Archive for the ‘Loretta Lynch’s Muslim Terrorist Connections’ Category

Loretta Lynch’s Secret Identity Exposed – This Is Criminal

(Christian News Alerts) – Amidst all of the hoopla over President Donald Trump and his supposed corruption, the mainstream media has underplayed the various conspiracies and shady dealings of the Obama administration — relentlessly.

According to Gateway Pundit, Internet mogul, Kim Dotcom, released information revealing that former Attorney General Loretta Lynch used an alias in order to write, and respond to, hundreds of internal emails. One of the emails even shows that Lynch hid her identity from Justice Department officials.

Lynch’s code name was Elizabeth Carlisle.

Kim Dotcom’s reports not only show that the emails were forwarded to Lynch’s Elizabeth Carlisle account, but that a Twitter account bearing the name Elizabeth Carlisle regularly posted anti-Trump, pro-Hillary Clinton articles.

The use of aliases seems to have been common in the Obama White House. Lynch’s predecessor, Attorney General Eric Holder, used a grand total of three aliases during his tenure.

While using fake news is not a crime in and of itself, it does set off alarms when one considers the various malpractices, and possible violations, that Lynch currently stands accused of.

During the 2016 election, while still the acting AG, Lynch met with former President Bill Clinton in a private meeting in Phoenix, Arizona. At the time, Hillary Clinton was under federal investigation because she used a private email server to trade classified information back and forth on unsecured networks.

Amazingly, this meeting was first reported by a local Arizona reporter, and not by the mainstream media. Recently, leaked emails showed that both the Washington Post and New York Times were initially hesitant to cover the story.

Former FBI Director, James Comey, testified that AG Lynch requested the FBI refer to their Clinton investigation as a “matter.” This was an attempt to minimize the damage that could befall Clinton’s campaign. Lynch’s clandestine meeting with Clinton has more than a passing whiff of collusion.

Last week, Congressional Republicans moved against both Lynch and Comey, by requesting that Congress establish a second special counsel tasked with investigating the possible crimes and misdemeanors of Obama officials in 2016. The items up for investigation not only include Lynch’s meeting with Bill Clinton and her possible obstruction of the FBI’s case against Hillary Clinton, but also the fact that Clinton was given a pass by the FBI, despite the fact that Comey admitted that she broke the law.

Other possible investigations are shedding light onto how much the Ukrainian government participated in the Clinton campaign. Similarly, we’re gaining insight into former National Security Advisor Susan Rice’s espionage campaign against President Trump and his team. The possibility that “opposition research” firm, Fusion GPS, “set-up” Donald Trump, Jr., and others — thus entrapping them, is very real.

Washington Republicans certainly have a lot of material to work with. Their efforts will undoubtedly be encouraged by the White House. The only possible issue is that special counsel Mueller will race ahead with his Russian investigation, thanks to wall-to-wall coverage by the mainstream media. There’s a real possibility that a second special counsel will get drowned out.

The question remains: why did Lynch feel the need to use a code name? Is there something she is hiding?

ALL FISA Applications to WireTap Trump Were Signed Off By AG Loretta Lynch!

The FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance) Court is in the news this weekend after President Trump tweeted that former President Obama had petitioned a court twice in order to wire tap current President Trump when he was running for office.

In his first tweet President Trump tweeted:

Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my “wires tapped” in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!
He next tweeted:

Is it legal for a sitting President to be “wire tapping” a race for president prior to an election? Turned down by court earlier. A NEW LOW!
The Gateway Pundit reports,

The FISA Court was put in place in 1978 when Congress enacted the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA):


The Court sits in Washington D.C., and is composed of eleven federal district court judges who are designated by the Chief Justice of the United States. Each judge serves for a maximum of seven years and their terms are staggered to ensure continuity on the Court. By statute, the judges must be drawn from at least seven of the United States judicial circuits, and three of the judges must reside within 20 miles of the District of Columbia. Judges typically sit for one week at a time, on a rotating basis.

Pursuant to FISA, the Court entertains applications submitted by the United States Government for approval of electronic surveillance, physical search, and other investigative actions for foreign intelligence purposes. Most of the Court’s work is conducted ex parte as required by statute, and due to the need to protect classified national security information.
Every single judge on the FISA Court as of today was appointed during Obama’s Presidency!

Five of the current eleven judges on the court are scheduled to be on the court for President Trump’s entire first term with six of the judges’ terms expiring before January 2021. Seven of the judges are scheduled into the year 2020.


Current Chief Justice John Roberts has been in his role since 2005 and therefore he has appointed all the judges to the FISA court. Judge Roberts is famous for supporting Obamacare in two radical positions, one of which Justice Antonin Scalia, in his withering dissent, refered to as “applesauce”. Knowing this, it is concerning that Judge Roberts also is responsible for the makeup of the current FISA court.

Only two in over 10,000 applications were turned down by the FISA Court.
According to ABC News:

More than a thousand applications for electronic surveillance, all signed by the attorney general, are submitted each year, and the vast majority are approved. From 2009 to 2015, for example, more than 10,700 applications for electronic surveillance were submitted, and only one was denied in its entirety, according to annual reports sent to Congress. Another one was denied in part, and 17 were withdrawn by the government.

According to ABC, all applications to the FISA Court were signed off on by the Attorney General and therefore if any applications were processed in the past year, they were signed off on by Loretta Lynch. This means that Lynch signed off on any requests for wire tapping President Donald Trump during the Presidential race. This is disheartening knowing that she released a video over the weekend calling for the need for more marching, blood and death on the streets. This also means that she chose not to investigate the Clinton Foundation for illegal activities but rather signed an application to wire tap President Trump.

Finally, another very disturbing fact about the wire tapping request of President Trump is that the FISA Court turned down President Obama’s Administration’s first request to wire tap President Trump that was evidently signed off on by Attorney General Lynch. With only two applications denied out of 10,700 from 2009 through 2015, the fact that the Obama Administration’s application was denied by the FISA Court is very disturbing. The odds of this happening were 0.02%.
Read more at The Gateway Pundit

Attorney General Loretta Lynch's Muslim Terrorist Connections

By Tim Brown

United States Attorney Loretta E. Lynch speaks during an announcement of the arrest of Abraxas J. ("A.J.") Discala, CEO of OmniView Capital, and six co-conspirators for fraudulent market manipulation at the U.S. Attorney's office in Brooklyn, New York July 17, 2014. Discala, 43, and the other defendants were accused of running a $300 million stock manipulation scheme that cheated elderly and other investors.   REUTERS/Lucas Jackson (UNITED STATES - Tags: BUSINESS CRIME LAW HEADSHOT)

United States Attorney Loretta E. Lynch speaks during an announcement of the arrest of Abraxas J. (“A.J.”) Discala, CEO of OmniView Capital, and six co-conspirators for fraudulent market manipulation at the U.S. Attorney’s office in Brooklyn, New York July 17, 2014. Discala, 43, and the other defendants were accused of running a $300 million stock manipulation scheme that cheated elderly and other investors. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson (UNITED STATES – Tags: BUSINESS CRIME LAW HEADSHOT)

Attorney General Loretta Lynch recently said that the Department of (IN)Justice would stand with Muslims in the wake of the San Bernardino jihad attacks and stated unequivocally, “When we talk about the First Amendment we [must] make it clear that actions predicated on violent talk are not American. They are not who we are, they are not what we do, and they will be prosecuted.” But beyond the fact that she has engaged in unconstitutional criminal activity, Lynch was also a part of a Jew-hating, Pro- Muslim Terrorist Harvard Group.

Discover the Networks informs us that Loretta Lynch was born in Greensboro, North Carolina (So Lynch is not African-American, she’s American, at least by birth. Having dark skin does not make you African. My friend Andre De Villiers, who makes custom knives, is from Africa and is as white as can be!), Lynch “earned an A.B. from Harvard College, where she was an original member of Delta Sigma Theta, a newly formed African-American sorority chapter; another noteworthy original member was Sharon Malone, who subsequently went on to marry Eric Holder.”

However, Discover the Networks goes on to report, “After completing her undergraduate studies, Lynch in 1984 earned a J.D. from Harvard Law School, where she was a member of the Black Law Student Association.”

Well now, just what is the Black Law Student Association? Charles Johnson reports on the group during the years between 1981-1984 when Lynch was a member.

During those years the radical black group brought representatives from the Palestinian Liberation Operation (PLO).

The group’s leader, Mohammed Kenyatta, called for the “liberation of Palestine” and expressed support for the terrorist organization.

The BLSA defended bringing the terrorists in a letter to the editor of the Harvard student newspaper, The Harvard Crimson.

Jewish student organizations protested the speeches, especially in 1984. Liberal professor Alan Dershowitz joined the anti-PLO protests.

For documentation of the event, click here, here, here and here.

Lynch-600-LIWhile the BLSA responded to the controversy in a letter to the editors of the Harvard Crimson, in an attempt to do damage control, the Crimson blasted the BLSA’s letter.

THE BLACK LAW STUDENTS ASSOCIATION (BALSA) committed an unjustifiable and discriminatory violation of student liberties last week when it denied Jewish students an opportunity to participate in a campus forum featuring a representative of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO).

More than 30 Jewish Law Students Association (JLSA) members attended the panel discussion, outnumbering members of BALSA and the Third World Coalition, the event’s sponsors. But after opening the forum to questions from the floor, BALSA moderator Muhammad I. Kenyatta refused to recognize any of the white hands raised in the audience. BALSA and TWC members were to be given priority, he announced, proceeding to call on a Black student who hadn’t raised his hand.

We defend the PLO’s right to appear in an open forum at Harvard. All groups have a right to present their views; had Kenyatta permitted all students to challenge the speaker with critical questions, the ensuing discussion might have provided a constructive exchange of ideas and opinions.

By stifling debate, however, Kenyatta reduced the event to little more than a propaganda platform for a terrorist organization that has pledged to destroy the State of Israel. His refusal to open the floor to all students views showed a glaring disregard for the principles of free discussion that are vital to an enlightened academic community.

Moreover, Kenyatta’s actions are particularly disturbing in light of the apparently widening rift between Black and Jewish organizations at Harvard and nationwide. Longtime political allies, particularly on civil rights issues, these groups recently have traded bitter words on a variety of issues; it is regrettable that Kenyatta acted in a way that helps further drive this wedge between Blacks and Jews.

Loretta LynchNone of this should surprise us, as Lynch has not only tied herself to organizations that promote terrorism, but she has served alongside other criminals. Under President Bill Clinton, Lynch served as US Attorney for the Eastern District of New York. During that time, from October 1994 to January 1998, Lynch was a partner with the Connecticut-based Ujamaa Investment Group. “Ujamaa” is a Swahili term signifying a commitment to the practice of “shared wealth” and a repudiation of economic inequality.

Lynch is as much a racist as Eric Holder and Barack Obama are. She believes that an enforcement of critical race theory is what is needed. By the way, keep in mind that she graduated from Harvard just like Hussein Obama, the same Harvard where Professor Derrick Bell, the racist man who produced critical race theory, taught.

Ms. Lynch has called Voter ID laws racist and has stolen over $900 million in asset forfeitures in 2013 alone, against the protections of the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution.

All of this is not only immoral, but anti-American.

To further make the point of associations in this administration, consider the Eric Holder even participated in an armed takeover of a former Columbia University ROTC office! And don’t forget the Michelle Obama, as well as creator’s Executive were also part of a racist college group that hosted a pro-terrorist speaker. Show me who your friends are and I’ll tell you what you are!

Lynch is a criminal just like Obama, Holder and the Clintons. She is a woman who cannot be trusted and yet, US Senators had all of this information, but many of them chose to confirm her, just like they did her predecessor Eric Holder, whom Congress held in contempt for his obvious obstruction of justice concerning Fast and Furious.

Marxists and Islamic sympathizers have it in for America, and there is no doubt that Loretta Lynch is among them. Now the question is, who in Congress will call for her impeachment and subsequent indictment? I’ll be the first among the people!

SEO Powered By SEOPressor