Posts Tagged ‘ONE WORLD ORDER’

What is the New World Order and Why Does it Matter?


Ron Paul warns of coming New World Order

EURO's big-government socialistic malignancy topples free enterprise

by Ken LaRive

A one world order begins with disorder

“The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.” -Thomas Jefferson

We are tied into the fate of all nations by nearly invisible paper-trail lines of profit and debt. Our fortunes are a helix of complexity, and every corner of the world is lit by both instant communiqué and business potential. We live in a brave new world and it is fraught with both high adventure and danger, evil and goodness.

Europe’s disintegrating micro-economies are fading from their overbearing and imperious governments, and their collective cancer-tool of domination called socialism is seen as the root cause. So why is this American Progressive administration trying to mimic them to the letter? Could I, should I dare speculate that this might have been the plan all along? Profit without moral bounds? A secular bottom line without an honest standard or ethical principle? Do I hear laughter?
“I think myself that we have more machinery of government than is necessary, too many parasites living on the labor of the industrious.” -Thomas Jefferson

There are four EU entities failing, with surely more to come. Shouldn’t we be studying why this is happening, instead of setting ourselves up for an equivalent catastrophe by doing the exact same thing? One would think that our leaders would observe this, that we should and could actually learn from another’s mistake, with a true study of history as well. Instead we blunder forward, destroying our constitution, free press, civil liberty, and replace our children’s motivation to learn and dream with apathy and lies. It seems so hopeless as we watch our government plunge us into an unrecoverable debt, and questions about securing our borders, foreign entanglements, the drug war, 9-11 inconsistencies, and many many others are viewed by media to be taboo. We are broke, printing money out of thin air, borrowing money with our children’s future as collateral, and there seems not a damned thing we can do about it. We are even told who we can have for president.

Unfortunately, most of America doesn’t understand their dire circumstances, nor will the problems and challenges we now face hit home until it is too late, most likely. What will it take to get government to back down, to get out of our way? More than you know. In fact, it just might be impossible.

“When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.” -Thomas Jefferson

Surely, optimism persists. Some have been taught that there will be a formidable miracle of divine intervention of biblical proportions, and there will be war and rumors of war that will finally usher in a new age of peace with Jesus at the helm. There is also the draw of another momentous false flag perhaps, another wakeup call that goes both unheeded and misunderstood by media lies. Most likely the bulk of America will remain uninspired until there is no place else to go but up. No place left to run.

Author’s Note: For a very few, however, there seems to be hope in the trying. Some consider it a virtual duty, as they see the problem as evil, and want to righteously thwart it, …to set the world straight according to their own loving insight. They deny fear as their motivator, and rely on faith as inspiration, and they are being roused in all segments of our society. There are millions trying to waking up, studying issues, and looking for truth and justice, and with time they find Ron Paul. It is indeed a revolution, an intellectual revolution. They are finding, like myself, that Ron Paul’s ideas dispel apathy, and find hope. Only truth has that ability.

I have found the writings of Craig Smith truthful and inspiring…

Craig Smith: “I see no widespread political will or citizen demand to change our financial trajectory. Given that 47% of Americans receive some form of payment or benefit from the government, how many will vote for a politician who campaigns on taking their perks away? Those perks will only stop when this Greek tragedy takes place in America.

One way or another, we the people are going to pay. Either with crushingly high taxes or a massive devaluation of the currency. Or both!”

Look for part two coming soon. I’ll tell you the truth about Greece, France, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Want to be free? Learn truth.

“I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.”-Thomas Jefferson

UN to propose planetary regulations of water, food - George Soros One World Order

An environmental report issued by an agency of the United Nations last month has some critics sounding the alarm, saying it is a clarion call for “global governance” over how the Earth is managed.

The report, “21 Issues for the 21st Century,” from the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) Foresight Process, is the culmination of a two-year deliberative process involving 22 core scientists. It is expected to receive considerable attention in the run-up to the Rio+20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, which will be held in Rio, Brazil, in June

The scientists who wrote the report say it focuses on identifying emerging issues in the global environment, and that it is not about mandating solutions.

But its critics see an agenda lurking in its 60 pages, which call for a complete overhaul of how the world’s food and water are created and distributed — something the report says is “urgently needed” for the human race to keep feeding and hydrating itself safely.

Bilderberg 2011 Attendees at St. Moritz, Switzerland

Children Will Soon Be Able to Haul Their Parents Before a UN Tribunal

On June 9th, the Human Rights Council of the United Nations approved a new treaty that will operate in parallel with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC).

Under this “Optional Protocol to the Convention of the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure” http://portal.ohchr.o… children will be able to file a quasi-judicial complaint against their parents, their government, or anyone else alleged to have violated their rights under one of the three existing child’s rights treaties.

In addition to the main CRC, there are separate treaties regarding child soldiers and sex trafficking. These parallel treaties are also called “optional protocols.”

While the United States has not become a party to the main CRC, it became a party to the other two protocol treaties in 2002. There are two remaining steps for this new Communications Protocol to become fully operative. First, this new treaty must be approved by the United Nations General Assembly. This is a foregone conclusion. Second, ten nations must become parties to this new treaty by signing and then ratifying under whatever process is followed in their own nation. In the United States this would mean the President (or his representative) would have to sign the treaty and the U.S. Senate would have to vote to ratify.

For a long time, we have pointed out that the CRC would give children the ability to file lawsuits against their parents in American courts. The advocates for the CRC have tried to downplay this idea. But now, in broad daylight, the United Nations itself—with the full cooperation and approval of the United States in the Human Rights Council—is creating a new mechanism that forthrightly allows children to “sue” their parents and haul them before the UN Committee in Geneva.

If the United States Senate approves this Communication Protocol, even if we do not approve the main CRC treaty, legal actions could still be filed by American children before this UN tribunal. Such actions would have to arise under one of the two optional protocols to which we are a party.

As is routine for UN treaties, this new protocol requires a child to first exhaust all domestic judicial remedies before turning to the UN tribunal.

One U.S. case that would almost certainly have been appealed to the UN if this new protocol had been in place involved two California cities that banned military recruiters on high school campuses. These cities claimed that such recruiting violated the UN optional protocol on child soldiers to which we are a party.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the authority of the cities to pass such an ordinance. The disgruntled parties could then have pressed their action in the United Nations—if this new protocol had been in effect.

Obviously, the far greater danger lies in the possibility that the United States will adopt both the main Convention on the Rights of the Child and this new optional protocol. If this happens, then American parents can expect their children to threaten to “take them to Geneva” if there is a conflict over internet usage, dating, recreation, school choices, religious choices, or anything else. The scope of the UN’s CRC is absolutely unlimited and any parental decision at all could become the basis for a complaint.

A friend of mine says that the goal of every committee is to rule the world. The Committee on the Rights of the Child is making a serious run at achieving this objective. There is no doubt that some nations will adopt this new protocol and the UN will have an excuse to intervene in a great number of families in ways that would have been unimaginable just a generation ago.

Whether the UN will gain the ability to rule the families of the United States will largely depend on efforts of people like you and me. If your Senator is not already a co-sponsor of SRes 99, http://www.parentalri… please call them today and urge them to stop the UN from gaining this stunningly dangerous power.

Geithner Spins the One World Order Command from George Soros - Oil release not a political move (BS)

By Jason McLure
U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner defended the decision by industrialized nations to release emergency oil reserves into global energy markets, saying on Friday that it was not a political move.
“It’s really as simple as this: there’s a war in Libya, costs between one and two million barrels a day in lost output, I think 140 million barrels off the market so far,” he said in response to a question at Dartmouth College, where he spoke on a panel.
“Reserves exist to help mitigate those kinds of disruptions and we helped to organize a coordinated global international response to help ease some of that pressure,” he added.
The Paris-based International Energy Agency announced on Thursday that it was tapping member countries’ emergency reserves — some 60 million barrels over 30 days — for only the third time since it was founded in 1974, to fill the gap in supplies left by the disruption to Libya’s output.
The 28-nation IEA, which was set up after the Arab oil embargo as a counterweight to OPEC, said the move was a bid to boost the global economic recovery by holding down oil prices.
The United States will provide half of the total volume to be released.
The decision caught energy and financial markets by surprise and generated criticism from oil companies, members of the OPEC oil-producing cartel and Republican opponents of the Obama administration.
Since oil prices already had fallen from early-May peaks near $115 a barrel, critics said the action appeared aimed at propping up President Barack Obama’s popularity rating as much as helping consumers.
But Geithner, who met with local business leaders earlier on Friday in nearby Manchester before speaking at Dartmouth, said putting additional oil supplies on market was “sensible policy” that should give a lift to a slowly expanding economy.
“It will provide some modest help and relief” to the U.S. economy, Geithner told reporters afterward. “It was a prudent use of existing reserves.”
High oil prices have put “significant” pressure on global growth, he said.
Geithner has limited his foreign travel this year, concentrating on trying to build support in Washington for a hike in the debt ceiling before August 2 when Treasury said the country will be at risk of default. But he has made several day trips to different regions, like Friday’s to New Hampshire, urging business groups to tell Republican lawmakers that concluding a budget and debt deal is urgent.
In his remarks at Dartmouth, Geithner said many factors restraining U.S. economic expansion were temporary, including supply-chain disruptions from Japan’s massive earthquake in March. He also said an adjustment in housing markets was about two-thirds over.
He said costlier energy and less vigorous worldwide growth would keep U.S. economic growth to around a 2 percent annual rate in the first half this year, but he insisted that underlying trends were improving.
Regarding budget talks in Washington, Geithner said he was confident Congress can still reach a deal, even after a top Republican lawmaker walked out of the talks this week. But he said tax increases cannot be taken out of the equation.
“You need to have modest changes in revenue,” Geithner said. “There is no way to do a deal without it.”
He said that business leaders whom he met with on Friday had some encouraging words about the environment they face.
“Things are gradually getting better,” Geithner said, adding that the U.S. economy is still growing “a little slower” than had been expected.
U.S. economic growth in the first quarter was an annualized 1.9 percent, the Commerce Department said on Friday.
That was revised up from a previous 1.8 percent reading. But it is still too low to be an engine for job creation, with the high U.S. unemployment rate of 9.1 percent posing a reelection challenge for Obama.
The budget deal “needs to get done in a way that doesn’t put too much pressure on the economy near term,” said Geithner, calling for “the right kind of balance” and a deal that does not skew too much to elements that could hinder growth.
Business people badly want to see Washington reach a broad agreement on the budget, and soon, Geithner added. “A lot of people think that would be good for the economy, and I agree.”
(Additional reporting by Ros Krasny in Manchester, Rachelle Younglai and David Lawder in Washington; writing by Glenn Somerville; editing by Leslie Adler




Bilderberg 2011 Switzerland Briefing[youtube][/youtube]

The Bilderberg Group, Bilderberg conference, or Bilderberg Club is an annual, unofficial, invitation-only conference of approximately 140 guests, most of whom are people of influence in the fields of politics, banking, business, the military and news media. The names of attendees are made available to the press, but the conferences are closed to the public and the media, and no press releases are issued.
Because of its exclusivity and privacy, the Bilderberg group is frequently accused by conspiracy theorists from both extremes of the political spectrum of being an all-powerful secret society fixing the fate of the world behind closed doors.
Critics of Bilderberg conspiracy theories counter that it is nothing more than a policy discussion forum and social club which only serves as a means to brainstorm, reach consensus, and create social cohesion within the power elite of Western European and North American nations, to better promote Atlanticism and neoliberalism.

The original conference was held at the Hotel de Bilderberg, near Arnhem in the Netherlands, from 29 May to 31 May 1954. It was initiated by several people, including Polish politician Józef Retinger, concerned about the growth of anti-Americanism in Western Europe, who proposed an international conference at which leaders from European countries and the United Stateswould be brought together with the aim of promoting Atlanticism – better understanding between the cultures of the United States and Western Europe to foster cooperation on political, economic, and defense issues. Retinger approached Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, who agreed to promote the idea, together with Belgian Prime Minister Paul Van Zeeland, and the head of Unilever at that time, Dutchman Paul Rijkens. Bernhard in turn contacted Walter Bedell Smith, then head of the CIA, who asked Eisenhower adviser Charles Douglas Jackson to deal with the suggestion. The guest list was to be drawn up by inviting two attendees from each nation, one of each to represent conservative and liberal points of view. Fifty delegates from 11 countries in Western Europe attended the first conference, along with 11 Americans.]
The success of the meeting led the organizers to arrange an annual conference. A permanent Steering Committee was established, with Retinger appointed as permanent secretary. As well as organizing the conference, the steering committee also maintained a register of attendee names and contact details, with the aim of creating an informal network of individuals who could call upon one another in a private capacity. Conferences were held in France, Germany, and Denmark over the following three years. In 1957, the first US conference was held in St. Simons, Georgia, with $30,000 from the Ford Foundation. The foundation supplied further funding for the 1959 and 1963 conferences.

Organizational structure
Meetings are organized by a steering committee with two members from each of approximately 18 nations. Official posts, in addition to a chairman, include an Honorary Secretary General. There is no such category in the group’s rules as a “member of the group”. The only category that exists is “member of the Steering Committee”. In addition to the committee, there also exists a separate advisory group, though membership overlaps.
Dutch economist Ernst van der Beugel became permanent secretary in 1960, upon Retinger’s death. Prince Bernhard continued to serve as the meeting’s chairman until 1976, the year of his involvement in the Lockheed affair. The position of Honorary American Secretary General has been held successively by Joseph E. Johnson of the Carnegie Endowment, William Bundy of Princeton, Theodore L. Eliot, Jr., formerU.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan, and Casimir A. Yost of Georgetown’s Institute for the Study of Diplomacy.
A 2008 press release from the ‘American Friends of Bilderberg’ stated that “Bilderberg’s only activity is its annual Conference. At the meetings, no resolutions are proposed, no votes taken, and no policy statements issued” and noted that the names of attendees were available to the press. The Bilderberg group’s unofficial headquarters is the University of Leiden in the Netherlands.
According to the ‘American Friends of Bilderberg’, the 2008 agenda dealt “mainly with a nuclear free world, cyber terrorism, Africa, Russia, finance, protectionism, US EU relations, Afghanistan and Pakistan, Islam and Iran”.

Secret Societies- The Bilderberg Group
Claims of political conspiracy
According to chairman Étienne Davignon, a major attraction of Bilderberg group meetings is that they provide an opportunity for participants to speak and debate candidly and to find out what major figures really think, without the risk of off-the-cuff comments becoming fodder for controversy. However, because of its privacy and refusal to issue news releases, the Bilderberg group is frequently accused of political conspiracies. This outlook has been popular on both extremes of the ideological spectrum, even if they disagree on what the group wants to do. Left-wingers accuse the Bilderberg group of conspiring to impose capitalist domination, while some right-wing groups such as the John Birch Society have accused the group of conspiring to impose a world government and planned economy.
For decades, the exclusive roster of globally influential figures who attend Bilderberg conferences has captured the interest of an international network of conspiracists, who are convinced powerful elites and secret societies are moving the planet toward a “new world order”. Their populist worldview, characterized by a deep and angry suspicion of the ruling class rather than any prevailing partisan or ideological affiliation, is widely articulated on overnight AM radio shows and a collection of Internet websites. The video sharing website YouTube alone is home to thousands of Bilderberg-related videos.
Proponents of Bilderberg conspiracy theories in the United States include individuals and groups such as the John Birch Society, political activist Phyllis Schlafly, writer Jim Tucker, political activist Lyndon LaRouche, radio host Alex Jones, and politician Jesse Ventura, who made the Bilderberg group a topic of a 2009 episode of his TruTV series Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura. Other proponents include Russian-Canadian writer Daniel Estulin, and British writer David Icke.
In 2001, Denis Healey, a Bilderberg group founder and, for 30 years, a steering committee member, said:
To say we were striving for a one-world government is exaggerated, but not wholly unfair. Those of us in Bilderberg felt we couldn’t go on forever fighting one another for nothing and killing people and rendering millions homeless. So we felt that a single community throughout the world would be a good thing.
In 2005 Davignon discussed these accusations with the BBC:
It is unavoidable and it doesn’t matter. There will always be people who believe in conspiracies but things happen in a much more incoherent fashion… When people say this is a secret government of the world I say that if we were a secret government of the world we should be bloody ashamed of ourselves.
In a 1994 report Right Woos Left, published by Political Research Associates, investigative journalist Chip Berlet argued that right-wing populist conspiracy theories about the Bilderberg group date back as early as 1964 and can be found in Schlafly’s self-published book A Choice, Not an Echo, which promoted a conspiracy theory in which the Republican Party was secretly controlled by elitist intellectuals dominated by members of the Bilderberger group, whose internationalist policies would pave the way for world communism.
In August 2010 former Cuban president Fidel Castro wrote an article for the Cuban Communist Party newspaper Granma in which he cited Estulin’s 2006 book The Secrets of the Bilderberg Club, which, as quoted by Castro, describes “sinister cliques and the Bilderberg lobbyists” manipulating the public “to install a world government that knows no borders and is not accountable to anyone but its own self.”
G. William Domhoff, a research professor in psychology and sociology who studies theories of power, sees the role of policy discussion forums and social clubs such as the Bilderberg group as being nothing more than a means to brainstorm, reach consensus, and create social cohesion within a power elite. He adds that this understanding of forums and clubs such as the Bilderberg group fits with the perceptions of the members of the elite. In a 2004 interview with New Internationalist magazine, Domhoff warns progressives against getting distracted by conspiracy theories which demonize and scapegoat such forums and clubs. He argues that the opponents of progressivism are conservatives within the corporate elite and the Republican Party. It is more or less the same people who belong to forums and clubs such as the Bilderberg group, but it puts them in their most important roles, as capitalists and political leaders, which are visible and therefore easier to fight.

Bilderberg Group 2011: Arab Spring,

Bilderberg 2011: Full Official Attendee List
WAS HELD IN St Moritz Switzerland June 9 – 12th 2011
Thanks to the fantastic work of Bilderberg activists, journalists and the Swiss media, we have now been able to obtain the full official list of 2011 Bilderberg attendees. Routinely, some members request that their names be kept off the roster so there will be additional Bilderbergers in attendance.
Infowars will be on the scene identifying other attendees not on the list.
• Coene, Luc, Governor, National Bank of Belgium
• Davignon, Etienne, Minister of State
• Leysen, Thomas, Chairman, Umicore
• Fu, Ying, Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs
• Huang, Yiping, Professor of Economics, China Center for Economic Research, Peking University
• Eldrup, Anders, CEO, DONG Energy
• Federspiel, Ulrik, Vice President, Global Affairs, Haldor Topsøe A/S
• Schütze, Peter, Member of the Executive Management, Nordea Bank AB
• Ackermann, Josef, Chairman of the Management Board and the Group Executive Committee, Deutsche Bank
• Enders, Thomas, CEO, Airbus SAS
• Löscher, Peter, President and CEO, Siemens AG
• Nass, Matthias, Chief International Correspondent, Die Zeit
• Steinbrück, Peer, Member of the Bundestag; Former Minister of Finance
• Apunen, Matti, Director, Finnish Business and Policy Forum EVA
• Johansson, Ole, Chairman, Confederation of the Finnish Industries EK
• Ollila, Jorma, Chairman, Royal Dutch Shell
• Pentikäinen, Mikael, Publisher and Senior Editor-in-Chief, Helsingin Sanomat
• Baverez, Nicolas, Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
• Bazire, Nicolas, Managing Director, Groupe Arnault /LVMH
• Castries, Henri de, Chairman and CEO, AXA
• Lévy, Maurice, Chairman and CEO, Publicis Groupe S.A.
• Montbrial, Thierry de, President, French Institute for International Relations
• Roy, Olivier, Professor of Social and Political Theory, European University Institute
Great Britain
Lynn Forester de Rothschild
Business 2-Jul-1954 Telecom executive

• Agius, Marcus, Chairman, Barclays PLC
• Flint, Douglas J., Group Chairman, HSBC Holdings
• Kerr, John, Member, House of Lords; Deputy Chairman, Royal Dutch Shell
• Lambert, Richard, Independent Non-Executive Director, Ernst & Young
• Mandelson, Peter, Member, House of Lords; Chairman, Global Counsel
• Micklethwait, John, Editor-in-Chief, The Economist
• Osborne, George, Chancellor of the Exchequer
• Stewart, Rory, Member of Parliament
• Taylor, J. Martin, Chairman, Syngenta International AG
• David, George A., Chairman, Coca-Cola H.B.C. S.A.
• Hardouvelis, Gikas A., Chief Economist and Head of Research, Eurobank EFG
• Papaconstantinou, George, Minister of Finance
• Tsoukalis, Loukas, President, ELIAMEP Grisons
International Organizations
• Almunia, Joaquín, Vice President, European Commission
• Daele, Frans van, Chief of Staff to the President of the European Council
• Kroes, Neelie, Vice President, European Commission; Commissioner for Digital Agenda
• Lamy, Pascal, Director General, World Trade Organization
• Rompuy, Herman van, President, European Council
• Sheeran, Josette, Executive Director, United Nations World Food Programme
• Solana Madariaga, Javier, President, ESADEgeo Center for Global Economy and Geopolitics
• Trichet, Jean-Claude, President, European Central Bank
• Zoellick, Robert B., President, The World Bank Group
• Gallagher, Paul, Senior Counsel; Former Attorney General
• McDowell, Michael, Senior Counsel, Law Library; Former Deputy Prime Minister
• Sutherland, Peter D., Chairman, Goldman Sachs International
• Bernabè, Franco, CEO, Telecom Italia SpA
• Elkann, John, Chairman, Fiat S.p.A.
• Monti, Mario, President, Univers Commerciale Luigi Bocconi
• Scaroni, Paolo, CEO, Eni S.p.A.
• Tremonti, Giulio, Minister of Economy and Finance
• Carney, Mark J., Governor, Bank of Canada
• Clark, Edmund, President and CEO, TD Bank Financial Group
• McKenna, Frank, Deputy Chair, TD Bank Financial Group
• Orbinksi, James, Professor of Medicine and Political Science, University of Toronto
• Prichard, J. Robert S., Chair, Torys LLP
• Reisman, Heather, Chair and CEO, Indigo Books & Music Inc. Center, Brookings Institution
• Bolland, Marc J., Chief Executive, Marks and Spencer Group plc
• Chavannes, Marc E., Political Columnist, NRC Handelsblad; Professor of Journalism
• Halberstadt, Victor, Professor of Economics, Leiden University; Former Honorary Secretary General of Bilderberg Meetings
• H.M. the Queen of the Netherlands
• Rosenthal, Uri, Minister of Foreign Affairs
• Winter, Jaap W., Partner, De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
• Myklebust, Egil, Former Chairman of the Board of Directors SAS, sk Hydro ASA
• H.R.H. Crown Prince Haakon of Norway
• Ottersen, Ole Petter, Rector, University of Oslo
• Solberg, Erna, Leader of the Conservative Party
• Bronner, Oscar, CEO and Publisher, Standard Medien AG
• Faymann, Werner, Federal Chancellor
• Rothensteiner, Walter, Chairman of the Board, Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich AG
• Scholten, Rudolf, Member of the Board of Executive Directors, Oesterreichische Kontrollbank AG
• Balsemão, Francisco Pinto, Chairman and CEO, IMPRESA, S.G.P.S.; Former Prime Minister
• Ferreira Alves, Clara, CEO, Claref LDA; writer
• Nogueira Leite, António, Member of the Board, José de Mello Investimentos, SGPS, SA
• Mordashov, Alexey A., CEO, Severstal
• Bildt, Carl, Minister of Foreign Affairs
• Björling, Ewa, Minister for Trade
• Wallenberg, Jacob, Chairman, Investor AB
• Brabeck-Letmathe, Peter, Chairman, Nestlé S.A.
• Groth, Hans, Senior Director, Healthcare Policy & Market Access, Oncology Business Unit, Pfizer Europe
• Janom Steiner, Barbara, Head of the Department of Justice, Security and Health, Canton
• Kudelski, André, Chairman and CEO, Kudelski Group SA
• Leuthard, Doris, Federal Councillor
• Schmid, Martin, President, Government of the Canton Grisons
• Schweiger, Rolf, Ständerat
• Soiron, Rolf, Chairman of the Board, Holcim Ltd., Lonza Ltd.
• Vasella, Daniel L., Chairman, Novartis AG
• Witmer, Jürg, Chairman, Givaudan SA and Clariant AG
• Cebrián, Juan Luis, CEO, PRISA
• Cospedal, María Dolores de, Secretary General, Partido Popular
• León Gross, Bernardino, Secretary General of the Spanish Presidency
• Nin Génova, Juan María, President and CEO, La Caixa
• H.M. Queen Sofia of Spain
• Ciliv, Süreyya, CEO, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S.
• Gülek Domac, Tayyibe, Former Minister of State
• Koç, Mustafa V., Chairman, Koç Holding A.S.
• Pekin, Sefika, Founding Partner, Pekin & Bayar Law Firm
George Soros is a life time member of the Bilderberg Group

• Alexander, Keith B., Commander, USCYBERCOM; Director, National Security Agency
• Altman, Roger C., Chairman, Evercore Partners Inc.
• Bezos, Jeff, Founder and CEO,
• Collins, Timothy C., CEO, Ripplewood Holdings, LLC
• Feldstein, Martin S., George F. Baker Professor of Economics, Harvard University
• Hoffman, Reid, Co-founder and Executive Chairman, LinkedIn
• Hughes, Chris R., Co-founder, Facebook
• Jacobs, Kenneth M., Chairman & CEO, Lazard
• Johnson, James A., Vice Chairman, Perseus, LLC
• Jordan, Jr., Vernon E., Senior Managing Director, Lazard Frères & Co. LLC
• Keane, John M., Senior Partner, SCP Partners; General, US Army, Retired
• Kissinger, Henry A., Chairman, Kissinger Associates, Inc.
• Kleinfeld, Klaus, Chairman and CEO, Alcoa
• Kravis, Henry R., Co-Chairman and co-CEO, Kohlberg Kravis, Roberts & Co.
• Kravis, Marie-Josée, Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute, Inc.
• Li, Cheng, Senior Fellow and Director of Research, John L. Thornton China Center, Brookings Institution
• Mundie, Craig J., Chief Research and Strategy Officer, Microsoft Corporation
• Orszag, Peter R., Vice Chairman, Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.
• Perle, Richard N., Resident Fellow, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
• Rockefeller, David, Former Chairman, Chase Manhattan Bank
• Rose, Charlie, Executive Editor and Anchor, Charlie Rose
• Rubin, Robert E., Co-Chairman, Council on Foreign Relations; Former Secretary of the Treasury
• Schmidt, Eric, Executive Chairman, Google Inc.
• Steinberg, James B., Deputy Secretary of State
• Thiel, Peter A., President, Clarium Capital Management, LLC
• Varney, Christine A., Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust
• Vaupel, James W., Founding Director, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research
• Warsh, Kevin, Former Governor, Federal Reserve Board
• Wolfensohn, James D., Chairman, Wolfensohn & Company, LLC

Our BIlderberg 2011 coverage is sponsored by Midas Resources, the trusted name in precious metals. Visit them at
2011- Bilderberg Group Will Create World Wide Economic Collapse

DSK top secret agenda

SEO Powered By SEOPressor