reported by Western Journalism, Chris Mark, who served in a Marine Corps elite Force Reconnaissance unit, agreed with O’Neill. He wrote in an “Open Letter To Khizr Khan“ over the weekend: “I am troubled that you would allow a party that has little more than contempt for the US Service Member to parade you into the DNC to denounce Donald Trump.”
“As you continue to make the media circuit and bask in the glow of affection cast upon you by a party that has little regard for your son’s own sacrifice, and veterans in general, I would ask you to consider your comments and your position more closely,” he added.

Hillary’s Mental Problems

Hillary Clinton made a possible politically fatal mistake last week when she appeared with Chris Wallace on FOX and then later in an interview said she may have “SHORT CIRCUITED” when she was trying to twist
FBI Comey’s statement that she had not told the truth during her appearance before the House Committee. Google Brain SHORT CIRCUITS and look for the Science Daily article about it.
A condition that can exist after a brain injury (remember Hillary’s fall and brain injury that Bill said took 6 mos or longer for her to recover from (longer than the public knew) a condition called
Cortical Spreading Depolarizations”, otherwise known as SHORT CIRCUITING in the brain can occur. They show up as lapses in regular brain activity and can show up as physical and/or mental
impaired activity. The lapses typical last for 2-3 minutes, but in the study cited some 25% of the people tested experienced lapses of 3 min up to 16 min in duration. HILLARY HAS A BRAIN DISORDER AND
HER AIDES DISCUSSED HOW SHE CAN BE CONFUSED AT TIMES. Once again her quest for fame via deceit/secrecy is the only thing that guides her……the truth be dammed.

Paul Ryan Joins Hillary’s Side In Attacks On Trump

Joining in on the left’s recent attack against his own party’s nominee, House Speaker Paul Ryan added his two cents worth to the twisted debate over a fallen Muslim soldier.

Ryan released a statement Sunday: “As I have said on numerous occasions, a religious test for entering our country is not reflective of these fundamental values. I reject it. Many Muslim Americans have served valiantly in our military and made the ultimate sacrifice. Captain Khan was one such brave example. His sacrifice — and that of Khizr and Ghazala Khan — should always be honored. Period.”

Breitbart called Ryan a “double agent” and noted that “Ryan did not mention that Trump has recently made clear that his plan to curb Islamic migration will focus on geography and regions. Nor did Ryan mention that — as many, including Jeff Sessions and Andrew McCarthy, have pointed out — religious screening is, in fact, constitutional.”

Also noted is that Captain Kahn died in 2004 in Iraq in a war which Hillary Clinton voted for, and which Trump opposed.

While Ryan was so quick to join the media frenzy surrounding Kahn and the attacks against Trump, Ryan recently shunned several mothers of children who were killed by illegal aliens as they tried to meet with him.

A religious test for entering our country is not reflective of America’s fundamental values. I reject it.

— Paul Ryan (@SpeakerRyan) July 31, 2016

Trump clarified his stance in several Twitter statements:

This story is not about Mr. Khan, who is all over the place doing interviews, but rather RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM and the U.S. Get smart!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 1, 2016

WICKED & HILARIOUS: Brutal Anti-Hillary Ad Is UPSETTING Hillary’s Campaign – So SPREAD It!

What kind of feminist gives a disgusting, sex-crazed pig a pass? Hillary-the-Feminist doesn’t say much about Bill’s philandering.

The media won’t touch it, but Trump is reminding everyone about Bill’s serial womanizing and so should you!

Share this brutal Anti-Hillary ad EVERYWHERE!

Donald Trump’s philosophy is never to use a scalpel when a meat ax is available, and so it is with his attack on the Clinton scandals of the 1990s. And yet, in slamming Hillary as Bill’s “enabler” and daring to invoke the allegation of rape against Clinton, Trump is again demonstrating his unsurpassed ability to needle his opponents and expose their vulnerabilities.
Hillary Clinton’s self-image as a feminist champion has always been at odds with her political partnership with a serial womanizer. Hillary tends to get a pass, because the 1990s were long ago, the media often scold anyone who brings up the scandals, and most politicians hesitate to talk about someone else’s marriage. Unconstrained by these boundaries, Trump is hitting her with his characteristic abandon…
…Hillary’s defenders say this is tantamount to blaming her for Bill’s infidelities. Of course, she’s not responsible for his philandering. But as a fully vested member of Bill’s political operation, Hillary had as much interest in forcefully rebutting allegations of sexual misconduct as he did.
The Clinton campaign in 1992 reportedly spent $100,000 on private-detective work related to women. The approach, when rumors first surfaced, was to get affidavits from women denying affairs — the reflex of most women is to avoid exposure — and, failing that, to use any discrediting tool at hand.

Dems Go Nuts Defending Muslim US Soldier’s Family, Then Chilling Truth Comes Out

It was the speech that the media can’t stop bringing up as the latest gambit against Donald Trump: The appearance of a Muslim Gold Star family at the Democratic National Convention, blaming Donald Trump for “sacrificing nothing and no one.”

During the speech, Khizr Khan, father of Army Capt. Humayun Saqib Muazzam Khan, lambasted Donald Trump’s temporary pause on immigration from countries with links to terrorism, arguing his son “loved America.”

In the media’s coverage of the incident, one fact seemed to predominate: That Khan was one of 14 Muslims killed in action after 9/11.
However, there was one thing that they didn’t point out: namely, that this is the same number of non-Muslim U.S. soldiers killed by Muslim U.S. soldiers in terror-related attacks during the same period.

This is according to a report by House Homeland Security Chair Peter King, who notes two major terror attacks conducted by Muslim U.S. military members.

Perhaps most famously was the attack by then-Army Maj. Nidal Hasan at Fort Hood, Texas, back in 2009, which killed 13, including 12 soldiers. Sometimes forgotten is the attack at the start of the Iraq War in 2003, when then-Army Sgt. Hasan K. Akbar killed two and wounded 14 in an attack at Camp Pennsylvania in Kuwait.

Let’s be clear: Capt. Humayun Saqib Muazzam Khan was a hero, and our deepest condolences go out to his family. However, his sacrifice is not proof that there isn’t a problem with Islamic terrorism, and this is the fact that proved it.
The blame here doesn’t lie with Trump or the Khans, but instead the Democrat politicians who willfully exploited this man’s loss for cynical gain. The logic behind the messaging — that one Muslim died for our country, so therefore there is no problem with Islamic terrorism — is prima facie absurd.

But logic wasn’t what Democrats were going for. They were going for emotion. And at the end of the day, the Islamic State group grows stronger, and our power to fight it both abroad and within our borders grows weaker.