SICK: Teen Girl Horrified at What She Caught Transsexual Doing in Locker Room

One of our worst fears regarding the transsexual community and its cry for gender equality are becoming a dangerous reality, and an incident at an Olympia, Washington, college illustrated the sick direction in which gender discrimination laws are headed.

Evergreen College shared a locker room with the Capital High School swim club and a children’s swim academy. Evergreen was forced to follow state laws against discriminating on the basis of gender identity, which presented the troubling situation of grown transsexual men using the same locker room with small girls — some as young as 6 years old.

It didn’t take long for something disturbing to happen. In 2012, a young girl told her parents that a 45-year-old transgender student exposed himself to her in the locker room.
As expected, parents were outraged when they heard what happened and demanded something be done.

The college installed “privacy curtains” in the locker room and allowed the transgender student to continue using the women’s facilities. The college claimed that while the curtains weren’t a perfect solution, they did address the privacy issues of this involved.

That’s assuming transgender men will actually use the area with the curtains — because they were not required to do so.
Evergreen spokesman Jason Wettstein told KOMO the college must abide by state laws.

“Gender identity is one of the protected things in discrimination law in this state,” Wettstein said.

“If it were my kid, I would be absolutely outraged,” said Joseph Backholm, director of the conservative non-profit Family Policy Institute of Washington. Backholm said parents have a “reasonable expectation” that there are not going to be naked men around their daughters in a restroom.

This kind of behavior is most likely going to continue as more states pass laws prohibiting “discrimination” against transgender individuals. It’s a frightening direction for our country, and we have liberals to thank for it.

Brexit Leader Loses It When Fox News Host Asks About Obama…Then Drops The Hammer

The man who led the “Leave” campaign that ended with last week’s vote in Great Britain to exit the European Union took some time out during a victory lap in Brussels, Belgium, to explain just how that political revolution actually played out.

And — not surprisingly — President Obama came out looking badly.

Actually, it was a good deal worse than badly — and American voters thinking about the difference between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump in the fall’s election should be listening.
“Obama came to Britain and I think behaved disgracefully,” United Kingdom Independence Party leader Nigel Farage told “Your World With Neil Cavuto” guest host Trish Regan on Monday. He was talking about Obama’s April visit when the leader of the free world visited a traditional ally to actually threaten its voters if they chose the path to a free future.

“Telling us we’d be at the back of the queue…. Treating us — American’s strongest, oldest ally — in the most extraordinary way.”

Meanwhile, Russia President Vladimir Putin — a dictator in all but name — actually looked the more presidential of the two.
“Vladimir Putin behaved in a more statesmanlike manner than President Obama did in this referendum campaign,” Farage said.

“Statesmanlike,” in this case meant maintaining silence, something Barack Obama has found impossible since he called those Cambridge, Massachusetts, cops “stupid” for trying to stop a reported home burglary back in 2009. (It should be noted that there are those who believe Putin may benefit from “Brexit” as the vote has created instability in the European Union specifically and the Western alliance generally.)

Check out the Farage interview below. The Obama bash begins about the 8:45 mark.
Farage is a rhetorical bomb-thrower, of course. Men who take on the establishment generally are.

To an American ear, the themes he sounds are familiar: Getting control of an immigration problem that seems to be swamping the country, arranging better trade deals, and ensuring the country’s sovereignty in an increasingly globalized world.

Those are themes Donald Trump hits incessantly — while Hillary Clinton promises to continue Barack Obama’s policies, and go even further when it comes to legalizing aliens already in the country illegally.

Republicans can only hope the election in November is as satisfying as Thursday’s referendum was for Farage and his United Kingdom Independence Party.

“Whatever problems you’ve got in the USA, they are as nothing to what we’ve had,” Farage told Fox News’ Regan.

“And what we did last Thursday was we said, ‘We want our country back, and we voted for it, and we’ve got it back!’”

And that’s just what Hillary, Obama and the rest of the Democrat Party is afraid of.

Wikileaks Founder Drops The HAMMER On Hillary With Stunning News… She’s DONE

Following recent news of a Russian intelligence-directed hack of the Democrat National Committee‘s computer network, it was expected that previously secret documents will soon be released for the general public to review.

This is not good news for the Democrat Party, and is even worse news for presumptive Democrat nominee, Hillary Clinton, who will quite likely find her corrupt and dishonest ways further exposed.

To that point, the founder of Wikileaks, Julian Assange, recently declared on Britain’s ITV News that he was preparing to release information on Clinton that should be enough to “proceed with an indictment.”

“We have upcoming leaks in relation to Hillary Clinton,” Assange said. “We’ve accumulated a lot of material about Hillary Clinton. We could proceed to an indictment.”

But as to the FBI investigation into Hillary’s use of a private email server to store and traffic in official classified government documents, Assange did not have high hopes of justice being served.
Assange explained that he didn’t believe Attorney General Loretta Lynch would indict Hillary, and thought the FBI would exact concessions from a Clinton administration in order to remain silent on the travesty of justice such an occurrence would be.

That said, “(T)here is very strong material, both in the emails and in relation to the Clinton Foundation,” that could serve to further discredit and dishonor the already discredited and dishonorable Clinton.

While it is clear that Assange was no big fan of Hillary, his feelings on presumptive GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump were less known.

“I think Trump is a completely unpredictable phenomenon,” Assange said. “You can’t predict what he would do in office.”
Essentially, it boils down to the fact that Assange has taken issue with Clinton’s seemingly deep interest in prosecuting him over Wikileaks, not to mention her relative hawkishness in the use of military force, which he claims was revealed in some of the formerly private email exchanges that he possessed.

It remained to be seen whether Assange and Wikileaks would follow through on the promise to release more damaging information regarding Hillary Clinton, though considering the manner in which they have previously released damaging and secretive documents, there was little reason to believe they would hold back now.

If I Had a Job


Here is to you Hillie


Obama’s Chilling Threat: Constitution Only Matters When I Say It Does


It was late September of 2015.

Pope Francis had recently boarded a plane back to the Vatican after a controversial trip to America. The plane was barely out of sight before President Barack Obama was getting back to business as usual — attacking religious freedom.

That night, at a Democratic National Committee-sponsored event in New York City billed as an “LGBT gala,” Obama took to the podium and warned Christians across the country that their religious freedom means nothing in the face of gay rights.
“We affirm that we cherish our religious freedom and are profoundly respectful of religious traditions,” the POTUS said. “But we also have to say clearly that our religious freedom doesn’t grant us the freedom to deny our fellow Americans their constitutional rights.”

Obama patronized Christians and Christian groups about their “genuine concerns,” but ultimately suggested that the issue was being pushed by Republicans who were simply using the concerns to acquire more votes.

Fast forward the clock to the June of 2016. Obama is happy to throw the Constitution in a huge dumpster fire as long as it gets HIM more votes for his leftist gun control agenda.

BOMBSHELL: HILLARY CLINTON’S UN RESOLUTION Is Why Orlando Terror Transcript Was “Bleached Out

Former US Attorney General Mukasey rips into Loretta Lynch for “bleaching out any part of Islam that promotes violence” but the bombshell is in regard to Clinton and UN resolution 16/18:

So Hillary Clinton’s role as Secretary of State brought about the “bleaching out of Islam” – THIS is very concerning! Please read below how Hillary Clinton implemented a Sharia-favored government effort to silence free speech in criticizing Islam. And THIS woman wants to be your next president? This happened in 2011 and is now being used by our government.

Islamic World Tells Clinton: Defamation of Islam Must be Prevented — in America

This brilliant article by Clare M. Lopez goes into much greater detail but I tried to give you the main part of the argument that Hillary is in cahoots with the OIC/UN to stifle our freedom of speech when it comes to Islam:

As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton welcomes Secretary General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu to Washington this week, it is critical that Americans pay attention to what these two leaders intend to do. From 12 to 14 December 2011, working teams from the Department of State (DoS) and the OIC are going to discuss implementation mechanisms that could impose limits on freedom of speech and expression.

The OIC’s purpose, as stated explicitly in its April 2011 4th Annual Report on Islamophobia, is to criminalize “incitement to hatred and violence on religious grounds.” Incitement is to be defined by applying the “test of consequences” to speech. Under this twisted perversion of falsely “yelling ‘fire’ in a crowded theater,” it doesn’t matter what someone actually says — or even whether it is true or not; if someone else commits violence and says it’s because of something that person said, the speaker will be held criminally liable.

The OIC is taking direct aim at free speech and expression about Islam.

Last March, the State Department and Secretary Clinton insisted that “combating intolerance based on religion” can be accomplished without compromising Americans’ treasured First Amendment rights. But if that were so, there would be no possible excuse for engaging at this level with an organization like the OIC that is openly dedicated to implementing Islamic law globally.

This is why it is so important to pay attention not only to the present agenda, but to a series of documents leading up to it, issued by both the U.S. and the OIC. From 12 to 14 December 2011, the DoS and OIC working teams will focus on implementation mechanisms for “Resolution 16/18,” a declaration that was adopted by the U.N. Human Rights Council in April 2011.

Resolution 16/18 was hailed as a victory by Clinton, because it calls on countries to combat “intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization” based on religion without criminalizing free speech — except in cases of “incitement to imminent violence.” But if the criterion for determining “incitement to imminent violence” is a new “test of consequences,” then this is nothing but an invitation to stage Muslim “Days of Rage” following the slightest perceived offense by a Western blogger, instructor, or radio show guest, all of whom will be held legally liable for “causing” the destruction, possibly even if what they’ve said is merely a statement of fact. The implications of such prior restraint on free speech would be chilling (which is precisely the point).

Clearly, the OIC feels some sense of urgency to get the rest of the non-Muslim world, and especially the U.S., on board with these objectives.

Official Set to Testify Against Hillary Found Dead – The Clinton Crime Family Strikes

The suspicious circumstances surrounding the death last week of former U.N. President John Ashe had many wondering whether foul play was involved.

The New York Post’s Page Six reported that after Ashe was found dead Wednesday, the U.N. claimed that he had died from a heart attack. Local police officers in Dobbs Ferry, New York, later disputed that claim, saying instead that he died from a workout accident that crushed his throat.

Adding to the mysterious nature of Ashe’s death was the fact that he had been slated to be in court Monday with his Chinese businessman co-defendant Ng Lap Seng, from whom he reportedly received over $1 billion in donations during his term as president of the U.N. General Assembly.
And then there was this: During the presidency of Bill Clinton, Seng illegally funneled several hundred thousand dollars to the Democrat National Committee.

According to an unidentified source who spoke with Page Six, prosecutors had intended to use the latter fact to link Ashe directly to Democrat front-runner Hillary Clinton, with whom he could be seen schmoozing in the picture above.
“It would have been very embarrassing,” the source added. “His death was conveniently timed.”

There was no evidence at the moment to corroborate the source’s theory of foul play, but that certainly did not stop conspiracy theorists from theorizing about “what really happened.”

Those theorists inclined to believe the stories about Hillary and Bill Clinton ordering the murders of their opponents wondered whether the former U.N. president was merely their latest victim

However, Ashe’s own lawyer, Jeremy Schneider, strongly disagreed with these theories.

UNBELIEVABLE: Obama’s DHS is Shuttling Illegals Across the Border Into Arizona


In 2014, FedEx faced drug-trafficking charges after a federal grand jury in San Francisco indicted it for conspiring to deliver prescription drugs for illegal Internet pharmacies.

“The indictment says FedEx knew for a decade that such pharmacies used their services…”

They apparently ignored nearly a decade of warnings from the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Food and Drug Administration and members of Congress… “FedEx knew that it was delivering drugs to dealers and addicts,” the Justice Department said in a press release.

Fast forward to today. After two years, FedEx and our government are headed to federal court. I personally think this is a shakedown, similar to the 2013 case involving UPS. They avoided a court fight, choosing instead to settle, paying the feds some $40 million.

Some however, would say that our government is trying to help us, by cracking down on the evil drug trade – and that’s a good thing, right?

But what about human trafficking? Seems to me this is even worse than drugs. Cartels based in Mexico shuttle illegals into America under the radar and drop them off in various places across the country.

One would think the Obama administration would be more concerned with this epidemic than FedEx and some internet pharmacies. Well, they might, if our government wasn’t the cartel.

Last week Judicial Watch and Zero Hedge reported that the Obama Department of Homeland (In)Security (DHS) “is quietly transporting illegal immigrants from the Mexican border to Phoenix and releasing them without proper processing or issuing court appearance documents.” Yes – you read that right!

DHS is classifying the illegals as “Other Than Mexican” (OTM), which is an all-encompassing term for any illegal alien who hails originally from a country other than Mexico. They claim the illegals come from Honduras, Colombia, El Salvador and Guatemala. And I wonder where else?

Judicial Watch (JW) witnessed the offloading of 35 illegals in Phoenix, who arrived in an unmarked white van – transported from Tucson, where they were being held by the Border Patrol. Of course the government, meaning we, picked up the tab for this whole shady and unlawful venture.

And what happened to the illegals after they arrived at the inland destination of DHS’s choosing? Nothing – they are simply released into the general population. Well, not quite. Border Patrol sources told JW that “none of the OTMs were issued official court appearance documents, but were told to ‘promise’ they’d show up for a hearing when notified, said federal agents with firsthand knowledge of the operation.” Oh, well then that’s okay.

Think it can’t get worse or somehow weirder? Think again.

DHS isn’t actually doing the transporting. Their hands are clean in that regard – just dirty everywhere else. They instead contracted the transportation to a security firm to perform the “mule” duties. And who is this firm?

It is said to be the world’s largest multinational security company, whose U.S. headquarters are in Jupiter, Fla. The company is G4S. Huh –where have heard that name? Oh, that’s right – it’s the firm that employed the Orlando Islamist killer, Omar Mateen. Small world, isn’t it.

Yes – a terrorist who was once on a watch list and interviewed several times by the FBI, while in their employ, for ties to at least two known Islamic terrorists, was employed by the world’s largest security firm who happens to be contracted to covertly transport illegal OTMs to places unknown within the U.S.

Need I remind you of segment one of my June 5 Podcast, where I chronicled the journey of an Afghani man with ties to the Taliban and his five Pakistani buddies who all made it into the U.S. before being captured. Would they not also be classified as “Other Than Mexican?”

JW has yet given no indication of how long the Obama administration has been perpetrating this heinous act – just that the Border Patrol is outraged, saying: “They’re telling us to put them on a bus and let them go,” said one law enforcement official in Arizona. “Just move those bodies across the country.”

Brandon Judd, chief of the National Border Patrol Council estimates that, “about 80% of apprehended illegal immigrants are released into the United States,” and that, “Single males that aren’t actually seen crossing into the U.S. by Border Patrol agents are released if they claim to have been in the country since 2014.”

We’ve witnessed years of lawlessness by the Obama administration, but they may all pale in comparison to this. In a sane and just world, everyone involved, from the president on down, should rightly be imprisoned for this. It’s what we would do with other human traffickers, would we not?

Clearwater, FL Chosen for Immediate Syrian Refugee Relocation

by Rex Kramer
The Obama Administration is bringing Syrian refugees to Clearwater, Florida. Source-ish: Entheta
Clearwater, FL – Humanitarian workers will resettle the next wave of Syrian refugees in Clearwater, Florida, as the Obama Administration struggle to bring at least 10,000 Syrian refugees to the U.S. by the end of September.

Special: Melissa McCarthy Uses New Skinny Pill to Drop 50lbs in 35 Days
Since the Syrian civil war first began, 95 Syrian families have been relocated to Florida. All of whom were resettled in the Miami area until last month, when Lutheran Social Services of Northeast Florida relocated twenty families to St. Augustine. The families fled Syria in 2013, lived in several refugee camps, and underwent a security screening process before coming to the United States.

“Clearwater has affordable housing, ample job opportunities, and a welcoming community,” said Aamil Bahri, director of refugee and immigration services at Lutheran Services Florida. “We expect to resettle many more families in Clearwater, along with many other refugee groups we are proud to serve.”
The war in Syria has killed hundreds of thousands and has displaced millions more. Under pressure to help as the war rages on, President Obama has pledged the U.S. will take in at least 10,000 more Syrian refugees this fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30th. Only thirty-five hundred have been relocated thus far.

Bahri and other Clearwater based humanitarian workers say the Obama Administration has told them to expect a much faster pace of resettlement efforts during the next three months. The government has taken steps to help with the president’s goal by dispatching additional workers to Jordan to interview applicants for resettlement, a U.S. State Department spokesman said. The Obama Administration also has resumed interviewing applicants in Mosul, Iraq, and has begun processing refugee resettlement cases in Al-Zabadani, Syria.

Those changes, according to the State Department, “will not curtail any aspects of the process, including its robust security screening. Refugees are the most thoroughly screened travelers to the United States.” Syrian refugees, according to the State Department, are screened to an even higher standard, and those screenings involve multiple agencies to make sure possible terrorists to do not slip through the cracks.

Refugees will be processed and briefly held at the Old Pinellas County Courthouse. Source: Ebyabe
“President Obama is under a lot of pressure,” said Kevin Appleby, senior director of international migration policy for the New York City based Center for Migration Studies. Failing, he said, “would undermine the nation’s credibility with allies and others who need to share the burden of resettling the Syrian people in need. It is difficult for us to instruct the Europeans, or even nations in the region, to accept large numbers of refugees when we can’t even meet our modest goals.”

Theodore Hanson, a former volunteer for Marco Rubio’s presidential campaign, isn’t at all happy about accepting refugees from countries that breed radical terrorists. “There’s still a tremendous amount of outrage over the refugee resettlement plan among Floridians,” said Hanson. “Even the FBI has admitted we can’t vet these people properly.”
Kyle Erickson, a local activist for Clearwater Conservatives, said he expects the level of anger to rise as the November election draws near. “This will be the end of the United States as we know it,” Erickson said. “Florida has just experienced the worst terrorist attack in U.S. history, and the federal government is going about things business as usual. No longer can we pretend that our national security is a non-issue.”

Clearwater Mayor, George Cretekos, declined to comment on the matter until he speaks further with governor Rick Scott. But Pastor Mark Harrold at a Clearwater community church welcomes the refugees with open arms. “Through God’s almighty grace we shall love our neighbors with all our hearts,” said Pastor Harrold.