Categories
Archives
HELP US KEEP YOU BETTER INFORMED ABOUT THE TRICKS OF THE RADICAL PROGRESSIVE REVOLUTION PLEASE DONATE ANY AMOUNT YOU CAN
target="_top">

Posts Tagged ‘dirty’

LA County Is Telling Illegal Immigrants How to Get Free Money/Benefits Paid for by Working Americans

In Los Angeles County they are handing out information to illegal immigrants on how to get free money/benefits paid for by working Americans.

The flyer reads:
New USCIS guidelines permit immigrants and their children to use certain non-cash benefits and special purpose cash benefits without affecting their immigration status including:

* Medi-Cal
* Food Stamps
* Healthy Families
* Prenatal Care
* Foster Care
* Adoption assistance
* Transportation vouchers
* Housing assistance
* Energy assistance

John Kasich Takes $700K From Socialist George Soros

main-george-soros-chaos
By Lori

Apparently John Kasich will take money from anyone. After finding his campaign unable to finance ads in Utah, Kasich finally got bankrolled $700,000 to keep going — courtesy of none other than George Soros. According to Kasich, he’s just trying to keep Trump below 15 percent in Utah. “Well, Trump is at 10 percent. He’s not at 15 percent; he’s at 10 percent,” Glenn said Monday on The Glenn Beck Program. “And why, Kasich, are your ads aimed at Cruz?” That’s a very good question. Another is why would George Soros would give money to a Republican presidential candidate. As usual, Soros is using his money to rig a preferred outcome — and that preference is not likely to be stopping Donald Trump. “If that was what you were trying to do, you would fund Cruz, you wouldn’t fund Kasich,” Glenn said. “You would fund the guy who actually has a chance of doing it.” Glenn also shared some behind-the-scenes intel on why Kasich is staying in the race. “No matter what happens, he’s not getting out because he thinks that he’s Abraham Lincoln,” Glenn said.

Source: http://www.glennbeck.com/2016/03/21/john-kasich-takes-700k-from-socialist-george-soros/?utm_source=glennbeck&utm_medium=contentcopy_link

Below is a rush transcript of this segment, it might contain errors: GLENN: George Soros also is giving 700 — or, gave $700,000 to Kasich’s campaign. PAT: Yeah. And the article — this appeared in both CNS News and Breitbart and other places over the weekend, even though it’s mathematically — not just mathematically impossible for Kasich to win, he also has to win eight states before he can be considered at the convention, and that’s not going to happen either. I mean, he’s one for 28 right now. He knows. GLENN: Kasich knows he’s not — here’s the behind the scenes: Talked to several people over the weekend who have spoken to John Kasich. Some of them are his friends. And I’ve said, “What are you doing? What is happening? You’re a friend with John Kasich. Have you talked to him?” “Oh, yes, I have. Yes, I have.” “What does he say?” “He’s not getting out. He thinks he’s Abraham Lincoln.” PAT: Good golly. GLENN: Those are his friends. PAT: I know Abraham Lincoln. You’re no Abraham Lincoln. GLENN: Abraham Lincoln, so he went to the convention, and it was a contested convention, and he won in like the ninth vote. And that’s how we have Abraham Lincoln: He won in the ninth vote. John Kasich thinks — he’s not getting out. No matter what happens, he’s not getting out because he thinks that he’s Abraham Lincoln. PAT: So just — it was a simple search of Kasich’s campaign donation list, and they found that the Soros fund management is the sixth highest individual donor with $202,700. GLENN: What does that tell you? PAT: Seventh largest donor is the Ducane HEP Family Office, with 150. The super PAC side, Kasich’s New Day for America received 150,000 from Stanley HEP Druckenmiller, who operates the Ducane family office. All of these, you know, employed by the Soros Fund Management Team. So he’s — all together, if you add it up, it’s $700,000 from Soros people. Soros and his surrogates giving to the Kasich campaign. What is that about? GLENN: Soros — so you know, Kasich couldn’t run ads in Utah. Suddenly, he finds enough money to run ads in Utah. And he says, “Hey, I’m just trying to keep Trump under 15 percent.” Well, Trump is at 10 percent. He’s not at 15 percent; he’s at 10 percent. And why, Kasich, are your ads aimed at Cruz? PAT: Yeah, you would think they would be aimed at Trump. GLENN: He is going after Cruz, and he’s being a surrogate for Donald Trump. Now, I don’t know how the Soros thing works and what Soros — what game Soros is playing, other than trying to keep Cruz out. PAT: Yeah. And they’re saying he’s trying to keep Trump out. I doubt that. GLENN: Who, Soros is? I don’t think — PAT: I think it’s likely he’s trying to keep Cruz out. GLENN: If that was what you were trying to do, you would fund Cruz, you wouldn’t fund Kasich. You would fund the guy who actually has a chance of doing it. PAT: Yeah. GLENN: I don’t know, but I know this: Soros like the imams over in Iran, like the — the people over in Europe that are — what is it, The Coming Insurrection people, like Occupy Wall Street, like Black Lives Matter, they all want one thing, and that is chaos.

Source: http://www.glennbeck.com/2016/03/21/john-kasich-takes-700k-from-socialist-george-soros/?utm_source=glennbeck&utm_medium=contentcopy_link

Leaked Email Reveals Left’s Long Term Strategy to Control the USA

clintonsoros
A memo has leaked recently as part of the WikiLeaks releases from the account of Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, John Podesta. In it, the dark money Clinton talks about is actually evidenced — and it is being funneled to the left in an effort to fundamentally transform the United States.

The Daily Caller reported:

The memo went out to several major Clinton donors, including George Soros, Peter Lewis, Steve Bing and Herb and Marion Sandler, giving them a preview of an upcoming September 27, 2007 meeting between the donors and Podesta, who was president of the Soros-funded Center for American Progress at that time.
“Our meeting in New York brings together the most generous funders of progressive causes and progressive infrastructure in the country,” the memo read.

“We sit in September 2007, in a much different position than August 2003, when the same group literally jump-started an independent effort to change course in this country.”

From there, the memo goes on to illustrate the steps the left planned to take to divide the country and push their radical agenda.

“Control the political discourse” via a “strong echo chamber.”

So much effort over the past few years has been focused on better coordinating, strengthening, and developing progressive institutions and leaders.

Now that this enhanced infrastructure is in place—grassroots organizing; multi-issue advocacy groups; think tanks; youth outreach; faith communities; micro-targeting outfits; the netroots and blogosphere—we need to better utilize these networks to drive the content of politics through a strong ‘echo chamber’ and message delivery system.

As the Daily Caller noted, Obama adviser Ben Rhodes boasted about the use of the media as an “echo chamber” to frame the disastrous Iran Nuclear deal. Guess who created that echo chamber? It was a liberal non-profit that requested funding from none other than Soros.

Get out the Vote — i.e., the progressive vote.

“Non-partisan voter registration can be highly effective in delivering progressive voters to the polls,” the memo stated. “The Sandler family and OSI are already deeply involved in funding organizations to do this work in communities of color and with respect to unmarried women.”
“Securing advantageous demographic and geographical trends” for progressives.

The memo went on about the importance of essentially dividing and conquering. They want to divide the country along various demographic lines (race, gender, age, education level, economic strata, etc.) and secure them for the progressive movement. Millennials, women, and Latinos were seen as especially important to target.

While the memo specifically targeted Latinos, progressives think they’ve got blacks locked down. The memo described blacks as the “most reliable bloc in the Democratic camp.”

This is what the left is doing to “fundamentally transform” America and it is truly disturbing. You can take a look at the full memo below:

Memo
To:
George and Jonathan Soros, Peter and Jonathan Lewis, Herb and Marion Sandler, Steve Bing, John Sperling, Michael Vachon
From:
Andy Stern, Anna Burger, and John Podesta writing as private citi!ens”
Date:
Septe#ber $%, $&&%
RE:
STRATEGIC

OUTLOOK FOR THE 2008 ELECTIONS
‘his #e#o outlines our analysis o( the political landscape and progressive strengths and wea)nesses going into the $&&* elections+ t is intended as bac)ground (or our #eeting on Septe#ber $%
th
, $&&%, and not as a concrete set o( reco##endations about what to do in the upco#ing year+ -ur proposed agenda (or this #eeting is included in the acco#panying docu#ent+Although the prospects (or continued electoral gains are solid.and the assets o( the progressive #ove#ent (ar better than in years past.several gaps re#ain to be (illed+ /hie( a#ong these is better connection between ground activity and substantive content and #essaging+ n order to win ne0t year, we #ust do a better 1ob o( controlling the public dialogue and overall (ra#ewor) o( the election+ ( $&&* is about President Bush, a responsible e0it (ro# ra2, achieving universal health care, tac)ling our energy proble# and global war#ing, and helping econo#ically stressed(a#ilies, we will li)ely score sweeping victories+ ( $&&* is about the wea)nesses o( our candidate, congressional stasis, terroris#, ta0 hi)es, and (ear o( radical change, we could easily (all bac) and lose progress on #ultiple (ronts+ 3e suggest that you )eep in #ind the (ollowing strategic goals as we try to develop a (ra#ewor) (or electoral activity in $&&*4

Create the condton! “or a tda# $a%e a&an!t the GO'(
‘he sta)es o( the election need to (it the historical #o#ent+ ‘he country is #assively o(( trac)+ 5othing will change until Bush and his supporters are out and new leaders are in .leaders who will be willing and able to do what is necessary (or the country+ /orruption and the war set the stage (or victory in $&&6+ A li)ely downturn in the econo#y, the protracted war in ra2, rising ine2uality and 7epublican resistance to change can help set the stage (or widespread gains up and down the ballot in $&&*+ ‘his #ust again be a nationali!ed election in ter#s o( scope and #essage+

Kee) the ‘re!dent*! n+m,er! do$n and ,rand a## con!er%at%e canddate! a!-.+!h Re)+,#can!(/
Bush8s la#e duc) status cannot be allowed to create space

Strate&c O+t#oo “or the 2008 E#ecton!
(or the 7epublicans to clai# the #antle o( change or conservative principle+ ‘he 7epublican presidential candidate will atte#pt to be the true heir o( 7onald 7eagan and #ay try to position hi#sel( as an agent (or change, Sar)o!y style+ 3e#ust continually re#ind voters that the no#inee and all the rest o( the 7epublicancandidates are the residual (orces o( the (ailed Bush years+

E1)#ot the )artc+#ar $eane!!e! o” the Re)+,#can )re!denta# nomnee(
Beyond tying the candidate to Bush, we #ust not be shy about re#inding voters o( the personal (aults and character li#itations o( the 7epublican Party leader+ ‘he current crop o( candidates is relatively un)nown to A#ericans and will be ripe (or de(inition through serious opposition research and #edia wor)+ ‘his will not happen organically+ t will re2uire sustained pressure and a willingness to play politics by their rules+

En!+re that demo&ra)hc! ! de!tn(
An 9e#erging progressive #a1ority: is a realistic possibility in ter#s o( de#ographic and voting patterns+ But it is inco#plete in ter#s o( organi!ing and political wor)+ 3o#en, co##unities o( color, and highly educated pro(essionals are core parts o( the progressive coalition+ 5ationally, and in )ey battleground states, their in(luence is growing+ Latinos and young voters are 2uic)ly solidi(ying in this coalition as well+ But #any o( these voters are new to the process+ All o( these groups.in addition to wor)ing class voters and independents pic)ed up in $&&6.will re2uire signi(icantlong;ter# engage#ent in order to )eep the# reliably on our side+

Contro# the )o#tca# d!co+r!e(
So #uch e((ort over the past (ew years has been(ocused on better coordinating, strengthening, and developing progressive institutions and leaders+ 5ow that this enhanced in(rastructure is in place. grassroots organi!ing< #ulti;issue advocacy groups< thin) tan)s< youth outreach< (aith co##unities< #icro;targeting out(its< the netroots and blogosphere.we need to better utili!e these networ)s to drive the content o( politics through a strong 9echo cha#ber: and #essage delivery syste#+ • Set the !ta&e "or "+t+re )ro&re!!%e acton!( All o( this electoral activity will be(or naught i( we do not si#ultaneously advance a larger vision (or why progressive change is necessary and how speci(ic progressive legislation will achieve these goals+ Should progressives win in $&&*, the ne0t president and /ongress will (ace serious challenges in both cleaning up the #ess o( the Bush years and #oving signi(icant re(or#s in health care, energy, (oreign policy and ra2, poverty and #obility+ • Lea%e !omethn& ,ehnd( 3e should thin) o( invest#ents in $&&* as building bloc)s (or ongoing strategic ca#paigns and issue wor) in $&&= and beyond+ Si#ply getting progressives elected will not be enough to #aintain the political pressure and support necessary to pass progressive legislation and build a long;ter#, wor)ing #a1ority+ $ Strate&c O+t#oo "or the 2008 E#ecton!3HAT IS 4ICTOR5 IN 20086 7epublicans argue that $&&6 was an aberration in an otherwise ascendant center;right #a1ority built on conservative do#inance on national security and econo#ic issues and strong support (ro# white voters, the South and Heartland, and (a#ilies in rapidly growing e0urban counties+ 'his interpretation does not hold up given the results o( $&&6+ $&&6 was a watershed year (or progressives and the >e#ocratic Party+ >e#ocrats pic)edup ?& House seats and 6 Senate seats (or sli# #a1orities in both+ >e#ocrats won 6 governor8s seats and now hold a $* to $$ state advantage+ ‘hey pic)ed up ?$? state legislative seats and now control both legislative cha#bers in $? states and all three branches in @ states+ ‘he party holds a ;state advantage in ter#s o( Secretary o( State seats and a @=;state advantage a#ong state attorneys general positions+ n addition, all 6 states with #ini#u# wage initiatives passed the #easure, #ost inde0ing the #ini#u# wage to in(lation+ And o( @% #easures to li#it the power o( govern#ent, only one passedin AC although it was the only state to re1ect a gay #arriage ban”+ 3hile these gains are not unprecedented, they are on par with the 7epublican turn in @== and constitute a signi(icant shi(t in electoral ground toward progressives and >e#ocrats+ However, (urther realign#ent to progressives and the >e#ocrats is by no #eans inevitable+ -utside o( a national crisis, continued gains are li)ely to be slower and#ore (iercely contested+ n #any ways, the sta)es in $&&* will be greater than in previous elections+ ‘he conditions o( the country have grown #ar)edly worse over the past (ew years and i( we do not continue to build and sustain electoral power at all levels .and replace outgoing leaders with true progressives.the prospects (or (unda#ental change will di#+ deal victory in $&&* will re2uire  pri#ary acco#plish#ents4

A >e#ocratic president with an e0panded geographical base and ?&& or #ore electoral votes+ Sen+ John Derry received $$ electoral votes in $&&+”

Getting within stri)ing distance o( 6& votes in the Senate and holding the House with a strengthened #a1ority+

Signi(icant strengthening o( base >e#ocratic voters and (urther solidi(ication o( wavering independent and #oderate voters+

Additional gains in the @@ gubernatorial races and strengthening o( state legislative control in the lead up to redistricting a(ter $&@&+

A clear #andate (or progressive action on the issues we care #ost about4 (inancial security and opportunity (or low; and #iddle;inco#e voters, universal ?

Similar to NYC Meeting 2007 (Final Draft)(4)

Foxes in the Henhouse

Reagan’s Comeback

40 More Years

PolitiGuide 2016

Grassroots, Geeks, Pros, and Pols

The Case for Hillary Clinton

The 2014 Midterm Elections

Take No Prisoners

Life Among the Cannibals

Mia Love

Whistling Past Dixie

Rum, Romanism, and Rebellion

The 2016 Contenders

The Madness of Michele Bachmann

One Party Country

Soundscape

An Unlikely Truth

The Hillary Effect

The Rude Pundit’s Almanack 2012 Edition

The Case Against Trump

Return to Values

The Emerging Republican Majority

At the Tea Party

You Have the Power

The Teavangelicals

Saving America from the Democrats and Republicans

Train Wreck 2016

Nothing Will Stop This!
More From This User

4 7 15 Proposed Foundation Changes

TopLatinos.xls
NYC Meeting 2007 (Final Draft)(4)
by Peter Hasson
(0 ratings)
90K views
EMBED
Download
Add to libraryOther Library Actions
DESCRIPTION

Document
Show more
RELATED

Foxes in the Henhouse: How the Republicans Stole the South and the Heartland and What the Democrats Must Do to Run ’em Out
by Steve Jarding

Reagan’s Comeback: Four Weeks in Texas That Changed American Politics Forever
by Gilbert Garcia

40 More Years: How the Democrats Will Rule the Next Generation
by James Carville

PolitiGuide 2016: A Simple and Neutral Summary of the Most Important Issues in the 2016 Presidential Election
by Julian Rudolph
PreviousNext
Page 1 of 7
ABOUT
Browse books
Site directory
About Scribd
Meet the team
Our blog
Join our team!
Contact Us
PARTNERS
Publishers
Developers / API
MEMBERSHIPS
Join today
Invite Friends
Gifts
SUPPORT
Help
FAQ
Accessibility
Press
Purchase help
AdChoices
LEGAL
Terms
Privacy
Copyright
Scribd on AppstoreScribd on Google Play
Copyright © 2016 Scribd Inc.
Terms of service
Accessibility
Privacy
Mobile Site
Site Language:
English
Never pay full price to read again
Join Scribd and get the best books and audiobooks

DIRTY, DIRTY, DIRTY – KERRY’S STATE DEPT. FUNNELED MORE THAN $9 MILLION TO HIS DAUGHTER’S FOUNDATION

We’ve had so many years of this mess! It’s one tiring scandal after the next coming out of the government? So, then – WHY Hillary? Seriously – WHY? Don’t Americans want change?

The Daily Caller reports – More than $9 million of Department of State money has been funneled through the Peace Corps to a nonprofit foundation started and run by Secretary of State John Kerry’s daughter, documents obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation show.

The Department of State funded a Peace Corps program created by Dr. Vanessa Kerry and officials from both agencies, records show. The Peace Corps then awarded the money without competition to a nonprofit Kerry created for the program.

Initially, the Peace Corps awarded Kerry’s group — now called Seed Global Health — with a three-year contract worth $2 million of State Department money on Sept. 10, 2012, documents show. Her father was then the chairman of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, which oversees both the Department of State and the Peace Corps.

Read More: http://dailycaller.com

KERRY’S DAUGHTER GOT SIX FIGURE SALARY FROM ORG FUNDED BY DADDY

vanessakerry
Some folks are born to wave the flag, others are born to be the daughter of an anti-war traitor senator collecting six figures from an organization funded by the part of government that daddy happens to run.

More than $9 million of Department of State money has been funneled through the Peace Corps to a nonprofit foundation started and run by Secretary of State John Kerry’s daughter, documents obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation show.

The Department of State funded a Peace Corps program created by Dr. Vanessa Kerry and officials from both agencies, records show. The Peace Corps then awarded the money without competition to a nonprofit Kerry created for the program.

Initially, the Peace Corps awarded Kerry’s group — now called Seed Global Health — with a three-year contract worth $2 million of State Department money on Sept. 10, 2012, documents show. Her father was then the chairman of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, which oversees both the Department of State and the Peace Corps.

Seed secured a four-year extension in September 2015, again without competition. This time, the Peace Corps gave the nonprofit $6.4 million provided by the Department of State while John Kerry was secretary of state.

What did this mean for Vanessa?

Kerry drew a salary from Seed for the first time in 2014. She was the only officer listed on the nonprofit’s 990 tax form to receive compensation — some $140,000 for a reported 30 hours per week.

By this time, daddy was Secretary of State. Which was certainly convenient. It’s also interesting when you have an organization with only one compensated officer.
What does Kerry’s organization do? It exploits student debt to recruit volunteers.

Recognizing that many US health professionals face financial barriers to service, Seed offers the only US loan repayment program for international service. The average US physician graduates from medical school today with more than $170,000 in educational debt; other applicants may have home mortgages or other obligations that would make a GHSP assignment impossible or difficult to accept. Seed believes that debt should not be a barrier to public service and provides up to $30,000 in needs-based assistance for each year served.

You know, debt for people who unlike Vanessa Kerry weren’t born with a silver spoon in their mouths. So they get to do “volunteer” slave labor.

Vanessa Kerry was last in the headlines due to her Iran link.

DIRTY, DIRTY, SLIMLY DEMOCRATS -Look Who’s Getting That Bank Settlement Cash

Tens of millions of dollars disguised as ‘consumer relief’ are going to liberal political groups

GANGSTERS AND CROOKS

BN-PO858_koenig_J_20160826145732

By ANDY KOENIG

Imagine if the president of the United States forced America’s biggest banks to funnel hundreds of millions—and potentially billions—of dollars to the corporations and lobbyists who supported his agenda, all while calling it “Main Street Relief.” The public outcry would rightly be deafening. Yet the Obama administration has used a similar strategy to enrich its political allies, advance leftist pet projects, and protect its legacy—and hardly anyone has noticed.

The administration’s multiyear campaign against the banking industry has quietly steered money to organizations and politicians who are working to ensure liberal policy and political victories at every level of government. The conduit for this funding is the Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities Working Group, a coalition of federal and state regulators and prosecutors created in 2012 to “identify, investigate, and prosecute instances of wrongdoing” in the residential mortgage-backed securities market. In conjunction with the Justice Department, the RMBS Working Group has reached multibillion-dollar settlements with essentially every major bank in America.

The most recent came in April when the Justice Department announced a $5.1 billion settlement with Goldman Sachs. In February Morgan Stanley agreed to a $3.2 billion settlement. Previous targets were Citigroup ($7 billion), J.P. Morgan Chase ($13 billion), and Bank of America, which in 2014 reached the largest civil settlement in American history at $16.65 billion. Smaller deals with other banks have also been announced.

Combined, the banks must divert well over $11 billion into “consumer relief,” which is supposed to benefit homeowners harmed during the Great Recession. Yet it is unknown how much, if any, of the banks’ settlement money will find its way to individual homeowners. Instead, a substantial portion is allocated to private, nonprofit organizations drawn from a federally approved list. Some groups on the list—Catholic Charities, for instance—are relatively nonpolitical. Others—La Raza, the National Urban League, the National Community Reinvestment Coalition and more—are anything but.

This is a handout to the administration’s allies. Many of these groups engage in voter registration, community organizing and lobbying on liberal policy priorities at every level of government. They also provide grants to other liberal groups not eligible for payouts under the settlements. Thanks to the Obama administration, and the fungibility of money, the settlements’ beneficiaries can now devote hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars to these activities.

The settlements also give banks a financial incentive to fund these groups. Most of the deals give double credit or more against the settlement amount for every dollar in “donations.” Bank of America’s donation list—the only bank to disclose exactly where it sends its money—shows how this benefits liberal groups. The bank has so far given at least $1.15 million to the National Urban League, which counts as if it were $2.6 million against the bank’s settlement. Similarly, $1.5 million to La Raza takes $3.5 million off the total amount of “consumer relief” owed by the bank. There are scores of other examples.

Our analysis of over 80 beneficiaries from Bank of America’s settlement shows that they received, on average, more than 10% of their 2015 budgets from the bank. When other bank checks are added, the amount funneled to these organizations is guaranteed to rise. And the banks have multiple years to pay their total penalties, meaning some liberal interest groups can count on additional funding for years—and election cycles—to come.

As part of their “consumer relief” penalties, Bank of America and J.P. Morgan Chase must also pay a minimum $75 million to Community Development Financial Institutions—taxpayer-funded groups propped up by the Obama administration as an alternative to payday lenders. “Housing Counseling Agencies” also get at least $30 million. This essentially circumvents Congress’s recent decision to cut $43 million in federal funds routed to these groups through the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

The politicians who negotiate the settlements as part of the RMBS Working Group have also directed money to their supporters and states. Illinois’s Democratic attorney general Lisa Madigan announced she had secured $22.5 million from February’s Morgan Stanley deal for her state’s debt-ridden pension funds—a blatant payout to public unions. The deals with J.P. Morgan Chase, Bank of America and Citigroup yielded a further $344 million for both “consumer relief” and direct payments to pension funds.

New York hit the jackpot too. Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, also a Democrat and chairman of the RMBS Working Group, arranged for Morgan Stanley to fork over $400 million to New York nonprofits and $150 million to the state.

Despite the best efforts of a few principled legislators late last year, Congress missed an opportunity to amend the Justice Department’s funding bill to stop further handouts. Lawmakers now have another opportunity as Congress enters budget negotiation for fiscal year 2017. Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R., Va.) introduced a bill in April that would prevent government officials from enforcing settlements that funnel money to third parties, and it needs to gain wider traction with his colleagues. The political shakedowns disguised as public service must end.

Mr. Koenig is senior policy adviser at Freedom Partners Chamber of Commerce.

DIRTY, DIRTY, DIRTY – Feds pouring Muslim migrants into Rand Paul’s hometown

BY LEO HOHMANN

map_of_bowling_green_ky
The same resettlement agency that is funneling Syrian Muslims into Sen. Bernie Sanders’ state of Vermont and also into Nevada is now delivering them to Sen. Rand Paul’s hometown of Bowling Green, Kentucky.

WND reported last week on the plans to seed the small town of Rutland, Vermont, with 100 Syrian Muslims while another 75 are being sent to Reno, Nevada, and dozens more in Missoula, Montana. WND has previously reported on plans to bring up to 5,000 Syrians to Michigan and hundreds more to Idaho.

The feds have been scouting for new places to bring the Syrians including in northwest Arkansas and in Ithaca, New York.

Now the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, or USCRI – the same volunteer agency that is working in Rutland and Reno – has called a surprise meeting for 5 p.m. Friday to announce plans to bring 40 Syrians to Bowling Green, Kentucky, in October.

“That’s very little notice for a public meeting to be held on a Friday evening,” said Ann Corcoran, who follows the refugee movement at Refugee Resettlement Watch.

City goes from no Muslims to 10% Muslim in 15 years

Bowling Green is not new to Muslim refugees. The city has been transformed over the past decade from a typical Middle America town that had no Muslims to one that now has more than 7,000 who account for at least 10 percent of the city’s population. It had no mosques 15 years ago and now has several including a large Islamic Center. The Islamic refugees have come from 23 countries, mostly from Bosnia, Russia, Burma, Iraq and now Syria.

“They’ve had the same federal contractor, USCRI, in Bowling Green for a long time,” Corcoran added. “We have a large archive on Bowling Green because they have had many problems there over the years with Iraqi refugees. Now Syrian Muslims will join the Iraqi Muslims in Rand Paul-land.”

Make YOUR voice heard! Sign the petition to impose a temporary halt to all Muslim immigration to our country

Paul’s office told WND he is not in favor of the Syrian refugee dumps in Kentucky or anywhere else under the current vetting process being used by President Obama.

“Senator Paul believes we must pass the SECURE Act,” said Sergio Gor, the senator’s press secretary. “This legislation would suspend visa issuance for countries with a high risk of terrorism and impose a waiting period for background checks on visa issuance from other countries until the American people can be assured terrorists cannot enter the country through our immigration and visa system.”

Paul was much more outspoken against refugee resettlement three years ago, before he contemplated a run for president.

Paul softens his stance

In a June 2013 article in the Huffington Post, the senator said the U.S. should be skeptical of accepting refugees, from the Mideast in particular, because they take welfare and could plan attacks on American soil.

“We have had refugees attack us here. Ninety-five (percent) of our 70,000 Iraqi refugees are on food stamps, majority are in government housing, 46 percent are unemployed,” he said. “It’s one thing to have a big heart and invite people to our country, and if you do it in a small fashion, the churches and the people take care of them; that’s one thing. But like in my town in particular, they bring ’em in and there is someone whose job and expertise is to sign them up for welfare as soon as they get here.”

Since he decided to run for president, he has been much more guarded in the substance and tone of his comments about refugees.

Pamela Geller wrote the book on how to prevent creeping Shariah from entering your community in “Stop the Islamization of America.”

It was just last year that Americans learned a terrorist, Tashfeen Malik, had entered the U.S. from Saudi Arabia not as a refugee but on a fiancée visa. She, along with her husband, Syed Farook, killed 14 people at an office Christmas party in San Bernardino. And two of the jihadists who pulled off the bloody attack on Paris that killed 130 people in November 2015 had entered Europe as “refugees” carrying Syrian passports.

Head of resettlement agency paid salary of $289,192

The Syrians are being brought to Bowling Green by USCRI, a nonprofit headed by Lavinia Limon, the former head of the federal Office of Refugee Resettlement under Bill Clinton. Limon made the transition from government bureaucrat to government contractor at USCRI, where she now earns an annual salary of $289,192, according to USCRI’s 2013 IRS form 990. She also managed to get a relative, Peter Limon, a plum job at the nonprofit, which pays him $139,869.

USCRI, like the other eight volunteer agencies, gets paid nearly $2,000 in federal grant money for every refugee it brings to America.

Bowling Green has a troublesome history with Muslim refugees. Two Iraqi nationals who were resettled as refugees in the city in 2009 were caught in 2011 sending military supplies and other material support to al-Qaida in Iraq. They were eventually convicted and are serving long prison terms.

President Obama is in the midst of a “surge” in Syrian refugee resettlement, seeking to fulfill his promise to the United Nations that he will admit 10,000 Syrians into the U.S. by the end of the current fiscal year on Sept. 30. To reach that goal, he will need to bring in an average of 358 Syrians per week.

And the pipeline from Syria to the U.S. will continue even into the next fiscal year, officials with the State Department have said.

More than 97 percent of the Syrians resettled in the U.S. since the start of the Syrian civil war have been Sunni Muslim. Only 1 percent have been Christian, and of the 499 Syrians who have entered the U.S. since the “surge” began last month, not a single one has been Christian.

Christians are the most persecuted of all religious groups in Syria, hunted down and killed by the Islamic State, al-Nusra Front and other Sunni groups, but the administration has shown zero interest in offering them a safe haven in the United States.

Trump blasts Hillary on refugee stance

Hillary Clinton has promised to go even further with the resettlement of Syrian Muslim refugees selected by the United Nations.

Clinton wants to increase Syrian refugees from 10,000 to 65,000, an increase of over 500 percent. Donald Trump blasted her earlier this week saying she could not claim to care about women and women’s rights while advocating for a radical increase in Syrian immigration. Most Muslims coming from Syria are Shariah-compliant, meaning their women wear the veil in public and their husbands are allowed to beat them for disobedience in accordance with the teachings of Muhammad in the Quran (see Sura 4:34).

The Bowling Green International Center plans to help resettle refugees as a subcontractor working under USCRI. They will initially bring a group of 40 from Syria in October, according to the Bowling Green Daily News.

“A plan to accept Syrian refugees in Bowling Green is raising concerns,” the newspaper reported. “In response, the organizations involved have scheduled a town hall to address any questions.”

Bowling Green residents will be told vetting is airtight

International Center Director Albert Mbanfu told the local newspaper he hopes to address concerns about the screening process and explain how these refugees come to the United States.

“My objective is that people will leave this town hall with a sound knowledge on how refugee resettlement works,” he said.

Mbanfu said the federal government would never put the country at risk of potential terrorist infiltrators.

City Commissioner Melinda Hill is the only elected leader who has voiced concerns, calling the resettlement risky.

“This is not against the people,” Hill said. “Our federal government has not put in place a good vetting process.”

Mayor Bruce Wilkerson and City Commissioner Joe Denning declined to comment, citing “unfamiliarity with the topic,” the Daily News reported.

Another city commissioner, Sue Parrigin, said she sees refugees as a way for employers to fill jobs as the baby boomers grow old and exit the workforce, leaving a dearth of workers in the younger generations that have had smaller families. This is the exact same argument that European governments have given as to why they have imported so many Muslim migrants over the decades.

“This is for the community to come out,” Parrigin said. “The community deserves to come out and be heard.”

Of course, members of the community will be allowed to air their concerns, but none of their concerns will be addressed. As the government has shown in other cities, like Missoula and Rutland, these town-hall meetings are for show only. President Obama has said he will continue importing Sunni Muslims from the jihadist hotbed of Syria regardless of whether state or local leaders oppose him on the issue.

Town-hall meetings were also held in Spartanburg, South Carolina, in Twin Falls, Idaho, and in Helena, Montana, and scores of other cities. In all of these places where citizens voiced concerns, the numbers were initially downplayed only to be adjusted upward later.

For example, volunteer agency World Relief told residents of Spartanburg they would get less than 60 refugees and most of them would be from Africa, not Syria. Now, that story has changed and the Spartanburg area has been targeted for 120 refugees, most of whom will be from Syria.

But citizens can and should attend such meetings and demand as much information as possible, says Corcoran. They should also demand to see the R&P Abstract prepared by the federal contractor agency.

Despite what Mbanfu says, WND has reported numerous times that the government has imported terrorists, through the refugee program and other immigration programs, and Mbanfu need not look past his own hometown for proof. “Lax background checks were to blame” for the two Iraqi refugee terrorists infiltrating Kentucky in 2009, ABC News reported.

But these are the kind of outright lies and omissions the resettlement agencies tell concerned citizens at their town-hall meetings.

If the U.S. had trouble vetting refugees from Iraq, where it had occupied the country and had access to all law enforcement and intelligence records, how can it vet people claiming to be fleeing Syria?

FBI Director James Comey admitted last year before Congress that vetting Syrians is impossible. The president and his State Department have focused instead on the humanitarian aspect of helping widows and orphans.

But concerns include more than just terrorism. There’s also the issue of cost. Refugees, unlike most other immigrants, qualify for a full slate of welfare benefits on day one of their arrival. Those age 65 and over immediately receive Social Security benefits and 91 percent of refugees from the Middle East receive food stamps, according to the U.S. Office of Refugee Resettlement.

Congress approved Obama’s $1.1 trillion omnibus spending package in December, and it fully funded the president’s expanded refugee program, which will spend about $1.2 billion to resettle 85,000 foreign refugees from all countries in fiscal 2016. Another 100,000 are slated for arrival in 2017. That figure — $1.2 billion — does not include the cost of welfare benefits nor does it include the cost of educating refugee children.

Pamela Geller wrote the book on how to prevent creeping Shariah from entering your community in “Stop the Islamization of America.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/05/feds-pouring-muslim-migrants-into-rand-pauls-hometown/#CeGCGVgFUc8X6DBq.99

PHOTO: Here’s The Stunning Piece Of Paper That Proves The Colorado Vote Was “Rigged”

Presidential candidate and real estate mogul Donald Trump has received much criticism lately for calling the Colorado primary vote rigged — but Trump is right, and there is evidence to prove it.

Before the primary even began, delegates met and passed around a resolution which forbade delegates to vote for Trump for president or vice president because of a list of arbitrary reasons.

Social media users have gotten a hold of the resolution, and are going crazy over it.

The resolution states that “Donald Trump is not a Republican, Donald Trump is a demagogue, Donald Trump would destroy the Western alliance which is the basis of American security,Donald Trump would destroy the system of international trade…” and continued on and on and on.

letter-470x627

Spoiler alert! Kasich out to ‘deny Trump nomination’

john_kasich2
In an email to supporters Wednesday, the wife of Republican candidate John Kasich confirmed what many political observers have long suspected: A chief goal of the Kasich campaign is to deny GOP front-runner Donald Trump the party’s nomination.

“Friend, I’m going to be honest with you,” states the email blast from Kasich’s wife, Karen. “The stakes are high and it’s critical that we all pitch in to help John continue securing delegates and deny Trump the nomination.”

image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/04/Kasich_Email.jpg

Kasich_Email

Then Mrs. Kasich assures supporters that her husband is running a “positive campaign.”

“I’m so proud of the positive campaign John has run,” she writes. “It’s refreshing to have a candidate who’s focused on offering common-sense solutions to our challenges rather than taking advantage of people’s fears and very real concerns about America’s future.

“We have a choice to make. As John said yesterday, there are two paths we can take. I’m choosing the path that offers a positive vision for America’s future. Will you join us?”

image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/04/kasich_email2.jpg

kasich_email2

Noting that the New York Republican primary is only one week away, Mrs. Kasich promises: “[W]e have a real chance at grabbing some delegates.”

Who do you love? Get your favorite presidential bumper sticker here! Check out WND Superstore’s mind-blowing and hilarious selection

John Kasich has repeatedly insisted he’s not in the race to block Trump.

Rather, he claims his eye is on only one thing: winning the White House.

“I want to make something clear to people. I’m not in this to try to stop somebody,” Mr. Kasich told Fox News’ Chris Wallace on March 20. “I’m in this to tell people about my experience, my record, my vision, and my ability to bring – bring people together and to be a successful president of the United States. This is beginning to deteriorate into some sort of a political science class with a bunch of pundits trying to, you know, play a parlor game. I’m not interested in that. …

“I am interested in improving this country and being a good president and that’s precisely why I’m running. And people are beginning to understand my vision and my message because finally people are beginning to allow me to be heard.”

Kasich proved to be the anti-Trump vote and won the primary in his homes state of Ohio on March 15 with 46.8 percent of the vote to Trump’s 35.6 percent. Cruz received 13 percent.

“I will not take the low road to the highest office in the land,” Kasich said in his Ohio victory speech. He accused Trump of creating a “toxic environment” and said the GOP front-runners tactics are “not how we fix America.”

Just before the Ohio primary, Kasich told reporters his victory would increase the likelihood of a contested convention in July if a candidate doesn’t reach 1,237 delegates and win the GOP nomination by then.

“I’m not running to block anybody, but the math is real,” Kasich said.

But just last weekend, Kasich helped Trump block Cruz from sweeping delegate selections in Michigan.

“The Kasich campaign defended aiding Trump on the grounds that Cruz deserved it as punishment for trying to scoop up too many delegates,” Fox News reported Monday. “But whether it was bad blood, pique or part of a larger strategy, Kasich’s part in any anti-Trump strategy is increasingly in doubt.”

Kasich doesn’t appear to have a clear path to winning many more delegates in the remaining 16 states: New York, Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Indiana, Nebraska, West Virginia, Oregon, Washington, California, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico and South Dakota.

As it stands, Trump has 743 delegates. Cruz has 545. And Kasich has 143.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/04/spoiler-alert-kasich-out-to-deny-trump-nomination/#X47xKqDrUEO3AqHE.99

HILLARY CLINTON’S INFLUENCE PEDDLING SPEECHES!

Hillary Clinton’s influence peddling speeches! They paid how much for what? Did she give out great stock picks?

DATE EVENT LOCATION FEE

March 19, 2015 American Camping Association Atlantic City, NJ $260,000.00
March 11, 2015 eBay Inc. San Jose, CA $315,000.00
February 24, 2015 Watermark Silicon Valley Conference for Women Santa Clara, CA $225,500.00
January 22, 2015 Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce Whistler, Canada $150,000.00
January 21, 2015 tinePublic Inc. Winnipeg, Canada $262,000.00
January 21, 2015 tinePublic Inc. Saskatoon, Canada $262,500.00
December 4, 2014 Massachusetts Conference for Women Boston, MA $205,500.00
October 14, 2014 Salesforce.com San Francisco, CA $225,500.00
October 14, 2014 Qualcomm Incorporated San Diego, CA $335,000.00
October 13, 2014 Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers Colorado Springs, CO $225,500.00
October 8, 2014 Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed) Chicago, IL $265,000.00
October 7, 2014 Deutsche Bank AG New York, NY $280,000.00
October 6, 2014 Canada 2020 Ottawa, Canada $215,500.00
October 2, 2014 Commercial Real Estate Women Network Miami Beach, FL $225,500.00
September 15, 2014 Cardiovascular Research Foundation Washington, DC $275,000.00
September 4, 2014 Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, LLP San Diego, CA $225,500.00
August 28, 2014 Nexenta System, Inc. San Francisco, CA $300,000.00
August 28, 2014 Cisco Las Vegas, NV $325,000.00
July 29, 2014 Corning, Inc. Corning, NY $225,500.00
July 26, 2014 Ameriprise Boston, MA $225,500.00
July 22, 2014 Knewton, Inc. San Francisco, CA $225,500.00
June 26, 2014 GTCR Chicago, IL $280,000.00
June 25, 2014 Biotechnology Industry Organization San Diego, CA $335,000.00
June 25, 2014 Innovation Arts and Entertainment San Francisco, CA $150,000.00
June 20, 2014 Innovation Arts and Entertainment Austin, TX $150,000.00
June 18, 2014 tinePublic Inc. Toronto, Canada $150,000.00
June 18, 2014 tinePublic Inc. Edmonton, Canada $100,000.00
June 10, 2014 United Fresh Produce Association Chicago, IL $225,000.00
June 2, 2014 International Deli-Dairy-Bakery Association Denver, CO $225,500.00
June 2, 2014 Let’s Talk Entertainment Denver, CO $265,000.00
May 6, 2014 National Council for Behavorial Healthcare Washington, DC $225,500.00
April 11, 2014 California Medical Association (via Satellite) San Diego, CA $100,000.00
April 10, 2014 Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries, Inc. Las Vegas, NV $225,500.00
April 10, 2014 Let’s Talk Entertainment San Jose, CA $265,000.00
April 8, 2014 Marketo, Inc. San Francisco, CA $225,500.00
April 8, 2014 World Affairs Council Portland, OR $250,500.00
March 24, 2014 Academic Partnerships Dallas, TX $225,500.00
March 18, 2014 Xerox Corporation New York, NY $225,000.00
March 18, 2014 Board of Trade of Metropolitan Montreal Montreal, Canada $275,000.00
March 13, 2014 Pharmaceutical Care Management Association Orlando, FL $225,500.00
March 13, 2014 Drug Chemical and Associated Technologies New York, NY $250,000.00
March 6, 2014 tinePublic Inc. Calgary, Canada $225,500.00
March 5, 2014 The Vancouver Board of Trade Vancouver, Canada $275,500.00
March 4, 2014 Association of Corporate Counsel – Southern California Los Angeles, CA $225,500.00
February 27, 2014 A&E Television Networks New York, NY $280,000.00
February 26, 2014 Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society Orlando, FL $225,500.00
February 17, 2014 Novo Nordisk A/S Mexico City, Mexico $125,000.00
February 6, 2014 Salesforce.com Las Vegas, NV $225,500.00
January 27, 2014 National Automobile Dealers Association New Orleans, LA $325,500.00
January 27, 2014 Premier Health Alliance Miami, FL $225,500.00
January 6, 2014 GE Boca Raton, FL $225,500.00
November 21, 2013 U.S. Green Building Council Philadelphia, PA $225,000.00
November 18, 2013 CME Group Naples, FL $225,000.00
November 18, 2013 Press Ganey Orlando, FL $225,000.00
November 14, 2013 CB Richard Ellis, Inc. New York, NY $250,000.00
November 13, 2013 Mediacorp Canada, Inc. Toronto, Canada $225,000.00
November 9, 2013 National Association of Realtors San Francisco, CA $225,000.00
November 7, 2013 Golden Tree Asset Management New York, NY $275,000.00
November 6, 2013 Beaumont Health System Troy, MI $305,000.00
November 4, 2013 Mase Productions, Inc. Orlando, FL $225,000.00
November 4, 2013 London Drugs, Ltd. Mississauga, ON $225,000.00
October 29, 2013 The Goldman Sachs Group Tuscon, AZ $225,000.00
October 28, 2013 Jewish United Fund/Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago $400,000.00
October 27, 2013 Beth El Synagogue Minneapolis, MN $225,000.00
October 24, 2013 Accenture New York, NY $225,000.00
October 24, 2013 The Goldman Sachs Group New York, NY $225,000.00
October 23, 2013 SAP Global Marketing, Inc. New York, NY $225,000.00
October 15, 2013 National Association of Convenience Stores Atlanta, GA $265,000.00
October 4, 2013 Long Island Association Long Island, NY $225,000.00
September 19, 2013 American Society of Travel Agents, Inc. Miami, FL $225,000.00
September 18, 2013 American Society for Clinical Pathology Chicago, IL $225,000.00
August 12, 2013 National Association of Chain Drug Stores Las Vegas, NV $225,000.00
August 7, 2013 Global Business Travel Association San Diego, CA $225,000.00
July 11, 2013 UBS Wealth Management New York, NY $225,000.00
June 24, 2013 American Jewish University University City, CA $225,000.00
June 24, 2013 Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and Company, LP Palos Verdes, CA $225,000.00
June 20, 2013 Boston Consulting Group, Inc. Boston, MA $225,000.00
June 20, 2013 Let’s Talk Entertainment, Inc. Toronto, Canada $250,000.00
June 17, 2013 Economic Club of Grand Rapids Grand Rapids, MI $225,000.00
June 16, 2013 Society for Human Resource Management Chicago, IL $285,000.00
June 6, 2013 Spencer Stuart New York, NY $225,000.00
June 4, 2013 The Goldman Sachs Group Palmetto Bluffs, SC $225,000.00
May 29, 2013 Sanford C. Bernstein and Co., LLC New York, NY $225,000.00
May 21, 2013 Verizon Communications, Inc. Washington, DC $225,000.00
May 16, 2013 Itau BBA USA Securities New York, NY $225,000.00
May 14, 2013 Apollo Management Holdings, LP New York, NY $225,000.00
May 8, 2013 Gap, Inc. San Francisco, CA $225,000.00
April 30, 2013 Fidelity Investments Naples, FL $225,000.00
April 24, 2013 Deutsche Bank Washington, DC $225,000.00
April 24, 2013 National Multi Housing Council Dallas, TX $225,000.00
April 18, 2013 Morgan Stanley Washington, DC $225,000.00

Uncovered Mailing Address Reveals Carly Fiorina to Nude Melania Trump Ad

A super PAC that launched a smear ad on Melania Trump in Utah has been linked to former GOP presidential candidate and Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina.

According to Breitbart, the Make America Awesome PAC, which ran the smear ad in Utah about Melania’s nude modeling, is run by political consultant Liz Mair.

Unfortunately, Mair isn’t that bright. On Make America Awesome’s website, it tells potential donors, “If you would like to donate by mail, send checks to: Make America Awesome PO Box 26141 Alexandria, VA 22313.”
fiorina-hp-america

Problem: P.O. Box 26141 is also the mailing address for Carly for America, the official organization for Fiorina’s former presidential campaign. It’s since been re-purposed as a general-issue political action committee.

Whoops.

Mair’s advertisement touched off a Twitter war between the Cruz and Trump campaigns over each candidate’s wives, during which Cruz has vigorously accused Trump of playing dirty. Fiorina, for her part, has been an ardent supporter of Cruz’s campaign these last few weeks, linking the original smear ad back to Cruz for the first time.
The smear advertisement against Melania (it’s disgusting and underhanded enough that we’re not going to show it here; I assure you that you can find it easily enough on Facebook if you’re so inclined) also managed to incur the wrath of some liberals who felt that it was “shaming” Melania.

Mair was open about the fact that she didn’t actually believe in the ad’s content, she just wanted to win.
Lovely. Of course, you, loyal reader, could argue that Mair paid for the ads; can we really prove collaboration between Fiorina and Mair?

While we can’t definitively prove it, we can come pretty close. See, Make America Awesome’s filings with the FEC show that, on its own, the PAC doesn’t have enough money to Make America Even Slightly Different Than Before. It only lists seven donors who gave over $200, in 2015-16, for a total of only $2,000. (That will pay for the post office box, but not a whole lot more.)

Fiorina made a bold stand for women’s issues during the campaign, pointing out Hillary Clinton’s “war on women” on multiple occasions. It’s a shame to see her, acting as a surrogate for Ted Cruz, maligning Donald Trump’s wife as a sort of modern-day Jezebel to get votes.
1_BnqyKF_400x400
LIZ MAIR
In one simple act, both Mair and Fiorina have thrown away whatever scruples and decency they may have had. If it turns out a desperate Ted Cruz is behind this, too, we can only say the same for him.

Please like and share on Facebook and Twitter if you agree this smear campaign is disgraceful.

HELP US KEEP YOU BETTER INFORMED ABOUT THE TRICKS OF THE RADICAL PROGRESSIVE REVOLUTION PLEASE DONATE ANY AMOUNT YOU CAN