Categories
Archives
HELP US KEEP YOU BETTER INFORMED ABOUT THE TRICKS OF THE RADICAL PROGRESSIVE REVOLUTION PLEASE DONATE ANY AMOUNT YOU CAN
target="_top">

Posts Tagged ‘Barry the Phony’

A Straight Thinker

Obama2

I will stand with the Muslim - Barak Obama


Hi. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Do words matter? I think they do. I think we all need to take a man at his word. Barack Obama’s words from his own life story are under debate, yet should be of interest to all of us. Many conservatives attribute these words to Obama from his autobiography, “I will stand with the Muslims.” Those were not his exact words. But his actions indicate it is exactly what he meant.

Many defenders of Obama say that is too simplistic of an interpretation and the words have been taken out of context. The reference came in a paragraph where Obama discussed prejudice against different races and religions. He made it clear that it’s unfair for people to jump to conclusions and tar all members of one race or religion with the deeds of one small group of people. Defenders of Obama believe he promised only to defend Muslims against that kind of prejudice. They interpret his words to mean he promised to defend Muslims against the kind of unfair internment faced by Japanese-Americans during World War II.

I agree Obama’s remarks are open to interpretation. The problem is his actions today are so toxic as to convince many of us that he meant the words, “I will stand with the Muslims.” Judge for yourself. Actions speak louder than words.

Obama just made the most amazing statement at the National Prayer Breakfast. He blamed Christianity for “terrible deeds in the name of Christ.”

Did Obama really go there? A supposed Christian condemning Christianity for something that happened in the Dark Ages. The president of our nation condemning Christians for something all warriors for every religion did a thousand years ago: kill in the name of religion.

But today, only one religion is still killing like it’s the Dark Ages: Islam. Today, there are only “terrible deeds in the name of Allah.”

Were Americans who elected and re-elected Obama like the Jews of Nazi Germany, too naive to understand or believe a leader’s own words? Hitler said he’d kill the Jews. But Jews just couldn’t believe it. “It’s just hype and propaganda to get votes,” they thought. They guessed wrong.

Have Obama’s defenders guessed wrong, too?

Obama refuses to actually fight the Islamic State (which Obama calls ISIL) with a real plan. Yes, he’ll drop a few bombs from thousands of feet in the air, to make it look like we’re fighting ISIL. Yes, he says he’s got ISIL defeated. Results prove that’s an absurd lie. ISIL is stronger than ever. Ask that Jordanian pilot burned to death in a cage. Ask Kurds fighting for their lives.

Even decorated generals believe Obama has no plan to fight ISIL. But why would Obama make false claims when there is no plan? Is he stalling for time? The more time Obama wastes, the stronger ISIL becomes. If Obama stalls long enough, ISIL will become unbeatable. ISIL will be “here to stay.”

But why would any U.S. President have that agenda? In that context, don’t these words ring true? ”I will stand with the Muslims.”

Obama has no serious interest in helping Israel defeat Hamas either. Moderate Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia, Egypt and United Araba Emirates are giving more support to Israel than America under Obama.

But why would any U.S. president have that agenda? In that context, don’t these words ring true? ”I will stand with the Muslims.”

Obama has left our Southern border with Mexico wide open for six long years. Even Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein believes Islamic terrorist cells have slipped across our border.

An ISIL operative claims that 4,000 terrorists have been smuggled into Western states. What kind of a president would keep our border wide open and unsecured? What could be his agenda?

But why would any U.S. president have that agenda? In that context, don’t these words ring true? ”I will stand with the Muslims.”

Obama (in concert with the United Nations) has suspended immigration laws to import thousands of Muslims into America from war zones like Iraq, Somalia and Syria. He’s bringing the same violent, radicalized Muslims to America who have led to crisis, intolerance, terror attacks and crisis in Europe.

But why would any U.S. president have that agenda? In that context, don’t these words ring true? ”I will stand with the Muslims.”

Obama and the Democrats are in such denial about who our enemy is that dozens of Democratic leaders in Congress (including the vice president of the United States) are threatening to boycott the address to Congress by the prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu.

Now, as if to emphasize where he stands, Obama goes back to the Dark Ages to blame Christianity for the sins of Islam today. He lectures us about “terrible deeds in the name of Christ.”

Using Obama’s logic,

Should we blame all African-Americans today for the “terrible deeds in name of the Black Panthers of the 1960s?”
Should we blame all Germans today for “terrible deeds in name of Hitler in the 1940s?”
Should we blame every Japanese American for “terrible deeds by Imperial Japan at Pearl Harbor?”
Should we blame all white Southerners today for “terrible deeds by the KKK?”
Should we blame all baseball players today for “terrible deeds by racist baseball players in the 1950s?”
Should we blame all Italians today for “terrible deeds in the name of the Roman Empire?”
Should we blame all American Indians today for “terrible deeds in the name of Apache Indian raids on American settlers?”
How absurd to go back in time hundreds or thousands of years to try to twist logic and common sense, so as to deflect proper blame for something happening today.

There is one enemy of America, Christianity and good people of faith all over the world today. It isn’t Judaism or Christianity or Buddhism or Catholicism; it is radical Islam. It is Islamic terrorism. It is ISIL. It is jihad. Spell it how you want. Obama is taking great pains and irrational leaps to cover up for Islam.

Yes, Obama’s words are open to interpretation. He did not say verbatim “I will stand with the Muslims.” There was nuance. There was a second part to the statement. He couched his statement based on unfair prejudice and even internment. Obama did exactly what his mentor Saul Alinsky taught him to do- disguise your statements, distract the masses, camouflage your true intensions and hide your radical agenda. But at the root of Obama’s statement was the truth.

I believe Obama’s actions make the true meaning of his words clear. Obama may not have said the exact words “I will stand with the Muslims.” But he sure meant them.

Now we know what side he’s on. The real question is: Just how far will he go?

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.

The Difference between the Crusades and Islamic Jihad

by Gary DeMar

As you most likely know by now, President Obama offered something of a dismissal of today’s Islamic Jihadists by comparing their actions to the Crusades and Inquisition. Here’s what he said:

“Unless we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ. In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ.”

Obama pulled the tu quoque (pronounced too-kwo-kwee) fallacy, or the appeal to hypocrisy. Its less technical name is the “you too” argument. “Yes, some people who claim to be Islamic have done some evil things, but Christians have done evil things too.”

The former Soviet Union used the “you too” argument against the United States when human rights violations were brought up: “And you are lynching Negroes.” The use of the phrase was a way “to deflect criticism, e.g. by referencing racial discrimination and lynching in the United States.”

Obama used an old Soviet tactic. Bill Clinton also pulled the “you too” argument in a speech after the events of 9-11.

Committing an act in the name of Christ is not the same thing as finding in the Bible a command to perform that act. The Bible prohibits man stealing (slavery) and requires the death penalty for those who are engaged in the act of man-stealing. There is nothing in the Bible that can be used to support Jim Crow laws or lynching, which is murder.

I won a Kenyan lottery.

Talk about luck! According to a recent email from a Nigerian prince I won a Kenyan lottery.

He is holding the sum of ONE MILLION DOLLARS in my name, and he wants to send it to me FREE!
ATT00001

All I have to do is give him my bank account numbers and send him $500.00 US dollars in cash, to show my good faith, and he will transfer the money to my bank!

And then I got ANOTHER email. It’s from another Kenyan prince who wants to give me FREE healthcare for life!

ATT00002
All I have to do is give him:

MY BANK ACCOUNT NUMBERS,
MY SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER,
MY CONFIDENTIAL HEALTH INFORMATION
MY NUMBER OF DEPENDENTS
DEPENDENTS AGES AND ANY MEDICINES THEY USE
MY ESTIMATED INCOME FOR 2015
NAME OF MY FIRST GRADE TEACHER
MY USERNAME
MY PIN NUMBER
NAMES OF ALL MEDICINES I’M TAKING
MY INCOME FROM MY IRA
MY SPOUSE’S INCOME FROM HIS IRA
ALL MY TRADING ACCOUNTS
ALL MY OTHER PROPERTIES IF ANY
MY SPOUSE’S SOCIAL SECURITY
And then, if I pay $700 per month for a health insurance policy plan with only a $10,000 deductible, HE CAN MAKE IT HAPPEN!

​Am I lucky or what!

OBAMA THINKS THAT HE IS GOD -Quotes Nonexistent Bible Verse

ee5cc5cd515bc530670f6a7067008dfa_c0-0-4544-2648_s561x327
By Jessica Chasmar – The Washington Times

President Obama referred to the Bible on Tuesday as he was speaking about immigration reform in Nashville, but he confused some of the lines and even threw in a proverb that appears nowhere in the religious text.

“The good book says, don’t throw stones in glass houses,” he said. “Or … make sure we’re looking at the log in our eye before we are pointing out the mote in other folks’ eyes.”

The expression “they that live in glass houses should not throw stones” is a proverb of unknown origin that has been used in various form for centuries, The Washington Post reported. It does not appear in the Bible.

Mr. Obama’s reference to the “log in our eye,” is presumably from Matthew 7: 1-3, in which Jesus says, “Do not judge, so that you may not be judged … Why do you see the speck in your neighbor’s eye, but do not notice the log in your own eye?”

The word “mote,” which the president used, is a kind of antiquated word for “speck,” The Post notes.

During his speech Tuesday, the president also used the story of the birth of Jesus to relate to immigration reform.

“This Christmas season there’s a whole story about a young, soon-to-be-mother and her husband of modest means looking for a place to house themselves for the night, and there’s no room at the inn,” he said. “And as I said the day that I announced these executive actions, we were once strangers too. And part of what my faith teaches me is to look upon the stranger as part of myself. And during this Christmas season, that’s a good place to start.”

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/dec/10/obama-quotes-nonexistent-bible-verse-during-speech/#ixzz3MHxlgLBa
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

Obama: Americans Have No Right To Favor Americans

2014-11-22T054224Z_1_LYNXNPEAAL011_RTROPTP_4_USA-IMMIGRATION-OBAMA-e1416920267345-300x180
Not the issue.

The only Americans who can legitimately object to immigration are native Indian-Americans, President Barack Obama told his Chicago audience Nov. 24, as he made an impassioned ideological plea for endless immigration, cultural diversity and a big government to manage the resulting multicultural society.

“There have been periods where the folks who were already here suddenly say, ‘Well, I don’t want those folks,’ even though the only people who have the right to say that are some Native Americans,” Obama said, rhetorically dismissing the right of 300 million actual Americans to decide who can live in their homeland.

Americans should not favor other Americans over foreigners, Obama demanded. “Sometimes we get attached to our particular tribe, our particular race, our particular religion, and then we start treating other folks differently… that, sometimes, has been a bottleneck to how we think about immigration,” he said in the face of many polls showing rising opposition to his immigration agenda.

Obama denied any moral or practical distinction between native-born Americans and future migrants. “Whether we cross the Atlantic, or the Pacific, or the Rio Grande, we all shared one thing, and that’s the hope that America would be the place where we could believe as we choose… and that the law would be enforced equally for everybody, regardless of what you look like or what your last name was,” said the president.

“That’s the ideal that binds us all together. That’s what’s at stake when we have conversations about immigration,” he declared.

Obama did indicate his approval for some measures to exclude illegal immigrants, even as he works to amnesty 12 million illegals stage-by-stage. His current amnesty “doesn’t apply to anyone who has come to this country recently, or might come illegally in the future, because borders do mean something,” he said.

Obamacare Brainiacs

Obama Deports American Jobs

by Daniel Greenfield,

Obama123
ObamaObama’s excuse for his illegal amnesty will be that the immigration system is “broken” forcing him to act. But when Obama says that the system is broken, he means that some parts of it still work and so he intends to break immigration all the way through to benefit his own corrupt political allies.

That will hurt his own voters the most, but the Democratic Party has a notoriously masochistic relationship with its voting base. It beats them up and then it gaslights them by hugging them and telling them that it was really the mean Republicans who punched them in the face.

When African-American unemployment rates rise, the workers who can’t find jobs because of all the brand new DREAMERs won’t blame the White House, they’ll blame the evil Republicans for income inequality, assuming Sharpton manages to read the term correctly from his MSNBC teleprompter.

According to Obama our immigration system is broken because it doesn’t allow illegal aliens who illegally crossed the border to take American jobs. That’s not a broken system, that’s what the system is supposed to do.

When illegal aliens aren’t allowed to legally take American jobs, that’s how you know the immigration system is working.

In the language of progressivism, helping means ruining and fixing means breaking. A system that fulfills any useful purpose must be reformed out of all usefulness. If the tattered shreds of the immigration system still keep a single Democratic voter from legally cashing a welfare check and casting a vote, then immigration must be reformed and helped and fixed until it is completely destroyed.

The immigration system is broken because it was reformed so many times that it makes as much sense as an outhouse on a space shuttle. Its main function now is to bring millions of people without jobs to a country where millions are out of work. Obama wants to fix that by adding millions more people.

Our system of immigration is a perfectly good system for importing lots of low wage workers. The only problem is they’re being imported into a country where there are a lot more low wage workers than there are jobs. The cost of providing food stamps and social services for the immigrants and the Americans they put out of work is passed on to the shrinking middle class which kills more jobs.

Some Republicans would like to modify it to help Mark Zuckerberg bring cheaper third world programmers and engineers to replace the Americans over at Facebook. Why settle for just wiping out the working class, when you can also take out chunks of the middle class?

Our immigration system made perfect sense back when we were opening factories everywhere. It made sense when new ranches needed hands and land needed working. It makes a lot less sense when the government is fighting a war on carbon, when ranches have to get out of the way of the spotted red toad and farms are starved of water in the name of the environment.

The million immigrants a year are not entering booming industries, but serving as cheap labor in declining ones. And they’re doing it in a country where declining industries and poor workers are already being subsidized by taxpayers in a dozen different ways. Why then should taxpayers also be subsidizing the replacement of American workers with Somali and Honduran workers?

Who benefits from that except the Democratic Party which not only killed the industries, but is now managing to kill the American workforce? The glorious future of the new economy is a government subsidized Chinese factory using foreign workers to make subsidized solar panels in Oklahoma while taxpayers remain on the hook for the subsidies which used bonds sold to Chinese investors.

Declining industries tighten their belts by cutting costs. They find the cheapest employees they can. Those cheapest employees become a constituency for the nanny state. The nanny state makes it even more expensive to operate. The cycle spins on until the only industries left are state subsidized and everyone directly or indirectly works for the state. And the only items of collateral with which to borrow more money to subsidize them with are the land and the people. That’s not America. That’s Africa.

The Obama economy has created mostly low wage jobs. Those jobs continue to be filled by immigrants. There still aren’t enough jobs so Obama is proposing to create even less jobs by adding more immigrants by legalizing more illegal aliens.

There is something broken here, but it’s not so much immigration as Obama and his party.

Last week I spoke to a British immigration lawyer who described how difficult it was for seniors in the United Kingdom to retire in the United States. While most countries welcome wealthy retirees, our system makes it difficult for them to move and bring their money over here.

Meanwhile in his 2013 State of the Union address, Obama had praised Desiline Victor, a 102-year-old Haitian woman who had moved to the United States at around 80 and never learned to speak English, but did spend hours waiting in line in Florida to vote for Obama. There are plenty of senior immigrants coming through family reunification for a big bite of a social welfare system they never paid into.

But the Democratic Party would rather have a voter than a worker. And so what we have is not an immigration system, but a migration system.

That’s why Obama and his people fought so hard against an Ebola travel ban. It’s why the New York Times editorialized against allowing Cuban doctors to defect because of the “brain drain” but instead urged that “American immigration policy should give priority to the world’s neediest refugees.”

America certainly takes in plenty of needy people, but what the New York Times is emphasizing is that we should be taking in people with nothing to contribute and keeping out those who do. Its ideal immigrant will at best be a low wage worker and at worst a permanent welfare case. We don’t want Cuban doctors. We want Somali muggers and Liberian Ebola cases and Pakistani terrorists.

Immigration is not meant to serve American interests. America is meant to serve immigration.

The end result of this immigration policy will be a stratified society with a permanent lower class and a thin upper class whose leftists can always start a riot by shouting about income equality without ever being able to offer it. Without social mobility what we will have left is social instability. There will be lots of young men with time on their hands to build bombs or throw stones.

If the left doesn’t win through the system, they’ll have their revolutionary constituency standing by.

The only way we can afford the immigration policy that we have now is with a lot more industry and a lot less welfare. Instead our immigration rates were widened and rerouted to the Third World even as our actual industries declined. We kept on taking workers we didn’t have jobs for. We built ghettoes and rust belts and our politicians kept on reciting robotic speeches about being a nation of immigrants.

Immigration requires opportunity. We still have it, but less of it than we used to. Our immigration system is not based on opportunity. It’s based on a migratory flow of Democratic Party voters.

What broke the system was making it as open as possible to those who had the least to offer while closing it tightly to those who had the most to offer. Now Obama wants to import illegal aliens while deporting American jobs. He wants to trade American jobs to illegal aliens for Democratic votes.

If the immigration system is to work again, it should work for America… not for Obama.

One video to explain Jon Gruber and Obamacare

Only the average Obama voter was fooled. Republicans were reading that bill as fast as they could… trying to warn people that it absolutely was being sold as a lie to the American public. Not a single Republican would sign on to that lie. Remember that congressmen, Joe Wilson yelling at Obama… when Obama was lying during his “state of the union” address?… “You Lie”… well, he was right. He should have gotten medal for calling the Deceiver and Chief out on his bullshit to the American people. Now, just a few days ago… we see Obama lie again… saying he didn’t know the very guy he introduced as one of the chief architects of ObamaCare. Please… Obama supporters… grow some balls and call out your president.

FRANKENCARE

FrankenG-600-LI

SEO Powered By SEOPressor