Posts Tagged ‘Barry Soetoro’

Ted Cruz Nails Lying Sierra Club President to the Wall on Global Warming

“In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” – George Orwell
It’s absolutely stunning how a simple lie, no longer than a sentence long, can shape the perception of an entire nation. All it takes is a media that’s complicit with the one telling the lie, and an unbeatable propaganda machine rolls over anyone who dares to let the truth pass their lips.
Tuesday, Ted Cruz grilled Aaron Mair, president of the Sierra Club, a radical environmentalist organization. During the hearing, Mair told two lies that are used by every liberal to promote the global warming/climate change/climate disruption narrative. Not only did he tell these lies with a straight face, he repeated them multiple times.
The first lie was regarding “the pause.” Ted Cruz brought up the fact that satellite data show no significant rise in global temperature over the last 18 or so years. This is true.
But Mair wasn’t having it. This is the exchange between Cruz and Mair over this issue:
Mair: “Based upon the preponderance of evidence, the science is settled…”
Cruz: “How do you address that in the last 18 years, the satellite data show no demonstrable warming whatsoever?”
Mair: “I would rely on the Union of Concerned Scientists, and…the evidence from our own NOAA officials. The data are there.”
Cruz: “Is it correct that the satellite data over the last 18 years demonstrate no significant warming?”
Mair: “No.”
Cruz: “How is it incorrect?”
After this question, Mair sat back, spoke with one of his aides, then leaned forward and replied:
“Based upon our experts, it’s been refuted long ago, and it’s not up for scientific debate.”
I’m curious to know how the above chart has been “refuted.” But of course Mair doesn’t elaborate, nor did he elaborate when he released his rebuttal video shortly after the hearing.
Next, Cruz and Mair debated the infamous “97% consensus.” Here’s the exchange:
Mair: “Senator, 97% of the scientists concur and agree that there is global warming…”
Cruz: “The problem with that statistic, which gets cited a lot, is it’s based on one bogus study…I asked about the science and the evidence, the actual data. We have satellites, they’re measuring temperature. That should be relevant. And your answer was: ‘Pay no attention to your lying eyes and the numbers.’ Instead, listen to the scientists who are receiving massive grants, who tell us ‘Do not debate the science.’”
Cruz continued to press Mair, who simply repeated the 97% phrase over and over again:
Mair: “We concur with the 97% scientific consensus with regard to global warming.”
The alleged 97% consensus has been harshly criticized. The study from which the Sierra Club gets their information (it’s even cited on their website) was conducted by one John Cook.
John Cook allegedly reviewed thousands of peer reviewed papers, and found that out of those papers, 97% of scientists agreed that climate change is at least partially man-made. But there’s a problem with Cook’s results–they’re off by about 96%.
According to The Wall Street Journal, the former director of the University of Delaware’s Center for Climatic Research David R. Legates, examined the evidence, and came to a very different conclusion:
“…’only 41 papers–0.3 percent of all 11,944 abstracts or 1.0 percent of the 4,014 expressing an opinion, and not 97.1 percent–had been found to endorse’ the claim that human activity is causing most of the current warming.”
Not only that, but several of the scientists surveyed, including Dr. Craig Idso, Dr. Nor Shaviv, Dr. Richard Toll, and Dr. Nicola Scafetta, complained that their work was being misrepresented.
Popular Technology interviewed Dr. Idso, and he said:
“It would be incorrect to claim that our paper was an endorsement of CO2-induced global warming.”
They also interviewed Dr. Scafetta, who said:
“Cook et al. (2013) is based on a straw man argument…What my papers say is that the IPCC [United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] view is erroneous because about 40-70% of the global warming observed from 1900 to 2000 was induced by the sun.”
In essence, the study upon which the climate change alarmists at the Sierra Club base their idea of a 97% consensus is utter BS.
A final nail in the coffin of a “consensus” is the Global Warming Petition Project, which bears the signatures of over 30,000 scientists, over 9,000 of whom hold PhDs.
The petition states, in part:
“There is no convincing scientific evidence that the human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing, or will in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the earth’s climate.”
What I’m saying is: Cruz is correct, and Aaron Mair is a liar…or an idiot.



By Allen West

This brilliantly simple review of the Obama administration’s plan for our nation via Cloward-Piven was emailed to me by a fellow Georgian, retired Marine fighter pilot Colonel Orson Swindle who was John McCain’s roommate at the Hanoi Hilton.

It all makes perfect sense. To Our Communist Leader


Obama paid $5 million to seal his records (Photos)

slide showIn 1980, Barack Obama was identified as Barry Soetoro in his mother’s divorce papers. Credit: Free Republic


EVERYDAY THERE IS MORE DIRTY, DIRTY, DIRTY - Ex-energy loans watchdog became Obama donor

photo shows Herb Allison testifying on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert, File)

A veteran Wall Street executive who performed an independent review that exonerated the Obama administration’s program of loans to energy companies contributed $52,500 to re-elect President Obama in the months since completing his work, according to an Associated Press review of campaign records.

The executive defended the integrity of his conclusions and said he decided to donate to Mr. Obama after his work was finished.

The campaign contributions to Mr. Obama started just weeks after Herbert M. Allison Jr., in congressional testimony in March, minimized concerns that the Energy Department was at high risk in more than $23 billion in federal loans awarded to green energy firms.

Two weeks later, Allison began giving to the Obama campaign. His contributions to Mr. Obama and the Democratic National Committee totaled $52,500 by last month.

Allison previously was the former head of the government’s mass purchase of toxic Wall Street assets.

Allison did not make any Obama donations during his four-month review of Energy Department loans, and he has a long history of working with and giving money to both political parties.

However, Republican Party officials and congressional critics of the energy loans said Allison’s donations to Mr. Obama raise doubts about his objectivity and highlight his decision not to assess multimillion-dollar loans to two companies that later went into bankruptcy — the troubled Solyndra solar panel company and Beacon Power, an energy storage firm.

Allison’s report, completed in February and touted by the White House, acknowledged that the Energy Department could lose as much as $3 billion in loans, but it concluded that was far less than the $10 billion set aside by Congress for high-risk companies. The review did not assess the two bankrupt firms because those loans were no longer current.

Allison told Congress that “DOE has negotiated protections in the loan agreements that enable it to cut off further funding and to demand more credit protection if projects do not meet targets.” He also urged the Energy Department to toughen its oversight.

Allison defended the integrity of his review in an interview with The Associated Press. He said that he did not make the decision to back a presidential candidate until after he had finished his work and that his selection was approved by Energy Department lawyers before he began his review last October to “ensure there was no hint of bias or conflict of interest.”

“I was on the record with the White House that this had to be completely independent review and they agreed,” he said Wednesday in a telephone interview from his home in Westport, Conn. “It didn’t hew to anybody’s political suasion, I think, and it had to be fully factual or it wouldn’t be credible.”

Allison said he made his decision to support Mr. Obama after he saw “his administration in action and decided that I believe broadly in the things he’s trying to accomplish.”

Allison gave $2,500 to the Obama campaign on March 29, two weeks after he testified to the Senate Energy and Commerce Committee about his review. In May, he gave $15,000 to the Obama Victory Fund, a joint fundraising committee that supports both the president’s re-election campaign and the Democratic National Committee. Allison gave the same amount to the fund again in June and then $20,000 more in July.

Allison has donated money to both parties, but his gifts in the past have tended to be much smaller than his current contributions, typically no more than $1,000 or $2,000, according to Federal Election Commission records. Allison explained his larger donations to the Obama campaign by saying, “There’s a hell of a lot more money in politics today than in years past, and I decided I could go this route.”

Allison has given to GOP figures such as Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma and Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, and to Democrats such as Rep. Carolyn Maloney of New York and former Nebraska Sen. Bob Kerrey. Allison’s presidential preferences have been mostly Republicans — Sen. John McCain of Arizona and former Sen. Bob Dole of Kansas. He also gave $2,300 to Mr. Obama in 2008, a year before Mr. Obama appointed Allison as an assistant treasury secretary.

The White House and the Obama campaign defended Allison, saying his donations did not taint his work as independent reviewer of the loans program. They pointed to his repeated hiring over the past two decades by Republican presidential administrations and GOP campaigns as justification that Allison had the independence to oversee troubled government programs.

“Mr. Allison was selected to do this study because of his relevant expertise, and he is a public servant widely respected by Democrats and Republicans alike,” said Eric Schultz, a White House spokesman. Schultz added that Allison’s “analysis of the DOE loan portfolio was thorough and reliable, as evident by additional independent reports affirming his findings.” The Obama campaign said, “Having completed an independent assignment does not cost him his right to continue participating in the political progress on behalf of many candidates, as he has in the past.”

A former Merrill Lynch executive, Allison worked for several Republican administrations and earned a reputation for tackling troubled federal programs. During McCain’s failed 2000 presidential run, he served as national finance chairman and was rumored to be McCain’s choice to become treasury secretary if he had won.

Allison was named by President George W. Bush to head Fannie Mae after the quasi-government home lending agency was placed in conservatorship in 2008 following the Wall Street collapse. A year later, Mr. Obama named Allison as an assistant treasury secretary to oversee the Troubled Asset Relief Program that Mr. Bush had created to stabilize Wall Street banks and investment houses reeling with toxic debt.

During his work at the Treasury Department, Allison was among top officials who crossed swords with TARP Inspector General Neil Barofsky, who accused the department of failing to properly track government bailout money given to banks and investment houses. Barofsky declined to comment about his dealings with Allison.

Allison left the Treasury Department in 2010, but returned last year to head up the review of energy loans. The White House agreed to the review in the wake of mounting Republican criticism after Solyndra, a California firm, went belly up. The bankruptcy cost U.S. taxpayers $528 million in lost loans.

Rep. Cliff Stearns, R-Fla., who chairs the House Energy Committee’s oversight subcommittee, said Allison’s donations to the Obama campaign back up GOP warnings this year that the White House review was suspect. Stearns said Allison’s “financial support for the Obama campaign undermines (his) credibility and shows once again that the president did not want a careful, independent review of his risky green jobs scheme.”

Allison’s role as a large Obama donor “raises serious questions about an administration that puts campaign cash before taxpayer money,” said Joe Pounder, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee.

Allison declined to say whether he will keep donating to Mr. Obama. “Next time around,” he said, “I might support a Republican.”

Rudy Giuliani- Obama Friend to Israel, “The Biggest Joke I’ve Ever Heard”

By Javier Manjarres

While campaigning for Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney in Aventura, Former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who is highly regarding among members of the ‘conservative’ Jewish community, made the case for why Jewish-Americans should vote for Mitt Romney and not President Obama this coming November.

After his address to those in attendance, Mayor Giuliani took a few minutes to talk to the Shark Tank about President Obama’s position on Israel and the recent disclosure that he will only visit Israel if he is re-elected President.

Rudy Giuliani made it very clear how he felt about President Obama’s appeasement of the Islamic world and betrayal of Israel. Giuliani also stated that Obama’s approval rating with Israelis is a paltry 12%. When asked what he thought about President Obama being referred to as Israel’s closest friend, the good mayor responded-

I think that is the biggest joke I’ve ever heard- that he’s a friend of the state of Israel, I think that he is the least supportive President to the state of Israel that we’ve ever had since the state of Israel has existed, Republican or Democrat. -Mayor Rudy Giuliani


"From 'Hope' to Hypocrisy: Executive Privilege and Transparency"


The Anti-American President

By Boyd Richard Boyd

Obviously something is rotten on Pennsylvania Avenue; no intelligent American president would do the things Obama has done. There has been talk of his inexperience, incompetence, or just plain stupidity to explain his Bizarro-administration. However, Obama is not incompetent; he is an intelligent anti-American president. Obama is not a failure at his job — his job is the failure of our country.
Liberty-minded folk have several reasons why we assume another person is incompetent rather than malicious. One reason is our belief that a person is “innocent until proven guilty”; another is the natural presumption others are similar to ourselves. Unfortunately, these ideas have been coupled with a pair of dangerously pragmatic moral equivalencies foisted upon us all: “Who am I to judge?” and “They couldn’t possibly mean that.” As long as there is any possibility that Obama is just in over his head and doesn’t mean what he says and does, many will excuse him on those grounds.
Every American must judge Obama and his ideas and understand he does mean what he says, and realize there is no excuse, save one — Barack Obama is an anti-American in thought and deed.
Obama gets dreams from his socialist father. His mother was a fellow traveler. Obama lived in anti-American Indonesia as a child. Later, granddad decided Obama needed a Communist mentor. O got into Harvard on the recommendation of anti-Semitic Khalid al Mansour, an adviser to Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal. In college O chose his friends carefully — “the more politically active black students, foreign students, Chicanos, Marxist professors and structural feminists.” As a professor he taught Marxist Saul Alinsky tactics, and as a constitutional scholar he believed that there are fundamental flaws in the Constitution, such as restraint on governmental power. As a community organizer and counsel he pushed sub-prime mortgages which helped buckle our economy.
He’s a trench-mate with voter-fraudsters ACORN and quasi-commie SEIU. He had house parties and sat on boards with an unrepentant, revolutionary communist, who probably ghostwrote one of O’s autobiographies. He attended the social-justice church of Jeremiah Wright, where he was preached at on collective salvation and black liberation. Illinois state senator and communism-lover Alice Palmer, picked O as her chief of staff. As a U.S. senator, he had the most leftist voting record. His wife’s only source of American pride came in her 40s as a result of O’s own success. He was endorsed by the Communist Party in 2004, and in 2008 Obama got CPUSA’s endorsement again, basically running on the CPUSA platform. (And yes, CPUSA have endorsed him again for 2012!)
And this was before the campaign and presidency. Does his bio reflect incompetence or something more sinister? Does his journey sound like one of an all-American or an anti-American?
In his own words, during the campaign:
Sept, 17 2007 to SEIU:
“[Y]our agenda’s been my agenda[.]”
November 2007 to ACORN:
“I’ve been fighting alongside ACORN on issues you care about my entire career.”
December 2007 addressing ACORN and other community organizations:
“[W]e’re going to be calling all of you in to help us shape the agenda, We’re going to be having meetings all across the country with community organizations so that you have input into the agenda for the next presidency of the United States of America.”
January 5, 2008 to SEIU
“I’ve been working with the SEIU before I was elected to anything … We are going to paint the nation purple with SEIU. SEIU, I’m glad you are with me. Let’s together change the country. SEIU! SEIU!”
January 17, 2008
“[I]f somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can, it’s just that it will bankrupt them…under my plan of a cap-and-trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.”
May 16, 2008 in Oregon:
“We can’t drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times … and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK…That’s not leadership. That’s not going to happen.”
June 3, 2008 in St Paul Minnesota
“This was the moment — this was the time –when we came together to remake this great nation”
July 13, 2008 to La Raza:
“[W]e rise and fall together as one people…And together, we won’t just win an election — we will transform this nation.”
October 12, 2008 to Joe the Plumber:
“I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”
October 30, 2008 at the University of Missouri, Columbia:
“We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America[.]”
How many Marxist groups will he share agendas with before it’s apparent? How many times will he say he wants to change, remake, or fundamentally transform America before we believe he wants to?
Almost everything Obama says and does is a scripted, controlled, and choreographed event. The man causes relentless instability, yet it is all planned. We know where his ideas come from: the George Soros-funded, Hillary Clinton-founded Center for American Progress and Joel Rogers’ Apollo Alliance with help from its ex-Weather Underground co-founder, among others.
As president he’s appointed the following foxes as hen house guards:
A former SEIU member who kind of agrees with Mao…as manufacturing czar.
A former commissioner of Socialist International, eco-profiteer, and CAP board member…as global warming czar.
An ACORN defender and Obama’s private attorney…as ethics and transparency czar.
A revolutionary communist…as green jobs czar.
A power-lusting control freak longing to delimit choices…as regulatory czar.
An anti-capitalist Chicken Little peddling junk science…as science czar.
A man who thinks terrorists represent the legitimate needs and grievances of ordinary people…as counter-terrorism czar.
An anti-Israel “poverty breeds terrorism” theorist…as U.S. ambassador to the U.N.
A woman who believes that Congress can abridge free speech and another who thinks the court of appeals is where policy is made…as Supreme Court justices.
An SEIU VP, activist for the Working Families Party, and political director for Bertha Lewis, the head of ACORN’s New York chapter…as director of the office of public affairs to help push the president’s agenda.
A man who gives guns to drug cartels while allowing them to smuggle drugs in, who refuses to protect our borders while litigating any state which tries to defend its own as and turns a blind eye to voter intimidation…as attorney general.
A woman worried about white right-wing extremists while she has Grandma groped at the airport…as homeland security chief.
A woman who proposes that the U.S. has the right to protect “Palestine” from Israel…as a foreign policy adviser.
SEIU president and Marxist Andy Stern and the AFL-CIO’s Dick Trumka are/were two of the most frequent White House guests. Obama directs NASA’s chief to perform Muslim outreach. The EPA will handle cap and trade after Congress said no. The borders won’t be secured until O gets amnesty for millions of potential voters with no allegiance to America. O imposed a drilling ban for oil, then said the judge could fly a kite when the judge lifted the ban. Brazil purchased some of those rigs, and Obama wants to be a big consumer of Brazil’s oil. His administration may have facilitated the murder of a border agent and is trying to suppress second-amendment rights, as a result.
His Tea Party mockery, the takeover of industries, the contortions of Obamacare, the slow response to BP’s oil spill, the tens of thousands of new regulations, the aggressive deficit spending, the Fed’s printing sprees, bowing to and borrowing from anti-Americans — all are part of the blueprint. Even his petulance, arrogance, constant golfing, and “let them eat cake” attitude are part of the plan. Obama understands how grating such behavior is to any American who doesn’t worship strongmen. His glaring at Netanyahu after throwing Israel under the bus, his browbeating the Supreme Court during the SOTU, and of course, his Mussolini-like poses with his chin touching the ceiling are all calculated to intimidate some into a cult of personality and alienate others. And he has done so much more.
Obama has never stood for individualism, capitalism, or liberty. Everything he does has the reek of statism, collectivism, and tyranny, but not because he is an incompetent bumbler — though he may be in many areas, sans TOTUS — it’s because he is a statist and a collectivist and the citizens of our country naïvely gave the reins of power to a tyrant.
To paraphrase the Wizard of Oz, an honest Obama would say to us, “Oh, no, my fellow world citizens, I’m a very good anti-American president. I’m just a very bad American president.”
Boyd Richard Boyd blogs as the Cold Hearted Patriot at and is the author of America Vs. Anti-America. E-mail: Twitter: @ColdHartPatriot.

Read more:


By: Nelson Abdullah – Oldironsides
Barack Hussein Obama has been distorting the facts in his own TV ads and with the complacent assistance of the leftist news media, no one has asked any questions. What more can be said of the biggest liar ever seen in American history. Maybe the news media has just gotten used to it but for the rest of us who haven’t had our memories dulled by too much reality television, the ads stink like a pile of crap. Funded by billions of dollars in campaign contributions pouring in from every pro-communist, pro-Muslim, America-hating leach, the campaign to reelect Obama has been bombarding us with distortions of the truth. One particular campaign ad has no dialog, just a moving scale of events that illustrates the collapse of our economy beginning in January 2008 and then showing the miraculous turnaround brought about by the Messiah/Muslim-in-Chief.

What is wrong with the ad is where it begins (it begins on the far left and isn’t that an appropriate play on words) and the lack of identifying labels to show what caused the collapse that is still being felt. In other words, who drove the truck off the cliff and when did they get behind the wheel.

Seemingly laying the groundwork for an invasion, no one appeared to notice that the news media’s concerted effort to make George W. Bush a very unpopular president during his second term, led to a Democratic Party majority getting swept into office during the elections of 2006 and 2008. Along with the Democratic Party majority came the new chairmanships of the various committees that write the vast array of government regulations that burden our lives in every way.

In the Democrat controlled Congress of 2008, two such important committees were the Senate Banking Committee under the leadership of Democrat Senator Chris Dodd and the House Financial Services Committee, led by Democrat Congressman Barney Frank. Together, these two Democrats passed rules and regulations that committed the Federal National Mortgage Association, commonly known as Fanny Mae, and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, known as Freddie Mac, to obligate banks to make sub-prime housing loans to people who were judged to be unable to afford them. An article from the British newspaper, The Independent, tells the whole story.

Thursday, October 09, 2008
Barney Frank and Christopher Dodd deserve blame for Fannie and Freddie

The Independent, a British newspaper, blames the Democrats for the failure of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac:

What is the proximate cause of the collapse of confidence in the world’s banks? Millions of improvident loans to American housebuyers. Which organisations were on their own responsible for guaranteeing half of this $12 trillion market? Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, the so-called Government Sponsored Enterprises which last month were formally nationalised to prevent their immediate and catastrophic collapse. Now, who do you think were among the leading figures blocking all the earlier attempts by President Bush — and other Republicans — to bring these lending behemoths under greater regulatory control? Step forward, Barney Frank and Chris Dodd.

In September 2003 the Bush administration launched a measure to bring Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac under stricter regulatory control, after a report by outside investigators established that they were not adequately hedging against risks and that Fannie Mae in particular had scandalously mis-stated its accounts. In 2006, it was revealed that Fannie Mae had overstated its earnings — to which its senior executives’ bonuses were linked — by a stunning $9.3billion. Between 1998 and 2003, Fannie Mae’s executive chairman, Franklin Raines, picked up over $90m in bonuses and stock options.

Yet Barney Frank and his chums blocked all Bush’s attempts to put a rein on Raines. During the House Financial Services Committee hearing following Bush’s initiative, Frank declared: “The more people exaggerate a threat of safety and soundness [at Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae], the more people conjure up the possibility of serious financial losses to the Treasury which I do not see. I think we see entities that are fundamentally sound financially.” His colleague on the committee, the California Democrat Maxine Walters, said: “There were nearly a dozen hearings where we were trying to fix something that wasn’t broke. Mr Chairman, we do not have a crisis at Freddie Mac and particularly at Fannie Mae under the outstanding leadership of Mr Franklin Raines.”

When Mr Raines himself was challenged by the Republican Christopher Shays, to the effect that his ratio of capital to assets (that is, mortgages) of 3 per cent was dangerously low, the Fannie Mae boss retorted that “our assets are so riskless, we could have a capital ratio of under 2 per cent”.

The web site Politico reported this on October 9, 2008 in a story written by Patrick O’Connor & Amie Parnes:

“During a town hall in Wisconsin on Thursday, McCain called Senate Banking Chairman Christopher J. Dodd (Conn.) and House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank (Mass.) “willing co-conspirators” in the current financial collapse. ”

“This comes as conservative talk radio hosts and an outside group aligned with the GOP accuse the duo of similar crimes against the economy, particularly an allegation that congressional Democrats blocked legislation to increase regulations and oversight for mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.”

“The fact is that the same people that are now claiming credit for this rescue are the same ones that were willing co-conspirators in causing the problem,” McCain told supporters at a town hall meeting in Waukesha, Wis., on Thursday. “Congressman Barney Frank and Senator Chris Dodd are two of them.”

Nothing new there. The Democrats are STILL claiming credit for fixing the mess they caused six years ago. Did I misquote the years? No, because in 2006 the Democrats took control of both houses of Congress following a sweeping victory in the mid-term elections and they used their veto proof majority to ram through changes in the banking regulations to allow people who could not afford mortgages to get them, and hundreds of thousands did, and many more subsequently lost their homes in the foreclosure problem that brought down the banks. All the while Republican George W. Bush was catching the blame for what the Democrats had done. And for whom Democrat Barack Hussein Obama has been blaming for all our troubles for the last four years.

Which brings us up to date. So now, in Iowa, Democrat Barack Hussein Obama calls Mitt Romney’s words ‘A Cow Pie of Distortion’

“I know Gov. Romney came to Des Moines last week and warned about ‘a prairie fire of debt’,” Obama said Thursday evening. “But he left out some facts. His speech was more like a cow pie of distortion.”

Want to know what a real “cow pie of distortion” looks like? Take a good look at the latest TV commercial that Barack Hussein Obama has been passing around. That red graph following January 2008 at the start of the ad was all caused by the Democrats.

Barack Hussein Obama’s delusions of grandeur make him the biggest pile of cow poop in Washington. And Obama, along with the 88 Congressional members of the Democratic Socialists of America, are at the center of the problem. In plain language folks, Obama is a piece of shit and he and the rest of the Democrats in Washington should all be flushed down the toilet.

The two illustrations above came from a YouTube post “Published on May 10, 2012 by BarackObamadotcom” The post carries a subtext message that says: “Remember how things were? Do we really want to reverse course now?” Funny as to how I do remember how things were and how good they were before Barack Obama got into politics and YES, I do want to reverse course now. I also happen to know that the FORWARD message also being promoted as Obama’s campaign slogan was copied from a whole bunch of Communist propaganda.

My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides.


On August 13, 2009, JB Williams of the Canada Free Press wrote the following:
“After decades of failed attempts to take over America via their third party initiatives that couldn’t break America’s two party system, leaders of both the Communist Party USA and Socialist Party USA chose a new strategy.

“Both being the ultimate ‘party of the working class stiff,’ they joined forces in a new venture that would work within the US two party system, by hijacking control of one of the two primary parties. As the Democrat Party had already spent years identifying itself as the “party of the working class,” engaging in socio-economic class warfare as its primary method for expanding its political power, it was ripe for the hijacking.

“Together, Communist Party and Socialist Party leaders established the Democratic Socialists of America, and they share a common ideology which is now the platform and mantra of today’s DNC – CPUSA.

“To gain full control of the Democrat Party, DSA leadership established two congressional legislative bodies, headed by DSA/CPUSA/SPUSA members. Today, these are the two congressional bodies in control of congress.

“They are the Congressional Progressive Caucus established by Socialist Party member Bernie Sanders of Vermont, and the Congressional Black Caucus established by Communist Party member John Conyers of Michigan. “ALL members of these two congressional committees represent the Democratic Socialists of America, as both committees are the creation of, and operate under the control of DSAUSA.”

Sheriff Joe Says - Hawaii Duped Arizona

“Hawaii duped Arizona” in its response to Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett’s request to verify Barack Obama’s eligibility for the 2012 election, charges the lead investigator of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse.

“We have developed incontrovertible proof that the verification provided by the Hawaii Department of Health to Arizona’s secretary of state on May 22 really doesn’t verify anything of significance,” said Mike Zullo, who is in Hawaii to follow up on his team’s initial findings concerning Obama’s birth record.

Zullo – who met with Hawaii Department of Health officials in Honolulu the day before the letter to Bennett was issued – said that after he returns to Phoenix to brief Arpaio, the sheriff will schedule a press conference “at the earliest possible date in June.”Zullo explained his team will need time to prepare the extensive new information developed since Arpaio’s March 1 press conference. The sheriff announced at that time that his posse had found probable cause that the Obama birth record released by the White House one year ago and Obama’s Selective Service registration form are forgeries.

Zullo declined to detail the new information but pointed to what he considered “obvious defects” in the May 22 letter the Hawaii Department of Health sent to Bennett:

Tuesday’s letter, he said, fails to identify or list President Obama’s date of birth, even though the letter’s apparent purpose was for the Hawaii Department of Health to verify Obama was born in Hawaii.
To the right of the registrar’s stamp on the letter appear the initials “gk,” suggesting that Hawaii Department of Health Registrar Alvin Onaka did not apply the registrar’s stamp himself.
“I suspect these defects are not accidental,” Zullo said. “My suspicion is that top officials in the Hawaii DOH and the Hawaii Attorney General’s office created a defective document that could be disclaimed rather than take the time to produce a thoroughly proofread and officially certified legally binding state document.”

Does anyone really know where Obama is from? Find out the startling truth from New York Times best-selling author Jerome Corsi.

Zullo told WND that Onaka refused to meet with him and his investigators when they appeared this week at the downtown Honolulu headquarters of the Hawaii Department of Health.

“Either Onaka refused to initial his registrar’s stamp or the Hawaii DOH is not sufficiently competent to produce a legally valid document,” Zullo concluded. “But either way, the cover-up appears alive and well in Hawaii.”

Zullo insisted defects in the Hawaii letter were not limited to what might be explained as clerical errors or Hawaii DOH operating policies.

“The Hawaii DOH letter is nothing more than a highly lawyered, cleverly crafted document that we can now prove does not verify what it appears to verify,” he said. “At Sheriff Arpaio’s next press conference we will be able to prove that the Hawaii DOH has actually refused to verify either that Obama was born in Hawaii or that the long-form birth-certificate released by the White House on April 27, 2011, is an authentic document.”

As WND reported, Arpaio launched his investigation last September after 250 Maricopa County residents belonging to the Surprise, Ariz., Tea Party presented him with a petition claiming their voting rights would be compromised if Obama used a forged birth certificate to win a place on the 2012 Arizona presidential ballot.

Political pressure

Zullo affirmed to WND that he believes Hawaii has outsmarted Bennett.

“To begin with, it was no surprise to me that Bennett buckled to political pressure,” Zullo said.

Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett
“I knew when I met with Mr. Bennett last week in Phoenix, before we left for Hawaii, that he was desperately trying to get out of the political corner he had painted himself into.”

Zullo told WND that in an approximately hour-long meeting May 15 in Bennett’s Phoenix government office, the secretary of state said he fully expected there would be no problem getting the Hawaii government to verify that Obama was born in Hawaii.

“Bennett obviously believed Obama was telling the truth,” Zullo said. “He was shocked when Hawaii didn’t immediately issue the verification. As it dragged on into weeks, Bennett became desperate to do whatever Hawaii asked to get what amounts to even this meaningless letter.”

Zullo explained to WND that immediately following his meeting with Bennett, he returned to MCSO headquarters and briefed Arpaio.

“I told the sheriff that I suspected Bennett would reach over backwards in a desperate attempt to get some form of document from the Hawaii Health Department in written form, so he could managed to come out of the political problem he had created for himself,” Zullo said.

“In my meeting with Sheriff Arpaio, I disclosed my belief that Secretary of State Bennett would confer with Hawaii’s attorney general to draft a second, probably watered-down letter of request from Hawaii,” he continued.

Zullo said it was “no shock to me or Sheriff Arpaio when the verification was released, and we believe the timing is suspect in that the release of the verification came one day after MCSO met with Hawaii Department of Health officials in Honolulu.”

In his meeting with Zullo, Bennett admitted that he never would have made the promise in writing to members of the Surprise Tea Party if he thought there might be a problem getting the verification.

“My impression was that Bennett wanted to appear sympathetic to the tea party group to win their political favor, but that he guessed wrong, calculating that Hawaii was telling the truth about Obama’s birth and had nothing to hide,” Zullo said. “Bennett was dumbfounded when Hawaii hesitated.”

Zullo told WND that his purpose in requesting the meeting with Bennett was to share with the Arizona secretary of state recent developments in the MCSO law enforcement investigation into Obama’s birth.

“I was shocked to find out Bennett knew virtually nothing about our investigation – only what he read in the newspapers,” Zullo said.

He added that Bennett did not appear interested in understanding the serious information the investigation had developed.

“When I tried to bring him up to speed, it became apparent the 20 minutes remaining in the meeting was not going to be enough time to explain even the key points of the investigation,” Zullo said.

“I felt Bennett was totally ignorant of what I was talking about, and he really didn’t care.”

Zullo said he left Bennett’s office fully convinced the secretary of state would capitulate to pressure by Arizona and national Republican Party officials, including Sen. John McCain.

Bennett has declared his desire to run for Arizona governor. He is currently the co-chairman of Gov. Mitt Romney’s Arizona presidential campaign.

Read the preliminary findings of Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse investigation.

SEO Powered By SEOPressor