Posts Tagged ‘Sharia Law’

16 Heroic States Move to BAN Sharia Law!

by Tim Brown
The threat is very real to impose Islamic Sharia law in America and thankfully at least sixteen states realize the threat and are seeking to squash it before it can gain any more momentum.

Back in September, Texas stood up against any foreign law being implemented, including Sharia, and cries of the Muslims were heard across the nation, including those from designated terror group the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). But Texas wouldn’t back down and have determined that they won’t have Sharia enforcement in their state.

Alabama banned Sharia after voters passed a measure to add an amendment to their state constitution. We hope they’ll stand for that a little better than they did their marriage amendment.

So far, these states have bills before their respective legislatures to put a halt to Islamic law being imposed in their states and it was CAIR that identified them in in a report:

Alabama (two bills)
Florida (two bills)
Indiana (two bills)
Mississippi (four bills)
Missouri (two bills)
North Carolina
Oklahoma (seven bills)
South Carolina (two bills)
Texas (six bills)
West Virginia
Wyoming (two bills)

sharia freeBirmingham attorney Eric Johnston, who drafted the amendment to the Alabama constitution said, “Your constitutional rights are not affected by it. We’ve got a religious freedom amendment in Alabama. All it says is pay attention to the religious freedom amendment. Women’s rights are compromised by Sharia rights if a lawyer in a custody case says, ‘Islam requires you to do this.’ It’s a help to judges. It doesn’t create any new laws.”

Of course, CAIR, as a Muslim Brotherhood front group whose goals are the destruction of America from within, engages in taqiyya and claims that these bills are “virulently racist” and “outright hostility towards Muslims,” but nothing could be further from the truth. First, Islam is an ideology, not a race. There is but one race, the human one. However, ethnically, Islam is embraced by members of all ethnicities similar to how Christianity is. Should we start calling CAIR racists bigots who show hostility towards Christians when they demand and get prayer in public schools, but blast Christians for offering an off campus Bible study?

Sadly, it is socialist Democrats who are aiding the Islamists in their attempts to implement Sharia. Just take a look at my own state of South Carolina.

Americans see what is becoming of the United Kingdom and several countries in Europe and they don’t want that going on here in the united States. In fact, these bills are actually unnecessary since the law has already been established. Our Constitution already provides for shutting down Islam at its core. If Islamists want to cause an uprising because they want to undermine the law, that’s what the militia is for, putting down insurrections and repelling invasions. It’s really that simple. There is no need for these bills.

However, at least symbolically, it represents that there is still some fight left in the American people to oppose the teachings of Mohammad being implemented in their states. To that end, I’m glad to see my fellow Americans standing their ground.


Ben Carson Is Vindicated As Muslims Are Asked If Sharia Law Should Supersede US Constitution

Can America Defend Itself Against Sharia Law?

sharia law
by Gary DeMar
There is a great amount of fear that Sharia law will make its way to the United States. Efforts are underway to stop it. What legal/moral standard will be used to determine why Sharia Law should not be implemented? What is the foundation of law in the United States? Does anybody know?

The Constitution doesn’t tell us. The Constitution contains little moral prescription even though Article VI states, “This Constitution . . . shall be the Supreme law of the land.” But there’s not much law, other than procedural law, in the Constitution. It tells us how the national government is to work in terms of authority and its relationship to the states. There are no prohibitions against murder, rape, stealing. These moral prohibitions are assumed.

The Preamble begins with “We the people.” But we’ve seen how the courts have overturned the will of the people on the question of same-sex marriage. More than 30 states have ruled that same-sex marriage should not be permitted. Judges have dismissed the will of the people and the law-making efforts of the legislature.


sharia lawThe framers mistakenly believed that there was no need to acknowledge an independent and objective body of law since natural law — “the laws of nature and of nature’s God” — was almost universally accepted. The belief system was written into the Declaration of Independence and acknowledged in the Constitution.

This is why Clarence Thomas could write: “We look at the Natural Law beliefs of the founders as a background to our Constitution.”[1] The left-leaning members of the committee took exception to Thomas’s natural law beliefs. Joseph Biden – yes, that Joseph Biden – wrote an article that appeared in the Washington Post[2] in which he claimed the following for his version of natural law:

It does not “function as being a specific moral code regulating individual behavior.”
It is not “a static set of unchanging principles.”
It is “an evolving body of ideals.”
Note Biden’s appeal to evolution. Natural law as it was constructed throughout the centuries died in 1859 with the publication of Darwin’s On the Origin of Species. “Charles Darwin destroyed natural law theory in biological science. . . . His successors destroyed natural law theory in social science. In the 1920’s, quantum physics destroyed natural law theory in the subatomic world. This immediately began to undermine modern legal theory.”[3]

Natural Law in the West was formulated by reading the world through the lens of the Bible. Once the Bible was dismissed and evolution accepted, Natural Law had lost its moral foundation. Natural Law became the law of the jungle.

An evolving law means a flexible law that can be manipulated by whoever’s in power. If Muslims gain power in the United States, as they are doing, then they could change America into an Islamic Caliphate bound by Sharia law. Sharia law can advance in the West because Western law is morally bankrupt.


Rise Of Radical Islam


City in Michigan First to Fully Implement Sharia Law

by: Cheerios Washingtonsharialaw12
In a surprise weekend vote, the city council of Dearborn, Michigan voted 4-3 to became the first US city to officially implement all aspects of Sharia Law. The tough new law, slated to go into effect January 1st, addresses secular law including crime, politics and economics as well as personal matters such as sexual intercourse, fasting, prayer, diet and hygiene.

The new law could see citizens stoned for adultery or having a limb amputated for theft. Lesser offenses, such as drinking alcohol or abortion, could result in flogging and/or caning. In addition, the law imposes harsh laws with regards to women and allows for child marriage.

Some in town seem to welcome the new legislation while others have denounced the move as “abhorrent”, a threat to freedom and incompatible with the Constitution. When asked by National Report about the need for such a law, local resident Jeremy Ahmed stated:

“It is because of our need that Allah the Almighty, in all his generosity, has created laws for us, so that we can utilize them to obtain justice. We hope to see other cities taking this action in the face of the governments inaction of passing such legislation”.

Other local residents have taken to social media sites with comments ranging from “praise be to Allah” and “long live Islam” to “RIP Dearborn” and “Only in Obama’s America would an American city consider Sharia Law”.

The city of Dearborn is a well-known safe haven for Muslims and Muslim sympathizers. With a population of around 98 thousand people, roughly 30% of its residence are Muslims making them the largest concentration of Muslims in the United States.

The dangers of Sharia Law in America were first outlined in a 2010 study produced by the Center for Security Policy (CSP) titled “Sharia: The Threat to America“, a 352-page book based on authoritative sources of Islamic law. While sharia includes strict rules for prayer and fasting, it is also an all-encompassing legal and political code that covers all aspects of life including those that have nothing to do with religion.

Muslims Demanding Their Own Sharia Patrols in Michigan

The State Law the Feds Blocked to Protect Sharia

This happened back in January 2010, the federal courts blocked Oklahoma’s ability to ban Sharia Law. The only law the United States should follow is the Constitution!

From CNN:

A federal appeals court has blocked an Oklahoma voter-approved measure barring state judges from considering Islamic and international law in their decisions.

The three-judge panel at the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an earlier injunction preventing State Question 755 from being certified until the free speech questions are resolved. The decision Tuesday allows a lawsuit brought by Islamic-American groups to move ahead to a bench trial.

“The proposed amendment discriminates among religions,” said the judges. “The Oklahoma amendment specifically names the target of its discrimination. The only religious law mentioned in the amendment is Sharia law.”

A federal judge last summer had issued a temporary restraining order in favor of the Council of American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which had sued to nullify the law completely.

Here is Glenn Beck warning us of what life would be like under Sharia Law.


Muslim Beheads Christians In New Jersey, Mainstream Media Silent As To Motive?

JosepSounds like something a member of the religion of ‘peace’/pieces would do….otherwise a deranged psychopath……. but then of course……jihadists are psychopaths!!

Why did he cut off their hands? New Jersey Attorney General Jeffrey S. Chiesa said: “We allege that the defendant was ruthless and calculating in the manner in which he carried out the killings and attempted to prevent identification of the victims by cutting off their heads and hands before burying their bodies.”

That may be, but the story below notes that the victims were Coptic Christians, and “privately some wonder if it had something to do with the victims’ religion.” So apparently Yusuf Ibrahim is not himself a Copt, but a Muslim. Could then, the cutting of the heads and hands have had something to do with this Qur’an passage? “When thy Lord was revealing to the angels, ‘I am with you; so confirm the believers. I shall cast into the unbelievers’ hearts terror; so smite above the necks, and smite every finger of them!” — Qur’an 8:12

It is not clear what was going on here, and whether these murders were Yusuf Ibrahim’s jihad — and given how clueless and/or complicit the mainstream media is, we may never know.

“Gruesome double murder, men decapitated,” by Jeff Pegues in WABC, February 11 (thanks to K.):

JERSEY CITY (WABC) — There’s a gruesome double murder mystery in New Jersey.Police say who did it’s not a mystery because someone is under arrest but the mystery is why the accused killer cut of two men’s heads and hands.

The victims are reportedly from Jersey City, but their remains were found buried in a town southwest of Philadelphia.

On the streets of Jersey City along Bergen Avenue, to the naked eye it’s not obvious.

But to members of the close knit Coptic Orthodox church the pain is real.

“It’s a shock, something like this doesn’t happen to people like that,” a resident said.

Now they know two members of the church have been brutally murdered.

But no one in this community seems to know why.

“It was crazy what happened to these two. Do they deserve it? No. Was it expected? Never. And it’s just sad,” a resident said.

The two victims were found buried in a back yard in Buena Vista, New Jersey last Thursday.

Monday, police announced an arrest.

28-year-old Yusuf Ibrahim is in custody.

Investigators say Ibrahim shot and killed the victims, severed their heads and hands, and buried the remains at a Buena Vista house.

Back in Jersey City, friends of the victims are praying that police will have the answers to the questions that now haunt them.

Privately some wonder if it had something to do with the victims’ religion.

“I leave it for the police and the investigation,” said Samy Hohareb, the victim’s friend.

So far, police have not revealed a motive for the grisly murders as the suspect sits behind bars, waiting for his day in court.

Think the politically correct liberal media will report on this and identify him as a Muslim? Or will they cover it up and call it something other than a hate crime?

Muslim sharia law demands execution of homosexuals

Obama Administration Sets Stage For Sharia Law In America

One of the most terrifying things that Americans could expect from a second term of Barack Obama is not the economic downturn that we are already experiencing. It’s not another ‘Fast and Furious’ scandal. Rather it appears that more and more the Obama administration, specifically the Department of Justice, is turning a blind eye to attempts to introduce aspects of sharia law into the legal system. Last week Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ), a member of the House Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on the Constitution questioned Assistant Attorney General of the DOJ Civil Rights Division Thomas Perez on the First Amendment and specifically he was asking in regards to criminalizing those who speak out against any religion.
Franks’ questions were prompted by a Daily Caller article from late last year in which Perez was quoted as warmly embracing the proposals of Islamist advocates in a meeting at George Washington University, among them a request for “a legal declaration that U.S. citizens’ criticism of Islam constitutes racial discrimination.”
Perez reportedly ended the meeting with an enthusiastic closing speech and was quoted as saying, “I sat here the entire time, taking notes…I have some very concrete thoughts … in the aftermath of this.”
Rep. Franks asked,
“Will you tell us here today that this Administration’s Department of Justice will never entertain or advance a proposal that criminalizes speech against any religion?”
Mr. Perez would not answer with a simple yes or no. In fact, though he was asked four times he still would not answer the question posed to him.
So why the targeting of Perez by Franks? William Bigelow writes,
Last October, at George Washington University, there was a meeting between DOJ officials, including Perez, and Islamist advocates against free speech. Representatives from the Islamist side included Mohamed Magid, president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). The ISNA was an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding trial in 2008, as well as functioning as a Muslim Brotherhood Front. The leader of the Islamist attack was Sahar Aziz, an Egyptian-born American lawyer and Fellow at the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding, a Muslim advocacy group based in Michigan. At the meeting, the Islamists lobbied for:
Cutbacks in U.S. anti-terror training
Limits on the power of terrorism investigators
Changes in agent training manuals
A legal declaration that criticism of Islam in the United States should be considered racial discrimination
Aziz said that the word “Muslim” has become “racialized” and, once American criticism of Islam was silenced, the effect would be to “take [federal] money away from local police departments and fusion centers who are spying on all of us.”
Niether the DOJ nor Perez had any response. It tells us very clearly that the Obama DOJ doesn’t care at all for real free speech. The implementation of Sharia law would completely undermine the U.S. Constitution.
The Obama administration obviously care that homosexuals can spout off about Christianity. They must believe that Muslims are OK to mock, openly ridicule and attack Christians, but look out if it should come to speech against Islam and pointing out its errors or false prophet!


Read more:

SEO Powered By SEOPressor