Categories
Archives
HELP US KEEP YOU BETTER INFORMED ABOUT THE TRICKS OF THE RADICAL PROGRESSIVE REVOLUTION PLEASE DONATE ANY AMOUNT YOU CAN
target="_top">

Archive for the ‘Dirty Obama Politics’ Category

MILLIONS OF NON-CITIZENS MAY HAVE VOTED IN '12

ANTI-TRUMP CIA Director Brennan Admits To Being a COMMUNIST – But Wait, That’s NOT EVEN THE WORST PART

We have been told that CIA intelligence reports are sacrosanct and that only an irresponsible person with his own agenda would consider dismissing anything the director certifies to be true. Just ask Democrat Senator Chuck Schumer.

You know, like a magic bullet killed John Kennedy and that Iraq was awash in weapons of mass destruction. The CIA hasn’t limited themselves to only certifying false information as true, either. The have been guilty of attempted coups as in the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba and perhaps with 9/11 and the assassination of JFK.

So who the hell is current CIA Director John Brennan and why the hell should we trust anything he says?

His past raises more questions than it answers for a man we are supposed to trust more than any other.
You know, like a magic bullet killed John Kennedy and that Iraq was awash in weapons of mass destruction. The CIA hasn’t limited themselves to only certifying false information as true, either. The have been guilty of attempted coups as in the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba and perhaps with 9/11 and the assassination of JFK.

So who the hell is current CIA Director John Brennan and why the hell should we trust anything he says?

His past raises more questions than it answers for a man we are supposed to trust more than any other.

World Net Daily reported that, John Guandolo one of the F.B.I.’s foremost experts on Islam noted that, “Mr. Brennan did convert to Islam when he served in an official capacity on the behalf of the United States in Saudi Arabia.”

Guandolo continued “That fact alone is not what is most disturbing.. His conversion to Islam was the culmination of a counterintelligence operation against him to recruit him. The fact that foreign intelligence service operatives recruited Mr. Brennan when he was in a very sensitive and senior U.S. government position in a foreign country means that he either a traitor … [or] he has the inability to discern and understand how to walk in those kinds of environments, which makes him completely unfit to the be the director of Central Intelligence.”

“The facts of the matter are confirmed by U.S. government officials who were also in Saudi Arabia at the time that John Brennan was serving there and have direct knowledge. These are men who work in very trusted positions, they were direct witnesses to his growing relationship with the individuals who worked for the Saudi government and others and they witnessed his conversion to Islam.”

Then there’s the question of Brennan’s communist sympathies.

According to CNN, Brennan admitted to voting for the Communist Party candidate during an address before the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation’s annual conference.

Brennan was recalling having to answer a question during his background interview for a position in the CIA: “Have you ever worked with or for a group that was dedicated to overthrowing the US?”

This is the guy we’re supposed to trust to tell us the truth about Donald Trump? He is against everything Trump stands for!

Then again, the man who appointed him, Barack Hussein Obama, stands against everything Americana that Donald Trump represents.

Why would we expect anything different from Obama’s CIA director?

SOROS PAID AL GORE MILLIONS TO PUSH GLOBAL WARMING FEARS IN US

Dirty, Dirty, Dirty

shutterstock_7771426-1000x641
LOOKS LIKE THERE’S MORE TENTACLES ON GEORGE SOROS HEAD THAN THERE WERE SNAKES ON MEDUSA’S. IGNORANCE IS THE CURRENCY OF THE LEFT AND AL GORE IS THE FEDERAL CHAIRMAN. SOROS IS FUNDING BOGUS CLIMATE CHANGE, BOGUS BLM, BOGUS IMMIGRANTS, THE DEMOCRAT PARTY, HILLARY CLINTON, AND BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA. JUST HAPPENS TO BE ALL THINGS THAT ARE AIMED AT ONE GOAL, THE DESTRUCTION OF THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE.

Daily Caller:

Liberal billionaire George Soros gave former Vice President Al Gore’s environmental group millions of dollars over three years to create a “political space for aggressive U.S. action” on global warming, according to leaked documents.

A document published by DC Leaks shows Soros, a Hungarian-born liberal financier, wanted his nonprofit Open Society Institute (OSI) to do more to support global warming policies in the U.S. That included budgeting $10 million in annual support to Gore’s climate group over three years.

“U.S. Programs Global Warming Grants U.S. Programs became engaged on the global warming issue about four years ago, at George Soros’s suggestion,” reads a leaked OSI memo.

“There has been a budget of $11 million for global warming grants in the U.S. Programs budget for the last several years,” the memo reads. “This budget item captures George Soros’s commitment of $10 million per year for three years to Al Gore’s Alliance for Climate Protection, which conducts public education on the climate issue in pursuit of creating political space for aggressive U.S. action in line with what scientists say is necessary to put our nation on a path to reducing its outsize carbon dioxide emissions.

Liberal billionaire George Soros gave former Vice President Al Gore’s environmental group millions of dollars over three years to create a “political space for aggressive U.S. action” on global warming, according to leaked documents.

A document published by DC Leaks shows Soros, a Hungarian-born liberal financier, wanted his nonprofit Open Society Institute (OSI) to do more to support global warming policies in the U.S. That included budgeting $10 million in annual support to Gore’s climate group over three years.

“U.S. Programs Global Warming Grants U.S. Programs became engaged on the global warming issue about four years ago, at George Soros’s suggestion,” reads a leaked OSI memo.

Do You Think Al Gore Cares More About Saving The Planet Or Making Money?
Making Money

It’s unclear what year the memo was sent, but the Gore co-founded Alliance for Climate Protection (ACP) was established in 2006 and lasted until it became The Climate Reality Project in July 2011. In 2008, the Alliance launched a $300 million campaign to encourage “Americans to push for aggressive reductions in greenhouse gas emissions,” The Washington Post reported.

ACP got $10 million from the Open Society Institute (OSI) in 2008, according to the nonprofit’s tax filings. OSI handed over another $5 million to ACP in 2009, according to tax filings. The investigative reporting group ProPublica keeps a database that has OSI tax returns from 2000 to 2013. TheDCNF could not find other years where OSI gave money to ACP.

OSI is primarily a grant-making nonprofit that hands out millions of dollars every year to mostly left-wing causes. Now called the Open Society Foundations, Soros’s nonprofit has handed out more than $13 billion over the last three decades.

OSI didn’t only plan to fund Gore’s climate group to promote global warming policies in the U.S., OSI also planned on giving millions of dollars to spur the “youth climate movement.”

“This budget item also allows for the renewal of U.S. Programs’ long-standing support of the Energy Action Coalition, which is the lead organizer of the youth climate movement in the U.S., the memo reads.

“We are also including a placeholder for an additional $2 million, pending discussion about and development of OSI’s global warming agenda,” the memo reads. “There is a memo from Nancy Youman in the strategic plans binder that recommends pathways forward for OSI on the climate issue – in the U.S., as well as in other parts of the Open Society Network.”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/17/soros-paid-al-gore-millions-to-push-aggressive-us-action-on-global-warming/#ixzz4HiK4vPBV

BREAKING: Clinton Just Got DEVASTATING News, Could Die In ONE Year… [VID]

Who's to Blame

Deflecting-600-CI

Obama’s National Security Chief Makes SICK Statement About White Men… This Is Infuriating

This whole “diversity” thing has gone way too far — and National Security Advisor Susan Rice just took it to the next level, leaving an entire race out in the cold.

“Too often, our national security workforce has been what former Florida Sen. Bob Graham called ‘white, male, and Yale,’” Rice said, delivering a commencement speech at Florida International University. “In the halls of power, in the faces of our national security leaders, America is still not fully reflected.”

“White, male, and Yale”? Oh, goodness.“I’m not talking about a human resources issue,” Rice stressed. “I’m highlighting a national security imperative.”

You know what else is a national security imperative? Liberalism — it’s the art of dividing people, encouraging minority rule and advocating for a non-existent Utopian system under which the government doles out everyone’s “fair share.”
“By now, we should all know the dangers of ‘group think,’ where folks who are alike often think alike,” Rice told the graduates. “By contrast, groups comprised of different people tend to question one another’s assumptions, draw on divergent perspectives and experiences, and yield better outcomes.”

It’s rather humorous because Rice has the same end goal that many people want from a president’s national security team — a team that’s experienced, objective and results-oriented. Honestly, is that not what we all want? A competent set of individuals advising the president on the pressing issues of our time?

But the Obama administration is anything but. The president has surrounded himself with people who think just like he does — badly, if at all.

Moreover, the proposed manner by which Rice is suggesting that team be selecting was completely wrong. If a white male can deliver the goods and check off all the boxes, then he should be hired — and the same goes for every person, regardless of race, color, religion, etc.

Congress Stole Millions from Our Veterans to Resettle Afghanis!

shutterstock_177220931-e1464159028664-800x300
Written by Tim Brown

In what can only be described as a disgusting move on the part of the united States Senate, they took money from cuts to military veterans in the 2016 budget in order to fund the resettlement of Afghan interpreters to the united States.

Rachel Soltzfoos reports:

The Special Immigrant Visa program allows Afghan interpreters who aide the U.S. government to get out of harm’s way by resettling in the United States, and last year the Senate authorized a major expansion of the program. The $336 million price tag of the expansion fell on U.S. military veterans in the form of increased pharmacy co-pays, The Daily Caller News Foundation has learned.

“That’s bullshit,” former Army combat veteran Alex Plitsas told TheDCNF. “Military families shouldn’t be paying for the SIV program through a pseudo tax. The program should be funded outright because of the service our interpreters rendered. This is infuriating.”

Last year’s defense bill increased co-pays for military families, saving the government about $1.5 billion, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). A portion of the money saved was used to pay for the extra Afghan visas, a spokesman for the Armed Services Committee told TheDCNF, although the bulk of the money went elsewhere. Budget caps require lawmakers offset increases in spending with budget cuts.

This is all about the Judiciary Committee’s consideration of expanding this same program into 2017.

You might guess that John “Songbird” McCain is at the center of the push, along with Senator Jeanne Shaheen. Both senators are pushing for more visas, on top of the 7,000 already allocated through Fiscal Year 2017. However, neither of the senators have publicly addressed how to pay for it.

The CBO estimates the proposed increase would bring the cost of the program up to $446 million over the next ten years, from its current cost of $336 million.

So, as far as I’m concerned, how can any veteran or American support such representatives who care more for America’s enemies than they do their own veterans? Shame on those who support this!

On top of everything, I want to ask these senators where they are getting their authority to spend this money to bring foreigners to the US. They certainly didn’t get that authority in the US Constitution!

“Senate Republicans recognize the contribution of certain Afghan citizens who have been helpful to our war effort,” a spokesman for Republican Sen. Roger Wicker, who sits on the Armed Services Committee, told TheDCNF. “However, any bill to expand the SIV program should contain acceptable offsets and go through regular order through the Judiciary Committee.”

No, Senator Wicker! There is no authority in the Constitution for this to even be considered. If individuals want to help Afghans, fine. However, this is a usurpation of the Constitution to fund such migrations and rob those who have served to protect America. Again, shame on the US Senate for even considering these measures.

America’s veterans are committing suicide 22 times a day and those who represent us are more concerned with spending our money unconstitutionally to bring Afghan interpreters over here than they are getting the Veterans Administration in order and caring for those who have served America faithfully.

Am I the only one that sees a problem with what is being considered here?

What the State Dept Did to the Benghazi Files AFTER they were Subpoenaed

Why in the world would the State Department go against a subpoena? Can you say “more than a little something to hide”? Anyone else that pulled a stunt like this would already be locked up and looking forward for the key to be thrown away. Read the story here:
benghazi-attack-consulate
State Department officials removed files from the secretary’s office related to the Benghazi attack in Libya and transferred them to another department after receiving a congressional subpoena last spring, delaying the release of the records to Congress for over a year.

Attorneys for the State Department said the electronic folders, which contain hundreds of documents related to the Benghazi attack and Libya, were belatedly rediscovered at the end of last year.

They said the files had been overlooked by State Department officials because the executive secretary’s office transferred them to another department and flagged them for archiving last April, shortly after receiving a subpoena from the House Select Committee on Benghazi.

The new source of documents includes electronic folders used by senior officials under Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. They were originally kept in the executive secretary’s office, which handles communication and coordination between the secretary of state’s office and other department bureaus…….The House Benghazi Committee requested documents from the secretary’s office in a subpoena filed in March 2015. Congressional investigators met with the head of the executive secretary’s office staff to discuss its records maintenance system and the scope of the subpoena last April. That same month, State Department officials sent the electronic folders to another bureau for archiving, and they were not searched in response to the request.

The blunder could raise new questions about the State Department’s records process, which has come under scrutiny from members of Congress and government watchdogs. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R., Iowa), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, blasted the State Department’s Freedom of Information Act process as “broken” in January, citing “systematic failures at the agency.”

The inspector general for the State Department also released a report criticizing the agency’s public records process in January. The report highlighted failures in the executive secretary’s office, which responds to records requests for the Office of the Secretary.

Since last fall, the State Department has taken additional steps to increase transparency, recently hiring a transparency coordinator.

But the late discovery of the electronic folders has set back the release of information in a number of public records lawsuits filed against the State Department by watchdog groups.

The State Department first disclosed that staffers had discovered the unsearched folders in a January court filing. Attorneys for the department asked the court for additional time to process and release the documents in response to a 2014 lawsuit filed by the government ethics group Judicial Watch.

Around the same time, the State Department alerted the House Select Committee on Benghazi to the discovery. On April 8, the department turned over 1,100 pages of documents from the electronic folders to the House Benghazi Committee, over a year after the committee’s subpoena. The committee had received other documents from the production in February.

The delay has had consequences. The Benghazi Committee had already completed the majority of its interviews with diplomats and government officials regarding the Benghazi attack before it received the latest tranche of documents.

Rep. Trey Gowdy (R., S.C.), chairman of the Benghazi Committee, said in an April 8 statement it was “deplorable that it took over a year for these records to be produced to our committee.”

“This investigation is about a terrorist attack that killed four Americans, and it could have been completed a lot sooner if the administration had not delayed and delayed and delayed at every turn,” Gowdy said.

The decision by State Department officials to transfer the electronic folders to another bureau after receiving the subpoena could also raise questions.

The subpoena requested Benghazi-related documents and communications from 10 of Hillary Clinton’s top aides for the years 2011 and 2012.

The requests included standard language that “Subpoenaed records, documents, data or information should not be destroyed, modified, removed, transferred or otherwise made inaccessible to the Committee.”

The State Department’s attorneys said the executive secretary’s office transferred the folders to the Office of Information Programs and Services for “retiring” in April 2015. Public records officials did not realize for almost eight months that the folders had been moved, and so they were not searched in response to FOIA requests or subpoenas.

“In April 2015—prior to its search in this [Judicial Watch] case—the Secretariat Staff within the Office of the Executive Secretariat (“S/ES-S”) retired the shared office folders and transferred them to the custody of the Bureau of Administration, Office of Information Programs and Services,” the State Department said in a Feb. 5 court filing.

“The IPS employees working on this FOIA request did not initially identify S/ES retired records as a location to search for potentially responsive records because they were operating with the understanding that, to the extent responsive records from the Office of the Secretary existed, they resided within [the executive secretary’s office].”

According to congressional sources, officials on the House Benghazi Committee had a meeting with the executive secretary’s office to discuss the subpoena and the locations of potentially relevant records on April 10, 2015. Electronic folders of senior staff members were discussed during the briefing.

State Department officials at the meeting included the director of the executive secretary’s office staff, who was responsible for handling the office’s records maintenance, the assistant secretary for legislative affairs, and Catherine Duval, the attorney who oversaw the public release of Hillary Clinton’s official emails. The officials gave no indication that electronic folders had recently been transferred out of the office.

The State Department declined to comment on whether the folders were transferred after the meeting took place.

A State Department official told the Washington Free Beacon that personnel did not mislead congressional investigators, and added that no officials at the meeting were involved in transferring the folders.

“The Department personnel who briefed the Select Committee in April 2015 did not play a role in the transfer of these files to State’s Bureau of Administration,” the State Department official said.

The official added that department files are often moved as a routine matter.

“Files that are generated in an office are regularly moved to the Bureau of Administration for storage according to published records retirement schedules,” the official said. “This is a routine action that would not involve a senior supervisor. It also continues to make them available to respond to either Congressional or FOIA requests.”

Duval left the State Department last September. She had previously overseen document production for the IRS during the targeting controversy. Republicans had criticized that process after agency emails were reportedly destroyed and a key IRS official’s hard drive was shredded months after they had been subpoenaed by Congress.

In recent months, the State Department has been working to increase transparency.

“The Department has worked closely with the Select Committee in a spirit of cooperation and responsiveness,” a State Department official said. “Since the Committee was formed, we have provided 48 witnesses for interviews and more than 95,000 pages of documents.”

The efforts drew some praise from the House Benghazi Committee last fall.

“It’s curious the Department is suddenly able to be more productive after recent staff changes involving those responsible for document production,” committee spokesman Jamal Ware said in a Sept. 25, 2015 press release.

Still, it could be months before the public is able to see many of the Benghazi-related documents belatedly discovered by the State Department. The House Benghazi Committee is still completing its investigation and has not released them.

The department’s attorneys have also been granted extensions to produce the documents in response to several public records lawsuits. In one FOIA case, first filed by the watchdog group Citizens United in 2014, a judge has given the State Department until next August to turn over the new materials.

Correction: The original version of this article stated that the House Select Committee on Benghazi had submitted two subpoenas to the State Department. The Committee only submitted one subpoena, on March 4, 2015. The November 2014 request was an official letter from the Committee to Secretary John Kerry.

IF YOU ARE A TAXPAYER, TAKE THE TIME TO VIEW THIS VIDEO

So you think Trump’s plan to send them back is crazy???

You have to see this, so outrageous. This is from an Indiana news station.

Incredible and absolutely insane. Heads need to roll.

The IRS will put you in jail if you fail to pay the taxes that support this fraud.
This, without a doubt, is the craziest nation on the face of the earth. I urge
you to watch this and pass it on; maybe it will get to one of our Congressmen
who gives a damn!

New Poll finds that 59% of Americans Support Trump on Deporting Illegal Immigrants!

HELP US KEEP YOU BETTER INFORMED ABOUT THE TRICKS OF THE RADICAL PROGRESSIVE REVOLUTION PLEASE DONATE ANY AMOUNT YOU CAN
SEO Powered By SEOPressor