Posts Tagged ‘CAIR’

Mayor takes stand against Muslim Shariah courts


When a group of imams tried to bring a form of “Shariah light” to Texas, they met an unlikely foe – Irving Mayor Beth Van Duyne.

Now, Van Duyne has been thrust into the national media spotlight, and her city is being called “ground zero” in the battle to prevent Islamic law from gaining a foothold, no matter how small, in the U.S. legal system.

Van Duyne’s name and picture has popped up on Facebook pages and Twitter feeds across America in recent days, casting her with equal enthusiasm as villain or hero, depending on one’s political outlook.

She’s either the mayor who stood up to the Muslim Brotherhood or the “Islamophobic bigot” looking to cash in politically on fears about Islamic terrorism.

The media frenzy was touched off by reports that an Islamic tribunal was being set up in the Dallas, Texas, area. A group of imams from surrounding mosques would sit on what they call a “mediation panel,” as defacto judges, and mediate disputes between Muslims who voluntarily submit to its edicts. They denied this was a Shariah court, saying the panel would mete out nonbinding decisions in business disputes, divorces and other family matters “in full accordance with the law.”

Van Duyne wrote a blistering Facebook post last month in which she vowed to “fight with every fiber of my being against this action.”

Get the details on how to stop Islamization of America – $4.95 today only!

She worked with state legislators to craft a bill that would declare it illegal for any U.S. court to adopt any foreign legal system for the basis of its rulings. Islam was not mentioned in the bill, nor was any religion.

Last Thursday the Irving City Council voted 5-4 to endorse the bill before a packed room full of mostly angry Muslims.

When called on by the Council of American-Islamic Relations to apologize for her February Facebook post, Van Duyne flatly refused. She also appeared in the national spotlight in an interview with conservative media icon Glenn Beck.

She’s been practically canonized by some websites while becoming the target of journalistic hit pieces from others.

Her local newspaper, the Dallas Morning News, cast her as a petulant demagogue who uses “gifted speaking skills” to “get a crowd on her side.”

“The dispute has made Van Duyne a hero among a fringe movement that believes Muslims – a tiny fraction of the U.S. population – are plotting to take over American culture and courts,” the Dallas Morning News reported. The newspaper then quoted local imam Zia Sheikh as saying the mayor’s stance “fuels anti-Islamic hysteria” and is “very Islamophobic.”

But to conservatives who have watched one city, state and federal leader after another kowtow to the threats and demands of CAIR, she is a breath of fresh air.

“The U.S. is a constitutional republic ruled by constitutional law. If Muslims want to live under Shariah law, fine, then let them move to a country that is ruled by Shariah law,” wrote Greg Polkowski in a March 24 Facebook post. “The problem is they come here for the freedom and opportunities that aren’t available in their home countries (usually Muslim controlled) and upon arrival decide they want to change the U.S. to reflect the political/religious environment they left. This reminds me of a sign I’ve seen posted by a few swimming pools over the years, ‘We don’t swim in your toilet, please don’t pee in our pool.’”

The Dallas Morning News attacked Van Duyne’s supporters as followers of “fringe websites.”

“Van Duyne had spent the last month criticizing and questioning a Muslim mediation panel, conflating it with a court in an interview seen around the country. That night, she pushed the council to endorse a state bill whose author had targeted the panel.

“The dispute has made Van Duyne a hero on fringe websites that fear an Islamic takeover of America.”

While eager to denigrate Van Duyne’s supporters, the Dallas newspaper closes its eyes to the dubious reputation of the group demanding apologies, CAIR. More than just a fringe element, CAIR is a front for the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, which are terrorist elements.

CAIR is known in the U.S. as a nonprofit advocacy group for Muslim-Americans, but in 2007 U.S. prosecutors named it an unindicted co-conspirator in a terrorism-funding case against the Holy Land Foundation charity. The charity was convicted of supporting Hamas, which is on the U.S. State Department’s list of terrorist organizations. When President Obama took office in 2008 the trial was shut down and investigations into CAIR ceased. In fact, the president has sought counsel from CAIR officials in matters of Homeland Security and law enforcement, acceding to its demand that the FBI scrub from its training manuals all references to radical Islam.

Yet, despite its connections to the Muslim Brotherhood, the Dallas Morning News and countless other U.S. media outlets continue to quote its officials as credible representatives of all U.S. Muslims. The Muslim Brotherhood has been designated a terrorist organization by scores of countries, including even some Arab and Muslim countries such as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and the United Arab Emirates, along with Russia, Israel and others.

Dr. Mark Christian grew up in a prominent Muslim family in Egypt and converted to Christianity as an adult. He has been disowned by his family.
Dr. Mark Christian grew up in a prominent Muslim family in Egypt and converted to Christianity as an adult. He has been disowned by his family.
Dr. Mark Christian, a former Muslim who grew up in Egypt the son of a Muslim Brotherhood activist, said such “mediation panels” would not be tolerated in Egypt. But the ignorance of American government officials makes them easy prey for CAIR’s intimidation.

“The concept of ‘Shariah mediation’ to settle disputes between Muslims here in the U.S. is indeed disturbing.” he said. “It is the first step in establishing a parallel system of government within our own system.”

After fleeing Egypt, Christian lived in Great Britain before coming to the United States.

“I have seen these tribunals in operation in Britain,” he said. “They supplant the laws of the host nation by forcing Muslims to abandon their inherent rights under our law and submit instead to Shariah, many times to their own detriment.”

“I applaud the mayor for her strength of conviction. She isn’t denying rights to Muslims; she is preserving them for Muslims.

“She is, however, denying the Muslim Brotherhood one of their chief tools in controlling Muslim populations in free nations.”

CAIR’s alliance with leftists in the U.S. media and so-called “watchdog” groups like the far-left Southern Poverty Law Center assures that whenever someone criticizes CAIR and points out facts about its connections to the Muslim Brotherhood they get branded as “Islamophobic” or “bigoted.”

Thus, it’s no surprise that most politicians cower at the sight of a CAIR spokesman and avoid at all costs saying anything that can be seen as remotely anti-Islam.

But the mayor of one small city in Texas seems to dance to a different drumbeat.

WND requested a phone interview with Van Duyne Tuesday but was told by her secretary that she had urgent city business to tend to.

“I wish to see her character in every elected official in our nation,” Christian said.


MUSLIMS CAIR Reacts to Megyn Kelly’s Epic Smackdown


CAIR has been attempting to block a new film (The Honor Diaries) that draws attention to the plight of women under Islam.

The following parody crystallizes the key issues involved — and offers food for thought to the Muslim “civil rights” group about how it may consider effectively contributing to dialogue and human rights in the future:

An Ex-Muslim’s Warning

by, Abdul Rahman | h/t MKamal – No Compulsion

To the Infidel world:

I was born and raised as Muslim. My whole family is still Muslim. I know every genetic code of Muslim. I know Islamic brain. I live and breath with them. I am an insider. I left Islam when I understood that Islam is a sick and evil religion. Following are the Islamic message to the West.

To the infidels of the West:

Constitution for the new Islamic Republic of EU and USA is under construction.

We will fight the infidel to death.

Meanwhile American laws will protect us.

Democrats and Leftist will support us.

UN will legitimize us.

CAIR will incubate us.

ACLU will empower us.

Western Universities will educate us.

Mosques will shelter us

OPEC will finance us

Hollywood will love us.

Koffi Annan will pass politically correct sympathetic statement for Jihadists.

Our children will immigrate from Pakistan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Indonesia and even from India to the US and to the other Western countries. They will go to the West for education in full scholarship. America is paying and will continue to pay for our children’s educations and their upbringing in state funded Islamic schools.

We will use your welfare system. Our children will also send money home while they are preparing for Jihad.

We will take the advantage of American kindness, gullibility, and compassion. When time comes, we will stab them in the back. We will say one thing on the camera and teach another thing to our children at home. We will give subliminal messages to our children to uphold Islam at any cost. Our children in America will always care more about Islamic Country’s interest than US interest.

We will teach our children Islamic supremacy from the very childhood. We will teach them not to compromise with Infidel. Once we do that from the very early age our children won’t hesitate to be martyr. We will take over the Europe first and then US will be the next. We already have a solid ground in the UK, Holland, Sweden, Spain, Italy, Germany, and now in the US.

Our children will marry Caucasian in Europe and in America. We will mixed with intricate fabric of the Western society but still will remember to Jihad when time comes. Who are we?

We are the “sleeper cells”.

We will raise our children to be loyal to Islam and Mohammad only. Everything else is secondary.

At the time of the real fight we will hold our own children as our armor. When American or Israeli troops shoot at us the world will be watching. Imagine,- Imagine the news in the world “Death of Muslim babies by infidels”.

We know CNN, ABC, CBS are broadcasting live. Al-Jazeera will pour gasoline on the fire. The news will spread like wildfire. “Americans killed 6 babies, 10 babies”. “Jews killed two women”,

Keep your Nukes in your curio cabinets. Keep your aircraft carrier or high-tech weaponry in the showcase. You can’t use them against us because of your own higher moral standard. We will take the advantage of your higher moral standard and use it against you. We won’t hesitate to use our children as suicide bomber against you.

Visualize the news flash all over the world, -Moslem mother is sobbing, -.crying. -.Her babies are killed by Jews and Americans, the whole world is watching live. Hundreds of millions of Muslims all around the world are boiling. They will march through Europe. We will use our women to produce more babies who will in turn be used as armor/shield. Our babies are the gift from Allah for Jihad.

West manufactures their tanks in the factory. We will manufacture our military force by natural means, by producing more babies. That is the way it is cheaper.

You infidels at this site cannot defeat us. We are 1.2 billion. We will double again. Do you have enough bullets to kill us?

On the camera:

We will always say, “Islam is the religion of Peace.”

We will say, “Jihad is actually inner Jihad.”

Moderate Muslim will say there is no link between Islam and Terrorism and the West will believe it because the West is so gullible.

Moderate Muslim all over the world will incubate Jihadists by their talk by defending Islam.

Using Western Legal system we will assert our Sharia Laws, slowly but surely.

We will increase in number. We will double again.

You will be impressed when you meet a moderate Muslim personally. As your next-door neighbor, coworker, student, teacher, engineer, professionals you may even like us. You will find us well mannered, polite, humble that will make you say, “wow, Muslims are good and peaceful people”, But, we will stab you in your back when you are sleeping as we did on 911.

There will be more 911 in Europe and in America. We will say, “We do not support terrorism but America got what it deserved.”

Muslims, CAIR, ISNA, MPAC and other international Islamic Organization will unite. We will partner with Leftist, ACLU, with Koffi Annan, and the UN, and if we have to then even with France. Fasten your seatbelt. The war of civilizations has just begun.

We will recite Quran and say Allah-Hu-Akbar before beheading infidels, as we have been doing it. We will video tape those and send it to all infidels to watch. They will surrender – ISLAM means surrender.

We will use your own values of kindness against you.

You are destined to loose.

Must be very depressing for you. Isn’t it?


as we say just before beheading.

21st Century Islamic Warfare

Let’s see the effectiveness of Islamic warfare.
Muslims Vs. the West.

THE RULE HAS CHANGED. There is new game in town.

Bill Clinton ordered 50 Tomahawks Cruise missiles costing $100,000,000 each to destroy $50 mud houses that belonged to Osama’s family. What a stupidity? What a poor ROI (Return On Investment)

In return Osama’s attack on the US.
Cost: 19 martyrs and less than $500,000.
Cost to the West: over 3,000 dead.

At least $1,000,000,000,000 (one trillion) dollars economical loss in one year. This includes the ripple effect.

Osama’s ROI with respect to: life = 3,000/19 = 158 fold.
Dollar = $1 tr./500K = 2,000,000 fold

That is modern warfare. The West will loose.

Islam will rule the world. There is nothing you can do. Even if the per capita GDP of the world drops to half of its present level as a consequence of Islamic laws in place all over the world but still Islam will rule the word.

From your point of view we bring to the world to the dark ages, so be it. But still Islam wins, West looses.

Are you sure you want to play this game?

Jihad, ..Jihad…Jeeehaaad…

You are destined to loose.


Saudi Arabia’s $100 billion investment over the last 3 decades on over 60 thousands Madrassas and school all over the Islamic world is finally paying off. While the West was busy inventing medicine, increasing life expectancy, elevating human suffering, decoding human gene to find cure for Cancer, heart disease etc, launching space shuttle, inventing internet, working on new laws/theory for human rights, developing better economical models for a more prosperous world, while ACLU was gaining control over common sense, while American ingenuity was benefiting the rest of the world, we Muslims were busy producing over 200 million out of 1.4 billion, Walking, Talking, Non-Thinking, West-Hating, Pre-Programmed, Suicidal, Parasitic, Terrorist Robots. You can’t win. The Genie is out of the bottle.

We will use American’s kindness, fairness, compassion, freedom of speech and non-discriminatory policy against them. We will stab them in the back.

What are you going to do? You are doomed.

Would you like to know just how accurate the above information is?

I have been researching to determine when the original of this article was written. So far, I have traced the origins back at least 10 years ago. At this link HERE you will find an article from 04June2006 and at the beginning the woman mentions that she received the above in a letter from an ex-muslim about 2 years prior. (2004) Now, look at what has transpired in our nation over the last 10 years relevant to Islam.

The Muslim War is On - Hamas-CAIR Member In Washington Arrested For Raping 12-Year-Old Girl Because She Was Dressed “Provacatively”

By David WoodHamasCAIRMe3
Omar Abdelbadie was born in Egypt, but has lived in the United States for the past eight years. He is currently studying Neurobiology at the University of Washington. In his free time, he volunteers with CAIR-Washington, promotes interfaith unity as Vice-President of Bridges (the University of Washington’s Interfaith Council), and walks the streets looking for little girls to play with drugs and take back to his apartment. The only silver lining to this dark cloud of perversion is Abdelbadie’s unnamed friend, who called police after realizing that a sex-crime had just been committed. (If this friend happens to be Muslim, I tip my hat to him, for living a far better life than some of his Muslim brothers across the Atlantic have been living.)

Of course, perverts can come from all sorts of backgrounds. The point here, however, is that Muslim preachers keep telling us that Islam is the solution to Western immorality. With so many recent cases of Muslim pedophiles targeting little (non-Muslim) girls, I’d say that Muslim preachers have lost the right to tell us what Islam can do for the West. When a religion glorifies a man who had sex with a nine-year-old girl, allows its adherents to rape female captives, and calls anyone who rejects the religion “the worst of creatures” (Qur’an 98:6), it will never benefit societies with large populations of unbelievers.
The Seattle Pi reports:
Washington—A University of Washington student accused of having sex with a 12-year-old girl he picked up in the University District has been charged with child rape.

Currently free after posting bond, UW Senior Omar Abdelbadie is alleged to have plied the girl with marijuana, brought her back to his apartment and had sex with her hours after they met. Abdelbadie, a 22-year-old originally from Bellevue, was described by prosecutors as a threat to community safety, despite his lack of a criminal history.

“The defendant is a danger to children given the circumstances of this crime where he met a 12 year old girl on the street, exposed her to marijuana, and took her to his home, where they had sexual intercourse,” Senior Deputy Prosecutor Carol Spoor said in court papers.

Having left home that evening, the girl ended up in the U District just after midnight on June 10, according to charging papers. She told police she was about to head home – she described the crowd there as “creepy” – when she encountered Abdelbadie.

CAIR Member Omar Abdelbadie

According to the girl’s account, Abdelbadie approached and struck up a conversation with her, and then asked her to smoke marijuana with him. The girl said she told him her age several times before he brought her back to his apartment, where he had sex with her after claiming she had “seduced” him.

The girl left Abdelbadie’s home the following day. Abdelbadie and a friend are alleged to have walked her home, and watched hiding behind a fence as she walked up to the house.

Abdelbadie’s friend – who met Abdelbadie when signing him up for a children’s charity — then called 911 after arguing with Abdelbadie about his conduct with a young girl. Officers responded to the area and arrested Abdelbadie.

According to charging papers, Abdelbadie told police he met the girl walking near University Avenue and claimed she was dressed “provocatively.” He is alleged to have admitted he “hooked up” with the girl, but would not say whether he knew her true age.

Read more:

The State Law the Feds Blocked to Protect Sharia

This happened back in January 2010, the federal courts blocked Oklahoma’s ability to ban Sharia Law. The only law the United States should follow is the Constitution!

From CNN:

A federal appeals court has blocked an Oklahoma voter-approved measure barring state judges from considering Islamic and international law in their decisions.

The three-judge panel at the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an earlier injunction preventing State Question 755 from being certified until the free speech questions are resolved. The decision Tuesday allows a lawsuit brought by Islamic-American groups to move ahead to a bench trial.

“The proposed amendment discriminates among religions,” said the judges. “The Oklahoma amendment specifically names the target of its discrimination. The only religious law mentioned in the amendment is Sharia law.”

A federal judge last summer had issued a temporary restraining order in favor of the Council of American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which had sued to nullify the law completely.

Here is Glenn Beck warning us of what life would be like under Sharia Law.


Council on American-Islamic Relations using courts to stifle enemies and the American Way of Life

by Art MooreCair

A federal judge’s rebuke of the controversial Council on American-Islamic Relations supports claims that the Muslim lobby group is abusing the court system in an attempt to silence opposition, says a lawyer for defendants in the case.

CAIR, which was tied to a major terrorist-financing scheme, “has a long history of filing lawsuits that cost millions of dollars to its victims,” Daniel Horowitz told WND.
A federal judge’s rebuke of the controversial Council on American-Islamic Relations supports claims that the Muslim lobby group is abusing the court system in an attempt to silence opposition, says a lawyer for defendants in the case.

CAIR, which was tied to a major terrorist-financing scheme, “has a long history of filing lawsuits that cost millions of dollars to its victims,” Daniel Horowitz told WND.

“It is the same tactic that Scientology and other groups have used,” he noted.

CAIR filed suit in 2009 against former federal investigator Dave Gaubatz and his son, Chris Gabatz, after the two carried out an undercover investigation of the Islamic group. The Center for Security Policy in Washington, D.C., and three of its employees were later added to the suit for their part in commissioning a documentary.

Evidence from the investigation was published in the WND Books expose’ “Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That’s Conspiring to Islamize America.” The book documents CAIR’s support of radical jihad, recounting its origin as a front group for the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, the worldwide movement that has stated its intent to transform the U.S. into a Saudi-style Islamic state.

CAIR alleges it suffered damage after the younger Gaubatz, posing as an intern, obtained access to some 12,000 pages of CAIR internal documents under false pretenses and made recordings of officials and employees without consent.

On Friday, federal Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia denied CAIR’s motion to extend discovery of the Center for Security Policy and several of its employees.

Fight back against CAIR’s attack on First Amendment by making a contribution to WND’s “Legal Defense Fund.” Donations of $25 or more entitle you to free copy of “Muslim Mafia” – the book so devastating to CAIR the group is trying to ban it.

The court agreed with a brief by the American Freedom Law Center, which is defending CSP, and will soon set a schedule for motions that could end the case.

Kollar-Kotelly rebuked CAIR and its in-house legal counsel for their “inability to efficiently manage their discovery in this matter and to comply with the court’s scheduling and procedures order.”

Horowitz said the ruling “underscores how this process has to come to an end.”

“We are looking forward to trial so that this attack on the First Amendment can be ended,” he said.

Horowitz said the “glaring weakness” in CAIR’s case has always been a lack of damages.

“CAIR can’t sue for being exposed for its Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas founding. That is what ‘Muslim Mafia’ was about,” he said.

“If they sued for this, the judge would throw the case out of court,” he explained. ‘Instead, it is suing for minor points that caused no harm.”

Nevertheless, he said, “the cost of defending is still in the millions, so CAIR abuses the judicial system to silence its opposition.”

Horowitz pointed out that in a complaint by talk-host Michael Savage against CAIR several years ago, his team prepared a RICO complaint that alleged the Muslim group was engaging in a deliberate tactic to silence opposition.

Kollar-Kotelly also denied CAIR’s request to depose two non-party witnesses in the case, ruling the request was untimely, without cause, and would disrupt the court’s management of its schedule and prejudice defendants by delaying resolution of the case.

The court said even CAIR’s motion seeking more time for discovery was itself untimely and substantively deficient.

CSP attorney David Yerushalmi called CAIR’s motion “a blatant and patently false presentation of the discovery record in this case.”

“Indeed, this misrepresentation is just a part of CAIR’s pattern of taking a troubling and seemingly abusive approach to civil litigation,” he said.

In its motion to extend the discovery period, which had been ongoing for more than 13 months, CAIR requested to depose “Muslim Mafia” co-author Paul Sperry.

In the lawsuit, CAIR, a self-described Muslim civil-rights group, does not defend itself against the book’s claims, and the FBI seized the CAIR material from the Washington law office of one of the Gaubtazes’ three high-profile lawyers. A previous filing in the case revealed a federal grand jury is investigating CAIR for possible violation of laws that ban financial dealings with terrorist groups or countries under U.S. sanctions.

In her opinion in June 2011, Judge Kollar-Kotelly granted part of the Gaubatzes’ motion to dismiss the case, throwing out the count pertaining to the audio and video recordings but maintaining other counts, including theft of physical documents.

Gaubatz attorney Martin Garbus told WND at the time that he “would rather have seen the entire case dismissed at this point, but I believe it will be dismissed at the next point.”

Garbus, a renowned First Amendment lawyer who has handled many high-profile cases over the past four decades, said he thinks the Gaubatzes have a valid First Amendment argument and that CAIR didn’t suffer any financial damage.

“They haven’t shown that they have been damaged by those documents,” he said.

CAIR previously attempted to file its initial amended complaint without court approval. Kollar-Kotelly reversed the filing and ordered CAIR to file a motion to explain why it should be allowed to amend.

As WND reported, CAIR’s complaint seeks to expunge all copies of “Muslim Mafia,” in an attempt, according to Horowitz, to eliminate evidence that could lead to criminal prosecution of the group.

In May 2007, CAIR was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the Justice Department’s terror-finance case against the Richardson, Texas-based Holy Land Foundation, which was convicted of funneling more than $12 million to Hamas.

As “Muslim Mafia” recounts, FBI wiretap evidence from the Holy Land case showed CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad was at an October 1993 meeting of Hamas leaders and activists in Philadelphia. CAIR was born out of a need to give a “media twinkle” to the Muslim leaders’ agenda of supporting violent jihad abroad while slowly institutionalizing Islamic law at home.

Rogues gallery of terror-tied CAIR leaders

As former FBI agent Mike Rolf acknowledges in “Muslim Mafia,” “CAIR has had a number of people in positions of power within the organization that have been directly connected to terrorism and have either been prosecuted or thrown out of the country.” According to another FBI veteran familiar with recent and ongoing cases involving CAIR officials, “Their offices have been a turnstile for terrorists and their supporters.”

A review of the public record, including federal criminal court documents, past IRS 990 tax records and Federal Election Commission records detailing donor occupations, reveals that CAIR has been associated with a disturbing number of convicted terrorists or felons in terrorism probes, as well as suspected terrorists and active targets of terrorism investigations. The list is long and includes:

FBI agents arresting CAIR founding director Ghassan Elashi in 2002.
Ghassan Elashi: One of CAIR’s founding directors, he was convicted in 2004 of illegally shipping high-tech goods to terror state Syria and is serving 80 months in prison. He was also convicted of providing material support to Hamas in the Holy Land Foundation terror-financing trial. He was chairman of the charity, which provided seed capital to CAIR. Elashi is related to Hamas leader Mousa Abu Marzook.
Muthanna al-Hanooti: The CAIR director’s home was raided in 2006 by FBI agents in connection with an active terrorism investigation. Agents also searched the offices of his advocacy group, Focus on Advocacy and Advancement of International Relations, which al-Hanooti operates out of Dearborn, Mich., and Washington, D.C.Al-Hanooti, who emigrated to the U.S. from Iraq, formerly helped run a suspected Hamas terror front called LIFE for Relief and Development. Its Michigan offices also were raided in September 2006. In 2004, LIFE’s Baghdad office was raided by U.S. troops, who seized files and computers. Al-Hanooti is related to Sheik Mohammed al-Hanooti, an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.
Muthanna al-Hanooti, wearing traditional headgarb
“Al-Hanooti collected over $6 million for support of Hamas,” according to a 2001 FBI report, and was present with CAIR and Holy Land officials at a secret Hamas fundraising summit held in 1993 at a Philadelphia hotel. Prosecutors added his name to the list of unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land case.

Although Al-Hanooti denies supporting Hamas, he has praised Palestinian suicide bombers as “martyrs” who are “alive in the eyes of Allah.”

Abdurahman Alamoudi: Another CAIR director, he is serving 23 years in federal prison for plotting terrorism. Alamoudi, who was caught on tape complaining that bin Laden hadn’t killed enough Americans in the U.S. embassy bombings in Africa, was one of al-Qaida’s top fundraisers in America, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.
Siraj Wahhaj: A member of CAIR’s board of advisers, Wahhaj was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. The radical Brooklyn imam was close to convicted terrorist Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman and defended him during his trial.
Imam Siraj Wahhaj
“Muslim Mafia,” citing co-author’s Sperry’s previous book “Infiltration” as well as terror expert Steven Emerson’s research, reports that Wahhaj, a black convert to Islam, is converting gang members to Islam and holding “jihad camps” for them. With a combination of Islam and Uzis, he has said, the street thugs will be a powerful force for Islam the day America “will crumble.”

Wahhaj was a key speaker at CAIR’s 15th annual fund-raising banquet in Arlington, Va., in 2009.

Randall “Ismail” Royer: The former CAIR communications specialist and civil-rights coordinator is serving 20 years in prison in connection with the Virginia Jihad Network, which he led while employed by CAIR at its Washington headquarters. The group trained to kill U.S. soldiers overseas, cased the FBI headquarters and cheered the space shuttle Columbia tragedy. Al-Qaida operative Ahmed Abu Ali, convicted of plotting to assassinate President George W. Bush, was among those who trained with Royer’s Northern Virginia cell.
Bassam Khafagi: Another CAIR official, Khafagi was arrested in 2003 while serving as CAIR’s director of community affairs. He pleaded guilty to charges of bank and visa fraud stemming from a federal counter-terror probe of his leadership role in the Islamic Assembly of North America, which has supported al-Qaida and advocated suicide attacks on America. He was sentenced to 10 months in prison and deported to his native Egypt.
Laura Jaghlit: A civil-rights coordinator for CAIR, her Washington-area home was raided by federal agents after 9/11 as part of an investigation into terrorist financing, money laundering and tax fraud. Her husband Mohammed Jaghlit, a key leader in the Saudi-backed SAAR network, is a target of the still-active probe.Jaghlit sent two letters accompanying donations – one for $10,000, the other for $5,000 – from the SAAR Foundation to Sami al-Arian, now a convicted terrorist. In each letter, according to a federal affidavit, “Jaghlit instructed al-Arian not to disclose the contribution publicly or to the media.”Investigators suspect the funds were intended for Palestinian terrorists via a U.S. front called WISE, which at the time employed an official who personally delivered a satellite phone battery to Osama bin Laden. The same official also worked for Jaghlit’s group.In addition, Jaghlit donated a total of $37,200 to the Holy Land Foundation, which prosecutors say is a Hamas front. Jaghlit subsequently was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the case.
Nihad Awad
Nihad Awad: Wiretap evidence from the Holy Land case puts CAIR’s executive director at the Philadelphia meeting of Hamas leaders and activists in 1993 that was secretly recorded by the FBI. Participants hatched a plot to disguise payments to Hamas terrorists as charitable giving.During the meeting, according to FBI transcripts, Awad was recorded discussing the propaganda effort. He mentions Ghassan Dahduli, whom he worked with at the time at the Islamic Association for Palestine, another Hamas front. Both were IAP officers. Dahduli’s name also was listed in the address book of bin Laden’s personal secretary, Wadi al-Hage, who is serving a life sentence in prison for his role in the U.S. embassy bombings. Dahduli, an ethnic-Palestinian like Awad, was deported to Jordan after 9/11 for refusing to cooperate in the terror investigation. (An April 28, 2009, letter from FBI assistant director Richard C. Powers to Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz. – which singles out CAIR chief Awad for suspicion – explains how the group’s many Hamas connections caused the FBI to sever ties with CAIR.)Awad’s and Dahduli’s phone numbers are listed in a Muslim Brotherhood document seized by federal investigators revealing “important phone numbers” for the “Palestine Section” of the Brotherhood in America. The court exhibit showed Hamas fugitive Mousa Abu Marzook listed on the same page with Awad.
Omar Ahmad
Omar Ahmad: U.S. prosecutors also named CAIR’s founder and chairman emeritus as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land case. Ahmad, too, was placed at the Philadelphia meeting, FBI special agent Lara Burns testified at the trial. Prosecutors also designated him as a member of the Muslim Brotherhood’s “Palestine Committee” in America. Ahmad, like his CAIR partner Awad, is ethnic-Palestinian.(Though both Ahmad and Awad were senior leaders of IAP, the Hamas front, neither of their biographical sketches posted on CAIR’s website mentions their IAP past.)

Nabil Sadoun
Nabil Sadoun: A CAIR board member, Sadoun has served on the board of the United Association for Studies and Research, which investigators believe to be a key Hamas front in America. In fact, Sadoun co-founded UASR with Hamas leader Marzook. The Justice Department added UASR to the list of unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land case. UPDATE: In 2010, Sadoun was ordered deported to his native Jordan. An immigration judge referenced Sadoun’s relationship with Hamas and the Holy Land Foundation during a deportation hearing.
Mohamed Nimer: CAIR’s research director also served as a board director for UASR, the strategic arm for Hamas in the U.S. CAIR neglects to mention Nimer’s and Sadoun’s roles in UASR in their bios.
Mohamed Nimer
Rafeeq Jaber: A founding director of CAIR, Jaber was the long-time president of the Islamic Association for Palestine. In 2002, a federal judge found that “the Islamic Association for Palestine has acted in support of Hamas.” In his capacity as IAP chief, Jaber praised Hezbollah attacks on Israel. He also served on the board of a radical mosque in the Chicago area.
Rabith Hadid: The CAIR fundraiser was a founder of the Global Relief Foundation, which after 9/11 was blacklisted by the Treasury Department for financing al-Qaida and other terror groups. Its assets were frozen in December 2001. Hadid was arrested on terror-related charges and deported to Lebanon in 2003.
Hamza Yusuf: The FBI investigated the CAIR board member after 9/11, because just two days before the attacks, he made an ominous prediction to a Muslim audience.”This country is facing a terrible fate, and the reason for that is because this country stands condemned,” Yusuf warned. “It stands condemned like Europe stood condemned because of what it did. And lest people forget, Europe suffered two world wars after conquering the Muslim lands.”
CAIR’s founder Ahmad, while claiming to be a moderate and patriotic American, reportedly told a group of Muslims in Northern California in 1998 that they are in America not to assimilate, but to help assert Islam’s rule over the country.

“Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant,” a local reporter paraphrased him as saying. “The Quran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.”

Ahmad insists he was misquoted. However, the reporter stands by her story, and an FBI wiretap transcript quotes Ahmad agreeing with terrorist suspects gathered at the secret Philadelphia meeting to “camouflage” their true intentions.

He compared it to the head fake in basketball.

“This is like one who plays basketball: He makes a player believe that he is doing this, while he does something else,” Ahmad said. “I agree with you. Like they say, politics is a completion of war.”

Hooper, CAIR’s communications director, also has expressed a desire to overturn the U.S. system of government in favor of an Islamic state.

“I wouldn’t want to create the impression that I wouldn’t like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future,” Hooper said in a 1993 interview with the Minneapolis Star Tribune. “But I’m not going to do anything violent to promote that. I’m going to do it through education.”

IMPORTANT NOTE: The CAIR legal attack on WND’s author is far from over. WND needs your help in supporting the defense of “Muslim Mafia” co-author P. David Gaubatz, as well as his investigator son Chris, against CAIR’s lawsuit. The book’s revelations have led to formal congressional demands for three different federal investigations of CAIR. In the meantime, however, someone has to defend these two courageous investigators who have, at great personal risk, revealed so much about this dangerous group. Although WND has procured the best First Amendment attorneys in the country for their defense, we can’t do it without your help. Please donate to WND’s Legal Defense Fund now.


Massive fraud, cover-up by CAIR exposed in federal lawsuit

by Christopher Collins

Last Friday, the Law Offices of David Yerushalmi, P.C. and the American Freedom Law Center (AFLC) said that they filed a devastating legal brief supported by hundreds of pages of evidence, asking a federal judge to find the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) liable to five of its former clients for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

In a release to the media today, AFLC stated:

“The legal brief demonstrates beyond any reasonable doubt that CAIR is a criminal organization that deceptively holds itself out to the public as the nation’s largest Muslim-American civil rights organization.”

“The brief and supporting evidence were filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in two companion cases, Saiyed v. CAIR and Lopez v. CAIR, in which David Yerushalmi is lead counsel. The brief and supporting evidence overwhelmingly demonstrate that CAIR was involved in a massive criminal fraud and cover-up that injured numerous client-victims who had looked to CAIR for legal assistance, yet the CAIR “attorney” allegedly handling their cases was in fact not an attorney.”

Yerushalmi, who is also Co-Founder and Senior Counsel of AFLC, commented, “The evidence has long suggested that CAIR is an organization set up by the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas to further its aims of stealth Jihad in the United States,” referring to the fact that CAIR was named by the federal government as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism financing trial.

“According to the facts that are carefully laid out in our legal brief and fully supported by the record evidence,” Yerushalmi explained, “CAIR has engaged in a massive criminal fraud in which numerous CAIR clients have been victimized, and because of the CAIR cover-up many still don’t realize it. The fact that CAIR has victimized Muslims and non-Muslims alike demonstrate that it is only looking out for itself and its ongoing efforts to bilk donors out of millions of dollars of charitable donations thinking they are supporting a legitimate organization.”

AFLC went on to say that five former clients of CAIR filed the two lawsuits in federal court alleging common law and statutory fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and intentional infliction of emotional distress against CAIR. These two lawsuits followed an earlier lawsuit which had also alleged that CAIR’s fraudulent conduct amounted to racketeering, a federal RICO crime. In that case, the court dismissed the RICO counts, concluding that CAIR’s conduct as alleged was fraudulent but not a technical violation of RICO. The two civil lawsuits were filed by Yerushalmi on January 6, 2010, and because they arise out of the same facts, the cases were consolidated.

AFLC stated, “The supporting evidence, which was compiled after more than a year and a half of contentious discovery that involved numerous document requests, motions to compel the production of documents that CAIR was concealing, and multiple depositions of high-ranking CAIR officials, shows that Morris Days, the “Resident Attorney” and “Civil Rights Manager” at the now defunct CAIR-MD/VA chapter in Herndon, Virginia, was in fact not an attorney and that he failed to provide legal services for clients who came to CAIR for legal representation.

The evidence also shows that CAIR knew of this fraud and purposefully conspired with Days to keep the CAIR clients from discovering that their legal matters were being mishandled or not handled at all. While Yerushalmi and AFLC represent the five plaintiffs in these two lawsuits, three of whom are Muslim Americans, according to CAIR’s internal documents; there were many more victims of the CAIR fraud scheme.”

“As set forth in the court filings, CAIR knew or should have known that Days was not a lawyer when it hired him. But, like many organizations accused of wrongdoing, things got worse when CAIR officials were confronted with clear evidence of Days’ fraudulent conduct. Rather than come clean and attempt to rectify past wrongs, CAIR conspired with Days to conceal and further the fraud. To this end, CAIR officials purposefully concealed the truth about Days from the clients, law enforcement, and the media. When CAIR did receive calls from irate clients about Days’ failure to provide competent legal services, CAIR fraudulently deceived them about Days’ relationship with CAIR, suggesting that he was never actually employed by CAIR.”

Robert Muise, co-counsel in the lawsuit and Co-Founder and Senior Counsel of AFLC, commented, “The overwhelming evidence marshaled in this case will finally put to rest the myth fabricated by CAIR’s PR machine and perpetrated by a complicit media that this is a legitimate Muslim-American civil rights organization.”

“This lawsuit strips away CAIR’s veil of legitimacy.”

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and its sister organization, the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC), have been controversial over the years and recently were systematically involved in the 2012 presidential elections in getting American Muslims out to vote for President Obama in the swing states of Florida, Virginia, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. Those states election results became controversial due to voter irregularities and allegations of voter fraud in favor of President Obama.

CAIR Goes Jihad on Law Enforcement Trainer

By Alan Kornman

I attended the June 27-29, 2011 Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) Intelligence Operations Guide for Islamist Terrorism class taught by Sam Kharoba who is now under attack from a coalition of some 30 Muslim organizations led by CAIR Tampa Director Hassan Shibly.

Throughout the entire 20 hour class Mr. Kharoba repeatedly stressed that he was teaching Islamic doctrine, theology, and culture as it pertains to Islamist terrorism, not the individual followers of Islam. Yet despite all these qualifiers CAIR and other Muslim groups are trying to paint Mr. Kahroba with all the misleading racial buzz word propaganda they can throw on the wall.

CAIR Florida Director Hassan Shibly, esq.

On June 9, 2012, I attended a “Know Your Rights Civil Liberties Conference” presented by CAIR Tampa Director Hassan Shibly, Esq. Mr. Shibly taught his predominately Muslim audience to be very distrustful of the FBI and law enforcement because they may entrap any Muslim if the opportunity presents itself. It is beyond belief that at his own Civil Liberties Conference, Hassan Shibly tried to violate my civil liberties by saying, “…anyone writing for the purposes of defaming the Muslim community or writing about the Muslim community or like, would be considered trespassing.” Mr. Shibly, who is also an attorney, was trying to violate my free speech with the threat of legal action and intimidation, now he is going after Mr. Sam Kharoba.

During the June 9 Civil Liberties Conference Hassan Shibly quotes Sam Kharoba directly. Mr. Shibly said, “ Sam Kharoba taught that anyone who wears their watch on their right hand is an extremist and you better watch out for that brother, he’s wearing it on his right hand you better watch out for him.” Mr. Shibly’s quote is untrue. I attended Mr. Kharoba’s training class and he told us that a Muslim who wears his watch on his right hand is Shariah compliant, which is a factual statement.

The Case Against Mr. Kharoba

On July 12, 2012 Tampa Bay Online’s Ray Reyes reported, “local Muslims are asking for the removal of a state contracted law enforcement counter-terrorism instructor” named Mr. Sam Kharoba of the Counter Terrorism Operations Center (CTOC).

In a July 2012 letter to Commissioner Bailey of the FDLE, 28 Islamist Groups and 2 individuals are, “requesting that Mr. Sam Kharoba be removed from your approved list of trainers and not be approved to train anyone associated with the FDLE. Officers who received his training should be retrained by someone with appropriate credentials and accurate subject matter content.” The “letter’s” 30 signatories however, did not offer any acceptable alternative terrorism trainers for the FDLE to consider in that letter. Without CAIR providing a single alternative Islamist terrorism trainer to the FDLE it gives the appearance this complaint is nothing more than a witch hunt and Mr. Kharoba is CAIR’s target of convenience.

Muslim Law Enforcement in Kharoba Training:

In Mr. Kharoba’s June 2011 training class, which I attended, there was a high ranking official from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police who also happened to be a follower of Islam. During the 20 hours of class time this Muslim officer did not offer any formal objections to either content or presentation.

The Muslim officer did have some minor differences with Mr. Kharoba on some Qur’anic text issues presented on the first day of class. Mr. Kharoba answered every question professionally citing codified Islamic text to back up his statements. This high ranking Muslim police officer appeared satisfied with Mr. Kharoba’s answers and did not file any formal complaints about Mr. Kharoba to the FDLE.

Intended Audience and Context of Mr. Kharoba ‘s Class Material

“The primary audience for this publication (Kharoba’s class booklet) is federal, state, and local law enforcement officers, intelligence analysts and detectives who are investigating Islamist terrorism cases.

The needs of law enforcement when investigating Islamist terrorism cases is centered on what motivates those individuals from a doctrinal and cultural point of view. While it is impossible to assign any set of “terrorist characteristics” to all followers of Islamic doctrine. Islamic terrorists have displayed many sensitive unique characteristics and patterns that is vital knowledge our law enforcement community must understand in order to protect those under their jurisdiction.” Sam Kharoba

Mr. Khoraba in his training manual says, “While it is impossible to assign any set of “terrorist characteristics” to all followers of Islamic doctrine.” Mr. Khoraba explains there are no absolutes or monolith notion that all Muslims are terrorists as CAIR, ICNA, and the other signatories are trying to put forward. CAIR, ICNA, etc… appear to be executing a well coordinated deceptive attack to destroy the livelihood and character of Mr. Kharoba by implying he made blanket statements which he did not.

After analyzing the “letter” sent to the FDLE attacking Mr. Kharoba, I was questioning if these 30 signatories are on the side of American law enforcement or the Islamist terrorists Mr. Kharoba is teaching about. Once you understand who some of the groups are attacking Mr. Kharoba, one will better understand there possible motivations.

Analysis of 3 of the 30 Signatories on CAIR’s Letter

CAIR – The Council on American Islamic Relations: David Goodhue-AHN Reporter “In 2009 The FBI severed ties with CAIR after a 15 year investigation. “FBI agents say CAIR’s executive director, Nihad Awad, was involved in planning meetings with the Holy Land Foundation. Five Holy Land Foundation members were convicted in December of funneling $12.4 million to Hamas. The U.S. government considers Hamas a terrorist organization. Prosecutors in that trial identified CAIR’s chairman emeritus Omar Ahmad an unindicted co-conspirator in the case.

CAIR officials unsuccessfully sued to have Ahmad’s, (and CAIR’s name), removed as a co-conspirator, and the group is protesting the FBI’s decision to sever relations.” Read the case documents here.

The FBI severing ties with CAIR in 2009 and the corroborating federal Holy Land Foundation Trial case proves beyond a shadow of doubt CAIR is tied to terrorism. CAIR’s ties to terrorism begin with it’s founder Nihad Awad, who is still the current Executive Director of CAIR.

Mr. Sam Kharoba is a Jordanian Christian, fluent in Arabic, expert on Islamic Doctrine and Theology teaching law enforcement officers how to understand and investigate Islamist Terrorism. CAIR can not control, influence, or silence Mr. Kharoba, their only other option is to try and lynch him in the court of public opinion first and possibly our court system second.

CAIR is sending a public message that if you exercise your free speech rights against Islamic Doctrine CAIR may attack you publicly and in court. Our elected officials, law enforcement, and our military get the message that if they hire anyone who does not meet CAIR’s approval they can expect to get sued and then be publicly labeled with every nasty vitriolic racial name one can think of. See the last paragraph of this article for confirmation from the Department Of Justice BCOT initiative.

CAIR’s objective in using “legal Jihad” or “lawfare” here in America and against Mr. Kharoba in particular, is that it scares people into silence. The end result is that CAIR and other like minded groups will control who teaches our policy makers, law enforcement, and military about Islamic Doctrine. If you want to understand CAIR, read this federal case , United States V. Holy Land Foundation and come to your own conclusions.

Islamic Circle of North America

The Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA) was identified as a Muslim Brotherhood organization in the Holy Land Foundation prosecution, the largest successful terrorism financing prosecution in US history. Recently, ICNA announced that they are embarking upon a $3 million propaganda campaign to promote Shariah (Islamic Law) in America.

ICNA’s handbook , by their own hand, exposes their political ideology and goals as it pertains to North America. The Investigative Project on Terrorism does an in depth analysis of ICNA’s handbook that should be read and devoured by all who read this article.

Here is one example out of the ICNA Handbook that should be troubling for all Americans and a red flag for law enforcement.

3. Implementation of the Islamic Guidance (page 11)

In this stage, Islam is to be truly implemented in the society at all levels. This will require the strength of the organization and its leaders with substantial support of the people of the land.

“Islam is to be truly implemented in the society at all levels” Based on this previous quote it would be in ICNA’s best interests to have Mr. Kharoba removed from Law enforcement Islamist terrorist training. Law enforcement and government policy makers swore an oath to uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution. ICNA, in their words, say they would like to see another form of government “implemented in the society at all levels.” Sedition is the what comes to mind when an established group wants to change American society at all levels. ICNA should be thoroughly investigated by the authorities for these actionable comments.

Islamic Center of Boca Raton

According to IPT Reports – From 1998 to 2007 the Islamic Center of Boca Raton has been sympathetic to the Islamist terrorist ideology beginning with it’s founder Ibrahim Dremali.

It is troubling to me there are so many Mosques on the list of signatories to this hate filled letter CAIR put out and their profound ignorance of the first amendment.

Objections in The “Letter” about Mr. Kharoba

Mr.Kharoba said, “…Muhammad lived a diabolical life as a Prophet where initially the Qur’anic revelations were peaceful and tolerant but later became radical and militant.”

CAIR conveniently left out the next sentence which states, “Muhammad initially attempted to spread Islam peacefully using Da’wa…when the Da’wa did not succeed, Muhammad resorted to Jihad – violence and warfare to forcibly convert people to Islam.”

These statements are factually accurate based on codified Islamic texts chronicling Muhammad’s life. Muhammad started raiding caravans, attacking nearby cities, and trading in slaves as soon as he arrived in Medina. In fact, the Islamic calendar begins when Muhammad entered Medina, thus named al-Hijra.

When Muhammad needed money and resources, Allah transmitted through the Archangel Gabriel who transmitted to Muhammad’s ear, Qur’an 8:69 “So enjoy what you took as booty; the spoils are lawful and good.” Allah now declared that what Muhammad steals from others is lawful and good, Muhammad was now religiously justified to steal, rob, kill, and wage war in the pursuit of booty.

The CAIR letter states, “In one particularly stereotypical characterization of all Muslims, Kharoba writes: “Stoning to death is another example of the lack of reformation in Islam. Instead of banning stoning to death, Muslims practice this barbaric act as a sporting event similar to football and baseball games.”

CAIR’s argument is propaganda because Mr. Kharoba does not say that “all” Muslims engage in stoning, much less approve of it. CAIR however, does not deny that stoning takes place or more appropriately that the practice should be banned. In Islamic countries where stoning is still a Shariah compliant legal remedy the physical act of the stoning is a community affair. The public execution acts as a warning to other community members not to engage in unIslamic behavior and more importantly not to make trouble. This fact is an uncomfortable truth and goes on most everyday in “chop-chop square” Saudi Arabia while CAIR, Hassan Shibly, ICNA, etc…. are all silent.

The one complaint that seems to be getting the most traction was taken out of the March/April 2011 Washington Monthly where Mr. Kharoba comments on the life of Muhammad. Mr. Kharoba said, “When I look at the life of Muhammad, I get a very nasty image,” said Kharoba, pausing to look around the auditorium. The audience was silent. “I am talking about a pedophile, a serial killer, a rapist.”

Sadly Mr. Kharoba’s comment is historically accurate based on codified Islamic texts.

The Hadith of Bukhari comments on Muhammad’s pedophilia relationship with Aisha. Most rational people would consider the story of Aisha as a rape by a 53 year old man (Muhammad) against a 9 year old girl (Aisha). Many people don’t know this but Aisha had an older sister Muhammad could have had but instead chose the younger Aisha. It is up to the reader to analyze the Islamic text below and come to ones own conclusions.

Read with caution because once you possess this knowledge from Bukhari it carries a heavy burden on an individuals conscience going forward.

Bukhari Volume 5, Book 58, Number 236:

Narrated Hisham’s father:

Khadija died three years before the Prophet (Muhammad) departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married ‘Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old.

The content of the Bukhari Hadith above should create a “very nasty image” in everyone’s mind. For those individuals and groups who defend the indefensible causes me great concern.

Muhammad As A Serial Killer

Muhammad as a serial killer taken from the Hadiths of Ibn Kathir. The massacre of 800 Jews from the Banu Qurayzah tribe in Medina

According to Ibn Kathir:

Then the Messenger of Allah (Muhammad) commanded that ditches should be dug, so they were dug in the earth, and they (Jews) were brought tied by their shoulders, and were beheaded. There were between seven hundred and eight hundred of them. The children who had not yet reached adolescence and the women were taken prisoner, and their wealth was seized.

Tafsir Ibn Kathir – The Campaign against Banu Qurayzah

It is worth mentioning here, not all were lucky enough to be beheaded among Banu Quraiza. Those whose lives were spared had a worse fate awaiting them. Again from Haykal:

The Prophet (Muhammad) divided the properties, women, and children of Banu Quraiza among the Muslims after he had separated one-fifth for public purposes. Each man of the cavalry received two shares, one for himself and one for his horse. On that day, the Muslim force included thirty-six cavalrymen. Sa’d ibn Zayd al Ansari sent a number of Banu Qurayza captives to Najd where he exchanged them for horses and armour in order to increase Muslim military power.

CAIR, ICNA, and various Mosques Acted As They Should

I believe CAIR, ICNA, various Mosques, and individuals who were signatories on the letter attacking Mr. Kharoba were acting appropriately and as they should have according to Islamic doctrine and theology.

Any attacks on Muhammad from a Muslim or non-Muslim is a very serious offense that falls under Islamic blasphemy laws and in many countries is a capital offense.

Imam Abu Hanifa was the founder of the Hanafi school of Fiqh had this to say about anyone speaking against Muhammad.

“Muslim speaking against the Messenger of Allah [Muhammad] (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) should be executed and if it is a non-Muslim who doesn’t have a contract he should also be executed.”Imam Abu Hanifa

Since CAIR, ICNA, and the other signatories on the “letter” can not exact punishment as Imam Abu Hanifa dictates in America they are now attempting a public lynching of Mr. Sam Kharoba in the press and through a sophisticated intimidation campaign against the FDLE and law enforcement.

BCOT – Building Communities of Trust Initiative

Respect and Trust for any group or individual is earned not given. Respect and Trust will not be earned by nice talk and sensitivity training. The Islamist terrorists despise weakness in their opponents (us) and BCOT is weakness personified.

CAIR is using the BCOT initiative as the foundation for their case against Mr. Kharoba. In 2010 under President Obama, BCOT was started. In the CAIR letter attacking Mr. Kharoba it states the signatories are active in BCOT. It is troubling there are self confessed terrorist supporter groups active in BCOT even though our government advisors are not concerned.

The BCOT initiative’s greater mission is to build a development of trust between law enforcement and minority communities with a focus on targeting violent extremists. Sounds all warm and fuzzy but unfortunately real life is not always so sanitary and nice.

Imagine J. Edgar Hoover and the FBI initiating a “building communities of trust” program within the neighborhoods of organized crime leaders. Hoover put agents inside these organizations and communities in order to disrupt and destroy them, he did not try to be politically correct and sensitive towards those who broke the law or were seditious to the United States.

One member of the BCOT Advisory Committee is named Muhammad Elibiary. Patrick Poole reports on 12/1/11 in PJ Media, “Mohamed Elibiary had downloaded Texas Department of Public Safety reports from a sensitive DHS database and shopped those documents to at least one left-leaning media outlet claiming that Gov. Rick Perry was running an “Islamophobia” operation.”

Mr. Elibiary’s Freedom and Justice foundation had it’s 501c3 status revoked but as of 12/2011 he was still soliciting tax exempt donations. Click here for more details.

Watch this VIDEO of Rep. Louie Gohmert questioning DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano and holding her accountable regarding Muhammad Elibiary. Video Source: Creeping Sharia

Muhammad Elibiary was working to manufacture charges of hate and intolerance against a sitting governor using classified documents and farming it out to the media. CAIR and ICNA are working from the same manufactured hate speech to destroy Mr. Sam Kharoba. Racial politics is a very powerful tool and once you get labeled, even if it’s a lie, the victim rarely gets their reputation back.

Muhammad Elibiary is still walking free and the Department of Homeland Security appears to be protecting Elibiary, based on Congressional video above.


I am going to leave you with a cut and paste directly from the President Obama DOJ BCOT initiative. You will learn about appropriate language that should be used so terrorists will not blame the U.S. government for any societal discrimination. Yes, you read that correctly.

All this feel good pop psychology babble is only hampering the effectiveness of our nations Law Enforcement community as they try to work their numerous terrorist cases.

We the people, can not afford to have Islamic Terrorist training experts like Sam Kharoba railroaded out of the FDLE, based on the trumped up charges of CAIR, an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorist funding case in United States history.

Our government and citizenry must come to the conclusion there are Islamic Terrorists operating within the fabric of our society, government, and military. The fact Mr. Kharoba’s training is effective in combatting Islamist Terrorism scares those who support Islamist terrorism the most. Remember terrorism is not always bombs and bullets. Domestic Islamist terrorism is also getting Islamist friendly public policy initiatives passed, like we see in the BTOC Initiative.

The war against Islamist Terrorism is being fought here in America. It is up to people like Sam Kharoba to educate our law enforcement communities what our adversaries believe, how they operate, and what motivates them to execute terrorist attacks on U.S. soil.

Once the basic tenets of Political Islam are taught to law enforcement and elected officials across the country, is the day America will be a much safer place to embrace life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

BTOC is not the answer America needs in these most unstable of times and why the classes Mr. Kharoba provides law enforcement on Islamist Terrorism are more important than ever.

BTOC Initiative: Understand and Use Appropriate Language and Terminology before Taking Action

To avoid misusing terms such as radical, radicalism, extremist, and violent extremism, the police, fusion center personnel, and analysts must understand the culture of communities that are impacted by their various investigative approaches.

Police officers, crime analysts, and intelligence analysts cannot use race, ethnicity, national origin, or religious affiliation as factors to support suspicion and trigger investigations. There is an inherent danger in publicly highlighting the views espoused by violent extremists in such a way that those views are perceived to be held by the majority of an immigrant or minority community. To do so can be counterproductive for law enforcement and could inhibit the development of trust between law enforcement and the community, since it is likely that these communities could find themselves typecast in a prejudicial way , blaming law enforcement and, more generally, the government, for societal discrimination.

Always do your own research and come to your own conclusions.

God Bless America and God Bless Our Troops

One Team One Fight

Alan Kornman


Dozens of parents in Tampa, Florida, are outraged after finding out that a member of the controversial Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) spoke to history students at Steinbrenner High School last fall. Dozens of parents showed up at the Hillsborough County school board meeting on Tuesday night to make their frustrations known. Among their concerns, as FOX News reports, the parents discussed the group’s alleged ties to a terror financing case involving Hamas.

MyFoxTampaBay describes the meeting that took place earlier this week:

Dozens flooded into the school board meeting to try and convince members not to allow CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) representatives to talk to public school students, claiming the group has ties to terrorism.
Amid the uproar, a board member made a motion to schedule a workshop that would include presentations from CAIR and the education coalition.
“We want a public workshop so that these folks who don’t understand what the truth is about this can hear the truth,” said Terry Kemple of the community issues council.
That motion was voted down.

This isn’t the first meeting during which this issue has come up. Video posted on YouTube at the end of January shows various community members voicing their concern:
CAIR is widely known as one of the nation’s premiere — not to mention the largest — Islamic civil liberties organizations. In recent years, the group has come under government and media scrutiny after being named by the Justice Department as a co-conspirator in a massive terror-financing case involving the Holy Land Foundation (read more about the Holy Land Foundation and CAIR).

CAIR is widely known as one of the nation’s premiere — not to mention the largest — Islamic civil liberties organizations. In recent years, the group has come under government and media scrutiny after being named by the Justice Department as a co-conspirator in a massive terror-financing case involving the Holy Land Foundation (read more about the Holy Land Foundation and CAIR).

The outraged parents weren’t upset that a Muslim had come to speak to students, they said. Instead, it was this aforementioned alleged terror connection that led to angst and concern.

“We do not have a problem with Islamic groups speaking with students, but we do have an issue with a group that has ties to terrorism speaking,” said Randall McDaniels. McDaniels’ group, ACT for America, seeks to prevent CAIR members from speaking in public schools; he leads the organization’s Jacksonville chapter.

“As a concerned citizen, and a mom-to-be, I would not allow you to have this man in the school, speaking to my child,” said resident Kimberly Kelley. “This is my right as a mom, and as a parent, and as a taxpayer.”

Despite these statements, CAIR is dismissing the need for concern over one of its members speaking to students. Spokesman Corey Saylor dismissed the response as “fear-mongering” and Hassan Shibly, the executive director of CAIR Tampa who spoke to the students, claims that the parents are incorrect in their insinuations.

“This hatred and animosity only shows the importance of reaching out to the community,” he said, “It’s insulting to the school and the students to think that one person can influence their beliefs. It’s misleading.”

Shibly also made the point that, if critics’ allegations were correct, CAIR would have already been shut down by the government.

“Given the current security environment — how Muslims are under the microscope — if any of the allegations that they had against us were true, our organization would have been shut down years ago,” he said.


NO You Aren’t, You are a Muslim Who is Desecrating The American Flag
Lefties and Muslims seek to remove the right of private businesses to establish their own dress codes for the safety of the workplace and the comfort of their customers. Hire a Muslim at your own peril.
Hamas-linked CAIR posted the video below. California Assembly member Mariko Yamada announced the introduction of a bill that clarifies the religious rights of workers.

The democrat from Davis held a news conference in West Sacramento, saying that confusion over the 1964 Civil Rights Act has caused employers to treat Sikhs and Muslims who wear religious head dress and beards differently.

Yamada says workers are often segregated by companies with strict dress codes because workers are often not allowed to deal with customers. Instead, they are assigned office or storeroom duties as an accommodation for religious beliefs.[youtube][/youtube]

SEO Powered By SEOPressor