Categories
Archives
HELP US KEEP YOU BETTER INFORMED ABOUT THE TRICKS OF THE RADICAL PROGRESSIVE REVOLUTION PLEASE DONATE ANY AMOUNT YOU CAN
target="_top">

Archive for the ‘Democrat Party’ Category

UH-OH! IT’S ABOUT TO GET REALLY NASTY: CLINTON’S FORMER MISTRESS SPEAKS OUT!!

By Chandra Medina
The closer we move to the election more skeletons come out of the closet. For Hillary, that means more of Bill’s former lovers keep coming out of the woodwork.

This time it’s a former Miss Arkansas, who says being Bill’s mistress is old news, but the message she is sending out will shock you? Or will it? She recently issued a warning about a possible suicide. Only, she says if she “mysteriously” is discovered dead, it is NOT at her own hands.

Hilary-Clinton-1400x885
From the Daily Mail:
A beauty queen who claims she was Bill Clinton’s mistress has posted a dramatic warning on Facebook that if she dies by ‘suicide’ no-one should believe it – because Hillary had previously ‘beat me down so I’d lose everything’.
Sally Miller, a one-time Miss Arkansas, warned that she believed she could be killed for revealing what she said were threats and intimidation by Clinton allies concerned that their methods would be revealed to voters.
‘Please share. Consider this a warning. Trust me, no one is safe,’ Miller wrote.
‘In this election year, if you read I died….by committing suicide….don’t believe it. Sally Miller.’
Sally Miller claims she is being followed and solicited online by unknown young men. She is being threatened and intimidated.
Miller had an affair with Bill Clinton in 1983, that was revealed in 1994. ‘She doesn’t care if I discuss my affair with Bill—that’s old news,’ Miller wrote. ‘She wants to make certain I don’t write about her actions—-how she paid professionals to stalk me, frighten and threaten me, and, ultimately, “finish me off.”’
Miller used Facebook to detail a series of what she describes as attacks on her by Hillary Clinton, remarking at one point, ‘I did a good job of hiding in China for 10 years after Hillary cause [sic] me to lose a job and almost my life.’ Things will only heat up even more as the presidential race goes on.
The Clinton’s have an interesting history with people “mysteriously disappearing” who choose to get in the way of what they want. History has shown Hillary smack in the middle of some dark shady practices which she continues to deny. She wants that chair in the Oval Office. I take this woman’s warning to heart…she may need to find another hiding place. What do you think?

Suicide2

The coming Obama winter

democrats110515
\
The Democrats’ insistence on chaining themselves to President Barack Obama’s dubious legacy guaranteed their winter of discontent. But after Tuesday’s bloodbath, they’ll need a blood transfusion and more than a little luck just to survive the fall. And I’m hard-pressed to offer much sympathy, especially considering we’ve already told them more than once that we really don’t like their jug-eared messiah.

Of course, Obama and his Democratic minions have even less regard for us, a point they’ve taken great pains to clarify in no uncertain terms. Were it not for their open disdain for more than half the country — a disdain set to words and music by Hillary Clinton — I might be tempted to feel kind of bad for the poor saps. But they cheered when the doddering old bat called 175 million Americans her “enemies,” so they’re welcome to get bent at their earliest convenience.

This past Tuesday, they not only got bent, they got wrenched into an angle for which you have to pay extra in Vegas. All across the nation, voters registered their extreme displeasure with Obama’s tomfoolery. With the man himself already astride his lame duck, from sea to shining sea, America exacted a pound of electoral flesh from his Democratic accomplices.

In Virginia, Gov. Terry McAuliffe led an army of Obama-endorsed anti-Bill of Rights hate groups like Moms Demand and Everytown into an epic battle for the souls of the Commonwealth. The gun grabbers poured millions upon millions of dollars into state legislative races, casting the NRA as some sort of terrorist group in a vicious campaign of bile and slander. For their efforts, and not a little bit of cash, they bought a brutal beating. Pro-Bill of Rights candidates prevailed at a 92 percent to 8 percent clip. The Goths didn’t hit Rome that hard, and they were trying to wreck the joint.

In Kentucky, the Democrats decided the spectacularly unraveling Obamacare gave them the best shot at retaining a governor’s mansion that they have controlled like a family manor. Departing Democratic Gov. Steve Beshear, a committed Obamacare flunky, sent voters to the polls with “(Obamacare) is a winner for our people, and because it’s a winner for our people, it’s going to be a winner politically … In 2016, I predict the Democratic nominee will make this a major issue and will pound the Republicans into the dust with it.” A Republican has held the keys to the Bluegrass State’s governor’s mansion only twice in the past century or so. Thanks in no small part to Beshear’s well-timed Obamacare reminder, Republican Matt Bevin will be moving in in January.

Joining Bevin in Frankfort will be newly elected Lt. Gov. Jenean Hampton, a political newcomer who can add “first African-American elected to statewide office in Kentucky” to her resume. In an era in which the Democrats flash the race card more often than Bill Clinton flashes his VIP card at the Bunny Ranch, their “rich white lawyer/rich white lawyer” ticket of Conway and Sannie Overly got trounced by racially diverse combat veterans Bevin and Hampton.

Deep in the heart of Texas, the liberal conclave of Houston dealt Obama’s dreams a serious blow by decreeing by vote that boys and girls probably shouldn’t be forced to share the same bathroom. Obama’s troops even gave the odious measure a cool moniker: HERO for Houston Equal Rights Ordinance. But Houstonians hammered the HERO by a nearly 2-1 margin. Turns out, even liberals get weirded out by the idea of their daughters sharing the lavatory with other people’s sons.

Out West, Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi, who proudly made the “sanctuary city” of San Francisco safe for illegal alien violence, was thrown over the fence by voters who felt Kate Steinle was more deserving of life and liberty than Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez. Lopez-Sanchez was the illegal alien who turned the get-out-of-jail-free card given to him by Obama’s buddies into the murder of Steinle, a young woman whose only crime was being in one of Obama’s beloved “sanctuary cities.” Much like Houstonians, the supremely liberal people of San Francisco have limits to their leftism, somewhere between “freedom for Francisco” and “funeral for Kate.”

All told, Obama’s shining legacy has now cost the Democrats nearly 1,000 state legislature seats, over a dozen governor’s mansions and majorities in both houses of Congress. The 2014 elections went badly for the party of Jim Crow and the Klan. The 2015 elections were actually worse. And the 2016 elections are shaping up to make the previous years’ elections look like cakewalks. The winter of the Democrats’ discontent is upon them; and, baby, it’s cold outside.

–Ben Crystal

Dem Lies About Trump on House Floor

Liberals are starting to worry about Trump.
Check it out:

Trump is getting it from all sides now as Luis Gutierrez, our old buddy from Illinois, a Democrat member of Congress that was desperately hoping we’d have amnesty by now. He had already set up procedures for it; Obama let him down. But he’s really been paving the way for it, and he’s really, really, really upset that Saturday Night Live is gonna host Trump.

Luis Gutierrez is leading an effort to get Saturday Night Live to rescind their invitation. He went to the floor of the House of Representatives to rail against Trump appearing on Saturday Night Live.

GUTIERREZ: “It starts every Q&A at every high school I visit. The questions are about Donald Trump. “Is he gonna be our next president? Is it true that he wants to revoke our citizenship, deport us to the countries our parents came from? Is it true he wants to round us up, Mr. Gutierrez, and deport us all?” When they hear that Trump is hosting Saturday Night Live — not just being a guest, but actually hosting — even after saying Mexicans are mostly rapists, criminals, and drug dealers, they get the impression that calling whole groups of people rapists, criminals, and drug dealers — based on their ethnicity or national origin — is basically okay with us in America.”

Luis, are you actually trying to tell us that people are running around talking about Trump hosting Saturday Night Live being worried about it, that if he were just guesting it’d be okay, but he’s hosting, and that has ’em really upset? Luis, this is your deal. This is typical of what these people do. (imitating Luis) “Everywhere I go, every high school I go to everybody’s asking me, ‘Luis, why, Luis, why is Trump saying… why?’” Nobody’s asking Luis about it. They have their own opinions already.

Luis is just putting his thoughts in other people’s mouths, minds, and trying to expand the universe of people that supposedly think the way he does. I think, Luis, you gotta be very careful. Your comments here that you just attributed to Trump are what put him at the top of the heap on day one. You’re just reminding people why they supported Trump at the outset, if you keep talking this way. He wasn’t through. We have one more bite, again, this on the floor of the House just this morning.

GUTIERREZ: “When I asked these young Americans whether they plan to get registered to vote, every hand goes up in the classroom. Donald Trump is spurring youth voter mobilization like I’ve never seen before. But let’s be honest. Do we really want to motivate civic participation through fear of deportation, racial profiling, and families being broken up?”

Stop the tape. Hell, yes, you do! That’s exactly what you want. By all rights, Luis, you should be demanding that Trump not be thrown off Saturday Night Live. If all of these benefits are accruing to the Democrat Party, if all these people tell you they can’t wait to register, they can’t wait to vote, Luis, you really care why they want to register? And if they’re registering out of fear of deportation or racial profiling or families being broken up, you worry that they’re — don’t try to sell us this bill of goods, Luis. You’ll take it however you can get it, and you’ll applaud Trump for doing it.

To The Senators Who Voted Against Kate’s Law — Your Hands Are Dyed Red

by Bob Knowles

It’s easy for man to let others die if those who are dying are out of sight. That much we’ve learned from war. Setting aside the morality of particular wars, war is easy to support when you’re not the one fighting. This ethical defect we’ve developed as a species was on full display this week when the Senate voted down Kate’s Law.

Kate’s Law, otherwise known as the “Stop Sanctuary Policies and Protect Americans Act,” would have withheld federal grants from sanctuary cities (cities that refuse to obey federal immigration laws, thus protecting criminal illegal aliens), and mandated a minimum five-year prison sentence for any illegal caught re-entering the United States who had a prior aggregated felony conviction, or two prior illegal re-entry convictions.

This bill was colloquially known as Kate’s Law because San Fransisco resident Kate Steinle was shot and killed in July by Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, an illegal alien and seven-time felon who had previously been deported five times.

The bill, which needed 60 votes to move forward, was blocked 54-45. 45 Senators voted against the bill, almost all of whom are Democrats (Lindsey Graham didn’t vote).

Prior to the vote, Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) said:

“The standard rhetorical device that so many Democratic Senators use is to say ‘Well, not all immigrants are criminals.’ Well of course they’re not…but this bill doesn’t deal with all immigrants, it deals with one specific subset of immigrants: Criminal illegal aliens. Those who come to this country illegally and also have additional criminal convictions, whether homicide, whether sexual assault, whether kidnapping, or battery, or drunk driving…For every Democratic senator, this vote today is a simple decision: With whom do you stand? Do you stand with the violent, criminal illegal aliens who are being released over and over again?”


It’s been argued–even by conservatives–that such mandatory sentences would burden our already overpopulated prisons, which would be fiscally imprudent. I understand that argument, however, the alternative to imprisonment is deportation. And as we’ve learned from the Kate Steinle killing, deportation doesn’t do very much when we have a porous border.

Democrats and Republicans love to brag about deporting criminal illegals while someone like Francisco Lopez-Sanchez entered into the United States illegally five times. Wow, we’re doing such a great job with those violent criminal illegals! Hey, is that Francisco creeping across the border AGAIN?! You little devil!

Also of note, the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) reported that in 2013, ICE released 36,007 “convicted criminal aliens” into the wind. Of the 36,007 criminal aliens, 193 had been convicted of homicide, 426 of sexual assault, 303 of kidnapping, and 1,075 of aggravated assault. This is a severe problem.

The Kate Steinle killing wasn’t some freak thing. We basically don’t have borders, and apparently, we just release many of the criminal illegals we do manage to snag.

To the Democrats–and singular Republican Mark Kirk–who voted against Kate’s Law, I suppose you’ve revealed your priorities. You care more about your agenda, whatever the end goal may be–voters for Democrats, and cheap labor for Republicans–than you do about human life.

I say this because in addition to voting against this law, you continuously obstruct any and every attempt to secure the border unless it’s packaged with “comprehensive” immigration reform legislation (translation: amnesty).

If someone is rushed into the ER with multiple stab wounds, gushing blood, the doctor’s first priority is to stem the blood-flow, not give the exsanguinating patient antibiotics. Similarly, if we don’t first secure the border, dealing with illegals who are already here doesn’t really matter, because we still have a gaping wound.

Regardless of the law itself, and the arguments against it fiscally, or on other grounds, Cruz is correct. The 45 Senators who voted ‘No’ on Kate’s Law, and the Senators who block “border security first” bills again and again–all to advance an agenda–bear the full burden of Kate Steinle’s death, as well as any subsequent deaths at the hands of criminal illegal aliens.

But it’s just so easy to let people die when you aren’t watching them take their final breath, isn’t it?

Read more at http://lastresistance.com/14339/to-the-senators-who-voted-against-kates-law-your-hands-are-dyed-red/#c5dHmcD3wZ2o6myt.99

LIAR, LIAR… PANTSUIT ON FIRE: Here’s A List Of Hillary’s Whoppers From The #DemDebate

Screen-Shot-2015-10-14-at-7.31.54-PM
Cackle, Cackle, Cackle


Tuesday night’s debate featured a master class on lying from the lying liar who lies about her lies, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

She spoke for approximately 24 minutes, and aside from her opening statement – “I’m Hillary Clinton” – virtually every word that exited her mouth was untrue. But because Hillary appeared to be lady with mild socialist depression in a full-blown socialist insane asylum, nobody laid a glove on her.

Thus it is left to us to debunk her various obfuscations and untruths. Here we go.

“I have spent a very long time – my entire adult life – looking for ways…to find the ways for each child to live up to his or her God-given potential.” Well, unless you’re an unborn child. Then, get ready for a trip down the sink.

“Yes, finally, fathers will be able to say to their daughters, you, too, can grow up to be president.” Technically, you’ll have to marry a president first, however.

“Actually, I have been very consistent.” Anderson Cooper asked Hillary about her shifting positions on issues ranging from the Iraq war to same-sex marriage to the Trans-Pacific Partnership. She then dropped that whopper. Hillary has been one of the least consistent major party candidates in American history. She then dropped a series of lies about her own positional changes. And then she finally concluded that she had a “range of views, but they are rooted in my values and my experience.” Those values are “becoming president” and her experience is “reading the polls.”

“I did say, when I was secretary of state, three years ago, that I hoped it would be the gold standard. It was just finally negotiated last week, and in looking at it, it didn’t meet my standards.” This is plainly untrue. Here’s what she said in 2012 about the TPP: “This TPP sets the gold standard in trade agreements to open free, transparent, fair trade, the kind of environment that has the rule of law and a level playing field.” She didn’t hope it would be the gold standard. It was the gold standard. Naturally, PolitiFact labeled this statement “half-true.” That means it’s a huge, glaring lie.

“I’m a progressive. But I’m a progressive who likes to get things done…how to find common ground, and I have proved that in every position that I’ve had, even dealing with Republicans who never had a good word to say about me, honestly.” Nope. As Senator from New York, Hillary accomplished virtually nothing. Her name was attached to exactly zero legislation. Her only major impact on policy came in the form of Hillarycare, which drove Republicans to massive electoral victory in 1994.

“When I think about capitalism, I think about all the small businesses that were started…” The media drooled over the exchange between Hillary and Bernie over capitalism. But there is no distinction between the economic philosophy of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT)16%
and that of Hillary Clinton. She said she wanted to use government to force companies to “share profits with the workers” – a line straight from the Marxist playbook. She said she wanted the wealthy to “pay their fair share” – which meant everything. She said she wanted paid family leave, universal college tuition availability, and a bevy of other free goodies. As I tweeted before the debate, her competition with Bernie Sanders looked like this:

Hillary: Free health care! Sanders: Free college! Hillary: Free abortions! Sanders: Free EVERYTHING! Hillary: FREE EVERYTHING INFINITY!

— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) October 13, 2015

“It was pretty straightforward to me that [Sanders] was going to give immunity to the only industry in America. Everybody else has to be accountable, but not the gun manufacturers.” There is no special immunity for gun manufacturers. The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act of 2005 was designed to prevent ultra-leftist jurisdictions from twisting tort law to make gun manufacturers liable for “public nuisance” in the way that manufacturers are liable for their pollution. The law does not stop lawsuits against manufacturers or dealers from being sued if they knowingly sell a product to a criminal. They can still be sued for design flaws, or negligence.

“Well first of all, we got a lot of business done with the Russians when Medvedev was the president, and not Putin….There’s no doubt that when Putin came back in and said he was going to be President, that did change the relationship.” Nonsense. Putin was always the leader of Russia, even when Medvedev was his puppet. Hillary knew Putin ran the country when Medvedev was president; Medvedev, for example, was president when Russia invaded Georgia in 2008. Hillary handed the Russians a reset button anyway. Hillary also advocated for taking on Bashar Assad – the same man she once called a “reformer.”

“I think while you’re talking about the tough decision that President Obama had to make about Osama bin Laden, where I was one of his few advisers, or putting together that coalition to impose sanctions on Iran…” Glomming onto the kill of Osama Bin Laden in order to explain her vote for the Iraq war was simply nonsensical. But the idea that she “put together the coalition to impose sanctions on Iran” is simply untrue. International sanctions against Iran have been on the books for decades. And Hillary was integrally involved in negotiating the end of those sanctions, as well as letting Iran enrich uranium.

“We had a murderous dictator, Gadhafi, who had American blood on his hands, as I’m sure you remember, threatening to massacre large numbers of the Libyan people… Our response, which I think was smart power at its best, is that the United States will not lead this.” Hillary reportedly manufactured the Libyan genocide story out of wholecloth, and overrode US intelligence in order to push that narrative. If Libya was “smart power at its best,” it would be incredible to find out what “smart power at its worst” would be (well, other than Syria, Ukraine, Iran…). Libya became a haven for terrorists because we deposed a dictator who posed no threat to us. The notion that Iraq was a disaster area of American foreign policy but Libya is a great success story is patently insane. Hillary’s lies about Libya didn’t end there.

“I’ll get to that.” Hillary said this with regard to Benghazi. She never did, of course. Her response mirrored her response in Benghazi, by the way: “I’ll get back to that,” she said to our Libyan staff, then proceeded to do nothing.

“The Libyan people had a free election the first time since 1951. And you know what, they voted for moderates, they voted with the hope of democracy.” It would be important to remember that the Libyan government is currently operating with no control of the country, and is effectively a government-in-exile.

“I think it has to be continued threat from the spread of nuclear weapons, nuclear material that can fall into the wrong hands. I know the terrorists are constantly seeking it, and that’s why we have to stay vigilant, but also united around the world to prevent that.” Hillary said the spread of nuclear weapons represented the chief threat to the United States. She also negotiated the Iran nuclear deal. The statement that people around the world are united to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons is a plain lie, given the acceptance of the Iran deal, which makes Iranian nuclear development inevitable.

“Well, I’ve taken responsibility for it. I did say it was a mistake. What I did was allowed by the State Department, but it wasn’t the best choice. And I have been as transparent as I know to be, turning over 55,000 pages of my e-mails, asking that they be made public. And you’re right. I am going to be testifying. I’ve been asking to testify for some time and to do it in public, which was not originally agreed to.” Lies, lies, and more lies. She did not take responsibility for her email scandal any more than she took responsibility for Benghazi: she said she “took responsibility” but never admitted to having done anything wrong. Her email scheme was not allowed by federal law, but she was the head of the State Department and thus waived rules for herself. She may have been as transparent as she knows how to be, but that transparency involved setting up a private server, loading it with classified information, and then deleting some 30,000 emails. She only asked to testify after Congress demanded she testify. Fortunately, none of this mattered, since Bernie Sanders intervened to hand her his testicles in a jar by saying nobody cared about her emails.

“I want to make sure every single person in this country has the same opportunities that he and I have had, to make the most of their God-given potential and to have the chances that they should have in America for a good education, good job training, and then good jobs.” Not everyone can marry the president of the United States.

“This inequality challenge we face, we have faced it at other points. It’s absolutely right. It hasn’t been this bad since the 1920s. But if you look at the Republicans versus the Democrats when it comes to economic policy, there is no comparison. The economy does better when you have a Democrat in the White House and that’s why we need to have a Democrat in the White House in January 2017.” If Democrats are so great at economics, why is inequality as bad as it has been in a century? And saying that Democratic presidents preside over good economies seems to neglect the fact that Bill Clinton, for example, presided over a Republican Congress.

“We have to deal with the problem that the banks are still too big to fail. We can never let the American taxpayer and middle class families ever have to bail out the kind of speculative behavior that we saw.” In this debate, Hillary Clinton also backed Dodd-Frank, which legally enshrines too big to fail. Bailouts are now mandated by federal law, thanks to Hillary Clinton and Democrats. And Democratic policy loves bailouts – they are huge fans of crony capitalism, endless bailouts through stimulus packages and taxpayer giveaways.

“I represented Wall Street, as a senator from New York, and I went to Wall Street in December of 2007 — before the big crash that we had — and I basically said, ‘Cut it out! Quit foreclosing on homes! Quit engaging in these kinds of speculative behaviors.’” This is idiocy. Hillary did do this, but saying that Wall Street was engaging in risky behavior, and that therefore they should have give more loans to risky home buyers and stop foreclosing on bad buyers – well, that’s just dumb. Those practices led to the crisis in the first place.

“I never took a position on Keystone until I took a position on Keystone.” True, actually. But brutally stupid nonetheless. She also said she would not take a position on pot legalization. No shock there.

“I have been on the forefront of dealing with climate change, starting in 2009, when President Obama and I crashed (ph) a meeting with the Chinese and got them to sign up to the first international agreement to combat climate change that they’d ever joined.” The Copenhagen Summit in 2009 was an international fiasco for the United States. As Michael Bastasch notes, “the summit quickly fell apart and no legally-binding agreement was signed. The summit was widely regarded as a failure, and even Obama was disappointed in the results.” The United States ended up signing onto a non-binding agreement that pledged $100 billion in funding to impoverished countries.

“My plan would enable anyone to go to a public college or university tuition free.” College is not free. Somebody pays for it. Who? As always, the wealthy.

“I think that it was necessary to make sure that we were able after 9/11 to put in place the security that we needed. And it is true that it did require that there be a process. What happened, however, is that the Bush administration began to chip away at that process. And I began to speak out about their use of warrantless surveillance and the other behavior that they engaged in.” Hillary Clinton voted to reauthorize the Patriot Act in 2006. And Hillary’s supposed leadership against Bush-era abuses of the Patriot Act didn’t stop President Obama from expanding the use of surveillance far beyond what Bush ever did.

“Well, I can’t think of anything more of an outsider than electing the first woman president, but I’m not just running because I would be the first woman president….Well, I would not ask anyone to vote for me based on my last name.” False and false.

“California has had a paid leave program for a number of years….And it has not had the ill effects that the Republicans are always saying it will have.” California uses employee payroll taxes to finance paid family leave. That means all the costs of the program are hidden, rather than explicit. Businesses leave California and employment declines because of its high tax rates. Businesses hire fewer women if forced to pay higher taxes in order to do so.

“They don’t mind having big government to interfere with a woman’s right to choose and to try to take down Planned Parenthood. They’re fine with big government when it comes to that. I’m sick of it.” Republicans want to defund Planned Parenthood. That’s not big government. That’s small government. Further, it’s not “big government” to protect human life through force of law any more than it is “big government” to have murder laws on the books.

“I know we can afford it, because we’re going to make the wealthy pay for it. That is the way to get it done.” This myth, repeated ad nauseum by Democrats, is truly reprehensible. Rich people cannot pay for all the utopian programs proposed by the left. As John Stossel points out, “If the IRS grabbed 100 percent of income over $1 million, the take would be just $616 billion.” Both Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton worshipped at the altar of Denmark last night, but Denmark has lower corporate tax rates than the United States, and far higher taxes on the middle class. You pay a 200 percent tax on cars in Denmark — everyone. Socialism isn’t built on the backs of the rich. It’s built on the backs of everyone who earns, and that includes the middle class.

“Well, in addition to the NRA, the health insurance companies, the drug companies, the Iranians.” The Iranians are not Hillary’s enemies. They love her.

Hillary’s a liar. But Democrats don’t care, because liars prosper in a world where hard work and honesty are punished in the name of equality and the Great Socialist Utopia.

Ben Shapiro is Senior Editor-At-Large of Breitbart News, Editor-in-Chief of DailyWire.com, and The New York Times bestselling author, most recently, of the book, The People vs. Barack Obama: The Criminal Case Against The Obama Administration (Threshold Editions, June 10, 2014). Follow Ben Shapiro on Twitter @benshapiro.

1 person was ‘stellar’ at Democrat debate

Anderson-Cooper-Hillary-Clinton-democratic-debate-cnn-600
While radio host Rush Limbaugh was not thrilled with the message of Democrats during their first debate of the 2016 election cycle, the conservative media star had high praise for the moderator of the CNN event.

“I thought Anderson Cooper was stellar last night,” Limbaugh said on his national broadcast Wednesday. “He came out of the box, and he was trying.”

Limbaugh was impressed with how Cooper focused on getting the candidates to stop dodging what was asked of them.

“Senator Sanders, you have to give a response,” Cooper said during the debate.

“Senator Sanders, you didn’t answer the question,” he said again.

“You agreed to these rules and you’re wasting time,” Cooper told Jim Webb. “So if you would finish your answer, we’ll move on.”

Like the reporting you see here? Sign up for free news alerts from WND.com, America’s independent news network.

Limbaugh explained: “They [the Democrats] put on a clinic on how to avoid answering these questions.”

“They wouldn’t answer any of his questions. They showed how it’s done. I mean, he was trying to get them to react to things they had said previously. He tried to get Hillary on flip-flopping. She wouldn’t go there. He tried to get the others on things they’ve said that have changed their minds about or things they’ve said that are really outrageous and over the top.”

Limbaugh noted there’s a stark difference when a Republican debate is taking place.

“The Republicans, of course, are obsessed with answering the questions specifically ’cause they think they have to, in order to show the independents that they’re nice people and that they’re not tricksters and they’re not afraid. But the Democrats can play whatever games of avoidance they want.”

Although Limbaugh initially said the moderators were not a factor in the event, he quickly took the claim back to say: “They didn’t ask specifically about Hillary’s problems. They didn’t really get into Benghazi or really get into her e-mails. In fact there was, I think, a conspiracy of sorts to just get rid of the e-mail subject altogether.

“And when that happened, when Bernie Sanders led that movement, that’s when I realized his candidacy is faux. F-A-U-X. He’s up there to get her nominated. There’s no way this guy is gonna get the nomination.”

Limbaugh also reiterated his theme that Democrats are Santa Claus, as the candidates made many financial promises including tuition-free college and free health care for illegal aliens.

Hillary Clinton noted, “I know we can afford it because we’re gonna make the wealthy pay for it.”

To that remark, Limbaugh responded: “We are $18 trillion in debt. Now, you can afford anything if you ignore that, and if you don’t think that’s a problem and if that number is irrelevant, the money never has to even be serviced or paid back, then of course you can afford anything. But the truth is, we can’t afford anything. We can afford maybe, what, what’s the number that we drag in by tax revenue every year? The numbers are confusing, but $3 trillion whatever we can afford every year, but we so exceed that. We have exceeded it for so long. We’re already paying for things we can’t afford. And these people just want to lop more and more on top of it.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/10/limbaugh-1-person-at-democrat-debate-was-stellar/#yKLVC3sufSo2I1of.99

TRUMP WON THE DEM’S DEBATE: With The Most Epic Tweet Of The Night

Screen-Shot-2015-10-14-at-7.01.03-AM-300x180
Donald Trump wins the debate even when he is isn’t in it.

While Tuesday night’s CNN political debate was intended as an opportunity for one of the Democrat Party presidential hopefuls to separate him or herself from the rest of the pack, the best line of the night came from a man who was not even in the room with the debaters nor in the same party.
In effect, Republican presidential hopeful Donald Trump stole the show with a perfectly-timed tweet explaining that Hillary Clinton, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Martin O’Malley, Jim Webb, and Lincoln Chafee spent their night talking about the all the free stuff they were going to give away–including ObamaCare benefits and tuition breaks for illegal immigrants–without once mentioning what they would do to make conditions better for U.S. military veterans.
So Trump tweeted: “Notice that illegal immigrants will be given ObamaCare and free college tuition but nothing has been mentioned about our VETERANS #DemDebate” It was the best line of the night by far

Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2015/10/trump-won-the-dems-debate-with-the-most-epic-tweet-of-the-night/

Arkansas Democrat Switches to GOP Because of Planned Parenthood

Holcomb
As the truth about Planned Parenthood is revealed to those who believed it was simply a women’s healthcare organization, people are turning away, disassociating themselves with a baby parts trafficking business which even harvests organs from born alive infants.

Today, Arkansas State Representative Mike Holcomb joined the list of defectors by leaving the Democratic Party and joining the Republican Party.

Holcomb, from Pine Bluff, a two-term legislator, said:

I’ve chosen to join the Republican Party because I firmly believe that the conservative values they represent best align with my own personal beliefs and convictions.

I believe in the sanctity of life. I believe in traditional marriage. I believe in helping Arkansans.

Read more at http://visiontoamerica.com/23571/arkansas-democrat-switches-to-gop-because-of-planned-parenthood/#1Xx53Ye77PZzVZeO.99

Why Hillary Clinton is Just Like Her Husband in All the Wrong Ways

at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 20, 2009.  (AP Photo/Jeff Christensen)

at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 20, 2009. (AP Photo/Jeff Christensen)

Hillary Clinton apparently has more in common with her husband than his last name. Before Hillary Clinton’s emails had been subpoenaed by the FBI, Clinton insisted, quite adamantly, that she had never sent or received classified information on her private server. That claim might have been true in a technical sense, but it smells like the kind of hair-splitting deception that made Slick Willy famous:

. . . The presence of classified information in e-mails Clinton wrote appears to contradict her assurances that she sent no such material.

“I have said repeatedly that I did not send nor receive classified material, and I’m very confident that when this entire process plays out that will be understood by the everyone,” she said last week during a Democratic Party meeting in Minneapolis. She said that government officials may now be making different determinations after the fact, but “it does not change the fact that I did not send, nor receive, material marked classified.”

Oh, I see. So when you said over and over again that you did not send or receive classified information, you meant that you did not send and receive information that was at the time marked classified. I see. So that doesn’t necessarily mean Hillary Clinton didn’t send and receive confidential, sensitive information. She apparently followed the letter of the law within a narrow set of parameters. She just didn’t follow the spirit of the law at all.

Is most fresh intelligence already marked classified? No. It gets marked classified after a review. So people in the State department have to be prudent about their correspondences so that sensitive or confidential information that will eventually be marked classified is treated like classified information from the outset.

Of all people, Hilary Clinton—as the Secretary of State—should have known that. In fact, I would be quite surprised if she didn’t. She just didn’t think it was that important. She didn’t care. Or she didn’t think she would be caught.

And now, just like her husband, she’s using carefully worded half-truths in order to shield herself from the consequences of her actions. “I have said repeatedly that I did not send nor receive classified material” sounds a whole lot like “I’m going to say this again: I did not have sexual relations with that woman.” It’s the same formula even. Repeat a half-truth long enough, and people might just believe it’s the whole truth.

So you wonder why Hillary Clinton defended her husband through all of his scandals? She’s just like him apparently. And though we may not be hearing about any extra-marital affairs on her part any time soon (because if she hasn’t already had one, she’s probably not going to at this point because, you know … [shudders]), I guarantee this will not be the last time she willfully deceives the American public.

Read more at http://lastresistance.com/13497/why-hillary-clinton-is-just-like-her-husband-in-all-the-wrong-ways/#zjutu3vuYChXSQfS.99

New Poll finds that 59% of Americans Support Trump on Deporting Illegal Immigrants!

walletWow. Could Donald Trump single handedly be turning the tide of political opinion against illegal immigration? It sure seems that way.

In recent years politicians have been terrified to even broach the subject of deporting illegal immigrants as part of immigration reform because of the likely backlash that they would have to face from voters. However, in recent days Donald Trump has seemed curiously impervious to critical reaction from left-leaning immigration activists and from moderate GOP sources who worry that he could be ‘poisoning the well’ for Republican presidential candidates. Ever major GOP candidate not named Ted Cruz has publicly commented on the “over the top” nature of Trump’s Illegal immigration comments. However, on this issue, it’s not Trump who is extreme, it’s everyone else (again not named Cruz) that doesn’t seem to understand what the American people are thinking on the subject.

The proof of Trump’s “mainstream” immigration policies are in the latest national poll from Investors Business Daily.

The latest IBD/TIPP Poll asked 913 adults coast to coast if they “support or oppose mandatory deportation of illegal immigrants in the U.S.” Not surprisingly, 87% of Trump supporters back the proposal.

What’s surprising is that 59% of the overall public does as well. Mandatory deportation gets majority support in all age groups except 18-24, every income group, among both women and men, at every level of educational achievement, and in rural, urban and suburban regions.

More interesting still is the fact that 64% of independents and 55% of moderates support deportation.

Even among Hispanics, the poll found 40% backed mandatory deportation — although the sample size is too small to make much of that number.

This is not a conservative/liberal divide; our ideas about illegal immigration are grounded in our beliefs about the law and justice. It is unjust for millions of people who broke the law to enter our nation to be given special treatment and be allowed to remain in our country when millions of other people have faithfully abided by our laws and are being kept out. It is also unjust for our government to prosecute American citizens for misdemeanor offenses while choosing to turn a blind eye toward the crimes of non-citizens who enter our country in defiance of our laws.

Corrupt politicians like Barack Obama (as well as other Democrats and Republicans) cannot have it both ways. Either we live in a nation governed by our laws… or we don’t.

Read more at http://eaglerising.com/23258/liberal-media-shocked-new-poll-finds-that-59-of-americans-support-trump-on-deporting-illegal-immigrants/#7bYWLCqmVwcU4SOu.99