Categories
Archives
HELP US KEEP YOU BETTER INFORMED ABOUT THE TRICKS OF THE RADICAL PROGRESSIVE REVOLUTION PLEASE DONATE ANY AMOUNT YOU CAN
target="_top">

Archive for the ‘Immigration’ Category

A paradigm shift in illegal border crossings-those aren’t Latinos coming across.

ICE Just Arrested 153 ILLEGALS In Massive Texas Raid – You Won’t Believe Who Was Among Them!

ICE agents conducted a massive raid in Texas and arrested 153 illegal immigrants. This was part of a standard enforcement operation that targeted illegal immigrant criminals.

It was a 12-day operation that spanned from March 20 to the 31st. The United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents successfully arrested the large group who were mostly criminals who entered the country illegally through Mexico, were deported, and re-entered.
What most democrats aren’t telling people is that ICE’s primary target is the convicted illegal aliens who have criminal records or are fugitives running from the law.

Another staggering number that liberals won’t want you to know is that many of the immigrants arrested had criminal records that included violent crimes. There’s a huge difference between someone who sells drugs once in a while compared to someone who has a history of violently attacking people. Both are bad in the own ways, but people do drugs by choice, they don’t get attacked by choice.

Some of the crimes committed by the illegal immigrants are quite startling and not exactly the people you would want living next door to your children.

“ICE’s primary immigration enforcement efforts target convicted criminal aliens,” Daniel Bible, field office director for ERO in San Antonio, said in a statement. “Consequently, our operations improve overall public safety by removing these criminals from our streets, and ultimately from our country.”

The most arrests – 62 people – were made in San Antonio, Texas. Another 24 men and women were arrested in Austin, 29 in Laredo and 38 in Harlingen, located in the Rio Grande Valley. Of the more than 150 people taken into custody, 138 were men and 15 were women.

Approximately 137 of the total number had criminal histories that included convictions of aggravated assault with a weapon, aggravated assault of a child, driving under the influence, sexual assault, burglary, robbery, resisting officer, vehicular manslaughter, alien smuggling, domestic violence and drug possession.

Reports state that over 90 percent of the illegal immigrants arrested were from Mexico. Several others were from Honduras, Guatamala, Canada, and El Salvador.

President Trump has given ICE the ability to successfully do their job and it has irritated people. Many people forget that former President Obama has deported mass amounts of people, more than many other Presidents. Democrats didn’t seem to give Obama as much criticism as they are Trump. Obama’s nickname was the “deporter in chief” if that tells you anything about his historic deportation skills.

We have four to eight years of ICE cleaning things up for a safer America. Most people don’t care about illegal immigrants who don’t break the law. The reason is because those immigrants are probably good people. It’s the criminals that everyone should be worried about. America has enough of it’s own criminals, so we should not be asked or expected to willfully harbor the criminals who come from other countries. That’s not our job.

ICE targets criminally active immigrants in hopes to provide a safer country for Americans. Liberals don’t seem to care about safety, which is apparent in their lust for letting every Tom, Dick, and Harry enter the country without vetting or passing immigration protocol.

Or should I call that, Tomas, Ricardo, y el Quique.

 

Trump is about to reverse one of Obama’s most controversial initiatives

President Donald Trump is likely to end DACA, an Obama policy protecting young undocumented immigrants from deportation. (Frederic J. Brown/AFP/Getty Images)

 Several government officials confirmed Friday that President Donald Trump is likely to end Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, commonly known as DACA, a program that allowed people who came to the United States illegally as children to remain in the country.

What is DACA, exactly?

DACA began in 2012 under the Barack Obama administration. Under the program, young people who arrived in the U.S. by 2007 are allowed to remain in the country, as long as they were brought in by their parents before they were 16 years old and haven’t committed any serious crimes. This applies both to people who arrived illegally or who overstayed their visas.

Who does this impact?

More than 800,000 people are covered by DACA. It is estimated that 200,000 people have applied for DACA status under the Trump administration.

How would the program end?

The administration is said to be weighing whether DACA will be immediately revoked or whether it will be gradually phased out, according to NBC News. White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders told reporters the program “continues to be under review” as of Friday.

Why would Trump end DACA?

Trump has been vocally in opposition to DACA since before he was elected, even going so far as to promise to end the program on day one of his administration.He has attacked the program as unconstitutional, on the basis that Congress, not the president, has the authority to determine who may legally enter and reside in the U.S.

Trump appeared to soften his stance against young undocumented immigrants in April, however, when he told the Associated Press that  those shielded from deportation could “rest easy” because his priority was deporting criminals.

The attorneys general from ten states announced plans to sue the Trump administration if he did not keep his promise to end DACA by September 5.

How would this move be received?

Like most things; split. Obviously, immigrant rights groups such as United We Dream and others will strongly oppose it. DACA advocates don’t believe immigrants should be punished for having been brought to the U.S. by their parents when they were children.

Opponents of DACA aren’t necessarily against exploring ways undocumented immigrants can stay in the country, but do believe Obama vastly overreached his authority by instituting this program without congressional approval.

Senator Lindsay Graham, for example, believes DACA is unconstitutional, but does support the DREAM Act, a bill that would give U.S. citizenship to illegal aliens who came here as children

Police Caught Working With Antifa To Create Sanctuary Cities

Arizona’s largest city recently became a sanctuary for illegal aliens after its police chief held a private meeting with a leftist group that demanded a change in immigration enforcement policies, records obtained by Judicial Watch show.

The closed-door session between Phoenix Police Chief Jeri Williams and Will Goana, policy director for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Arizona, occurred just weeks before the Phoenix Police Department quietly implemented a new policy banning officers from contacting the feds after arresting an illegal alien and forbidding them from asking about suspects’ immigration status. The new order violates key provisions of a state law upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court and leaves the city vulnerable to costly lawsuits.

Judicial Watch exposed the abrupt policy revision last month after obtaining a copy of the Phoenix Police Department’s new sanctuary Immigration Procedures and filed a public records request to uncover the steps that led to the change. Law enforcement sources told Judicial Watch in July that the revisions were crafted by a Hispanic advisory committee that promotes open borders with the backing of the influential ACLU. It appears to be part of a broader scheme to dodge federal immigration laws in Arizona’s most populous county. Earlier this year Judicial Watch reported that the newly elected sheriff in Maricopa County, which includes Phoenix, was releasing hundreds of criminal illegal immigrants—including violent offenders—from county jail facilities to protect them from deportation.

The new records obtained by Judicial Watch show that an ACLU offshoot known as People Power attempted to meet with Williams, who became chief on October 28, 2016, on April 19, 2017 to order the policy change. It’s not clear if that meeting took place, but it appears that it did not and People Power called in the big guns at the ACLU. That’s when Goana, who also lobbies the Arizona legislature on civil liberties issues, met privately with the chief, on May 9, according to the records. People Power reps followed up with a meeting request on May 16 to discuss the Phoenix Police Department’s immigration policy changes with Chief Williams, the records show.

The meeting occurred on June 9, about a week after Phoenix City Manager Ed Zuercher met with People Power and gave the group a glowing review. In his assessment, the city manager describes the leftist group as “one of the most reasonable groups I’ve talked with” and says it consisted of “a former high school teacher, a magazine editor, 2 attys, a massage therapist, and two Hispanic advocates who I’ve never seen before.” On June 29, Chief Williams had a follow-up meeting with the ACLU and People Power regarding the changes to the immigration policy, the records show.

People Power was launched by the ACLU as a direct response to the “Trump administration’s attacks on civil liberties and civil rights.” It recruits local activists to pressure law enforcement and elected officials to commit to the following demands: Not ask people about immigration status; Decline to engage in the enforcement of immigration law; Refuse to detain immigrants on behalf of the federal government unless there is a warrant signed by a judge.

Thanks in large part to the group’s efforts, the 3,000 officers in the Phoenix Police Department have been stripped of discretion from addressing the crime of illegal immigration or using sound judgement when it involves suspects thought to be in the U.S. illegally. No other federal crime in department policy has those restrictions. Officers continue to have the discretion to contact the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Secret Service, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), Postal Inspectors, U.S. Marshalls and Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) without fear of violating department policy.

Allowing officers to use their discretion when dealing with criminal aliens has been an effective tool in curbing crime. In 2008, former Phoenix Police Chief Jack Harris revealed that a 24% decrease in homicides and a 26% decrease in auto thefts could be partly attributed to “a new immigration policy that allows our officers to use their discretion when dealing with criminal aliens” and “unprecedented cooperation between our investigative units and our state, federal, and local partners (Maricopa County Attorney’s Office).”

Border patrol contacts in the Tucson Sector reported that in the same fiscal year (2008 – October to September) they saw a 41% decrease in border apprehensions. Nevertheless, on July 24 the new restrictive immigration policy went into effect at the Phoenix Police Department at the request of an open borders coalition. Now officers can’t even use the term “illegal alien,” which has been officially replaced with “unlawfully present.”

US TOWN WINS WITH BORDER WALL

author/kim-smith

President Donald Trump’s promise to build a border wall has earned him a lot of backlash from the left, but as the liberals continue to moan and complain about the cost of the wall, the endangered or threatened species living along the border and other gripes, new data from one U.S. town revealed a truth that will make critics’ heads spin.

A wall built near Yuma, Arizona, is proving that border walls work exceptionally well — in more than one way.

In fact, they are so successful that illegal crossings dropped 94 percent, according to testimony from the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, the Washington Examiner reported.

In addition, The Daily Caller reported that a Department of Homeland Security official said the town has seen an 82 percent reduction in illegal crossings since 2007 after the passage of the Secure Fence Act of 2006. Better border infrastructure can “guarantee” fewer border crossings for a “generation,” as official told The Daily Caller.

The Daily Caller also reported that an official also said that 126,472 individuals were arrested while attempting to enter the country illegally between January and July, a 46 percent decrease from 2016, adding that apprehensions of unaccompanied illegal immigrant minors has fallen 54 percent.

Additionally, Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents have arrested some 91,000 people between January and August, which is an increase of more than 43 percent since 2016.

In addition, The Daily Caller reported that a Department of Homeland Security official said the town has seen an 82 percent reduction in illegal crossings since 2007 after the passage of the Secure Fence Act of 2006. Better border infrastructure can “guarantee” fewer border crossings for a “generation,” as official told The Daily Caller.

The Daily Caller also reported that an official also said that 126,472 individuals were arrested while attempting to enter the country illegally between January and July, a 46 percent decrease from 2016, adding that apprehensions of unaccompanied illegal immigrant minors has fallen 54 percent.

Additionally, Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents have arrested some 91,000 people between January and August, which is an increase of more than 43 percent since 2016.

JEFF SESSIONS ISSSUES STUNNING STATEMENT TO SANCTUARY CITIES

Illegal Aliens To America: ‘You Will Give Us The Right To Vote, Or Else…’

We should no longer be surprised by any of the policies the Left might propose or support.

There’s simply nothing they won’t get behind if they think it’ll get them votes or help maintain their power.

Nothing is too degenerate or culturally destructive, which they’ve proven time and again as they push the goalposts further and further each passing year.

It wasn’t that long ago that gay marriage and illegal immigration was widely opposed by both parties. Videos of Senator Hillary Clinton can be found with her talking tough on the immigration issue, the same for the disgraceful Harry Reid.

The funny thing is, every time they try to push the envelope, they promise that it’s not going to lead to anything crazier, that the slippery slope argument isn’t true.

Yet here we are, gay marriage is universally legal, and now they’re fighting for the right to mutilate children and pump them full of hormones.

This, despite all scientific evidence showing that almost all grow out of their delusions, and that the cause itself is mental illness.

No, we’re the crazy ones for daring to question these policies; we’re the bigots for saying, “Hold on a second.”

Traditional marriage to gay marriage, fifty thousand genders/identities/sexualities, opposition to illegal immigration, support for letting illegals vote; it’s all insanity, the death throes of an aimless civilization.

The slope has gotten awfully slippery, as it’s no longer enough for the Left to pry open the floodgates and facilitate the invasion of America.

No, now they’re trying to give the invaders the right to vote, the latest in a long line of traitorous acts that will never be forgotten.

As reported at Breitbart, the far-left state of Maryland is already giving access to the ballot box to illegals but not content with the illegal status quo, one state politician wants to officially legalize voting rights for illegals.

In the ultra progressive College Park, Maryland, where the main campus of the University of Maryland can be found, the local municipality is reviewing a policy that would allow for illegal aliens to vote in municipal elections.

While the town would be the largest to do so in the Mid-Atlantic, it would not be the first.

The Baltimore Sun reports that College Park would be the eleventh city between Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties; both sharing boundaries with Washington, DC.

The scary thing is the legality of the proposal is not really under threat, because the illegal voting rights movement has been very successful thanks to the state’s ridiculous laws

We should no longer be surprised by any of the policies the Left might propose or support.

There’s simply nothing they won’t get behind if they think it’ll get them votes or help maintain their power.

Nothing is too degenerate or culturally destructive, which they’ve proven time and again as they push the goalposts further and further each passing year.

It wasn’t that long ago that gay marriage and illegal immigration was widely opposed by both parties. Videos of Senator Hillary Clinton can be found with her talking tough on the immigration issue, the same for the disgraceful Harry Reid.

The funny thing is, every time they try to push the envelope, they promise that it’s not going to lead to anything crazier, that the slippery slope argument isn’t true.

Yet here we are, gay marriage is universally legal, and now they’re fighting for the right to mutilate children and pump them full of hormones.

This, despite all scientific evidence showing that almost all grow out of their delusions, and that the cause itself is mental illness.

No, we’re the crazy ones for daring to question these policies; we’re the bigots for saying, “Hold on a second.”

Traditional marriage to gay marriage, fifty thousand genders/identities/sexualities, opposition to illegal immigration, support for letting illegals vote; it’s all insanity, the death throes of an aimless civilization.

The slope has gotten awfully slippery, as it’s no longer enough for the Left to pry open the floodgates and facilitate the invasion of America.

No, now they’re trying to give the invaders the right to vote, the latest in a long line of traitorous acts that will never be forgotten.

As reported at Breitbart, the far-left state of Maryland is already giving access to the ballot box to illegals but not content with the illegal status quo, one state politician wants to officially legalize voting rights for illegals.

In the ultra progressive College Park, Maryland, where the main campus of the University of Maryland can be found, the local municipality is reviewing a policy that would allow for illegal aliens to vote in municipal elections.

While the town would be the largest to do so in the Mid-Atlantic, it would not be the first.

The Baltimore Sun reports that College Park would be the eleventh city between Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties; both sharing boundaries with Washington, DC.

The scary thing is the legality of the proposal is not really under threat, because the illegal voting rights movement has been very successful thanks to the state’s ridiculous laws.

State law has allowed for townships to determine voter eligibility for municipal elections going back to the mid-1800s (of course, they never imagined that anti-American leftists would try to do what they’re doing).

The Sun also adds that a certain foreign influence in elections has come into play: “support for noncitizen voting here has also been driven by the large numbers of diplomatic staff who work in Washington and live in the Maryland suburbs.

Justifications for illegal alien voting rights at the local and national level usually employ the same arguments, the most common being the “we’ve allowed them to vote before” one.

While the United States has experimented with franchise eligibility over the ages, current federal law prohibits any non-US citizen from participating in an election, much less registering to vote.

Felony convictions, deportation, and barriers to naturalization are all intended deterrents—despite the fact that no requirement rests on voter registrars to verify claims of citizenship (again, thanks to the Left’s wolf-crying about stricter vote integrity protections).

But Maryland isn’t the only state considering giving illegals the right to vote. Commie-fornia is also flirting with the idea, as it’s imperative they be at the forefront of the Trump resistance.

And what better way to stick it to him than let the illegals vote?

Joe Matthews writes in the Sacramento Bee that it’s time to “go on offense” against President Donald Trump’s larger concerns for election integrity by empowering noncitizens to vote.

Given Trump’s threats to both immigrants and democracy, this is the moment to give the franchise back to noncitizens,” Matthews argues. He also compares California to an “apartheid” state until it grants voting rights to all present:

California is home to about five million adults (that’s one-in-six adults) who can’t vote because they’re not citizens.

This mass disenfranchisement is an affront to American principles.

Taxation without representation? Noncitizens pay taxes, but are not represented. Consent of the governed?

Noncitizens must follow our laws – but can’t vote to consent. Home of the brave? Noncitizens serve in the military but can’t vote for the government that sends them to war.

We Californians tolerate this apartheid, even though the lesser status of noncitizens – especially the 2 million-plus undocumented Californians – makes them more vulnerable to abuse and removal from the country they’ve helped build.

To its credit, California has taken steps on behalf of noncitizens, who now enjoy in-state tuition to our public universities, driver’s licenses, the ability to practice the law, and – if they are children – state-funded health care.

What Joe intentionally fails to point out is that many of these legal noncitizens are on the pathway to citizenship, and that not getting to vote is part of the process to gain that right.

But Joe and many leftists think it’s unfair that the H1B hire from New Delhi can’t immediately vote in an election because he’s not a citizen.

According to these nut-jobs, everyone should be allowed to vote. Illegals, green card holders, H1Bs…everyone. The push for such a policy is treasonous, there’s no other way to describe it.

It’s only a matter of time before it becomes a national issue, and we cannot let any kind of legal precedence be on their side. Otherwise, we risk the truth death of our democracy.

Source: Breitbart

Jeff Sessions Has 1 Idea to Destroy Gangs… Libs Furious

by Davis

Since the moment he officially announced his intention to run for president, President Donald Trump has been especially vocal about the need to curb illegal immigration and gang activity in the United States — a stance that continually infuriates liberals.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions is with Trump 100 percent when it comes to this issue. During an interview with Fox News’ Tucker Carlson that appeared on Thursday, Sessions told Carlson the best way to stop the gangs from entering the United States, Breitbartreported.

“Mr. Attorney General, how can the United States prevent MS-13 gang members from going north into the U.S.?” Carlson asked.

“Well, we need the wall. We need better enforcement at the border,” Sessions explained.

While the idea of a border wall/better enforcement may not be an original idea of Sessions’, it is good to hear that he agrees with Trump that the wall would be the best way to curb illegal immigration.

“And we need to be able to deport people rapidly who enter the country illegally, and we have to end this policy of taking unaccompanied minors — some of which include MS-13 members — and turning them over to the Department of Health and Human Services and then they take them to their destination city,” Sessions continued.

You can watch the exchange here:

To date, Sessions has cracked down (or attempted to) on sanctuary cities harder than any other attorney general in recent memory. So far, the administration’s efforts appear to be paying off, but Sessions stated that they aren’t done yet.

“We have reduced the illegal flow by 50 percent. But we’re not going to end there. We need to eliminate illegality in our immigration system,” Sessions explained.

While Trump and Sessions may have had their disagreementsrecently, it is abundantly clear that they both share the goal of ending illegal immigration, and ending the ability to gangs to come into the United States and terrorize our population.

Let’s just hope the rest of Congress can get on board with these ideas as well.

Share this on Facebook and Twitter and let us know if you think the border wall is actually going to be built.

What do you think of Sessions’ response?

(no title)

Fox News reports Maritha Nelson’s $240 in food stamps has run out, leaving her $9 in cash and seven people to feed.  The 50-year-old single mother, who entered the U.S. by swimming across the Rio Grande, has government funded housing, medication, and $700 a month in Social Security. She’s been on assistance for 20 years, and wants others to know that help is available.  Florida is teeming with food stamp recruiters…who have a goal: increase federal aid to Florida by $1 billion a year.

2.1 Million Illegals Panic as Trump DHS Sec Issues Shock Announcement

When then-candidate Donald Trump was running for office, he promised to overturn former President Barack Obama’s 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals “amnesty” program, but post-election, President Trump seemed to be backing off from that promise, suggesting that DACA enrollees had nothing to fear.

From Conservative Tribune

However, some of the estimated 800,000 illegal immigrants — USA Today suggests potentially as many as 2.1 million — who were brought into the country as children and were enrolled in Obama’s program may be on the verge of panic now. Department of Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly just informed members of Congress that the administration may not defend the controversial program from future legal challenges, according to The Washington Post.

Speaking in a closed-door meeting with members of the predominately Democrat Congressional Hispanic Caucus, Kelly informed them that if they wanted to ensure the amnesty program survived, they’d have to engage with Republicans in a bipartisan compromise immigration bill to protect the illegals legislatively.

“This is what he’s being told by different attorneys, that if it goes to court it might not survive,” DHS spokesman David Lapan said regarding Kelly’s remarks. Should Congress not pass a bill protecting the program, “they’re leaving it in the hands of the courts to make a decision.”

That was simply too much for a “visibly shaken” Illinois Rep. Luis Gutierrez, who dramatically proclaimed in both English and Spanish of the attorney general, “Jeff Sessions is going to say, ‘Deport them.’ If you’re going to count on Jeff Sessions to save DACA, then DACA is ended.”

“It’s not a pretty picture,” New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez told reporters, according to Politico. “The legal authorities that he’s spoken to suggest that DACA cannot be sustained legally. We have a different view.”

Kelly told the congressional members that, despite his own personal support for the program and Trump’s prior statements placing DACA enrollees at ease, an impending legal challenge by Texas and nine other Republican-led states would likely prevail in court and bring an end to the amnesty program, leaving it up to Congress to save the program.

While there are no doubt plenty of innocent people enrolled in the program who were brought to the country illegally as a child through no choice of their own — people Congress should figure out how to deal with humanely — some illegals have abused the program and many criminals and gang members have been protected by their “DREAMer” status.

In fact, Breitbart reported that since DACA was first rolled out, more than 1,500 of those enrolled have seen their status revoked due to gang affiliations or other criminal activities. Furthermore, several gang members caught in a recent roundup were found to have illegally entered the country as minors, and were potentially eligible for enrolling in the program.

Common sense and past experience suggests that the real number of illegals enrolled in DACA and involved in criminal or gang activity is much, much higher than just those who have been caught.

Obama never should have implemented DACA via executive action, and only did so because Congress had reached an impasse on a compromise. If Congress wants Obama’s amnesty program to remain intact and in effect, they better get to work crafting legislation that says as much, because as it stands right now, the program won’t hold up under legal challenge and the Trump administration won’t be wasting time defending it.

HELP US KEEP YOU BETTER INFORMED ABOUT THE TRICKS OF THE RADICAL PROGRESSIVE REVOLUTION PLEASE DONATE ANY AMOUNT YOU CAN
SEO Powered By SEOPressor