Categories
Archives
HELP US KEEP YOU BETTER INFORMED ABOUT THE TRICKS OF THE RADICAL PROGRESSIVE REVOLUTION PLEASE DONATE ANY AMOUNT YOU CAN
target="_top">

Archive for the ‘Democrat Party’ Category

Ten reasons to vote Democrat by Dave Letterman

#10. I vote Democrat because I love the fact that I can now marry whatever I want. I’ve decided to marry my German Shepherd.

#9. I vote Democrat because I believe oil companies’ profits of 4% on a gallon of gas are obscene, but the government taxing the same gallon at 15% isn’t.

#8. I vote Democrat because I believe the government will do a better job of spending the money I earn than I would.

#7. I vote Democrat because Freedom of Speech is fine as long as nobody is offended by it.

#6. I vote Democrat because I’m way too irresponsible to own a gun, and I know that my local police are all I need to protect me from murderers and thieves. I am also thankful that we have a 911 service that gets police to your home in order to identify your body after a home invasion.

#5. I vote Democrat because I’m not concerned about millions of babies being aborted so long as we keep all death row inmates alive and comfy.

#4. I vote Democrat because I think illegal aliens have a right to free health care, education, and Social Security benefits, and we should take away Social Security from those who paid into it.

#3. I vote Democrat because I believe that businesses should not be allowed to make profits for themselves. They need to break even and give the rest away to the government for redistribution as the Democrat Party sees fit.

#2. I vote Democrat because I believe liberal judges need to rewrite the Constitution every few days to suit fringe kooks who would never get their agendas past the voters.

#1. Reason I vote Democrat is because I think it’s better to pay $billions$ for oil to people who hate us, but not drill our own because it might upset some endangered beetle, gopher, or fish here in America. We don’t care about the beetles, gophers, or fish in those other countries.

“The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits”… Albert Einstein
I know you all will appreciate this definition —
— the best description of Obamacare so far:

Remember when Nancy Pelosi said:
“We have to pass it, to find out what’s in it.”

A physician called into a radio show and said:
“That’s the definition of a ‘stool sample.’”

AFTER ALL IT’S ALL IN THE FAMILY -HAVE YOU HEARD OF THIS GUY ??

EDX MEZVINSKY
He is Edward “Ed” Mezvinsky, born January 17, 1937.
Then you’ll probably say, “Who is Ed Mezvinsky?”
Well, he is a former Democrat congressman who represented
Iowa’s 1st congressional district in the United States House
of Representatives for two terms, from 1973 to 1977.
He sat on the House Judiciary Committee that decided the fate of Richard Nixon.
He was outspoken saying that Nixon was a crook and a disgrace to
politics and the nation and should be impeached.
He and the Clintons were friends and very politically intertwined for many years.
Ed Mezvinsky had an affair with NBC News reporter Marjorie Sue
Margolies and later married her after his wife divorced him.
In 1993, Marjorie Margolies-Mezvinsky, then a freshman Democrat in
Congress, cast the deciding vote that got President Bill Clinton’s
controversial tax package through the House of Representatives.
In March 2001, Mezvinsky was indicted and later pleaded guilty
to 31 of 69 counts of bank fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud.
Ed Mezvinsky embezzled more than $10 million dollars from people
via both a Ponzi scheme and the notorious Nigerian e-mail scams.
He was found guilty and sentenced to 80 months in federal prison.
After serving less than five years in federal prison, he was released in April 2008 and remains on federal probation.
To this day, he still owes $9.4 million in restitution to his victims.
About now you are saying, “So what!”
Well, this is Marc and Chelsea Mezvinsky.
MARC AND CHELSEA
That’s right; Ed Mezvinsky is Chelsea Clinton’s father-in law.
Now Marc and Chelsea are in their early thirties and purchased
a 10.5 million dollar NYC apartment (after being married in George Soros’ mansion).
Has anyone heard mention of any of this in any of the media?
If this guy was Jenna or Barbara Bush’s, or better yet, Sarah Palin’s daughter’s father-in- law, the news would be an everyday headline and every detail would be reported over and over.
And yet liberals say there are no double standards in political reporting.
And people are already talking about Hillary as our next President!
And then there is possibly Chelsea for president in our future!
The cycle never ends!
Lying and corruption seem to make Democrat candidates more popular.
When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty. ~~ Thomas Jefferson
“America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.”
~ ~Abraham Lincoln

Guess What -Inspector General finds more missing Lerner emails

Lois Lerner, Director of Exempt Organizations for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), invokes her fifth amendment right during a House Oversight and Governmental Reform Committee hearing on the IRS and it's targeting of conservative groups, on Capitol Hill on May 22, 2013 in Washington, D.C. UPI/Kevin Dietsch

Lois Lerner, Director of Exempt Organizations for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), invokes her fifth amendment right during a House Oversight and Governmental Reform Committee hearing on the IRS and it’s targeting of conservative groups, on Capitol Hill on May 22, 2013 in Washington, D.C. UPI/Kevin Dietsch


The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) has disclosed the discovery of a fresh batch of previously-unknown emails tied to former IRS administrator Lois Lerner’s email account.

TIGTA unearthed approximately 6,400 Lerner emails in its ongoing effort to recover Lerner’s allegedly missing computer data. The Inspector General has been collaborating with independent information technology experts to assist in retrieving the data, which Lerner alleged was permanently lost when her computer’s hard drive crashed. Lerner retired from the IRS after the scandal reached a media zenith in 2013.

No criminal charges have ever been filed against IRS officials for the roles they may have played in perpetuating the political discrimination scandal. The House voted to hold Lerner in contempt in May of last year, after she invoked the 5th Amendment and refused to continue testifying.

According to Fox News, roughly 650 of the emails date from 2010 and 2011; the remainder date from 2012.

According to a spokesman for Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), who chairs the Senate Finance Committee, congressional investigators do not yet know what the emails contain. But, he said, the new information will receive the same scrutiny that Lerner’s previously-revealed emails have so far received.

“These emails will be carefully examined as part of the committee’s bipartisan IRS investigation,” Hatch’s spokesman told The Hill. “After TIGTA produces their report regarding the missing data later this year, the Committee hopes to follow suit and move forward with the release of its bipartisan report on this issue.”

This entry was posted in Bell Ringer and tagged Lois Lerner. Bookmark the permalink.

Alan Dershowitz: Charges Against Baltimore Cops Won’t Stick

by Bill Hoffmann
Criminal charges filed Friday against six Baltimore police officers in the death of Freddie Gray were based on “politics and crowd control,” not justice, renowned civil rights lawyer Alan Dershowitz tells Newsmax TV.

“This is a very sad day for justice . . . Today had nothing to do with justice. Today was crowd control. Everything was motivated by a threat of riots and a desire to prevent riots,” Dershowitz said on “The Steve Malzberg Show.”

“The mayor outrageously said we’re going to get justice for the victim, the family and people of Baltimore, never mentioning the defendants. Under our Constitution, the only people who are entitled to justice are the defendants.

“They are presumed innocent, they need due process of law, and the mayor and the state attorney have made it virtually impossible for these defendants to get a fair trial. They have been presumed guilty.”

Dershowitz made the comments hours after Baltimore’s top prosecutor, State Attorney Marilyn Mosby, announced criminal charges against six cops who were suspended after Gray suffered a fatal spinal injury while in custody in a police van.

The charges came nearly two weeks after Gray’s death, which sparked riots that caused millions of dollars in damage and left dozens injured. The stiffest, second-degree, “depraved heart” murder charge was lodged against the driver of the van. The others face charges of involuntary manslaughter, assault and illegal arrest.

But Dershowitz, a Harvard Law professor emeritus and Newsmax contributor, said the case will very likely be thrown out for lack of evidence.

“I understand why the mayor and state attorney want to prevent riots . . . but that’s not the job of the justice system . . . You cannot allow police officers or any other defendants to become scapegoats for crowds demanding a continuation of rioting,” he told host Steve Malzberg.

“There’s no plausible, hypothetical, conceivable case for murder under the facts that we now know them. You might say that conceivably there’s a case for manslaughter. Nobody wanted this guy to die, nobody set out to kill him, and nobody intentionally murdered him.

“The worst-case scenario is a case for involuntary manslaughter or some kind of reckless disregard, but the idea of without further investigation coming down with murder indictments . . . This is a show trial. This is designed to please the crowd. It’s designed to lower the temperature.”

Dershowitz added that the charges did not meet the criteria for justice in the United States.

“It may have been the criteria in Rome, for Fidel Castro, in Iran, and in other countries, but in our country you don’t base indictments on what impact it’s going to have on the crowd,” he said.

“You base it on a hard, neutral, objective view of the evidence, and it doesn’t look like that was done here . . . They have invited a mess. What they did is they bartered short-term results today for long-term problems in the future.

“My prediction? They’ve overplayed their hand, it’s unlikely they’ll get any convictions in this case as a result of this, and if they do, there’s a good possibility it’ll be reversed on appeal and will just postpone the riots for months ahead.”

Dershowitz is the author of “Terror Tunnels: The Case for Israel’s Just War Against Hamas,” published by Rosetta Books.

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsmax-Tv/Freddie-Gray-Alan-Dershowitz-police-charges/2015/05/01/id/642143/#ixzz3ZdeVBvKC
Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now!

Meet One of Wisconsin’s Organized Crime Bosses

b99214964z.1_20140227232818_000_g6r51v6k.1-1
District Attorney John Chisholm is no better than an organized crime boss… because he IS a criminal running an organization, the state.

Meet yet another poster child for severely limited government: Milwaukee County, Wisconsin District Attorney, John Chisholm.

Here’s a review of his actions from the Daily Signal: “Wisconsin Home Invasions: When the Government Upends Democracy.”

These raids—engineered by Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm—represented nothing less than an attempt to upend democracy, to use law enforcement to thwart the will of the people and punish political enemies.

Because he opposed Republican Gov. Scott Walker—especially his reform of Wisconsin public employee unions—Chisholm used his position and a unique Wisconsin law to harass, threaten and embarrass Walker’s supporters and other Wisconsin conservatives.

Using a legitimate criminal case as a pretext, he opened a “John Doe” investigation and went after Walker’s office and anyone remotely connected to him. The unique provisions of John Doe law “permits Wisconsin officials to conduct extensive investigations while keeping the target’s identity secret.”

The covert investigation’s methods created a low-accountability recipe perfect for political targeting. Investigators took very public actions like home invasions in populated neighborhoods, and their targets could do nothing to defend themselves—not even contact a lawyer during the raids. Nor were they permitted to give any explanation to save their reputations.

You can read more about these pre-dawn or dawn raids here.

As long as men like this are allowed to severely abuse their power and authority—to be completely lawless and terrorize innocent citizens, in the name of the law—no one is safe.

These draconian tactics had the desired effect. Organizations were subpoenaed for all their business records. The Wisconsin Club for Growth had to shut down fundraising because they could no longer guarantee that donors’ privacy would be protected.

And as long as law enforcement officers are willing to be disgusting pawns in outrageous criminal acts, they deserve every bit of the blowback when the darkness is exposed. When officers are more concerned about preserving their paycheck and obeying lawless orders than they are about upholding their oath to the Constitution, they are not worthy of the badge.

Imagine if one of these completely innocent homeowners had opened fire and killed an officer–or even worse, if an officer had murdered one of them. And make no mistake, when law enforcement uses such tactics against people who know they’re not guilty of any crime, there’s a definite risk of tragedy.

I put myself in their place: I know there’s zero reason for any kind of Gestapo raid on my house, so in a similar event I’m going to legitimately assume whoever is breaking into my house is a criminal impersonating police. This madness of SWAT-type raids for non-violent offenses needs to end, everywhere, and immediately.

John Chisholm should be in prison, and forfeit every benefit of his office. Period.

Read more at http://politicaloutcast.com/2015/05/meet-one-of-wisconsins-organized-crime-bosses/#vchYmizPxZqE3BuO.99

Here’s The Real Reason For Baltimore’s ‘BLACK PROBLEMS’

Screen-Shot-2015-04-29-at-10.07.42-AM-300x180
Contrary to what the media and race baiters try to make you believe, here is the real reason why Baltimore is the way that it is.

By Allen West
The population of Baltimore is 622,000 and 63 percent of its population is black. The mayor, state’s attorney, police chief and city council president are black, as is 48 percent of the police force. But as 36-year-old Robert Stokes says, “You look around and see unemployment. Filling out job applications and being turned down because of where you live and your demographic. It’s so much bigger than the police department.”
Everyone wants to have an honest conversation about race, so let’s us endeavor to do just that. Now, of course, when you speak the hard truth about race issues in America – and not just the liberal progressive talking points – and you’re white, you’ll be branded a racist. And if you’re black, well, y’all just watch the comments below and see the denigrating drivel.
As posted on Breitbart.com by John Nolte, “Contrary to the emotional blackmail some leftists are attempting to peddle, Baltimore is not America’s problem or shame. That failed city is solely and completely a Democrat problem.”
“Like many failed cities, Detroit comes to mind, and every city besieged recently by rioting, Democrats and their union pals have had carte blanche to inflict their ideas and policies on Baltimore since 1967, the last time there was a Republican Mayor. In 2012, after four years of his own failed policies, President Obama won a whopping 87.4% of the Baltimore city vote. Democrats run the city of Baltimore, the unions, the schools, and, yes, the police force. Since 1969, there have only been only been two Republican governors of the State of Maryland. Elijah Cummings has represented Baltimore in the U.S. Congress for more than thirty years.”

The truth is that it is a culture of dependency as promulgated by the race baiters and new plantation overseers of the inner city that has created what we’re seeing play out in Baltimore. There is where the blame lies, but there are very few who are willing to admit just that.

Remember what ESPN sports commentator Stephen A. Smith said? He wished that for one voting cycle, the black community would vote Republican. Heck, they could do no worse — and look, even the people of the state of Maryland decided to try something different and elected a Republican governor. Who, when finally asked, immediately activated the National Guard to quell the violence and chaos which the Democrat Mayor of Baltimore failed to comprehend, and control. Perhaps what we’re witnessing in Baltimore is the pure definition of insanity — continuing to do the same thing and expect different results.

Yes, the dirty little secret that no one wants to admit is that Baltimore, and so many other urban areas and inner city communities in America are a reflection of the abject failure of liberal progressive socialist policies as advanced by the Democrat party.

The preeminent question is whether or not those in Baltimore and other places will recognize who is truly responsible for their plight. Or will they continue to be manipulated and propagandized by the liberal progressive media and the poverty pimps like the one supposedly heading down from New York City.

John Nolte’s piece was spot on and this is not about an American failure, it is about a Democrat failure. And ask yourself, who were the ones who developed the concept of urban economic empowerment zones — as opposed to the ones who have produced urban depraved enslavement zones?

Liberal DemocratBaltimore Mayor “Gave Those Who Wished to Destroy Space to Do That”

by Tim Brown
OK, if there is a picture that you would find in the dictionary beside the word “stupid,” perhaps Mayor of Baltimore Stephanie Rawlings-Blake would be the face you would see. Following the rioting that has occurred in the streets of her town, the mayor actually went on national television and told the public that the City of Baltimore “gave those who wished to destroy space to do that.”

“I worked with the police and instructed them to do everything that they could to make sure that the protesters were able to exercise their right to free speech,” Mayor Rawlings-Blake told reporters. “It’s a very delicate balancing act because while we try to make sure that they were protected from the cars and the other things that were going on, we also gave those who wished to destroy space to do that as well.”


Then she added, “We worked very hard to keep that balance and to put ourselves in the best position to de-escalate.”
OK, first thing is first, Baltimore… you people are absolutely brain-dead if you continue to allow this mayor to stay in office, and frankly, you get what you deserve by leaving her in place.
Second, understand that the right of free speech is not to destroy. It is to speak that which is truthful and right.

The fact that Mayor Rawlings-Blake gave space to those wanting to destroy makes her and any police who followed her lead accessories to the property damage that occurred in the city of Baltimore. The city did nothing when New Black Panthers leader Malik Shabazz encouraged the rioting. Furthermore, citizens of Baltimore you now have your mayor openly admitting that on video. I suggest that those who have had their property damaged by rioters sue Baltimore Police and Mayor Rawlings-Blake individually for their complicity in these criminal acts. Additionally, call for the arrest of every rioter present that can be identified (You can begin with this moron throwing a barricade).
As a side note, in a similar manner as I stated when there were some of these race rioters who wanted to stir things up in Florida just ahead of the George Zimmerman verdict, had I been mayor, I would have instructed every citizen to be well armed and deal with these violent criminals on the street to protect life and property. My office would have come along to either bring justice on those still living or carry away the dead (a good riddance to society). Order would have been maintained. There would have been no space given to criminals to destroy other people’s property at all, zero, zip, nada.
The fact that those elected to do a job are failing to do it only demonstrates how lawless the people have become because they tolerate it. They hold neither the criminals that perpetrate the crimes responsible nor do they hold those in authority who are charged with bringing justice to bear on those evildoers to a high standard (Rom. 13:1-5).
It’s time the people demanded that the mayor and the police officers who did nothing be arrested, along with the people that actually committed crimes, and brought to justice!

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/04/baltimore-mayor-stephanie-rawlings-blake-gave-those-who-wished-to-destroy-space-to-do-that/#UMs4uK01cBYQBJzO.99

‘Straight up evil': Harry Reid admits to despicable, baseless attacks on Mitt Romney during presidential campaign

Screen-Shot-2015-04-01-at-12.58.37-PM-1200x675
by Glenn Beck Program Wednesday, Apr 1, 2015 at 12:59 PM EDT Share This Tweet This On his way to retirement, Harry Reid still can’t muster up an ounce of class from within. When asked if he regretted lobbing baseless accusations against Mitt Romney in which he implied the GOP candidate cheated on his taxes, the outgoing Senator scoffed at the question and said ‘it worked, didn’t it?’. What a guy. Back during the 2012 presidential campaign, Reid was on the Senate floor when he accused Romney of not paying taxes. “Let [Mitt Romney] prove that he has paid taxes. Because he hasn’t,” he said. CNN’s Dana Bash brought up the incident with the retiring senator. “I don’t regret that at all. The Koch brothers. No one would help me. They were afraid the Koch brothers would go after them. So I did it on my own,” Reid said. “So no regrets, not about Mitt Romney about the Koch brothers. Some people have even called it McCarthyite,” asked Dana Bash. “Well, they can call it whatever they want. Romney didn’t win, did he?” Reid said. Wow.

“Ends justify the means. Saul Alinsky. Let’s give the tip of a hat to the first radical, Satan. I mean, that is evil,” Glenn said. “It’s evil. And what’s amazing about it, really, I haven’t heard anything about this. We accept this. We accept this. This is a guy who claims to be a religious guy. We accept it.” “I hope they’re listening to that in the church office in Salt Lake City. Because that is unbelievable. That is flat-out bearing false witness against your brother. And being proud of it. He’s proud of it.,” Pat said. Glenn was so angry over the audio he had to change topics before he said something inappropriate for air.

Source: http://www.glennbeck.com/2015/04/01/straight-up-evil-harry-reid-admits-to-despicable-baseless-attacks-on-mitt-romney-during-presidential-campaign/?utm_source=glennbeck&utm_medium=contentcopy_link

Are You Kidding Me -California Democrat Warns of Global Warming-Induced Prostitution

by Phillip Hodges
Rep_Barbara_Lee_California

Things are going to get so bad with manmade global warming that women will be forced to sell themselves just to get food and water for their families. And of course, it’s all the anti-science conservatives’ fault, even though there’s no science to back up the claim that the oil and gas industry and the Koch brothers are behind the effort to heat up the planet. They must not be trying hard enough, because the science shows that the planet hasn’t warmed in the past two decades. “Pro-science” liberals claim that the solution to the [non-]warming planet is to give more money and power to the failing green industry.

Writing for Breitbart, Warner Todd Huston reported:

On Wednesday, California Democrat Barbara Lee proposed a resolution in the House of Representatives that claims women will eventually be forced into prostitution in order to obtain life-sustaining food and water for their families.

Lee introduced House Concurrent Resolution 29, warning that women will be forced into “transactional sex” to get enough food and clean water — all because global warming will create “conflict and instability” in the world.

“Women will disproportionately face harmful impacts from climate change,” Lee’s resolution reads. It continues claiming, “Food insecure women with limited socioeconomic resources may be vulnerable to situations such as sex work, transactional sex, and early marriage that put them at risk for HIV, STIs, unplanned pregnancy, and poor reproductive health.”

Lee’s document goes on to urge Congress to agree on the “disparate impacts of climate change on women,” and goes on to demand that Congress use “gender-sensitive frameworks in developing policies to address climate change.”

Lee also charges that women, who are “often underrepresented in the development and formulation of policy regarding adaptation to climate change,” are doubtless in the best position to offer policy ideas.

John Kerry just warned of “climate refugees” emerging because of global warming. And now here’s a congress(wo)man warning that women will have to resort to prostitution to keep their families from starving.

And “poor reproductive health” just means that in this climatic apocalypse scenario, women will have limited or no access to abortion. To liberals, that’s pretty much the worst thing they can imagine.

Read more at http://lastresistance.com/10827/california-dem-warns-of-global-warming-induced-prostitution/#Dljd1h71hgtEaauX.99

Why Hillary’s Talking Points Don’t Add Up

Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks during a press conference at the United Nations in New York
Using the United Nations as a backdrop to theatrically remind people of her foreign policy gravitas, Hillary Clinton held what the UN referred to as a press “encounter” outside of the UN Security Council chamber on March 10th. Hillary repeated over and over again her well-rehearsed talking points regarding the private e-mail account she used during her tenure as Secretary of State. Figuring that it is better to beg for forgiveness rather than refrain from doing something that could later be considered wrong-doing, Hillary said that “looking back” she now thinks it would have been better if she had used one device connected to the official government e-mail account and a separate device connected to her own personal e-mail system. The former Secretary of State just thought at the time it would be more convenient to use only one device for both her personal and work-related e-mails, connected to a server that had been previously set up for her husband’s New York office, rather than two separate devices and e-mail accounts.

Hillary’s defenses amounted to the following four talking points: (1) She obeyed all laws and regulations that were in effect at the time and no classified materials were communicated via her e-mails. Moreover, what she did was not unusual. Other former Secretaries of State did the same thing; (2) She made sure to send many of her work-related e-mails to State Department and other federal government employees, whom she assumed were on the official .gov e-mail account. Therefore, such e-mails would have been captured and automatically archived on the government system; (3) She bent over backwards to turn over all e-mails that were even “possibly” work-related to the State Department in response to its request for such e-mails from all prior Secretaries of State. Hillary only got rid of the e-mails she determined to be personal (which may have been as many as 30,000, although the precise number was not entirely clear from her remarks); and (4) it is the responsibility of each federal employee to determine which of his or her e-mails will be regarded as personal and which ones will be determined to be work-related, which is precisely what Hillary said she did in making the selection of the e-mails turned over to the State Department.

None of these defenses stand up to any objective scrutiny.

First of all, there were archive regulations in effect in 2009, which required federal employees — including Hillary while she was Secretary of State — to preserve her work-related e-mails. The “every-one did it” defense holds no water because Hillary’s use of her own private server, set up in her New York residence, was reportedly unprecedented. Hillary rejected the suggestion that an independent third party examine her server including its hard drive, which raises the inevitable question of whether she is trying to hide something. Her privacy rationale is bogus, considering her decision to blend personal and work-related e-mails on the same personal account hosted by the same home-installed server in the first place. All Hillary could say was that the server “will remain private.”

Moreover, even if Hillary’s contention that she sent many of her work-related e-mails to government employees, expecting them to be automatically archived, is true, such action alone would not address any e-mails she may have sent to foreign government officials or to prospective donors to the Clinton Foundation that were not also sent to federal government employees.

Hillary’s defense that it is up to each federal employee to decide individually which of his or her e-mails are personal and which are work-related does not mean that such decision cannot be examined by the government and remedied if necessary. In Hillary’s case, that is impossible due to her refusal to turn over the server sitting in her residence to an independent examiner. We have to take her word that she turned over all e-mails that were even “possibly” work-related which, given her track record, is not very reliable. One question has already arisen regarding Hillary’s trip to Libya in October 2011 when she was photographed with “her handheld device in her hand,” according to South Carolina GOP Rep. Trey Gowdy, the chief congressional Benghazi investigator. Congressman Gowdy said that “we have no e-mails from that day. In fact, we have no e-mails from that trip.”

While most of the questions asked during Hillary Clinton’s press encounter dealt with her e-mail situation, she was also asked how she could reconcile her long advocacy of women’s rights with her foundation’s acceptance of donations from countries with abysmal human rights records involving women and girls. Hillary ducked the question. Hillary said that her advocacy of women’s rights issues over the years is unquestionable. Hillary added that she had no doubt that “people who want to support the foundation know full well what it is we stand for and what we’re working on.” Apparently taking money from countries like Saudi Arabia, where women are still treated as chattel, does not in Hillary’s mind call into question how committed she and her foundation really are to “working on” ending violence and discrimination against women and girls in Saudi Arabia and other human rights abusing Middle Eastern countries that are sources of foundation donations.

In sum, Hillary Clinton tried to use the typical Clintonian evasive tactics, hoping the press and the American people will move on to other matters. The Clintons have gotten away with their “what difference does it make” attitude many times before. Hopefully, the truth will finally catch up with them this time, especially if Hillary, as expected, does run for president.

HELP US KEEP YOU BETTER INFORMED ABOUT THE TRICKS OF THE RADICAL PROGRESSIVE REVOLUTION PLEASE DONATE ANY AMOUNT YOU CAN