Posts Tagged ‘Communists’

By: Stacy Coleman

As I dig deeper into this Wall Street occupation, the more I have an understanding on what President Obama’s campaign promise really meant. Of course, I am talking about his “Fundamental Transformation” of America, and the very Republic on which we were founded. I would like to first of all say that I am sorry for the length of this article, and the massive volume of information included in this particular piece. This information is of the highest importance for us to have, though in order to paint a clear picture as to what is behind this very anthem of Obama.

Through all of my research, I have come to the conclusion that the occupying of Wall Street is three-fold in my belief spurred on by the current residents of the White House. This movement will do a tri-fold action on our country, and it will work on all fronts that are all part and parcel to this administration’s agenda. I have been scouring YouTube for coverage in their own words, this way, they could not be taken out of context. Let us move on to show how bad this movement could become, if we let it have a snowball effect by not letting the truth be told. This is just another case that exists because the main stream media has dropped the ball, and they have allowed the co-opting by the Obama administration to continue to go unchecked.

First, let us get into something, not too many people are talking about as far as this movement is concerned. This will be its negative views on our dearest friend Israel. First thing we must do is see how our President views Israel in his words.

“http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbcyuRjiK4A

Calls for 1967 Borders for Israeli-Palestinian States”After studying these borders, it is easy to see that Israel will never be able to clearly defend these perspective borders. After remembering this aspect we must be able to discern the feelings that Obama must by default have towards our Jewish friends. Let us take a quick look on what he thinks about the protesters from the Wall Street occupation.

Obama: Wall Street protests express what people feel, from CNN News once again in his own words supporting the movement.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLYRATSi-uU

Now let us take a few minutes to look at some Anti-Semitism at Occupy Wall Street Protest these are just two examples of many that one can choose from, which are all readily available to anyone online.

Anti-Semitic Protester at Occupy Wall Street – LA

Anti-Semitism at Occupy Wall Street Protest

CAIR Joins Occupy Wall Street: Will Hold Friday Prayers in Zuccotti Park. With this information fresh in your mind, let’s see who has now joined the effort. The full article can be read by clicking here at TheBlaze.com

From The Blaze:

“An official invitation issued by CAIR’s New York chapter tells members to show “solidarity” with “the 99%” by attending Friday prayers in Zuccotti Park at 1:00pm. CAIR’s stated goal in hosting the prayer service at OWS is to “expand the role of New York Muslims in the Occupy movement.”

With all of the information just presented this does not go well for people of the Jewish faith. Every time, as history has shown, that a global movement starts the first target is that of the Jew, simply because evil always tries to separate people from God.

Let us turn our attention to the person that has been credited for the beginning of this movement. This will be the second fold of the Wall Street movement. This is Steven Lerner once again in his own words calling for the movement to collapse the banking industry.

This is just one of many people involved with the current President, who has hands on interaction with this movement. The following person in the next two clips is Van Jones, a former Czar of Mr. Obama.

Van Jones “Top Down, Bottom Up Movement”

These people are wanting to transform America into something else. In order to accomplish this task, they must force a revolution to cause chaos. Let me show you how they intend to do this. This second part, which we just previously discussed, can shape the third part class warfare which will result in a deeper divide in America. Contrast the two movements: The Tea Party and the newest Occupy Wall Street movement. Keep in mind how the Tea Party was viewed in the media, being hatemongerers, fringe, unpatriotic and racist. Let me show just a few examples of both movements. The images reflect many truths that the media’s bias seems to see differently than the media consumer.

Rosanne Barr at wall street:

Do these look like peaceful protestors?

Tea Party typical hatefull patriotism:

The last video is a 9/12 video that one again, The Tea Part is shown as the destroyers of America, by all in the main stream media.

After seeing all the evidence, I have laid out here in this article, it is easy to see that this movement has a three-pronged effect. The first being that of Israel,and yet again giving this administration a chance to step on them. Then this movement will cause an uprising and class warfare to which has not been seen on this soil since the days of the Civil War. Then the last and most important step will be the very people who caused this to come in to end the suffering from the very movement they caused. Let us not be sheep led to slaughter; let us, as the Bible teaches us be as harmless as a dove but also as wise as a serpent. If we all stay motivated, as well as, educated, this movement will not get off the ground. This could even have long reaching effects into the election if we are not careful. We all know that the President will do whatever he can to side step Congress because he already has before. May God continue to bless America.

This is a part of the very reason this movement will take root like no other in our past. For the first time in American history we are no longer contected to who we were as a nation.

The progressive movements though our schools and Universities have washed our history away. In some cases all but have had it rewritten in what is known as revisionism. This same movement has also chipped away at our connection to God, as well. America has been slowly turned to a place where the Wall Street movement can become greater than it ever could have been. Do not take this lightly. Please be aware of everything they do, and do not be swept into violence, as this is how they win.

On Friday at the National Center for Education Statistics website, the Department of Education posted a quote of the day from a great hero of the Obama administration: Mao Zedong. “Our attitude towards ourselves should be ‘to be satiable in learning’ and towards others ‘to be tireless in teaching.’”
As of this afternoon, the quote had been removed.

Valerie Jarrett is going to head Barack Hussein Obama’s meeting with business leaders today. This one of the biggest farces I’ve seen from BO to date – nothing is going to come out of this meeting. These CEOs are going to sit there and listen to BARAK OBAMA read from a teleprompter. And FYI, the last time that BARAK OBAMA met with his jobs council was Jan 2012. Today is nothing more than a photo op. And, there’s no small business representation, and no bank CEOs. BARAK OBAMA does not care what businesses have to say.

by Amie Parnes and Niall Stanage

President Obama and the heads of several labor unions and prominent liberal groups met at the White House on Tuesday at an event that was more pep rally than negotiating session.

Obama and the participants largely focused on areas on which they agree: in particular, the need to extend low tax rates for the middle class while letting them expire for wealthier households, according to people who attended the 45-minute meeting.

There was much less talk about possible areas of disagreement between Obama and his progressive partners, such as on cuts to entitlement spending.
“The president has been very clear for quite a while now on the tax cuts on the wealthiest 2 percent — that they need to be eliminated,” said Dennis Van Roekel, the head of the National Education Association (NEA). “Of course, there was no disagreement in that room.”

The meeting was billed as a chance to discuss the best ways to move the economy forward while finding a balanced approach to reduce the deficit, and it took place as lawmakers and the White House wrangle over how to handle tax hikes and spending cuts that take effect in January.

The heads of four of the nation’s largest unions —the Service Employees International Union, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, the NEA and the AFL-CIO — were all in attendance. So were representatives from prominent progressive groups, including the Center for American Progress and MoveOn.

Obama will host a second White House meeting on Wednesday with business leaders including the CEOs of Ford, General Electric and Wal-Mart.

Republicans are demanding that Obama accept entitlement reforms and spending cuts as part of a deficit-reduction package, while the president has said he will only agree to a compromise that includes higher taxes on the wealthy.

The White House and many Democrats believe that Obama, owing to his reelection victory, has leverage in the talks. Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) last week suggested a willingness to consider raising tax revenue, while over the weekend GOP pundit Bill Kristol suggested an openness to higher taxes on the wealthy.

“The mood of labor leaders and progressive leaders is pretty positive right now,” Van Roekel said. “A lot of good things have happened, and that sets the stage for this very well.”

He added that the election’s outcome was “not just about who was elected, but about values. The voters had the choice of having Medicare by vouchers, and they rejected that. They had the choice of cutting Social Security, and they rejected that.”

At the meeting itself and in conversations afterward, activists were keen to stress agreement with the president on the tax issue.

“It was a great meeting. The president was really standing firm on taxes. Everyone talked about how much they have the president’s back in this fight,” Neera Tanden, the president of the Center for American Progress, said afterward.

Attendees said Obama was “very clear” on where he stood on taxes. “He’s not just clear, he didn’t just draw a line in the sand, he spray-painted it,” one participant said.

The activists first met with the president’s economic team, headed by Gene Sperling, along with senior adviser Valerie Jarrett, before being joined by Obama and Vice President Biden. Obama began the meeting by expressing his gratitude to union leaders and the other progressives for their efforts in securing his reelection.

Tanden said there was “a lot of energy” at the meeting and that there “wasn’t fighting” in the room. But participants — including some women’s groups — also had an opportunity to air some of their concerns as the president “mostly listened,” observers say.

Obama “wasn’t talking about what was on or off the table” and didn’t discuss specifics in terms of Social Security, one participant said.

During the meeting, participants said they briefly touched upon issues such as sequestration — the $1.2 trillion in spending cuts set to begin in January under last summer’s congressional deal to raise the debt ceiling — along with Medicare and Medicaid.

“There was some concern that policies like Medicaid needed to be protected,” one attendee said.

Obama told the participants that the “campaign isn’t over,” and asked for their help.

It is the kind of assistance that the activists are only too happy to provide.

“We are keeping our folks active and ready to go,” Van Roekel said. “It’s not just about the 535 people who are in Congress. They ought to be making a decision that’s right for 300 million Americans. And we intend to hold their feet to the fire.”

Unhappy with the results of last night’s peaceful, orderly exercise of democracy, the anarchists,Unions and Communists associated with the occupy movement took to the streets of Milwaukee tonight for an impromptu march. Exclusive video from Breitbart News’ Jeremy Segal shows the march in its inception. As of 7:05 ET, there was one arrest reported.

by Sher Zieve
The revolutionary and Luciferian (he dedicated his book “Rules for Radicals” to Lucifer…aka Satan) Saul Alinsky said ““True revolutionaries do not flaunt their radicalism, Alinsky taught. They cut their hair, put on suits and infiltrate the system from within.” Alinsky also taught that community organizing (aka ‘teaching radicalism and Satanic concepts’) must begin at the local level and in a forceful manner. Karl Marx, his partner Frederich Engels and Vladimir Lenin wrote and believed the same. Adolph Hitler, along with Marx and the rest, also believed that environmental elements and ‘saving the planet’ were excellent ploys to be brought into every speech and were needed in order to shame and bully a population into submission. It worked—and still works—remarkably well.

Today, in the USA and the rest of the world, we now have the UN Agenda 21—which, in New Rochelle, NY (as well as other towns and cities throughout the nation), is attempting implementation via ICLEI (International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives). At one fell swoop, a city becomes part of the “international community” and is no longer accountable to its State or nation. And without the population realizing it, the city becomes part of the international order and one-world government commences with its attendant end to freedom, self-determination and the right to make any life decisions on one’s own. Thus, the end of liberty—and life as we know it—begins.

So it is in New Rochelle, New York.

Robert Cox is the Managing Editor of Talk of the Sound, the leading news web site in New Rochelle, NY.

Cox has been a pioneer in citizen journalism since 2002. As President of the Media Bloggers Association, he opened the door for bloggers to cover presidential debates, major sporting events, federal courts and corporate shareholder meetings, to name a few. He worked with a major insurance company to create the first-ever media liability insurance product for bloggers. He partnered with Harvard Law School and the Poynter Institute, to create a training program on media liability for online publishers at NewsU. Cox was part of the inaugural exhibit on citizen journalism at the Newseum in Washington, DC as the first blogger formally credentialed to cover a federal trial (US. v. Lewis “Scooter” Libby). He has lectured at numerous events at journalism conferences and journalism schools, events for the federal judiciary and new media conferences. He has appeared on all of the major cable news networks and numerous national talk radio shows.

Cox has a BA from the University of Notre Dame and MBA from the University of Chicago. He lives in New Rochelle, NY with his wife and children.

The Interview
Sher: Robert, thanks so much for taking the time, today, to speak to my readers. When we spoke a few days ago, we talked at length about how Agenda 21 has been introduced into the New Rochelle community via ICLEI or the “International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives.” Through ICLEI, the United Nations’ Agenda 21—which is designed to take over all local authority via its guise of a “sustainability agenda”—takes control of and makes decisions on virtually everything within a city and/or county. What initially prompted you to school yourself on Agenda 21 and to pursue a campaign against it?

Robert: During his annual State of the City Address in 2009, Mayor Bramson announced that New Rochelle was one of three localities selected for an ICLEI Pilot Program. That was the first time I had ever heard the word “ICLEI”. I am sure that many of the people in room applauding the announcement had never heard of ICLEI either. I later learned that many believed that the Mayor was announcing some sort of federal grant.
I have learned that when our Mayor is talking about something I have never heard of before, it is a good idea to do some research. The more I learned about ICLEI the more concerned I became about it.

Sher: New Rochelle’s Mayor Noam Bramson has been highly in favor of pushing the ICLEI agenda onto the city and may not have provided accurate information about what may or will befall New Rochelle if the program is implemented. What has been his response to your enlightening the community as to the real extent of its (and his) purpose?

Robert: My deepest concern with ICLEI in New Rochelle is that our Mayor and his supporters have gone to great lengths to misrepresent ICLEI as a homegrown association of local governments staffed by eager 30-something staffers who want to do good. The Mayor has repeatedly denied any association between New Rochelle and the United Nations despite the undeniable and rather obvious fact that New Rochelle is a member of ICLEI and ICLEI is a part of the UN system to implement Agenda 21.

When an ICLEI representative appeared before our City Council she flat-out lied in responding to a direct question on the origins and funding of ICLEI.

I might add that our City Council never held a vote to authorize joining ICLEI. When asked about this at a public meeting by Council Member Louis Trangucci, our City Manager said that joining ICLEI was implied when the ICLEI representative spoke before Council.

As for our Mayor, he has sought to demonize and demagogue the issue. He refuses to address legitimate questions about ICLEI, instead engaging in ad hominem attacks. As the leading critic of ICLEI in New Rochelle, much of his vitriol has been directed at me. A fair amount has gone to Council Member Trangucci who was the only member of Council to vote against the Mayor’s Local Agenda 21 Plan named GreeNR.

Sher: One of the things we discussed over the phone was that Mayor Bramson had told you and others that “there is no relationship between New Rochelle and the UN”. Yet, a husband and wife team (Steven and Mrs. Nakashima) in the community who were appointed by Mayor Bramson to assist in implementing the program both work for the United Nations. I also understand that Mrs. Nakashima’s work at the UN involves running an Agenda 21 organization. Has Mayor Bramson explained his previous contradictory statement?

Robert: The Mayor has repeatedly dismissed any expression of concern about the connections between his GreeNR plan and ICLEI and the UN’s Agenda 21 Plan as the stuff of conspiracy theories.
Not only is there a direct connection between ICLEI and the UN but the mayor appointed a UN employee to his advisory board, the spouse of a senior UN official.

Steven Nakashima is a UN employee who works in the Avian Flu program. His wife is Sophie de Caen. She is the Director of the $1 billion MDG Achievement Fund in New York. MDG stands for Millennium Development Goals. Goal 7, but listed first on her site, is Environment and Climate Change where the stated goal is to “integrate the principles of sustainable development into country policies and programmes”.

I have, so far, found direct connections to the UN for two other Advisory Board members.

Sher: What are you now doing to educate the people of New Rochelle and other communities about these organizations’ true agenda of eliminating the sovereignty of the USA and individual States, in favor of a one world government organization?

Robert: My focus is to educate New Rochelle residents on the large gap between the Mayor’s rhetoric and reality at a local level. It is enough for me to educate residents on the fact that New Rochelle joined ICLEI without any public hearing or public discussion or City Council vote. That our being part of the ICLEI pilot program has not been the source of federal grant money but instead has required spending hundreds of thousands of dollars.

I want New Rochelleans to understand that the Mayor is not being factual when he denies any connection between his GreeNR plan and the United Nations. There is the direct connection that runs from ICLEI to Local Agenda 21 to Agenda 21 and the UN Commission on Sustainable Development. His GreeNR plan is a UNCSD Local Agenda 21 Plan. It does not get any more direct than that.

Sher: If anyone would like to reach you for more information or to invite you for a speaking engagement, how should they contact you?

Robert: The best way to reach me is through the contact information on Talk of the Sound.

Sher: Thanks again, Robert, and we wish you the very best!