Archive for the ‘ISIA – Terrorists’ Category

HOMELAND STUPIDITY CHIEF: My Job Is To “Give Voice To The Plight Of Muslims”

by Tim Brown
My goodness! When are Americans going to have enough of the federal government advancing the religion of pieces? “Homeland Security” Secretary Jeh Johnson sides with Barack Obama about not getting at the root of the terrorism taking place in the world today, Islam. In fact, recently, Johnson said that it was part of the administration’s job to “give voice to the plight of Muslims.”

“We in the administration and the government should give voice to the plight of Muslims living in this country and the discrimination that they face,” he said. “And so I personally have committed to speak out about the situation that very often people in the Muslim community in this country face; the fact that there are 1.6 billion Muslims in the world and the Islamic faith is one about peace and brotherhood.”

They will trip all over themselves and fall flat on their faces to call any terrorism “Islamic.” They will do anything to promote Muhammad’s religion and political ideology over and against Christian values.

In simple taqiyya style, Johnson claims not only is it the job of the government to give voice to the plight of Muslims, but then promote Islam as a religion of peace and brotherhood.

Quite simply, this is nauseating to hear, but not unexpected. First, we’ve covered in several places that Islam, at its core, is not peaceful (unless you submit to it). Its history is filled with violence. In fact, I recently wrote about our own history and just how Islam is woven into the fabric of our history in the Barbary Wars.

When one starts pointing out the issues of Islam, the ridicule always comes out saying that someone is “xenophobic” or “Islamophobic,” even “racist,” as though Islam is a race. While many Middle Eastern people are automatically assumed to be Muslim, that is not always the case. Take for instance, the Christians that have been slaughtered like cattle by those that embrace Muhammad’s death cult.


Jeh JohnsonSecretary Johnson, like all of Obama’s appointees is a corrupt man. This guy, according to the Homeland Security website, “oversaw the development of the legal aspects of many of our nation’s counterterrorism policies, spearheaded reforms to the military commissions system at Guantanamo Bay in 2009.”

Reforms like spending your tax dollars to make Islamic jihadists more comfortable. Even though he was not in the current position, one might wonder what part Johnson has played in the release of several jihadists, including the illegal swap of five top Taliban leaders for American deserter Bowe Bergdahl.

It is because of Johnson that we recently heard the ridiculous claim that “right-wing extremists” are more of a threat to America than their buddies in the Muslim Brotherhood and its various front groups, who are operating with impunity in our borders and visiting our White House.

Many don’t remember, but Johnson was behind the wicked scheme to repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” in 2010, which allowed open sodomy in the military that dropped the morale of our men and women in uniform and also led to an all-time high of sodomite rapes.

Neither Johnson nor the administration nor the federal government’s job is to “give voice to the plight of Muslims.” The federal government is charged with a few things in our Constitution. In the branch Johnson participates in, his agency isn’t even authorized to be in existence, much less given a voice!

America, this administration does not love America. They hate it with a passion, which is why they want to “fundamentally transform” it. Why would you transform that which you claim to love? With all of his moral faults, former Mayor Rudy Giuliani was right about that statement, but for those of us who have been paying attention, we’ve known it since before his first term in office.


‘Islamophobia’– A Soft Jihad Monster: Will The West Keep Feeding The Beast?

Written by Audrey Russocookiemonster-20100301-170254-300x180
I came across an old cartoon series the other day called Fractured Fairy Tales. I realized that that title could aptly explain the world we now live in…where adults have become childlike in their inability to endure the slightest hardship, tossing security for comfort…and the leaders are the spinners of tales that when applied to reality, create tremendous adversity.

Enter…the first resort of cowards, that has never seen a victory: Appeasement. The very pacification that feeds the monstrous lie of Islamophobia.

As some of my guests have shared (Reza Kahlili, Raymond Ibrahim, Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer), Islamophobia is a faux term created by Islamists to verbally whip infidels into line. Dissected the term means: fear of Islam based upon ignorance…AND this weapon is drawn ANY time someone reveals the TRUE nature of the ideology of Islam. It’s used as an assassin’s blade to slay the character of the messenger.

This is a form of non-violent Jihad or “soft jihad”…but can, and has, led to violent Jihad or “hard jihad”.

This soft jihad monster is insatiable in its appetite to eviscerate free speech, and everyone who values this critical freedom should do all to starve this creature, right?
But such is not the case in Western media and with Western leaders. They appear to be a bit obsessive-compulsive concerning feeding this beast. They play its game of denying the reality of acts committed based upon the doctrine of Islam (WTC 1993, 9-11-01, Boston Marathon Bombing, Fort Hood Jihadist, Moore OK Beheading, etc.). The list of atrocities directly based in Islam’s holy books are unequivocal to the rational mind, but not to the Leftist/Progressive mindset that lives in what is now a fractured fairy tale. Their constant denial and appeasement is the vital nutrient this beast thrives upon.

The only weapon we possess to starve and defeat this enemy is TRUTH. The truth about the words, convictions, acts and practices of a 1,400 year old tyrannical ideology that has butchered its way into the 21st century…with a little help from friends on the Left, and the silence of the Lambs on the right.

It’s time to take the narrative back for free speech. When Islamophobia is hurled your way, retort with, “I’m an Islamorealist.” Because you’re concern is based in reality and fact, not ignorance of their system.

The Islamophobia lie is a soft jihad against freedom…it’s time to starve the beast back into its 7th century abode!

Shalom through strength…


Written by Audrey Russo on September 21, 2014
We in the West have been lied to. Our leaders, out of either political expediency or cowardice…have sold us a bill of goods. We have heard…and continue to hear ad nauseam, that the savage beheadings and underage rapes committed by devout Mohammedans have NOTHING to do with Islam.

But the funny thing is…according to the experts, in antithesis to the current rhetoric: Sex slaves & beheadings are INDEED Islamic, and it would thrill Muhammed that his followers continue his paradigm.

The first words that emanate from the lips of Western leaders following a savage beheading or the “discovery” that more young girls have been kidnapped/sexually abused by Muslims, is: These actions have nothing to do with Islam.

Au contraire…

According to author/scholar Raymond Ibrahim, Western leaders have it wrong. Here’s some of what his meticulous research has revealed:

** Begin with the command from the Koran, “Fight them [those who oppose Islam], Allah will torment them with your hands, humiliate them, empower you over them, and heal the hearts of the believers, removing the rage from their hearts” (Koran 9:14-15).
**Now, in order to comprehend the context, one must look to the Sira and Hadith…the biography and anecdotes of Muhammad, correspondingly.

Amr bin Hisham was a pagan Arab chieftain (infidel)…who had fierce opposition to Islam. A close companion to Muhammad and a new convert, mortally wounded Amr during the Battle of Badr…then started abusing him.
“According to Al-Bidaya wa Al-Nihaya (“The Beginning and the End”), Ibn Kathir’s authoritative history of Islam, ‘After that, he [Abdullah] slit his [‘Amr’s] head off and bore it till he placed it between the hands of the Prophet. Thus did Allah heal the hearts of the believers with it.’
“This, then, is the true significance of Koran 9:14-15: ‘Fight them, Allah will torment them with your hands [mortally wounding and eventually decapitating ‘Amr], humiliate them [pulling his beard], empower you over them [standing atop him], and heal the hearts of the believers, removing the rage from their hearts [at the sight of his decapitated head].’”
Sex Slaves/Rape (Grooming) Gangs (includes info from The Religion of Peace):
** Since Dar al-Islam (House of Islam) considers itself in a perpetual war with Dar al-Harb (House of War), which includes all infidels…Muslims believe that the booty of war includes human chattel (women & children). This is according to the Koran 33:50; 23:5-6; 70:29-30, to name a few verses.
** The Islamic booty or “Spoils of War” are confirmed by Raymond Ibrahim. This includes captive infidel women (which we are seeing currently in Iraq, Syria & Nigeria).
** Muslim men are taught that infidel women are unclean whores, so raping them is permissible.

The problem with the Western parrots, who repeat the paltering poop about these savage acts (and the ideology behind them) is…out of a desire to satisfy Political Correctness/Cultural Marxism (and for a time, they are protected from the fruit of their lies)…they are happy to throw the rest of the West to Muhammed’s mutts.

Their self-serving myopia prevents them from seeing the truth: That those savage beasts will eventually eviscerate them, as well.

Shalom through strength…


The United States has a problem with Islamic State. Its problem is that it refuses to acknowledge why Islamic State is a problem.

The problem with Islamic State is not that it is brutal. Plenty of regimes are brutal.

Islamic State poses two challenges for the US. First, unlike the Saudis and even the Iranians, IS actively recruits Americans and other Westerners to join its lines.

This is a problem because these Americans and other Westerners have embraced an ideology that is viciously hostile to every aspect of Western civilization.

Last Friday, Buzz Feed published a compilation of social media posts by Western women who have left Chicago and London and other hometowns to join IS in Syria.

As these women’s social media posts demonstrate, the act of leaving the West and joining IS involves rejecting everything the West is and everything it represents and embracing a culture of violence, murder and degradation.

In the first instance, the women who leave the West to join IS have no qualms about entering a society in which they have no rights. They are happy covering themselves in black from head to toe. They have no problem casting their lot with a society that prohibits females from leaving their homes without male escorts. They have no problem sharing their husband with other wives.

They don’t mind because they believe that in doing so, they are advancing the cause of Islam and Allah.

As the women described it, the hardest part about joining the jihad is breaking the news to your parents back home. But, as one recruiter soothed, “As long as you are firm and you know that this is all for the sake of Allah then nothing can shake you inshalah.”

Firm in their belief that they are part of something holy, the British, American and European jihadistas are completely at ease with IS violence. In one post, a woman nonchalantly described seeing a Yazidi slave.

“Walked into a room, gave salam to everyone in the room to find out there was a yazidi slave girl there as well.. she replied to my salam.”

Other posts discussed walking past people getting their hands chopped off and seeing dead bodies on the street. Islamic State’s beheadings of American and British hostages are a cause for celebration.

Their pride at the beheadings of James Foley and others is part and parcel of their hatred for the US and the West. As they see it, destroying the US and the West is a central goal of IS.

As one of the women put it, “Know this Cameron/ Obama, you and your countries will be beneath our feet and your kufr will be destroyed, this is a promise from Allah that we have no doubt over…. This Islamic empire shall be known and feared world wide and we will follow none other than the law of the one and the only ilah!” These women do not feel at all isolated. And they have no reason to. They are surrounded by other Westerners who joined IS for the same reasons they did.

In one recruitment post, Western women were told that not knowing Arabic is no reason to stay home.

“You can still survive if you don’t speak Arabic. You can find almost every race and nationality here.”

The presence of Westerners in IS, indeed, IS’s aggressive efforts to recruit Westerners wouldn’t pose much of a problem for the US if it were willing to secure its borders and recognize the root of the problem.

But as US President Barack Obama made clear over the summer, and indeed since he first took office six years ago, he opposes any effort to secure the US border with Mexico. If these jihadists can get to Mexico, they will, in all likelihood, have no problem coming to America.

Even if the US were to secure its southern border, it would still be unable to prevent these jihadists from returning to attack. The policy of the US government is to deny the existence of a jihadist threat by, among other thing, denying the existence of the ideology of Islamic jihad.

When President Barack Obama insisted last Wednesday that Islamic State is not Islamic, he told all the Westerners who are now proud mujihadin that they shouldn’t worry about coming home. They won’t be screened. As far as the US is concerned their Islamic jihad ideology doesn’t exist.

Whereas every passenger arriving in the US from Liberia can be screened for Ebola, no one will be screened for exposure to jihadist thought.
And this brings us to the second problem IS poses to the US.

As a rising force in the Middle East, IS threatens US allies and it threatens global trade. To prevent its allies from being overthrown and to prevent shocks to the international economy, at a minimum, the US needs to contain IS. And given the threat the Westerners joining the terror army constitute, and Washington’s unwillingness to stop them at the border, in all likelihood, the US needs to destroy IS where it stands.

Unfortunately, there is no reason to believe that the US is willing or able to either contain or defeat IS.

As US Maj. Gen. (ret.) Robert Scales wrote over the weekend in The Wall Street Journal, from a military perspective, IS is little different from all the guerrilla forces the US has faced in battle since the Korean War. Scales argues that in all previous such engagements, the outcomes have been discouraging because the US lacks the will to take the battle to the societies that feed them or use its firepower to its full potential out of fear of killing civilians.

Clearly this remains the case today.
Moreover, as Angelo Codevilla explained last month in The Federalist, to truly dry up the swamp feeding IS, it is necessary to take the war to its state sponsors — first and foremost Turkey and Qatar.

In his words, “The first strike against the IS must be aimed at its sources of material support. Turkey and Qatar are very much part of the global economy… If…the United States decides to kill the IS, it can simply inform Turkey, Qatar, and the world it will have zero economic dealings with these countries and with any country that has any economic dealing with them, unless these countries cease any and all relations with the IS.”

Yet, as we saw on the ground this weekend with US Secretary of State John Kerry’s failed mission to secure Turkish support for the US campaign against IS, the administration has no intention of taking the war to IS’s state sponsors, without which it would be just another jihadi militia jockeying for power in Syria.

And this leaves us with the administration’s plan to assemble a coalition of the willing that will provide the foot soldiers for the US air war against Islamic State.

After a week of talks and shuttle diplomacy, aside from Australia, no one has committed forces. Germany, Britain and France have either refused to participate or have yet to make clear what they are willing to do.

The Kurds will not fight for anything but Kurdistan.

The Iraqi Army is a fiction.
The Iraqi Sunnis support IS far more than they trust the Americans.
Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Jordan will either cheer the US on from a distance, or in the best-case scenario, provide logistical support for its operations.

It isn’t just that these states have already been burned by Obama whether through his support for the Muslim Brotherhood and the overthrow of Hosni Mubarak and Muammar Gaddafi. And it isn’t simply that they saw that the US left them hanging in Syria.

They see Obama’s “strategy” for fighting IS — ignoring the Islamic belief system that underpins every aspect of its existence, and expecting other armies to fight and die to accomplish the goal while the US turns a blind eye to Turkey’s and Qatar’s continued sponsorship of Islamic State. They see this strategy and they are convinced America is fighting to lose. Why should they go down with it?

Islamic State is a challenging foe. To defeat it, the US must be willing to confront Islamism. And it must be willing to fight to win. In the absence of such determination, it will fight and lose, in the region and at home, with no allies at its side.


Sotloff was sold to Islamic State terrorists by Syrian rebels, family spokesperson tells CNN

Steven Sotloff is the American journalist and holder of Israeli citizenship who was brutally executed by Islamic State terrorists last week.

Steven Sotloff, the American journalist and holder of Israeli citizenship who was brutally executed by Islamic State terrorists last week, was sold to the extremist jihadist group by a Syrian rebel organization, the spokesperson for the Sotloff family told CNN on Monday.

“For the first time, we can say Steven was sold at the border,” Barak Barfi, the spokesperson, told CNN’s Anderson Cooper. “Steven’s name was on a list that he had been responsible for the bombing of a hospital. This was false, activists spread his name around.”

“We believe that these so-called moderate rebels that people want our administration to support, one of them sold him probably for something between $25,000 and $50,000 to ISIS, and that was the reason he was captured,” Barfi told Cooper.

Barfi said that he learned this information from “sources on the ground.”

“Somebody at the border crossing made a phone call to ISIS and they set up a fake checkpoint with many people and Steven and his people that he went in with could not escape,” he said.

Barfi also criticized the Obama administration for “inaccurate statements” that have been attributed to government officials who have commented on the case.

“We know that the intelligence community and the White House are enmeshed in a larger game of bureaucratic infighting and [James Foley, the other journalist executed by Islamic State] and Steve are pawns in this game and that’s not fair and if there continues to be leaks the Sotloff family will have to speak out to set the record straight,” Barfi said.

ISIS leader was a US detainee

The Islamist extremist some are now calling the most dangerous man in the world.
Herald Sun

When Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi walked away from a U.S. detention camp [in Iraq] in 2009, the future leader of ISIS issued some chilling final words to reservists from Long Island.

“He said, ‘I’ll see you guys in New York,’” recalls Army Col. Kenneth King, then the commanding officer of Camp Bucca…

King had not imagined that in less that five years he would be seeing news reports that al-Baghdadi was the leader of ISIS, the ultra-extremist army that was sweeping through Iraq toward Baghdad.


Obama pulled US forces out of Iraq in 2011.

David French was a soldier in Iraq at the height of trouble:

I remember what Iraq was like in late 2008, when I left. My unit. . .had largely cleared out one of the last areas of al-Qaeda dominion in Iraq. At high cost we had taken thousands of square kilometers back from enemy control, broken the back of enemy resistance, and given the local population the chance to live something approaching a normal life. Want a measure of our success?

When we arrived in November 2007, in Diyala Province (labeled the Islamic Caliphate of Iraq by the al-Qaeda forces in control) every time any convoy rolled out of the gate, it had a greater than 25 percent chance of enemy contact — IEDs, ambushes, or sniper fire. When we left in late September 2008, that chance was down to approximately 1 percent.

Good men died making that progress. Friends and brothers, all of them.

But that’s not to say that al-Qaeda was completely defeated. Even as we prepared to hand over the battle space to an incoming unit, al Qaeda struck one last blow – killing a very dear friend of mine when our troopers cornered a senior leader.

The bottom line was that Iraq was under control, but still in a state of low-intensity war. Iraqi forces, with the help of small groups of American advisers and — in extreme circumstances — American air power, were more than capable of handling large-scale threats from jihadists but weren’t yet capable of stopping all violence (and, indeed, may never have been). The situation was stable, and — here’s the key — sustainable.

Yes, to sustain it would have required the continued presence of American troops, and those troops may have sustained occasional additional casualties, but that’s the price we pay to secure hard-won victories.