Archive for the ‘Dirty Democrats’ Category

Limbaugh: Democrats will ‘butcher the entire notion of decency’ to destroy Trump

Radio host Rush Limbaugh told his audience on Tuesday that violent “art” depicting the murder of President Trump is part of a scorched-earth plan to destroy the administration.

The eponymous host of “The Rush Limbaugh Show” said recent beheading art by comedian Kathy Griffin, the assassination of a Trump-like Julius Caesar in a New York Shakespeare in the Park production, and hyper-partisan rhetoric are all part of a strategy designed by the Democratic Party and its allies to cripple Mr. Trump.

From The Washington Times

The conservative said double-standards on decency are found by studying reactions to the election “bullseye” map used by Sarah Palin in 2011, which some pundits linked to the shooting of then-Rep. Gabby Giffords, Arizona Democrat.

“We know that the left enjoys watching a Donald Trump character stabbed to death on stage. We know that the left enjoys Donald Trump cut to pieces by a thousand illegal leaks. We know that some on the left actually appreciated the art of Kathy Griffin’s decapitation of Trump and that photo-op,” Mr. Limbaughsaid. “We know that left, for the most part, will actively and loudly and proudly support the political assassination of Donald Trump. And as far as that goes, nothing is out of bounds.”

“Sarah Palin had nothing to do with Gabby Giffords being shot. And yet, when it happened, that’s the only person the left blamed. Here Donald Trump is assassinated every night in Central Park on the stage, and the left applauds this and says it’s art and wants more of it.”

The host’s commentary came in the wake of Delta Air Lines and Bank of America parting ways with New York’s nonprofit Public Theater over its Trump-inspired version of “Julius Caesar.”

“It’s good to see just how ugly the left is when their masks of acceptability and sophistication are removed,” he said. “The Democrat Party is attempting to erase boundaries between countries, and they are attempting to erase the boundaries of civility. The modern day left and Democrat Party is attempting to butcher the entire notion of decency, proprietary behavior, and civility.”

Mr. Limbaugh’s analysis came one day after Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, New York Democrat, took to the House floor and claimed “every” racist in America voted for Mr. Trump in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

“That’s not to say that every American who voted for Donald Trump is a racist,” he said. “We do know that every racist in America voted for Donald Trump. That’s a problem.”


Remember When Tim Kaine Told Liberals To “Fight Republicans In The Streets.”? Well, Now They Are

This morning brought with it more politically motivated violence as a man opened fire on lawmakers who were at a park in Virginia playing baseball. These upper-level Congressmen were reportedly minding going through their normal routine, when a gunman shot 50-100 rounds, injuring at least 5 including congressmen and aides.

Anyone could really start shooting for any reason around D.C., it’s a pretty explosive place, but one eyewitness report has us all fearing for the future of our nation. This is the report that Republican Representative Ron DeSantis gave to Fox News about his encounter with who he assumes was the assailant just moments before shots were fired:

The Democrats serving their constituents want to tell you that their violent rhetoric is just hyperbole, but apparently, some are taking it to heart. Apparently, they’re whipping people up into such an emotional frenzy that they’re actually going out and targeting Republican lawmakers while they’re trying to have a nice time at the park, and shooting them, just for disagreeing.

Thankfully, security and law enforcement were quick to respond and the event was devastating than it could have been.

Tim Kaine, VP pick for Hillary Clinton’s failed campaign, is a stellar example of this virtue-signaling nonsense, as he’s seen advocating for fighting in the streets against Republicans

Gee, I wonder how that’s working out for you.


President Trump is likely under strict legal advice to limit what he says publicly about the phony Russia investigation, but he couldn’t help himself after a Washington Post article confirmed that Special Counsel Robert Mueller was personally investigating him for obstruction of justice. On Thursday morning, an irate Trump lashed out at the transparent attempt to remove him from office.

“They made up a phony collusion with the Russians story, found zero proof, so now they go for obstruction of justice on the phony story,” Trump wrote. “Nice.”

He followed that up with another tweet laying bare his thoughts about Mueller’s inquiry.

“You are witnessing the single greatest WITCH HUNT in American political history – led by some very bad and conflicted people!” he said.

According to the Post’s sources, both Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and NSA Director Mike Rogers have agreed to be interviewed by Mueller’s investigatory team in the coming days. Mueller’s team is reportedly looking into a meeting the president had with Coats and Rogers where he asked them to pull James Comey off the Flynn case or at least go to the public and confirm that there was no evidence to back up the Russian collusion allegations. Coats and Rogers reportedly refused to do either. Last week, they testified that the White House had not pressured them to bring the investigation to an end.

“This Russian investigation has gone nowhere, so they’re coming up with new charges,” said Jay Sekulow, a lawyer for the president, in an interview with Fox’s Sean Hannity. “If this is true that five individuals inside of the United States government, whether it was the FBI or the Special Counsel’s office — wherever it came from — leaked information about the president of the United States to the Washington Post, information about a supposed investigation, that is a crime.”

This is getting out of hand. Trump fires the FBI Director for refusing to clear his name publicly and now he’s personally under investigation for obstruction of justice? What? This basically gives the Democrats a license to throw whatever ridiculous charges they want against a sitting Republican president. And if he dares to intervene and say, “Look, this is wrong and it’s stalling the agenda that the American people voted for,” they can just charge him with the real crime of obstruction. It’s a trap, and they’ve been setting Trump up for this since November 8.

We’ll see what happens, but if the elites in Washington thought that the 2016 election was the big “Rage against D.C.,” they won’t know what hit them when they throw out the rightfully-elected president. In the next two elections, conservatives and angry Americans from coast to coast may just have to clean Congress from top the bottom and start fresh. Or, better yet, draw together a convention of states and take matters into our own hands. Because this – whatever this is – cannot be allowed to stand.


Texas Democrats confirm our WORST fears about voter fraud

If you happen to mention voter ID laws as protection against the rampant fraud happening in this country to a liberal, you’re likely to get a few eye rolls, coupled with jokes about tin foil hats tossed your direction.

From Allenbwest

The left claims that demanding an ID to vote, and thus confirming a person’s legal status to participate in an election, is racist, thereby insulting the intelligence of the very people they’re supposedly looking out or.

They say we’re all nuts for thinking voter fraud is a real thing, but what happened to two Texas poll workers says otherwise.

According to the Houston Chronicle, Two people who worked as election clerks during the May 2016 primary runoff have pleaded guilty to unlawfully casting a ballot for another person, Harris County Clerk Stan Stanart announced Monday.

Jeanene Johnson, 63, and Latunia Thomas, 46, pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of “unlawful deposit of ballot” earlier this month. They served one day in jail, and were released, according to the Harris County District Attorney’s Office.

With Johnson’s help, Thomas cast a ballot for her daughter at a Harris County Public Health and Environmental Services building during early voting for the May 24, 2016, primary runoff, according to Dane Schiller, a spokesman for the district attorney’s office. He said Thomas’ daughter was not present at the polling location.

“My office found convincing evidence that voter fraud was committed,” Stanart, a Republican, said in a statement Monday. “The evidence was provided to the Harris County District Attorney’s Office who presented the case to a Harris County Grand Jury.”
Stanart’s announcement comes amid allegations of rampant voter fraud, which have been used by Republican lawmakers across the country to ramp up controversial Voter ID laws. President Donald Trump has claimed that millions of people voted illegally for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election, and this month has put together a commission to help study how many non-citizens illegally cast ballots.

Stanart said both Thomas and Johnson were election clerks hired to work the poll by the county at the recommendation of the Harris County Democratic Party.
Elected chair of the Harris County Democratic Party, Lillie Schechter, said she was not well acquainted with this particular incident since it occurred before she took her position, but stated they’ll continue to take “voter fraud very seriously.”

Yeah. Right.

This just goes to show that the left is likely fully aware of situations like this happening, but are doing everything in their power to ensure it stays buried.

Well, we’re digging it up.

WHOA: Look What Was Discovered About The Judge Who Struck Down Trump Sanctuary City Order

As we reported yesterday, Executive Order 13768, which gave the attorney general and secretary of Homeland Security the power to withdrawal federal funds from sanctuary cities for not being in compliance with federal law, was blocked by a federal judge.

From Allenbwest

The White House quickly released a statement condemning the judge, stating “Once again, a single district judge — this time in San Francisco — has ignored Federal immigration law to set a new immigration policy for the entire country. This decision occurred in the same sanctuary city that released the 5-time deported illegal immigrant who gunned down innocent Kate Steinle in her father’s arms. San Francisco, and cities like it, are putting the well-being of criminal aliens before the safety of our citizens, and those city officials who authored these policies have the blood of dead Americans on their hands.”

The judge in question was San Francisco’s William Orrick, an Obama appointee who ruled that the order violated the Constitution by attempting to punish local governments by seeking to “deprive local jurisdictions of congressional allocated funds without any notice or opportunity to be heard.” The man is apparently unaware of Article VI, Clause 2 of the Constitution, the “Supremacy Clause,” which establishes that federal law triumphs over state law.

His ruling was ridiculous, and given his history, it’s quite obvious it was entirely politically-motivated. As HotAir reported, You don’t have to look very far for some evidence that this judge has a partisan streak. Orrick is the same judge who granted a restraining order against the Center for Medical Progress, the group that released undercover videos of Planned Parenthood back in 2015. And according to the Federalist’s Mollie Hemingway, Orrick was an Obama campaign bundler who collected more than $200,000 for the candidate in 2008. He had also previously raised more than $100,000 for candidate John Kerry in 2004.

As Allahpundit pointed out last night, the judge’s decision doesn’t appear to interfere with AG Jeff Sessions ability to withhold some federal money from sanctuary cities, so the impact of the injunction may be more symbolic than anything else. And on that count, CNN’s Chris Cillizza argues the politics of the decision are a win for the Trump administration. He stated that “there is nothing the Republican base — and the bulk of Republican elected officials — hate more than what they view as liberal judges run amok. It’s the epitome — to Republicans — of liberals trying to institute their will on a populace without ever letting people vote or have their opinions heard.

Had there truly been something unconstitutional in the order, you’d think another judge would’ve challenged it earlier than three months after it was signed.


Rush Limbaugh: Bill O’Reilly Departure Was Not ‘Natural’, It Was A ‘Campaign

Thursday on his nationally syndicated radio show, conservative talker Rush Limbaugh called Bill O’Reilly’s departure from the Fox News Channel a “campaign,” and not a “natural” event.

Limbaugh pointed to the origin of the story, which was first published in The New York Times and how it may have something to do with an internal struggle of “corporate intrigue” within Fox News.

From Breitbart

Partial transcript as follows:

Why do The New York Times break the story? Out of the blue, they want to do a story on O’Reilly and Fox with whatever number of payouts to women. Where’d this come from? Nothing just comes out of the ether folks. They are not sitting there over at the New York Times waiting for ideas to pop into their head and then one second some reporter, ‘You know what I think I’m going to do a story on what a sexual harasser Bill O’Reilly is.’ That is not how it happens.

The reason that it starts in The New York Times is important is because the second aspect is the corporate intrigue that I mentioned that is also behind this. It is — I don’t work there so there is no quicksand —but there is a battle for power going on there between sons of Rupert Murdoch and Rupert. And they are not conservatives my friends. In fact, they are — what is the generation before millennials? X? Their friends are all liberal, their wives. One of their wives works for the Clinton Global Initiative. One of the wives when this New York Times story, ‘You can’t keep the man on the air you just can’t this is embarrassing. It’s embarrassing to us, it’s embarrassing to dad company. You can’t do this.’ And the fact that the story ran on The New York Times was such a profound shock, sadness, and embarrassment that they felt that had to do something. That is why the fact that is started on The New York Times is crucial. There is two reason it is important. The Times is not just appearing out of nothing out of the ether.

Here’s the timeline, story New York Times. How long did it take before you started hearing about massive advertiser defections, just a day, right? You think that was natural? No, this was a campaign, folks. That’s why this is so frustrating to me, even after all this time, these campaigns are not immediately spotted for what they are. Therefore, people are not able to deal with them. And this one should have been expected given what’s been going on the last two years there. Tey should have been ready for this. But see the bottom line is they were.

Fox is not going to be the way it is for long. There is a massive –shakeup coming, and it is generational. It is generational and political. It is like anything else, nothing ever is constantly the same, there is change everywhere. But it has been amazingly easy to sit from a distance and watch this, it’s amazing how easy it appears, at least to me, that this massive and rapid transformation is occurring.




Many Americans are of the belief that the longer politicians are in Washington, the more susceptible to corruption they become. Today’s notably aged Democrats certainly have a way of lending credibility to that notion.

Allen B West reports,

And though corruption knows no particular age, race or creed, there’s one group of Washington insiders who seem to pop up on the malfeasance radar with somewhat stunning regularity — the Congressional Black Caucus.

From Charlies Rangel (D-NY) being found guilty of eleven ethics violations to shamed former-Congresswoman Corrine Brown (D-FL) being indicted, pleading guilty to 22 federal counts and facing a potential sentence of 357 years to Alcee Hastings (D-FL) (a formerly impeached federal judge) busted for misusing public funds to pay his girlfriend $2.5 million, CBC members are no strangers to the ethics microscope as they seem to be perpetually the subjects of investigations.

Now it’s Maxine Waters’ (D-CA) turn. Again. Waters, whose incessant tweets and tirades about Donald Trump have become a thing of internet legend, was named “one of the most corrupt members of Congress” by the non-partisan group CREW (Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington) for a virtually endless string of accusations and/or violations. Waters made the CREW list in 2005, 2006, 2009 and appears poised to keep the roll alive in 2017.

The Washington Free Beacon is reportingthat Waters has used public funds to pay her daughter, Karen Waters, over $600,000 since 2006:

In 2010 Waters was brought up on three counts of ethics violations by the House Ethics committee for her Congressional advocation on behalf of a bank in which she had a financial interest. Well, actually not her, but her husband…somehow that’d different. From The Hill:

“The House ethics committee on Monday outlined its charges against Rep. Maxine Waters, who is accused of helping a bank in which her husband owned stock secure federal bailout funds.

The committee charged the 10-term California Democrat with three counts of violating House rules and the federal ethics code in connection with her effort to arrange a 2008 meeting between Treasury officials and representatives with OneUnited bank.

The panel said Waters, who sits on the Financial Services Committee, broke a House rule requiring members to behave in a way that reflects “creditably” on the chamber. The committee said that by trying to assist OneUnited, she stood to benefit directly, because her husband owned a sizable amount of stock that would have been “worthless” if the bank failed.”

This swamp cannot possibly be drained quickly enough.

RAMPANT CORRUPTION: Podesta Company Paid One Billion Rubles from Russian Govt


The Putin Government gave John Podesta 35 millions dollars (1 billion rubles) while he advised Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

From The Gateway Pundit

Investigative reporter and author Peter Schweizer went on FOX and Friends to discuss Kremlin influence on US politics — and how the Clinton camp was in bed with the Putin regime.

Peter Schweizer: In 2011 John Podesta joined the board of this very small energy company called Joule Energy based out of Massachusetts. About two months after he joins the board a Russian entity called RUSNANO puts a billion rubles, which is about $35 million, into John Podesta’s company. Now, what is RUSNANO? RUSNANO is not a private company, Steve. It is a fund directly funded by the Kremlin. In fact the Russian finance minister called RUSNANO “Putin’s Child.” So you have the Russian government investing in one of John Podesta’s business in 2011 while he is an adviser to Hillary Clinton at the State Department.

Steve Doocy: OK. Does anybody in the Trump circle rise to the level that there is this kind of money involved?

Peter Schweizer: No.

And, once again, the frenzy on the left is all a disguise to hide their own rampant corruption.