Posts Tagged ‘BARAK’

A silent, possibly complicit Kingpin must be brought out of the shadows to answer burning inconsistencies.

(Steve Eichler J.D.) – It is becoming apparent the Birth Certificate which Mr. Obama presented to the public as a “true and accurate copy of the original” is neither. As a matter of fact, many are claiming it is a fraud! Forensic specialists have examined the publicly displayed Obama Birth Certificate and are claiming it is a poorly created dummy document, a fake!

However, the alleged fake document is what many are calling ‘an expected result from a charlatan of the likes of Obama’. At a closer view the document carries with it a higher degree of suspicion because of the nature of the forced disclosure by Obama. Whatever the motive to present this ‘Birth Certificate,’ may be, it has placed the Governor of Hawaii, Neil Abercrombie, in a precarious position.

In sum, it appears Abercrombie is one of the few people who can actually verify the validity of the Obama ‘Birth Certificate,’ for he, is the one whom the trust and validity of these documents reside, nonetheless, this may change if the court orders a forensic examination of Obama ‘Birth Certificate.’

Let us not forget, ONLY States and territorial jurisdictions of the United States can issue birth certificates. In short, there is no such thing as a ‘federal birth certificate.’ This means the weight of the validity of any State issued birth document is shifted onto the State, and then flows up to the chief official, in this case, Neil Abercrombie.

One important caveat, if it is found the Obama ‘Birth Certificate’ is a fraud, which at this writing, proof has revealed the document presented by the White House are most likely a forgery than not, then the focus shifts from Obama to Abercrombie.

Quite simply, if a falsification of a Hawaiian State issued Birth record is discovered, then the Hawaiian Governor has a fiduciary responsibility to the people of Hawaii, and, to the people of the United States of America. A responsibility to verify the validity of the ‘Birth Certificate’ in question, or denounce it as a fraud, anything less would be disingenuous of the highest office in the State of Hawaii, as evidenced by the oath of office .

The implications could be staggering. If it is found Obama’s published ‘Birth Certificate’ is a fraud and the Governor does not denounce such an open and conspicuous falsehood perpetrated upon the American people, then he will be complicit and perpetuate a fraud by defaulting on his responsibility to protect the interest of the good people of Hawaii and the United States as a whole. If a falsehood is knowingly covered-up by Abercrombie, then he has dirty hands, thereby, having used his office as an instrumentality for the committing of a series of crimes.

Make no mistake; if Neil Abercrombie chooses to be silent on a false Obama ‘Birth Certificate,’ he is as much an accessory to conspiracy to defraud, as if he personally printed the fabricated document himself. With Abercrombie’s authority and responsibility to the State of Hawaii, as well as to the laws of the United States, he is placed into a position of being the chief enforcement authority by this jurisdiction. Furthermore, he has sworn to protect the Constitution of the United States of America, this equates to a Judicial mandate which he must enforce or be negligent in his sworn duties as Governor.(i)

This could translate into an effort by the office of the Governor to launch a full and thorough investigation into birth certificate abuse. Not just in the light of the possible Obama Birth Certificate scheme, but also in other cases which have, or may not have, defrauded the people of Hawaii.

Additionally, the issue doesn’t stop with just a single birth certificate fraud case. The document in question could possibly represent hundreds, or even thousands, of fraudulent birth certificates used to commit a plethora of crimes. Crimes such as credit fraud, passport fraud and possibly has created a hidden pathway, which illegal aliens have trod for years, as they nefariously enter into the United States and pose as citizens.

Truth be told, the State of Hawaii, and it’s Governor, has authority under the Police Powers as guaranteed in the 5th and 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution, which raises the question of Federal jurisdiction as pertaining to State created documents. These State created documents carry Federal authority, and in this particular case, qualifies or disqualifies a person running for the office of the President of the United States of America.

What’s more important is, if Neil Abercrombie becomes aware of a fraud and refuses to act, this demonstrates a mens rea(ii) on his part. Men Rea is a necessary element in the determination of the intent to defraud, therefore, possibly setting the stage for being charged as a co-conspirator; consequently, Neil Abercrombie would have committed a crime on behalf of another.

In short, if Abercrombie has concealed the Obama ‘Birth Certificate,’ purported to be a State issued document, is indeed a fraud, then this places the Hawaiian Department of Justice on notice of the general intent by Abercrombie to mislead law enforcement and the specific intent to commit a crime on behalf of another by duplicity.

Will Abercrombie conceal the truth of the birth certificate by refusing to verify or denounce the accuracy of the ‘Birth Certificate’ presented by Obama?
Would the people of Hawaii be defrauded by the altering of a State issued birth certificate?

Yes! Because of the fact the Office of the President of the United States has, and will continue to exercise Federal jurisdiction over the people of Hawaii, not only in Federal questions, but also in monetary issues will have a direct impact on the economy of the State of Hawaii.

The question must be asked; is Neil Abercrombie complicit in the crime of defrauding the people of Hawaii and the government of the United States of America through duplicity, by concealing incriminating evidence of the Obama ‘Birth Certificate’?

Was document fraud deception deliberately practiced with a view to gain an unlawful advantage?

Birth document fraud is injurious to society, especially through deceit and trickery to mislead the course of due process. Is this what has happened?

Was our beloved Nation betrayed through a well-conceived and executed hoax?

Look at it this way, maybe, just maybe, the birth document is truly the actual Obama ‘Birth Certificate’ and Neil Abercrombie has nothing to worry about.

What do you think?

Visit Neil Abercrombie at: http://hawaii.gov/gov/

(i) I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Hawaii, and that I will faithfully discharge my duties as … to best of my ability.” As used in this section, “eligible public officers” means the governor, the lieutenant governor, the members of both houses of the legislature, the members of the board of education, the members of the national guard, State or county employees who possess police powers, district court judges, and all those whose appointment requires the consent of the senate. Source: http://vlex.com/vid/oath-of-office-303462#ixzz1Kxn8YRW4

(ii) The state of mind that the prosecution, to secure a conviction, must prove that a defendant had when committing a crime; criminal intent or recklessness. Blacks Law Dictionary 7th Edition, 1999, Page 999

Stephen Eichler J.D. is a Legal Analyst having graduated from Trinity Law School with additional studies in International law. Eichler is a founding student of Liberty University being personally taught by Dr. Jerry Falwell. Stephen Eichler is bringing national awareness to issues that challenge the security, sovereignty and domestic tranquility of the United States. He is the Executive Director of the Minuteman Project, Inc. led by Jim Gilchrist and Executive Director of the TeaParty.org. Stephen Eichler is represented by Tim Bueler and may be contacted atmedia@timbueler.com for Radio/TV and Print media bookings.

 

In this excerpt below from his book “Dreams from my Father” (written by Bill Ayers) (page 196 of the paperback edition) Obama explains how racial hatred and scapegoating of whites can provide a beneficial effect for blacks. Such racism and scapegoating is used by black nationalist and Afrocentric groups, such as the Nation of Islam, the New Black Panther Party and his own church, Trinity United Church of Christ of Chicago. Obama is describing a time that was before he joined Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity church. So, it shows that Obama was well-aware of the racial hatred of such groups, before he even met Jeremiah Wright. His conclusion is that such racism may be a necessary evil to improve the condition of the black race.

The same kind of “therapy” also produced a great improvement in the self-esteem of many Germans in the 1930′s and 1940′s. It is a proven technique! Though Obama claims that he does not personally feel good about such racial hatred, one has to take into account that he has a political career to protect. He could hardly say outright that he approves of racism without harming his career. However, he did join Wright’s church, which has a black nationalist doctrine, based on racial hatred and extreme anti-Americanism. Actions speak louder than words.

Obama demonstrates his general familiarity with the racist doctrine of black nationalism by discussing the finer details of the racism contained in the autobiography of Malcolm X and quoting Marcus Garvey, the father of the modern black nationalist mass movement. One of Garvey’s famous quotes, which Obama uses is a call for the black race to rise, “Rise up ye mighty race!” From reading other parts of this book, it is very obvious that Obama understood quite well the basic racist tenets of Black Nationalism at least since he was a teenager in Hawaii. This is to be expected, because he is not unintelligent and was very interested in exploring his black identity. He was fascinated and preoccupied with all things having to do with black culture, including black nationalism. The entire book is about his search since childhood for racial identity.

The doctrine of Trinity Church is based on Black Liberation Theology, which is a more sophisticated, pseudo-Christian version of the black identity theology of the Nation of Islam. Black Liberation Theology was written by a black professor in a seminary, James H. Cone. It is somewhat less direct in its racism and seems designed to be more socially acceptable in order to spread the racist concepts and extreme anti-American bigotry of the Nation of Islam among black urban professionals and black churches.

The theology of the NOI is not orthodox Islam but is branch of a wider black identity cult movement, whose various branches present a facade as Judaism, Islamic or Christian. They are really none of these religions, but closely-related black sects, based on a common, similar Gnostic doctrine, which all hold the black race to be the chosen people or actually God and the white race to be the ultimate evil or the devil.

When an author wants to express a controversial view in a book, but not have it blamed on himself, sometimes he will use a third party to state what they want to say. Rafiq, in this excerpt that follows, has never been identified with a real person and some people think that he is just a literary construct by Obama, which allows him to discuss the racism of Black Nationalism, while attempting to maintain some personal distance for himself. Obama writes in his analysis below that he does not feel good about it, but that racism may be necessary to improve the condition of the black race. This is the wrong conclusion! — especially, for a president of the United States!

When the two of us were alone, though, Rafiq and I could sometimes have normal conversations. Over time I arrived at a grudging admiration for his tenacity and bravado, and, within his own terms, a certain sincerity He confirmed that he had been a gang leader growing up in Altgeld; he had found religion, he said, under the stewardship of a local Muslim leader unaffiliated with Minister Louis Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam. “If it hadn’t been for Islam, man, I’d probably be dead,” he told me one day. “Just had a negative attitude, you understand. Growing up in Altgeld, I’d soaked up all the poison the white man feeds us. See, the folks you’re working with got the same problem, even though they don’t realize it yet. They spend half they lives worrying about what white folks think. Start blaming themselves for the shit they see every day, thinking they can’t do no better till the white man decides they all right. But deep down they know that ain’t right. They know what this country has done to their momma, their daddy, their sister. So the truth is they hate white folks, but they can’t admit it to themselves. Keep it all bottled up, fighting themselves. Waste a lot of energy that way.

“I tell you one thing I admire about white folks,” he continued. “They know who they are. Look at the Italians. They didn’t care about the American flag and all that when they got here. First thing they did is put together the Mafia to make sure their interests were met. The Irish—they took over the city hall and found their boys jobs. The Jews, same thing . . .you telling me they care more about some black kid in the South Side than they do ’bout they relatives in Israel? Shit. It’s about blood, Barack, looking after your own. Period. Black people the only ones stupid enough to worry about their enemies.”

That was the truth as Rafiq saw it, and he didn’t waste energy picking that truth apart. His was a Hobbesian world where distrust was a given and loyalties extended from family to mosque to the black race — whereupon notions of loyalty ceased to apply. This narrowing vision, of blood and tribe, had provided him with a clarity of sorts, a means of focusing his attention. Black self-respect had delivered the mayor’s seat, he could argue, lust as black self-respect turned around the lives of drug addicts under the tutelage of the Muslims. Progress was within our grasp so long as we didn’t betray ourselves.

But what exactly constituted betrayal? Ever since the first time I’d picked up Malcolm X’s autobiography, I had tried to untangle the twin strands of black nationalism, arguing that nationalism’s affirming message-—of solidarity and self-reliance, discipline and communal responsibility—need not depend on hatred of whites any more than it depended on white munificence. We could tell this country where it was wrong, I would tell myself and any black friends who would listen, without ceasing to believe in its capacity for change.

In talking to self-professed nationalists like Rafiq, though, I came to see how the blanket indictment of everything white served a central function in their message of uplift; how, psychologically, at least, one depended on the other. For when the nationalist spoke of a reawakening of values as the only solution to black poverty, he was expressing an implicit, if not explicit, criticism to black listeners: that we did not have to live as we did. And while there were those who could take such an unadorned message and use it to hew out a new life for themselves—those with the stolid dispositions that Booker T Washington had once demanded from his followers—in the ears of many blacks such talk smacked of the explanations that whites had always offered for black poverty: that we continued to suffer from, if not genetic inferiority, then cultural weakness. It was a message that ignored causality or fault, a message outside history, without a script or plot that might insist on progression. For a people already stripped of their history, a people often ill-equipped to retrieve that history in any form other than what fluttered across the television screen, the testimony of what we saw every day seemed only to confirm our worst suspicions about ourselves.

Nationalism provided that history, an unambiguous morality tale that was easily communicated and easily grasped. A steady attack on the white race, the constant recitation of black people’s brutal experience in this country, served as the ballast that could prevent the ideas of personal and communal responsibility from tipping into an ocean of despair. Yes, the nationalist would say, whites are responsible for your sorry state, not any inherent flaws in you. In fact, whites are so heartless and devious that we can no longer expect anything from them. The self-loathing you feel, what keeps you drinking or thieving, is planted by them. Rid them from your mind and find your true power liberated. Rise up, ye mighty race!

This process of displacement, this means of engaging in self-criticism while removing ourselves from the object of criticism, helped explain the much-admired success of the Nation of Islam in turning around the lives of drug addicts and criminals. But if it was especially well suited to those at the bottom rungs of American life, it also spoke to all the continuing doubts of the lawyer who had run hard for the gold ring yet still experienced the awkward silence when walking into the clubhouse; those young college students who warily measured the distance between them and life on Chicago’s mean streets, with the danger that distance implied; all the black people who, it turned out, shared with me a voice that whispered inside them-“You don’t really belong here.”

In a sense, then, Rafiq was right when he insisted that, deep down, all blacks were potential nationalists. The anger was there, bottled up and often turned inward. And as I thought about Ruby and her blue eyes, the teenagers calling each other “nigger” and worse, I wondered whether, for now at least, Rafiq wasn’t also right in preferring that that anger be redirected; whether a black politics that suppressed rage toward whites generally, or one that failed to elevate race loyalty above all else, was a politics inadequate to the task.

It was a painful thought to consider, as painful now as it had been years ago. It contradicted the morality my mother had taught me, a morality of subtle distinctions between individuals of goodwill and those who wished me ill, between active malice and ignorance or indifference. I had a personal stake in that moral framework; I’d discovered that I couldn’t escape it if I tried. And yet perhaps it was a framework that blacks in this country could no longer afford; perhaps it weakened black resolve, encouraged confusion within the ranks.

Desperate times called for desperate measures, and for many blacks, times were chronically desperate. If nationalism could create a strong and effective insularity, deliver on its promise of self-respect, then the hurt it might cause well-meaning whites, or the inner turmoil it caused people like me, would be of little consequence.