Posts Tagged ‘Dirty Democrats’

The Chick Who STARTED Chicago Trump Riots Was Getting PAID BY DNC

Zulema Rodgriguez, paid thug. You won’t believe who is footing the bill.

An activist who bragged about disrupting multiple Donald Trump campaign events in a recent Project Veritas video was on Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s campaign payroll, a search of Federal Election Commission (FEC) records reveals.
In a Veritas video released Monday, filmmaker and provocateur James O’Keefe recounts meeting activist Zulema Rodriguez at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland. In the video, Rodriguez takes credit for violent protests in Chicago that forced Trump to cancel a March rally.
…Notably, a search of FEC records reveals that Rodriguez was paid by the Clinton campaign shortly before she disrupted the Chicago rally. The campaign paid her $1,610.34 as a “payroll” expense, and also gave her a $30 payment that is described only as “phone.”
Read more: The Daily Caller
Rodriguez also admits to involvement in an Arizona protest that shut down the highway.

Since two cops were injured in Chicago, maybe Rodriguez can pay their hospital bill. After all, she’s bringing in the big bucks from Hillary’s campaign.


Is there a depth that these people WON’T sink to?

Well, there are still 20 days left.

We’re sure to find out.



Court filing suggests courtroom collusion against Arpaio

MORE DIRTY DEMS -Voting Machine in Chicago Hardwired to Vote Democrat

voting_machineA Republican candidate in Chicago, Jim Moynihan, tried to vote for himself in early elections and was surprised to find that the voting machine registered a vote for his opponent, a Democrat:

While using a touch screen voting machine in Schaumburg, Moynihan voted for several races on the ballot, only to find that whenever he voted for a Republican candidate, the machine registered the vote for a Democrat in the same race. He notified the election judge at his polling place and demonstrated that it continued to cast a vote for the opposing candidate’s party. Moynihan was eventually allowed to vote for Republican candidates, including his own race.

This is probably an isolated error, right? There’s just no way that this was an intentional rigging of the election. Right. As the midterm elections heat up, with Republicans slated to win a vast majority of seats in Congress, it seems that Democrats are doing whatever it takes to win. Honestly, this is just par for the course. Voting machine tampering has become more of an issue over the years, and there is good reason to believe voting machines aren’t accurately tallying votes.

Of course, this issue has been widely reported on when it comes to Democrat votes being switched to Republican. The documentary Hacking Democracy showed how easily Diebold voting machines could be hacked. Of course, the film-makers pointed to a vast right-wing conspiracy to change votes and steal elections. But it has been less widely publicized when a voting machine turns left. When a voting machine votes Democrat, it’s a computer glitch or a hardware error. If it turns Republican, it’s the center of some Republican conspiracy.

How about this, though? It’s likely that machines go both ways. It’s very likely that both parties has people within them that are willing to do whatever it takes, even cheating the system, to get their own people elected. And if it is the case that a voting machine could easily be tampered with, perhaps we should just return to paper ballots and a bipartisan counting committee which has to agree on numbers before they are released. Otherwise, we’ll never really know.

An important quote, often attributed to Joseph Stalin, applies here, “I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this—who will count the votes, and how.” Indeed.


Democrat Crime Wave Sweeps America

LeelandYeeLiberal views do not respect laws.
Check it out:

Just a little juxtaposition. Yesterday we had story after story after story on the latest crime wave in this country, and that crime wave is corrupt Democrat officeholders — mayors, state senators, you name it.

In fact, I want to show you something on the Dittocam. The NRA already out with an ad in California about San Francisco Democrat Leland Yee, and I want to hold this up to you. I’m gonna describe it ’cause those of you who don’t have the Dittocam are not gonna be able to see it. It’s a picture, billboard shaped, of a smiling, happy San Francisco Democrat Leland Yee. On the left side under his face it says “State Senator” in red, “2006: A+ Rated by the Brady Campaign, a national gun control group.”

On the right side of his face as you look at this: “2014: Arrested by the FBI for Trafficking Firearms.” Are you ready? There is the ad. Now, that is how you do it. The NRA is already out. Is that not a perfect-looking billboard? There you have San Francisco Democrat Leland Yee.

So, in addition to that, we had all these other mayors and so forth, and what did ABC’s World News Tonight open with last night? Seven minutes with Chris Christie. Worse than Obamacare and lying. They opened with seven minutes. In a 22-minute newscast, a seven-minute interview with Governor Christie over this Bridgegate business and his own internal investigation which exonerated him. And that’s the name of the game. That is how the Democrats at ABC News decided to circle the wagons yesterday.

So we’ll have more detail on the pope and also this crime wave that is sweeping. By the way, I’ve run into a bunch of people, you know, I offered a theory yesterday because a lot of people were saying, “You know, there’s not one Republican here that has been stung by the FBI. Every one of these major elected figures indicted for corruption, gun trafficking in this case, child pornography in another case, they’re all Democrats.”


13 Democrats Charged with Embezzling Millions from Charity

by Onan Cocawrightandsonmocrats

Leave it to the sleazy down-home Democrats of the Midwest to steal more than $16 Million from various charities, including one for those suffering from AIDS. Also not so surprising, several of the scammers have ties to President Barack Obama, including one who happens to be related to President Obama’s friend and former pastor Jeremiah “God Damn America” Wright.

The U.S. attorney’s office in Springfield has been busy the past few years investigating a variety of fraud schemes involving state grants. Thirteen people have been charged so far, six who have pleaded guilty.

Two of them have ties to President Barack Obama. One is the daughter of his controversial former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Another was chief of staff to Obama’s longtime friend Eric E. Whitaker when Whitaker was Illinois’ public health chief.

In all, prosecutors are alleging a total of $16 million in fraud involving state health or commerce department grants and contracts.

Why hasn’t this news about 13 prominent Democrats been circulating among the main stream media? Who knows? Maybe it’s another example of liberal corruption. Maybe they don’t think the story is “national news.” To me the most likely scenario is the media doesn’t want to sully the Democrat brand with these philandering monsters.

wrightandsonWhat about those connections to President Obama? One is the daughter of Jeremiah Wright and the other is the daughter of Obama mentor Danny Davis.

Defendant: Jeri L. Wright, daughter of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright

Charges: Money laundering and making a false statement before a grand jury

Details: Wright, described as a “close associate and friend” of Regina and Ronald Evans, is accused of aiding the Evanses in their money-laundering scheme.


Defendant: Quinshaunta R. Golden, former Illinois Department of Public Health chief of staff

Charges: Bribery/theft, mail fraud and obstruction of justice

Details: Golden, a niece of U.S. Rep. Danny K. Davis (D-Ill.), is accused of pocketing about $433,000 in kickbacks on health department contracts and grants that she oversaw.

Just goes to show you – you really do need to keep your hands on your wallet when there is a Democrat around.


$9,000,000,000,000 Missing From The Federal Reserve

Rep. Alan Grayson questions the FED inspector General where $9 TRillion dollars went… and Inspector General Elizabeth Coleman hasn’t a clue…Dunno whether to laugh or cry – I am still getting over the shock and have watched 4 times – LISTEN carefully to what she says – THEY HAVE NO JURISTRICTION to investigate the fed!!! Only their programs?? OK the world has been fooled long enough ENOUGH ENOUGH!!! Get the hell outa paper money people and if you buy gold and silver – get the real stuff not paper gold etc. This is pure evil!
I am not sure exactly when this took place – anyone have any idea when this was?

Stolen Elections: 20% of Ohio Voters Were Bogus

vampire_obama-275x300Barack Obama defeated* Mitt Romney by 166,214 votes in Ohio in 2012. That’s out of 5,489,028 votes cast. So Obama’s victory margin was just 3 percent, 50 to 47 over Romney.

But 20% of Ohio’s voters should not be on the rolls at all, according to a story in the Columbus Dispatch.

More than one out of every five registered Ohio voters is probably ineligible to vote.

In two counties, the number of registered voters actually exceeds the voting-age population: Northwestern Ohio’s Wood County shows 109 registered voters for every 100 eligible, while in Lawrence County along the Ohio River it’s a mere 104 registered per 100 eligible.

Another 31 counties show registrations at more than 90 percent of those eligible, a rate regarded as unrealistic by most voting experts. The national average is a little more than 70 percent.

Ohio’s elections chief, Secretary of State Jon Husted, sought help from Attorney General Eric Holder to clean up the state’s roles. You may have guessed how that went, as Husted is a Republican.
In a Feb. 10 letter, he asked U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder for a personal meeting to discuss how to balance seemingly conflicting federal laws so he could pare Ohio’s dirty voter list without removing truly eligible voters.

“Common sense says that the odds of voter fraud increase the longer these ineligible voters are allowed to populate our rolls,” Husted said. “I simply cannot accept that.”

Holder’s office has never replied.

Among the ineligible voters who remain on Ohio’s rolls include 1.8 million dead people and nearly 3 million who have registered to vote in multiple states. Both of these situations are ripe for voter fraud and it just so happens that fraud did occur in the last several Ohio elections, including 2008 and 2012. Obama won both of those.


Democrats and the IRS – WALL STREET JOURNAL – 5-16-2013

Chuck Schumer wanted the agency to probe tax-exempt political groups.
President Obama fired acting IRS Commissioner Steven Miller on Wednesday, two days after claiming it was an “independent” agency. That was certainly a rapid re-education. But Mr. Miller shouldn’t be the only fall guy, because the 54-page report released Tuesday by the Treasury Inspector General of Tax Administration makes clear that the tax agency tried to quash the political speech of groups opposed to Democrats during a Presidential election.
NY/NJ Political Leaders Call For Investigation Into Gas PricesBeginning in early 2010, the report says, IRS officials in Cincinnati began using “inappropriate criteria that identified for review Tea Party and other organizations applying for tax-exempt status based upon their names or policy positions instead of indications of potential political campaign intervention.” The Cincinnati workers also developed a spreadsheet that was dubbed “Be On The Look Out” with key words to target conservative groups.

Over the next 18 months those groups found their applications delayed, and they were served with aggressive and burdensome questionnaires as part of the process of applying for tax-exempt status. Of the 170 groups that got requests for extra information, the Treasury report finds that 98 or 58% of the requests were unnecessary.

IRS defenders have said in recent days that the operation wasn’t really partisan because tea party and similar groups only made up a third of all groups flagged for additional scrutiny. But according to the report, “all cases with Tea Party, Patriots, or 9/12 in their names were forwarded to the team of specialists” (our emphasis). Of the 296 applications that were selected as “potential political cases,” 91 of them, or 31%, were selected for scrutiny even though they showed no evidence of major political campaign activity.

Once they were selected, the report confirms they were slow-tracked: While a few applications got attention, the vast majority sat interminably as the 2012 campaign rolled on. According to the report, “No work was completed on the majority of these applications for 13 months.” And “all applications that were forwarded to the team of specialists experienced substantial delays in processing.” The political cases took the IRS some 574 days on average to process compared to 238 days for other nonprofit applications.

Those delays effectively sidelined the political activity of groups that would have opposed the re-election of President Obama and other Democratic priorities. The report acknowledges that “For I.R.C. § 501(c)(3) organizations, this means that potential donors and grantors could be reluctant to provide donations or grants. In addition, some organizations withdrew their applications and others may not have begun conducting planned charitable or social welfare work.”

It’s no surprise, then, that Democrats have been angling to blame all this on the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision to allow more independent campaign spending. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi responded to the scandal by saying that “We must overturn Citizens United, which has exacerbated the challenges posed by some of these so-called ‘social welfare’ organizations.” So a Supreme Court decision justifies selective tax enforcement?

Ms. Pelosi’s remarks are revealing because they underscore that Democratic agitation to restrict political speech may have driven this IRS dragnet. In a September 2010 letter to then-IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman, Montana Senator Max Baucus encouraged the IRS to investigate the use of nonprofit status by conservative groups. Noting media reports on conservative groups like Crossroads GPS, American Action Network and Americans for Job Security, Mr. Baucus wrote that there are “serious questions about whether such organizations are operating in compliance with the Internal Revenue Code.”

In March 2012, New York Senator Chuck Schumer and six other Democrats signed a letter demanding that the IRS put a “cap” on spending by nonprofits or face legislation. In the meantime, they wrote, the groups should be forced to “show their math” to prove that they deserve the tax-exempt status they are applying for. “The IRS should already possess the authority to issue immediate guidance on this matter,” the Senators wrote.

Before he was fired Wednesday, Mr. Miller, the acting IRS commissioner identified two “rogue” Cincinnati workers as the puppeteers behind the overly “aggressive” enforcement. But don’t be surprised if they thought they were merely following the direction of Senate Democrats.

Whether these T-men were dumb or ambitious, count us skeptical that the buck stops there. The report blames much of the debacle on inefficient management or inadequate oversight of low-level workers. But IRS Exempt Organizations Director Lois Lerner has years of experience that include 20 years at the Federal Election Commission, including as Acting General Counsel.

The report also lobs some softballs that deserve follow-ups. On page 7, the report notes that “We asked the Acting Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division; the Director, EO; and Determinations Unit personnel if the criteria were influenced by any individual or organization outside the IRS. All of these officials stated that the criteria were not influenced by any individual or organization outside the IRS.” So, that’s it? Let’s get that one answered under oath.

An IRS culture of politicized enforcement has shown up elsewhere too. The ProPublica website said recently that in 2012 the Cincinnati IRS gave it the confidential nonprofit applications of nine conservative groups, of which ProPublica later published six. The ProPublica reports were exploring the theme that Ms. Pelosi and Democrats sounded on tax-exemptions and political spending.

These leaks are an abuse of power. By all means let’s hear from the folks in Cincinnati, but the idea that conservative group tax-exemptions should be targeted also has a Washington pedigree.

A version of this article appeared May 16, 2013, on page A14 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: Democrats and the IRS.

SEO Powered By SEOPressor